Skip to main content

Audit Reporting for Going Concern Uncertainty: Literature Insights, Italian Evidence and Future Research Approaches and Pathways

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Audit Reporting for Going Concern Uncertainty

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Accounting ((BRIEFSACCOUNTING))

  • 679 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter provides the main findings reached from the journey through Audit Reporting for GCU. First of all, it résumés the main insights retrieved from the narrative literature review performed in Chap. 2; secondly, it contextualizes the results achieved in the empirical study (Chap. 3) conducted regarding the consequences on investors in Italy, also in Chap. 3; lastly, it outlines future trajectories for: scholars, suggesting future pathways of research and stressing the importance to “glocalize” results achieved, especially in archival studies; regulators, asking for a fine tuning action of current standards in accordance with the evidence provided throughout this study; auditors, calling for fair opinions more than in the past in the light of new standard requirements and to prevent other financial crises and/or scandals; investors, demanding a higher awareness about the deep meaning of a GCO, especially after novelties occurred that have rendered a GCO close to being mandatory, as seen in Chap. 1.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Amin K, Harris EE (2017) Nonprofit stakeholder response to going-concern audit opinions. 1303 J Account Audit Finan 32(3):329–349

    Google Scholar 

  • Barontini R, Bozzi S (2011) Board compensation and ownership structure: empirical evidence for Italian listed companies. J Manag Gov 15:59–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carson E, Fargher NL, Geiger MA, Lennox CS, Raghunandan K, Willekens M (2013) Audit reporting for going-concern uncertainty: a research synthesis. Audit J Pract Theory 32(1):353–384. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2000496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Core JE, Guay WR, Rusticus TO (2006) Does weak governance cause weak stock returns? An examination of firm operating performance and investors’ expectations. J Finance 61(2):655–687. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2006.00851.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cremers M, Nair V (2005) Governance mechanisms and equity prices. J Finance 60(6):2859–2894

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Pietra R, Grambovas C, Raonic V, Riccaboni A (2008) The effects of board size and ‘busy’ directors on the market value of Italian companies. J Manag Gov 12(1):73–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-008-9044-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fama EF, Jensen MC (1983) Separation of ownership and control. J Law Econ 26(2):301–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatfield HR (1911) Some variations in accounting practice in England, France, Germany and the United States. J Account Res 4(2):169–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ianniello G (2015) The effects of board and auditor independence on earnings quality: evidence from Italy. J Manag Gov 19:229–253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-013-9285-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones MJ (2011) Creative accounting, fraud and international accounting scandals. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Kvaal E, Nobes CW (2010) international differences in IFRS policy choice: a research note. Account Bus Res 40(2):173–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kvaal E, Nobes CW (2012) IFRS policy changes and the continuation of national patterns of ifrs practice. Eur Account Rev 21(2):343–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lev B, Gu F (2016) The end of accounting and the path forward for investors and managers. Wiley, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nobes C (1998) Towards a general model of the reasons for international differences in financial reporting. ABACUS 34(2):162–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nobes C (2006) The survival of international differences under IFRS: towards a research agenda. Account Bus Res 36(3):233–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pott C, Tebben T, Watrin C (2014) The effect of outside directors’ and auditors’ incentives on managers’ ability to manage cash bonuses. J Manag Gov 18(3):505–540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sercu P, Vander Bauwhede H, Willekens M (2006) Post-Enron implicit audit reporting standards: sifting through the evidence. Economist 154(3):389–403. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10645-006-9016-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ye K (2014) Independent director cash compensation and earning management. J Account Public Policy 33:391–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sandro Brunelli .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Brunelli, S. (2018). Audit Reporting for Going Concern Uncertainty: Literature Insights, Italian Evidence and Future Research Approaches and Pathways. In: Audit Reporting for Going Concern Uncertainty. SpringerBriefs in Accounting. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73046-2_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics