Advertisement

The Firm’ Going Concern in the Contemporary Era

Chapter
  • 524 Downloads
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Accounting book series (BRIEFSACCOUNTING)

Abstract

This chapter is aimed at reviewing the going concern (GC) assumption evolution over time in the two main regulatory accounting and auditing settings: International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) and Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) as regards the accounting standard setters, and International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB) and Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) as regards the auditing standard setters. Addressing the GC evolution is prodromic to go further in depth on the academic debate about the relevance that GC assumption has throughout the financial reporting process: from the preparation of financial statements, to the audit process that ends with the issuance of the audit report. Lastly, some insights about the GC evolution in other countries’ regulatory frameworks are provided (Australia, Canada, China, Japan, Russia and Singapore) in order to outline a worldwide representation of the GC auditing and accounting regulatory frameworks.

References

  1. AASB (2009) Basis for conclusions Canadian Auditing Standard (CAS) 570, going concern. http://www.frascanada.ca/canadian-auditing-standards/resources/basis-for-conclusions/item30664.pdf
  2. AICPA (1989) The auditor’s consideration of an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern. In: AU section 341. https://pcaobus.org/Standards/Auditing/Pages/AU341.aspx
  3. AUASB (2015) Auditing standard ASA 570 going concern. http://www.auasb.gov.au/admin/file/content102/c3/ASA_570_2015.pdf
  4. Deloitte (2013) Proposed narrow-focus amendment to IAS 1. https://www.iasplus.com/en/meeting-notes/iasb/2013/september/ias-1
  5. FASAC (2004) Revisiting the FASB’s conceptual framework. http://www.fasb.org/jsp/FASB/Document_C/DocumentPage&cid=1218220253854
  6. FASB (1978) Statement of financial accounting concepts no. 1-objectives of financial reporting by business enterprises. In: Original Pronouncements as amended. http://www.fasb.org/resources/ccurl/816/894/aop_CON1.pdf
  7. FASB (2014) Accounting standard update no. 2014-15, disclosure of uncertainties about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern. In: presentation of financial statements-going concern (Subtopic 205-40), Norwalk, Financial Accounting SeriesGoogle Scholar
  8. IAASB (2015b) International Standard on Auditing 570 (revised) going concern. http://www.ifac.org/system/files/publications/files/ISA-570-%28Revised%29.pdf
  9. IAASB (2015c) International Standard on Auditing 701 communicating key audit matters in the independent auditor’s report. http://www.ifac.org/system/files/publications/files/ISA-701_2.pdf
  10. IFRS (2008) IAS 1–Presentation of financial statements. http://eifrs.ifrs.org/eifrs/bnstandards/en/IAS1.pdf
  11. IFRS (2010) Conceptual framework for financial reporting. http://eifrs.ifrs.org/eifrs/bnstandards/en/framework.pdf
  12. IFRS (2017) Convergence between IFRS standards and US GAAP, IFRS global standards for the world economy. http://www.ifrs.org/use-around-the-world/global-convergence/convergence-with-us-gaap/Pages/convergence-with-us-gaap.aspx
  13. ISCA (2015) SSA 570 (revised)–Going concern. https://isca.org.sg/media/777078/ssa-570-revised-july-2015.pdf
  14. John TA (1993) Accounting measures of corporate liquidity, leverage, and costs of financial distress. Financ Manag 22(3):91–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. PCAOB (2015a) PCAOB release No. 2015-002, reorganization of PCAOB auditing standards and related amendments to PCAOB standards and rules. https://pcaobus.org/Rulemaking/Docket040/Release_2015_002_Reorganization.pdf
  16. PCAOB (2015b) AS 2415, consideration of an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern. https://pcaobus.org/Standards/Auditing/Pages/AS2415.aspx
  17. Zmijewski M (1984) Methodological issues related to the estimation of financial distress prediction models. J Account Res 22:59–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Management and LawUniversity of Rome Tor VergataRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations