Abstract
Bioeconomy encompasses the production of renewable biological resources and their conversion into bio-based products with less environmental impact (e.g. bioplastics). To boost the bioeconomy, it is crucial that companies not only develop these products, but also successfully market them. However, companies are often confronted with poor product acceptance by end-consumers. Depending on the product category, different barriers to acceptance seem to prevail but these are not yet fully understood. This paper seeks to contribute to understanding and overcoming these barriers by analysing product acceptance using the schema theory. It is hypothesized that if associations with the core product attributes do not match the associations with environmentally friendly products, consumers are likely to experience schema incongruity. This rather unpleasant cognitive state can, as a consequence, induce negative a product evaluation. Therefore, adding the label ‘green’ or ‘environmentally friendly’ to inappropriate products might lead to a more widely-held negative perception of bio-based products. Consequently, this lowers consumer acceptance of the products and thus impacts upon market success. To analyse this effect, people’s associations with environmentally friendly products were tested by an Implicit Association Test. Additionally, a bio-based substitute suffering from schema incongruity was identified and examined using the empirical setting of an experiment and a questionnaire. The results show that environmentally friendly products are somewhat more strongly associated with ‘gentle’ than with ‘strong’. There was also a significant effect of congruity in the product presentation on the perception of stability and environmental friendliness. Thus, to market bio-based substitutes, companies should weaken core product characteristics like strength as little as possible by emphasizing environmental friendliness. Hence, the product presentation should focus on information regarding core attributes and market sustainability as an additional product benefit.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Prior to this, a factor analysis was conducted that confirmed that the attitude items could be combined into one single variable (Cronbach's alpha = .93). The items measuring willingness to buy and use the product could be combined to one variable as well (Cronbach's alpha = .92). Items were measured on a bipolar scale (semantic differential).
References
Anderson JR (2015) Cognitive psychology and its implications, 8th edn. Worth, New York
Balderjahn I, Buerke A, Kirchgeorg M, Peyer M, Seegebarth B, Wiedmann K-P (2013) Consciousness for sustainable consumption: scale development and new insights in the economic dimension of consumers’ sustainability. AMS Review 3(4):181–192
Beise M, Rennings K (2005) Lead markets and regulation: a framework for analyzing the international diffusion of environmental innovations. Ecol Econ 52(1):5–17
Belz F-M, Peattie K (2009) Sustainability marketing: a global perspective. Wiley, Chichester, West Sussex, U.K., Hoboken, NJ
Belz F-M, Schmidt-Riediger B (2009) Marketing strategies in the age of sustainable development: evidence from the food industry. Bus Strategy Environ 19(7):401–416
Binsack M (2003) Akzeptanz neuer Produkte: Vorwissen als Determinante des Innovationserfolgs, Gabler Edition Wissenschaft Forschungsgruppe Konsum und Verhalten, 1st edn. Dt. Univ.-Verl, Wiesbaden
Bioökonomierat (2015) Auf dem Weg zur biobasierten Wirtschaft. Available at: http://www.biooekonomierat.de/fileadmin/Publikationen/Sonstige/Der_Biooekonomierat.pdf. Accessed 27 Jan 2015
Bruhn M, Kirchgeorg M (2007) Marktorientierte Führung im Wandel von Umweltbewusstsein und ökologischen Rahmenbedingungen. In: Bruhn M, Kirchgeorg M, Meier J (eds) Marktorientierte Führung im wirtschaftlichen und gesellschaftlichen Wandel. Gabler Verlag, Wiesbaden, pp 83–114
Brunner CB (2014) Corporate Social Responsibility in der Markenkommunikation nutzen. In: Esch F-R, Tomczak T, Kernstock J, Langner T, Redler J (eds) Corporate brand management. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden, pp 345–370
Carrington MJ, Neville BA, Whitwell GJ (2010) Why ethical consumers don’t walk their talk: towards a framework for understanding the gap between the ethical purchase intentions and actual buying behaviour of ethically minded consumers. J Bus Ethics 97(1):139–158
Chang C (2011) Feeling ambivalent about going green. J Advert 40(4):19–32
Egloff B, Schwerdtfeger A, Schmukle SC (2005) Temporal stability of the implicit association test-anxiety. J Pers Assess 84(1):82–88
Esch F-R, Brunner CB (2009) “Schein und Sein”, Wirtschaftswoche, pp 40–42
Esch F-R, Brunner CB (2010) “Mehr als nur leere Worte?”, absatzwirtschaft, No. 4, pp 75–77
Faltins R (2010) Bio-Lebensmittel in Deutschland: Kaufbarrieren und Vermarktung, Reihe Nachhaltigkeit, vol 31. Diplomica-Verl, Hamburg
Fiedler K, Messner C, Bluemke M (2006) Unresolved problems with the “I”, the “A”, and the “T”. A logical and psychometric critique of the implicit association test (IAT). European Rev Soc Psychol 17(1):74–147
Fiske ST, Linville PW (1980) What does the schema concept buy us? Pers Soc Psychol Bull 6(4):543–557
Gleim MR, Smith JS, Andrews D, Cronin JJ (2013) Against the green: a multi-method examination of the barriers to green consumption. J Retail 89(1):44–61
Goldstein EB (2011) Cognitive psychology, 3. ed., international student ed., special ed. Wadsworth Cengage Learning, Belmont, Calif
Gourville JT (2006) Wann Kunden neue Produkte kaufen. Harvard Bus Manag 28(8):44–57
Greenwald AG, McGhee DE, Schwartz JLK (1998) Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: the implicit association test. J Pers Soc Psychol 74(6):1464–1480
Greenwald AG, Nosek BA, Banaji MR (2003) Understanding and using the implicit association test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. J Pers Soc Psychol 85(2):197–216
Haws KL, Winterich KP, Naylor RW (2014) Seeing the world through GREEN-tinted glasses: green consumption values and responses to environmentally friendly products. J Consum Psychol 24(3):336–354
Jansson J (2011) Consumer eco-innovation adoption: assessing attitudinal factors and perceived product characteristics. Bus Strategy Environ 20(3):192–210
Jansson J, Marell A, Nordlund A (2010) Green consumer behavior: determinants of curtailment and eco-innovation adoption. J Consum Market 27(4):358–370
Jhang JH, Grant SJ, Campbell MC (2012) Get it? Got it. Good! Enhancing new product acceptance by facilitating resolution of extreme incongruity. J Mark Res 49(2):247–259
Kalafatis SP, Pollard M, East R, Tsogas MH (1999) Green marketing and Ajzen’s theory of planned behaviour: a cross-market examination. J Consum Market 16(5):441–460
Kotler P (2011) Reinventing marketing to manage the environmental imperative. J Market 75(4):132–135
Kroeber-Riel W, Gröppel-Klein A (2013) Konsumentenverhalten, 10th edn. Vahlen, München
Luchs MG, Naylor RW, Irwin JR, Raghunathan R (2010) The sustainability liability: potential negative effects of ethicality on product preference. J Market 74(5):18–31
Mandler G (1982) The structure of value: accounting for taste. In: Clark MS, Fiske ST (eds) Affect and cognition: the 17th annual Carnegie symposium. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 3–36
Meyers-Levy J, Tybout AM (1989) Schema congruity as a basis for product evaluation. J Consum Res 16(1):39–54
Nabih M, Bloem SG, Poisez TBC (1997) Conceptual issue in the study of innovation adoption behavior. Adv Consum Res 24(1):190–196
Ottman JA (1998) Green marketing: opportunity for innovation, 2nd edn. NTC Business Books, Lincolnwood, Ill
Ozaki R (2011) Adopting sustainable innovation: what makes consumers sign up to green electricity? Bus Strategy Environ 20(1):1–17
Pickett-Baker J, Ozaki R (2008) Pro-environmental products: marketing influence on consumer purchase decision. J Consum Market 25(5):281–293
Prothero A, Dobscha S, Freund J, Kilbourne WE, Luchs MG, Ozanne LK, Thøgersen J (2011) Sustainable consumption: opportunities for consumer research and public policy. J Public Policy Market 30(1):31–38
Ram S, Sheth JN (1989) Consumer resistance to innovations: the marketing problem and its solutions. J Consum Market 6(2):5–14
Rehfeld K-M, Rennings K, Ziegler A (2007) Integrated product policy and environmental product innovations: an empirical analysis. Ecol Econ 61(1):91–100
Robertson TS (1971) Innovative behavior and communication, Editors’ series in marketing. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York
Rogers EM (2003) Diffusion of innovations, 5th edn. Free Press, New York
Segal ZV (1988) Appraisal of the self-schema construct in cognitive models of depression. Psychol Bull 103(2):147–162
Smith KT, Brower TR (2012) Longitudinal study of green marketing strategies that influence Millennials. J Strateg Market 20(6):535–551
Smits M, Wald D, Vismans D, Huet E (2014) When social responsibility leads to growth No. 6, Boston
Sujan M (1985) Consumer knowledge: effects on evaluation strategies mediating consumer judgments. J Consum Res 12(1):31
Tanner C, Wölfing Kast S (2003) Promoting sustainable consumption: determinants of green purchases by Swiss consumers. Psychol Market 20(10):883–902
Tate K, Stewart AJ, Daly M (2014) Influencing green behaviour through environmental goal priming: the mediating role of automatic evaluation. J Environ Psychol 38:225–232
Teige S, Schnabel K, Banse R, Asendorpf JB (2004) Assessment of multiple implicit self-concept dimensions using the Extrinsic Affective Simon Task(EAST). Eur J Pers 18(6):495–520
Thøgersen J (1999) The ethical consumer. Moral norms and packaging choice. J Consum Policy 22(4):439–460
Thorndyke PW, Yekovich FR (1980) A critique of schema-based theories of human story memory. Poetics 9(1–3):23–49
Umweltbundesamt (2013) Green products in Germany 2014. Status Quo and Trends. Available at: http://www.umweltbundesamt.de/sites/default/files/medien/378/publikationen/uba_green_in_germany_2014.pdf. Accessed 8 Apr 2015
van Doorn J, Verhoef PC (2011) Willingness to pay for organic products: differences between virtue and vice foods. Int J Res Mark 28(3):167–180
Vantomme D, Geuens M, DeHouwer J, DePelsmacker P (2006) Explicit and implicit determinants of fair-trade buying behaviour. Adv Consum Res 33:699–703
Weiber R, Rosendahl T (1997) Anwendungsprobleme der Conjoint-Analyse. Die Eignung conjointanalytischer Untersuchungsansätze zur Abbildung realer Entscheidungsprozesse. Mark ZFP 19(2):107–118
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rudolph, K. (2018). Barriers to Acceptance of Bio-Based Substitutes: How Schema Incongruity Can Hinder the Purchase of Bio-Based Products. In: Leal Filho, W., Pociovălișteanu, D., Borges de Brito, P., Borges de Lima, I. (eds) Towards a Sustainable Bioeconomy: Principles, Challenges and Perspectives. World Sustainability Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73028-8_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73028-8_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-73027-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-73028-8
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)