Advertisement

Tropicalizing Sustainable Bioeconomy: Initial Lessons from Ecuador

  • Daniel V. Ortega-Pacheco
  • Ariel Silva
  • Alfredo López
  • Ramón Espinel
  • Diego Inclán
  • María J. Mendoza-Jiménez
Chapter
Part of the World Sustainability Series book series (WSUSE)

Abstract

Sustainable bioeconomy is being revised in tropical megabiodiverse developing countries. Given competing economic interests and development inequities, biodiversity may require becoming a strategic and central resource in national economies to ensure political feasibility of bioeconomic models. This paper attempts to address the need to document alternative approaches to transition to sustainable bioeconomy in the context of extractive economies in tropical and megabiodiverse developing countries. Using a case study approach, it reviews the Ecuadorian experience to developing a bio-industry value chain as an institutional arrangement that can enable a more efficient and integrated use of biological resources towards a sustainable and resilient economy, while addressing structural development and biodiversity protection challenges. Knowledge generated from this research can assist policymakers working on optimal design of instruments aiming at unraveling the full potential for biodiversity as a key resource in development strategies of tropical megabiodiverse countries.

Keywords

Bioeconomy Megabiodiversity Sustainable transition Bioindustry Ecuador 

References

  1. Amsden A (2001) The rise of “The Rest”. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barbier EB, Burgess JC, Folke C (1994) Paradise lost? The ecological economics of biodiversity. Earthscan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  3. BCE (2012) Información Estadística Mensual No. 1930. Banco Central del Ecuador, QuitoGoogle Scholar
  4. BCE (2015) Información Estadística Mensual No. 1966. Banco Central del Ecuador, QuitoGoogle Scholar
  5. BCE (2016) Información Estadística Mensual No. 1978. Banco Central del Ecuador, QuitoGoogle Scholar
  6. Boerrke PJ (2001) Putting the ‘political’ back into political economy. In: Biddle JE, Davis JB, Medema SG (eds) Economics broadly considered. Routledge, London and New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Braig M, Costa S, Göbel B (2015) Social inequalities and global interdependences in Latin America: a provisional appraisal. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Políticas Y Sociales 60(1):209–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cassiolato JE, Schmitz H (2002) Hi-tech for industrial development: lessons from the Brazilian experience in electronics and automation. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  9. Childs J, Hearn J (2017) “New” nations: resource-based development imaginaries in Ghana and Ecuador. Third World Q 38(4):844–861CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cornia GA (2014) Falling inequality in Latin America: policy changes and lessons. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cypher JM, Alfaro Y (2016) Triángulo del neo-desarrollismo en el Ecuador. Problemas del Desarrollo 47(185):163–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Domínguez R, Caria S (2016) Ecuador in the middle income trap. Problemas Del Desarrollo 47(187):89–112 Google Scholar
  13. Duff A, Padilla A (2015) Latin America: agricultural perspectives. Retrieved from https://economics.rabobank.com/publications/2015/september/latin-america-agricultural-perspectives/
  14. Espinel R (2009) Economía política de la biodiversidad: conocimientos ancestrales y derechos de propiedad. In: Martín Mayoral F (ed) Deuda externa y economía ecológica: dos visiones críticas. FLACSO Ecuador, Quito, p 13Google Scholar
  15. EU (2012) Innovating for sustainable growth: a bioeconomy for Europe. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. European Commission COM(2012)—BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  16. Falconí F, Larrea C (2004) Impactos ambientales de las políticas de liberalización externa y los flujos de capital: el caso de Ecuador. In: Falconí F, Hercowitz M, Muradian R (eds) Globalización y desarrollo en América Latina. FLACSO, QuitoGoogle Scholar
  17. Falconí F, Vallejo MC (2012) Transiciones socioecológicas en la región andina. Revista Iberoamericana de Economía Ecológica 18:53–71Google Scholar
  18. Gachet I, Grijalva DF, Ponce P, Rodríguez D (2016) Vertical and horizontal inequality in Ecuador: the lack of sustainability (WIDER Working Paper No. 2016/106). p 37Google Scholar
  19. Giljum S, Eisenmenger N (2004) North-south trade and the distribution of environmental goods and burdens: a biophysical perspective. The J Environ Dev 13(1):73–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Golden JS, Handfield R (2014) The emergent industrial bioeconomy. Ind Biotechnol 10(6):371–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Golinelli S, Vega-Villa K, Villa-Romero JF (2015) Biodiversidad: ciencia ciudadana, saberes originarios y biodiversidad aplicada en la economía social del conocimiento. In: Vila-Viñas D, Barandiaran XE (eds) Buen Conocer/ FLOK Society: Modelos sostenibles y políticas públicas para una economía social del conocimiento común y abierto en Ecuador. IAEN-CIESPAL, Quito, Ecuador, pp 345–396 DigitalGoogle Scholar
  22. Hill AB (2000) International markets for genetic resources: opportunities for Colombia. Science, technology and innovation. Discussion Paper No. 2, Center for International Development, Harvard University, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  23. IMF (2016) Ecuador: purchase under the rapid financing instrument (Tech. Rep. International Monetary Fund—IMF Country Report No. 16/288), p 38Google Scholar
  24. Jha V (2008) Environmental priorities and trade policy for environmental goods: a reality check. ICTSD Issue Paper, No 7Google Scholar
  25. Kloppenburg J (2014) Re-purposing the master’s tools: the open source seed initiative and the struggle for seed sovereignty. The J Peasant Stud 41(6):1225–1246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Li TM (2009) Exit from agriculture: a step forward or a step backward for the rural poor? The J Peasant Stud 36(3):629–636CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. MAE (2016a) Estrategia Nacional de Biodiversidad 2015–2030. Ecuador, QuitoGoogle Scholar
  28. MAE (2016b) Estrategia Nacional de Biodiversidad 2030. Ambiente 2035- Aportes Al Debate de La Política Ambiental, 5Google Scholar
  29. MAE (2017) Plan de Acción 2015–2021 para implementar la Estrategia Nacional de Biodiversidad. Quito, EcuadorGoogle Scholar
  30. Marconi S (1985) Tendencias estructurales del sector agrícola ecuatoriano. Cuestiones Económicas, 11, Banco Central del EcuadorGoogle Scholar
  31. Marconi S, Samaniego P (1995) Las fuentes del crecimiento económico: una perspectiva a partir de la demanda. Notas Técnicas, 19, Banco Central del EcuadorGoogle Scholar
  32. Marx K (1847) The poverty of philosophy: answer to the “philosophy of poverty” by M. Proudhon. Progress Publishers, Moscow; (reprinted 1955)Google Scholar
  33. OECD (2009) The bioeconomy to 2030: designing a policy agenda. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), ParisGoogle Scholar
  34. Piotrowski S, Carus M, Carrez D (2016) European bioeconomy in figures. BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  35. Polanyi K (1944) The great transformation: the political and economic origins of our time. Beacon Press, Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
  36. Rival L, Muradian R, Larrea C (2015) New trends confronting old structures or old threats frustrating new hopes? ECLAC’s compacts for equality. Dev Change 46(4):961–978CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Russi D, Gonzalez-Martinez AC, Silva-Macher JC, Giljum S, Martínez-Alier J, Vallejo MC (2008) Material flows in Latin America. J Ind Ecol 12(5–6):704–720CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Safrin S (2004) Hyperownership in a time of biotechnological promise: the international conflict to control the building blocks of life. The Am J Inter Law 98(4):641CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Schmid AA (1987) Property, power, and public choice: an inquiry into law and economics. Praeger Publishers, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  40. Schmid A (2004) Methods. In: Conflict and cooperation. Blackwell Publishing Ltd., Oxford, pp 138–162Google Scholar
  41. Scott JC (1985) Weapons of the weak. Yale University Press, New Haven, CTGoogle Scholar
  42. Secretaría Nacional de Planificación y Desarrollo (SENPLADES) (2013) Plan Nacional de Desarrollo del Buen Vivir 2013–2017. SENPLADES, QuitoGoogle Scholar
  43. SIISE (2016) Distribución del Ingreso: Coeficiente de Gini. Available at http://www.siise.gob.ec/siiseweb/siiseweb.html?sistema=1#
  44. Sillanpää M, Ncibi C (2017) A sustainable bioeconomy: the green industrial revolution. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  45. Vallejo MC (2006) Estructura biofísica de la economía ecuatoriana: un estudio de los flujos directos de materiales. Revibec: Revista Iberoamericana de Economía Ecológica 4:55–72Google Scholar
  46. Vicepresidencia del Ecuador (2015) Estrategia Nacional para el Cambio de la Matriz Productiva. QuitoGoogle Scholar
  47. Vivarelli M (2014) Innovation, employment and skills in advanced and developing countries: a survey of economic literature. J Econ Issues 48(1):123–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Walsh C (2010) Development as Buen Vivir: institutional arrangements and (de)colonial entanglements. Development 53(1):15–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wells MP (1998) Institutions and incentives for biodiversity conservation. Biodivers Conserv 7(6):815–835CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wong S, Kulmer V (2011) Poverty impacts of trade integration with the European Union: lessons for Ecuador. In: Durán Lima J, LaFleur M, Pellandra A (eds) Trade, poverty and complementary policies in Latin America. CEPAL, Santiago, pp 35–64Google Scholar
  51. WWF (2016) Living planet report 2016. Gland, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniel V. Ortega-Pacheco
    • 1
  • Ariel Silva
    • 2
  • Alfredo López
    • 3
  • Ramón Espinel
    • 1
  • Diego Inclán
    • 3
    • 4
  • María J. Mendoza-Jiménez
    • 1
  1. 1.Escuela Superior Politecnica del Litoral (ESPOL)GuayaquilEcuador
  2. 2.United Nations Development Program—BioFin InitiativeQuitoEcuador
  3. 3.National Biodiversity InstituteQuitoEcuador
  4. 4.Universidad CentralQuitoEcuador

Personalised recommendations