Fostering Sustainable Bioeconomies: The Role of Conscious Consumption

  • Madhavi Venkatesan
Part of the World Sustainability Series book series (WSUSE)


Sustainability is typically discussed in a siloed fashion in the United States. Cradle-to-cradle production and regulation to curb greenhouse gas emissions are proffered as salves for evidenced degradation, but little attention is directed to how a society can enable sustainability as a cultural norm. Further and related, the role of the individual economic agent as consumer, investor, and government participant is seemingly not acknowledged. To a large extent, the population majority delegates the powers conferred in the three roles to a minority largely through indifferent conveyance posited on trust, leaving outcomes impacting society as a whole dependent on incentives of a few, who may or may not be aligned with the public welfare. Therefore, given the evidence of marketed demand fostered by a consumerism based economy, perhaps the most significant, powerful, and traction-inducing vehicle for instituting sustainability may be found in enabling conscious consumption at the individual level. Arguably, the conduit for conscious consumption would then be education not limited to defining sustainability, but inclusive of the rationale for sustainability, the patience requisite for implementation, and the acceptance of sustainability as a societal norm of behavior. However, the building block for conscious consumption is found in understanding the basis of present consumption decisions, ultimately the values that shape the behaviors that lead to observable economic outcomes (Venkatesan 2015).


Consumerism based economy Conscious consumption Sustainability Sustainable bioeconomies 


  1. Bentham J (1879) An introduction to the principles of morals and legislation. Clarendon, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  2. Bishop RC (1993) Economic efficiency, sustainability, and biodiversity. Ambio 22(2/3):69–73Google Scholar
  3. Boran I (2006) Benefits, intentions, and the principle of fairness. Can J Philos 36(1):95–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Choi S, Ng A (2011) Environmental and economic dimensions of sustainability. J Bus Ethics 104(2):269–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Czech B (2000) Economic growth as the limiting factor for wildlife conservation. Wildl Soc Bull 28(1):4–15Google Scholar
  6. Day GS, Aaker DA (1970) A guide to consumerism. Journal of Marketing 34(3):12–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Marx K (2009) Das Kapital, vol 1. Regnerny Publishers, Washington, District of ColumbiaGoogle Scholar
  8. Mill JS (2016) In Ashley WJ (ed) Principles of political economy with some of their applications to social philosophy, 7th ed., 1909. Longmans, Green and Co., LondonGoogle Scholar
  9. Nelson RH (1995) Sustainability, efficiency, and god: economic values and the sustainability debate. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 26:135–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. O’Hara SU (1995) Sustainability: Social and ecological dimensions. Review of Social Economy 53(4):529–551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ricardo D (1911) The principles of political economy and taxation. J.M. Dent & Sons, LondonGoogle Scholar
  12. Schweitzer A (1981) Social values in economics. Rev Soc Econ 39(3):257–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Shah M (1999) Synthesis of ecology and economics: towards a new theoretical paradigm. Econ Polit Wky 34(46/47):3293–3298Google Scholar
  14. Smith A (1791) An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. Tourneisen and Legrand, Basil, p 22 Google Scholar
  15. UNESCO (Culture Sector) (2000) World culture report. United Nations, ParisGoogle Scholar
  16. Venkatesan M (2015, March 15) Values, behaviors and economic outcomes. Retrieved from
  17. Venkatesan M (2016) Economic principles: a primer, a foundation in sustainable practices. Kona Publishing, Mathews, NCGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsBridgewater State UniversityBridgewaterUSA

Personalised recommendations