Construction Planning for a Modularized Rail Structure: Type Selection of Rail Structure Modules and Dispatch Planning of Constructor Robots

  • Rui Fukui
  • Yuta Kato
  • Gen Kanayama
  • Ryo Takahashi
  • Masayuki Nakao
Chapter
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Advanced Robotics book series (SPAR, volume 6)

Abstract

Remote robot operation is highly anticipated for use in hazardous environments such as nuclear accident sites. We propose an automated construction system of a modularized rail structure for working robots to have access to any operational point. The modules are delivered and constructed through the cooperation of transfer robots and a connector robot. To realize time-efficient and economical construction of the structure, it is necessary to integrate three planning procedures: path planning from a start point to the operational point, type selection planning of rail structure modules, and dispatch planning of constructor robots. This paper describes newly developed algorithms that plan the type selection of all rail structure modules using rules of thumb, and which plan the dispatch of robots to deliver or construct modules avoiding deadlock. A simulation experiment demonstrates that the geometrical constraint conditions of the structure can reduce the search space of selecting module types.

Notes

Acknowledgements

A part of this study is the result of “HRD for Fukushima Daiichi Decommissioning based on Robotics and Nuclide Analysis” carried out under the Center of World Intelligence Project for Nuclear S&T and Human Resource Development by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan.

References

  1. 1.
    Fukui, R., Kato, Y., et al.: Automated construction system of robot locomotion and operation platform for hazardous environments - basic system design and feasibility study of module transferring and connecting motions. J. Field Robot. (2015)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fukui, R., Kawae, K., et al.: Rail structure supporting mechanism using foamable resin for pillar expansion, anchoring, and fixation. J. Robot. Mech. 28(2), 129–137 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Furuta, T., et al.: Development of the exploring robot toward future indoor surveillance missions in the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant. J. Robot. Soc. Jpn. 32(2), 92–97 (2014). (in Japanese)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Haviland, D., et al.: Fundamental behaviours of production traffic in underground mine haulage ramps. Int. J. Min. Sci. Technol. 25(1), 7–14 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hirose, S.: Development of robotic systems for the decommissioning operation of Fukushima Daiichi nuclear reactor. J. Jpn. Soc. Mech. Eng. 116, 732–735 (2013). (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    IRID: Basic data of Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant (Summary). http://irid.or.jp/fd/?page_id=237&lang=en. Accessed 19 Feb 2016
  7. 7.
    Kanai, S., et al.: An optimal delay management algorithm from passengers’ viewpoints considering the whole railway network. J. Rail Trans. Plan. Manag. 1(1), 25–37 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrtpm.2011.09.003 Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kawashima, M.: Unmanned anti-disaster system R & D project (NEDO). J. Robot. Soc. Jpn. 32(2), 117–121 (2014). (in Japanese)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kawatsuma, S.: Overview and issues to be solved on emergency response of robots to Fukushima NPP accidents. J. RANDEC 46, 14–26 (2012)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Okada, S., et al.: Result of site test for investigation robot for inside primary containment vessel of 1F-1 -Shape changing robot-. http://irid.or.jp/_pdf/20150714_4.pdf. Accessed 31 Oct 2015
  11. 11.
    Ota, J., et al.: An introduction of Intelligent Robots. Corona Publishing, Tokyo (2001)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Otani, M., et al.: Improving recovery capability of multiple robots in different scale structure assembly. J. Adv. Comput. Intell. Intell. Inf. 15(8), 1186–1196 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Peasgood, M., et al.: A complete and scalable strategy for coordinating multiple robots within roadmaps. IEEE Trans. Robot. 24(2), 283–292 (2008).  https://doi.org/10.1109/TRO.2008.918056 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Stoy, K., et al.: Self-reconfigurable Robots: An Introduction. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2010)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Şucan, I., et al.: The open motion planning library. IEEE Robot. Autom. Mag. 19(4), 72–82 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1109/MRA.2012.2205651 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Terada, Y., Murata, S.: Automatic modular assembly system and its distributed control. Int. J. Robot. Res. 27(3–4), 445–462 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    van den Berg, J.P., Overmars, M.H.: Roadmap-based motion planning in dynamic environments. In: Proceedings of IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (2004)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rui Fukui
    • 1
  • Yuta Kato
    • 1
  • Gen Kanayama
    • 1
  • Ryo Takahashi
    • 1
  • Masayuki Nakao
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical Engineering, Graduate School of EngineeringThe University of TokyoTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations