Skip to main content

Bestiality: Animal Cultures

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Semiotics of Animals in Culture

Part of the book series: Biosemiotics ((BSEM,volume 17))

Abstract

Multinaturalism shouldn’t be viewed solely as the paradigmatic existence of multiple natures in different cultures – or “ontologies” as Descola refers to them – but also and most importantly as the syntagmatic presence, and the resulting contrast, of various ontologies within the same culture. From a semiotic point of view, then, the so-called ontologies are considered to be effects of meaning derived from precise discursive dispositifs. Describing such dispositifs is the aim of this paper.

It is possible to read Kafka’s animal stories for quite some time without realising he isn’t talking of men When one is suddenly confronted with the name of the creature -the ape, the dog or the mole – one raises one’s terrified eyes and realises to already be far from the human continent.

Walter Benjamin

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See Marrone (2012a).

  2. 2.

    In this regard, the work of Primo Levi is particularly relevant, in which the theme of “being human” is constituted in semantic opposition to being a “beast”: cfr. Marrone (2016).

  3. 3.

    For a broader view of this concept and its semiotic significance, see Marrone (2011), Marrone ed. (2012b), and Marrone et al. (2016). The reference here comes particularly from Latour (1999), Descola (2005), and Viveiros De Castro (2009). An excellent anthology of texts on this theme is Consigliere (2014).

  4. 4.

    See the Treccani online dictionary, under “animality”: “s. f. [from the latin. tardo animalĭtas -atis, der. di anĭmal «animale»]. The constitutive essence of the animal, the complex of qualities that belong to animal life (and in contrast to the spiritual tendencies belonging to humans) (D’Annunzio)”.

  5. 5.

    There is an enormous amount of debate around this theme. For a good overview, see Cimatti (2013).

  6. 6.

    See the well-known synthesis by Sebeok Th (1968).

  7. 7.

    Some of these faits divers regarding the modern, problematic coexistence between humans and animals have been collected on the FB page: https://www.facebook.com/zoosemiotics/

  8. 8.

    This is a pertinent question for the ethologist.

  9. 9.

    The tale of the killer beating intensifies demonstrably when you mention the “33 interminable minutes” it lasted. If the exact calculation of time can’t help but produce yet another effect of the real, the adjective “interminable” is problematic: interminable for whom? For Sidony? For her son? For Anna who is watching the scene?

  10. 10.

    In a time of “femicide”, this is a juicy new version for journalists.

References

  • Barthes, R. (1963). Structure du faits divers. In Id Essais critiques. Paris: Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barthes, R. (1977). Fragments d’un discours amoureux. Paris: Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cimatti, F. (2013). Filosofia dell’animalità. Rome-Bari: Laterza.

    Google Scholar 

  • Consigliere, S. (Ed.). (2014). Mondi multipli. Roma: Youcanprint.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1975). Kafka, pour une littérature mineure. Paris: Minuit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Descola, P. (2005). Par-delà nature et culture. Paris: Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Despret, V. (2002). Quand le loup habitera avec l’agneau. Les empêcheurs de penser en rond. Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Despret, V. (2004). Hans, le cheval qui savait compter. Les empêcheurs de penser en rond. Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Despret, V. (2007). Bêtes et hommes. Paris: Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Despret, V., & Larrère, R. (Eds.). (2014). Les animaux: deux ou trois choses que nous savons d’eux. Paris: Hermann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greimas, A. J., & Courtes, J. (1979). Sémiotique. Dictionnaire raisonné de la théorie du langage. Paris: Hachette.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greimas, A. J., & Fontanille, J. (1991). Sémiotique des passions. Paris: Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1999). Politiques de la Nature. Paris: La Découverte.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (2005). La Science en action. Paris: La Découverte.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marrone, G. (2011). Addio alla Natura. Torino: Einaudi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marrone, G. (2012a). Stupidità. Milano: Bompiani.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marrone, G. (Ed.). (2012b). Semiotica della natura (natura della semiotica). Milano: Mimesis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marrone, G. (2016). Levi analogista. Riga, forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marrone, G., Ferraro, G., Giannitrapani, A., & Traini, S. (Eds.). (2016). Dire la Natura. Roma: Aracne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pezzini, I. (1998). Le passioni del lettore. Milano: Bompiani.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebeok Th, A. (Ed.). (1968). Zoosemiotics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Todorov, T. (1970). Introduction à la littérature fantastique. Paris: Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viveiros de Castro, E. (2009). Métaphysiques cannibales. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gianfranco Marrone .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Marrone, G. (2018). Bestiality: Animal Cultures. In: Marrone, G., Mangano, D. (eds) Semiotics of Animals in Culture. Biosemiotics, vol 17. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72992-3_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics