Advertisement

Towards a Model of Integration of Underserved Cultural Factors in Software by Reverse Localisation: Case Study in Yemba Culture

  • Mathurin SohEmail author
Conference paper
  • 320 Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering book series (LNICST, volume 204)

Abstract

This paper aims at contributing towards an empowerment of underserved culture through computer applications. It is inspired by the conviction that successful strategies can lead to balanced chances for all cultures in the context of computer applications. It raises and investigates the problem of cultural divide observable in computer applications and pave the way to the preservation of underserved cultures with such tools. We find that reverse software localisation approach as defined by [1] can help under-resourced cultures not to be engulfed by the dominating Western way of building computer applications. An approach to integrate underserved cultural factors in computer applications is provided and consist of investigation of cultural markers, followed by translation or adaptation, implementation and evaluation by end-users. As a case study, we investigate the cultural localisation of editor for the Yemba culture in Cameroon. It gives access to the use of a text editor to users fluent in Yemba culture. The adaptation of most computer software to non-native environments does not always capture the features of the target culture. Despite some trade-offs, this work has a strong symbolic value in the empowerment and preservation of the Yemba culture, and for underserved cultures.

Keywords

Cultural divide Cultural factors Localisation Editor Underserved culture Yemba 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank the Yemba language Study Committee, the anonymous reviewers for their careful reading of our manuscript, for their detailed and constructive comments and suggestions.

References

  1. 1.
    Schäler, R.: Reverse Localisation. Localis. Focus Int. J. Localis. 6(1), 39–48 (2007)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kersten, G.E., Matwin, S., Noronha, S.J., Kersten, M.A.: The software for cultures and the cultures in software. In: Hansen, H.R., Bichler, M., Harald, H. (eds.) Proceedings of the 8th ECIS 2000, Vienna, Austria, vol. 1, pp. 509–514. (2000)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wolff, F.: Effecting change through localization: localization guide for free and open source. IDRC, Canada (2011)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tedre, M., Kähkönen, E., Kommers, P.: Is universal usability universal only to us? In: Proceedings of ACM Conference CUU 2003, Vancouver, Canada (2003)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Reinecke, K., Schenkel, S., Bernstein, A.: Modeling a users culture. In: Blanchard, E.G., Allard, D. (eds.) The Handbook of Research in Culturally-Aware Information Technology: Perspectives and Models. IGI Global, Hershey (2010)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yacob, D.: Localize or be localized: an assessment of localisation frameworks. In: The International Symposium on ICT: Education and Application in Developing Countries. IEEE Press, Addis Abeba (2004)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Keller, B., Perez-Quinones, M., Vatrapu, R.: Cultural issues and opportunities in computing education. In: 9th International Conference on Engineering Education, pp. 14–18 (2006)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Reinecke, K., Reif, G., Bernstein, A.: Cultural user modeling with CUMO: an approach to overcome the personalization bootstrapping problem. In: Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Cultural Heritage on the Semantic Web at the 6th ISWC, pp. 83–90 (2007)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hofstede, G.: Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind. McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., New York (1997)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hestres, L.E.: The influence of American culture on software design: Microsoft Outlook as a case study. GNOVIS Georget. Univ. J. Commun. Cult. Technol. 3(1) (2003). 22 pagesGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Beelders, T., McDonald, T., Blignaut, P.: A proposed study to determine the effect of culture on the usability of word processors. In: Proceedings of CHI-SA 2005, pp. 29–33 (2005)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tedre, M., Sutinen, E., Kahkonen, E.: Ethnocomputing: ICT in cultural and social context. Commun. ACM 49(1), 126–130 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bartolotta, M., Di Naro, S., Brutto, M., Misuraca, P., Villa, B.: Information Systems for preservation of cultural heritage, In: International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, XXXIII, Amsterdam, pp. 864–871 (2000)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Internet World Stats. http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats7.htm. Accessed 9 Mar 2017
  15. 15.
    Cultural Politics. http://culturalpolitics.net/digital-cultures/cultural-divide. Accessed 19 Mar 2017
  16. 16.
    Vilbrandt, C., Pasko, G., Pasko, A., Fayolle, P.A., Vilbrandt, T., Goodwin, J.R., Goodwin, J.M., Kunii, T.L.: Cultural heritage preservation using constructive shape modeling. Comput. Graph. Forum 23(1), 25–41 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rauterberg, M.: From personal to cultural computing: how to assess a cultural experience. In: Kemper, G., von Hellberg, P. (eds.) uDayIVInformation nutzbar machen, pp. 13–21. Pabst Science Publ. (2006)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Michael, K., Dunn, L.: The use of information and communication technology for the preservation of Aboriginal culture: the Badimaya people of Western Australia. In: Dyson, L. (ed.) Information Technology and Indigenous People. Idea Group Publishing, Hershey (2006)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Anacleto, J., Lieberman, H., Tsutsumi, M., Neris, V., Carvalho, A., Espinosa, J., Godoi, M., Zem-Mascarenhas, S.: Can common sense uncover cultural differences in computer applications? In: Bramer, M. (ed.) IFIP AI 2006. IIFIP, vol. 217, pp. 1–10. Springer, Boston (2006).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-34747-9_1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Smith, A., Reitsma, L., Van den Hoven, E., Kotzé, P., Coetzee, L.: Towards preserving indigenous oral stories using tangible objects, In: Proceedings of the 2nd ICCC, Amsterdam, pp. 86–91 (2011)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Jagne, J., Smith, S.G., Duncker, E., Curzon, P.: Cross-cultural interface design strategy. Technical report, Interaction design Centre, Middlesex University (2004)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Grigas, G., Jevsikova, T., Strelkauskyt, A., Cox, S.: Localisation issues of software shortcuts. Int. J. Localis. 11, 40–53 (2011)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© ICST Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mathematics and Computer ScienceUniversity of DschangDschangCameroon

Personalised recommendations