Embedding Adaptation into Development Planning and Decision Making Process at the Municipal Levels in Mozambique

  • Luís Artur
  • Casimiro AntónioEmail author
  • Olanda Bata
  • Felisberto Afonso
  • Gilberto Muai
Part of the Climate Change Management book series (CCM)


Climate change has become one of the greatest challenges of the 21st century, particularly for growing cities. In places like Mozambique, the vulnerability of the cities (municipalities) is further compounded by socio-economic constraints that limit the ability of local and national governments to respond to extreme climatic events. All this means that climate change adaptation needs to be understood within a broader socio-economic and environment context. From this, we argue that adaptation interventions must be part of long lasting development plan and not a project per se. In so doing, the starting point should be to set a climate resilient development agenda that adaptation interventions will feed in. Currently indeed, most of the adaptation interventions are stand-alone initiatives based, in most of the cases, in assumptions made mainly by the international donors, NGOs and consultants that what is known globally around climate change apply to local context and can easily be replicated. Hence, pre-cooked ill locally researched interventions are proposed and implemented with very limited impacts. This trend is making adaptation less effective in developing countries despite a growing discourse of climate change adaptation. Against this backdrop, we present a different pathway. This paper addresses interventions by the Coastal City Adaptation Program (CCAP) in two municipalities in Mozambique which seek to apply action-research and use local participation (including local knowledge) to feed adaption interventions in a long lasting development agenda. The paper argues that this approach is far more effective for climate resilience because it responds to local development agenda, allows the prioritization of locally grounded interventions which are supported by a pool of local actors and, because it is locally grounded it allows the embedding of adaptation agenda in the local institution’s everyday planning practices making it sustainable over time.


Climate change Adaptation Risk Vulnerability Resilience 


  1. AEO. (2016). African economic outlook 2016—Mozambique. African Development Bank.Google Scholar
  2. Brooks, N., Adger, W. N., & Kelly, P. M. (2005). The determinants of vulnerability and adaptive capacity at the national level and the implications for adaptation. Global Environmental Change, 15, 151–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. CCAP. (2014). CCAP annual report 2014. Maputo.Google Scholar
  4. CCAP. (2015). CCAP annual report 2015. Maputo.Google Scholar
  5. Buys, P., Deichmann, U., Meisner, C., That, T., & Wheeler, D. (2007). Country stakes in climate change negotiations: two dimensions of vulnerability. Washington: The World Bank.Google Scholar
  6. DFID. (1999). Sustainable livelihood guidance sheets. London, UK.Google Scholar
  7. GIZ. (2012). Let’s Respond. A guide to integrating climate change risks and opportunities into municipal planning. German.Google Scholar
  8. Government of South Africa (GoSa). (2011). Adapting South African Cities and Towns—A local Government Guide to Climate change adaptation planning. South Africa.Google Scholar
  9. GoM. (2014). Plano Quinquenal do Governo 2014–2019. Maputo.Google Scholar
  10. IFRC. (2016). World disaster report. Resilience, saving lives today, investing for tomorrow. Geneva.Google Scholar
  11. IFRC. (2004). World disaster report. Geneva: Focus on Community Resilience.Google Scholar
  12. INGC. (2009). Synthesis report. In B. van Logchem & R. Brito (Eds.), INGC Climate Change Report: Study on the Impacts of Climate Change on Disaster Risk in Mozambique. INGC.Google Scholar
  13. INE – Instituto Nacional de Estatística. (2007). CENSO, Maputo.Google Scholar
  14. INGC, UEM, & Fewsnet. (2003). Atlas for disaster preparedness and response in the Limpopo Basin, Maputo, Mozambique.Google Scholar
  15. IPCC. (2012). Managing the risks of extreme events and disasters to advance climate change adaptation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  16. IPCC. (2007). Fourth assessment on climate change. Geneva.Google Scholar
  17. Mayhew, P. J., Jenkins, G. B., & Benton, T. G. (2007). A long-term association between global temperature and biodiversity, origination and extinction in the fossil record. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 275(1630), 47–53. pmc2562410. pmid 17956842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Moss, R. H., Edmonds, J. A., Hibbard, K. A., Manning, M. R., Rose, S. K., van Vuuren, D. P., Carter, T. R., Emori, S., Kainuma, M., Kram, T., Meehl, G. A., Mitchell, J. F., Nakicenovic, N., Riahi, K., Smith, S. J., Stouffer, R. J., Thomson, A. M., Weyant, J. P., Wilbanks, T. J. (2010). The next generation of scenarios for climate change research and assessment. Nature, 463(7282), 747–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. NEF and BCAS. (2002). The end of development? Global warming, disasters and the great reverse of human progress. UK: New Economics Foundation.Google Scholar
  20. OECD. (2014). Cities and climate change-policy perspectives: National governments enabling local action. OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  21. Reason, P., & Bradbury, H. (Eds.). (2008). The SAGE handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice. London: SAGE Publication Ltd.Google Scholar
  22. Stern, N. (2006). The economic costs of climate change. The Stern review. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  23. UNDP. (2009). Overcoming barriers. Human mobility and development. Human Development 2009. New York.Google Scholar
  24. UNU-EHS. (2011). World risk report 2011. Bonn, German.Google Scholar
  25. Urban Climate Change Research Network (UCCRN). (2011). Climate change and cities. In: First assessment report of the urban climate change research network-center for Climate Systems Research, Earth Institute, Columbia University 2011.Google Scholar
  26. Ypersele, J. (2008). Climate change: What do we know, according to IPCC (WG II)? Pre-COP IPCC workshop, Warsaw, 2 Oct 2008.Google Scholar
  27. Webster, M., Ginnetti, J., Walker, P., Coppard, D., & Kent, R. (2009). The humanitarian costs of climate change. Feinstein International Center. US: Tufts University.Google Scholar
  28. Wisner, B., Blaikie, P., Cannon, T., & Davis, I. (2004). At risk: Natural hazards. Routledge, London: People’s Vulnerability and Disaster.Google Scholar
  29. World Bank. (2011). Guideline for Resilient Cities. Washington DC.Google Scholar
  30. World Bank. (2010a). Cities and Climate Change: An Urgent Agenda. Washington DC.Google Scholar
  31. World Bank. (2010b). Economics of Adaptation to climate change—Mozambique. Washington DC.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Luís Artur
    • 1
  • Casimiro António
    • 2
    Email author
  • Olanda Bata
    • 2
  • Felisberto Afonso
    • 2
  • Gilberto Muai
    • 2
  1. 1.Eduardo Mondlane UniversityMaputoMozambique
  2. 2.USAID—Coastal City Adaptation Project Implemented by Chemonics International IncMaputoMozambique

Personalised recommendations