Ozone Layer Depletion, Climate Change, Risks and Adaptation

  • Aliaksandr Krasouski
  • Siarhei Zenchanka
Part of the Climate Change Management book series (CCM)


The recent years’ publications have focused on the influence of the ozone layer depletion (OLD) to the climate change (CC). Some authors suggested that the reasons for it are: (a) the ozone absorbs the solar radiation, and (b) ozone is a greenhouse gas. Hence, the variations of ozone concentration in the atmosphere and climate change are closely related. The human risks associated with ozone layer depletion are skin cancer, damage to the eyes, local and systemic immunosuppression. Some of environmental risks associated with ozone layer depletion are a changing of climatic regions; changing of land productivity, impact on plants and animals. The aims of the article are the investigation of mutual influence of OLD and CC, analysis of the regional OLD and associated risks. Presented results show that there is one more reason for the OLD influence on CC concerning with the change of the tropopause height. In addition, positive anomalies of ozone can be just as serious preconditions for climate risks, as well as negative anomalies.


Ozone layer Climate change Risk Adaptation The Republic of Belarus 


  1. Aggarwal, A., Kumari, R., Mehla, N., Deepali, Singh, R. P., Bhatnagar, S., et al. (2013). Depletion of the ozone layer and its consequences: A review. American Journal of Plant Sciences, 2013(4), 1990–1997. Accessed 15th Mar 2017. Scholar
  2. Clements, R., Haggar, J., Quezada, A., & Torres, J. (2011). Technologies for climate change adaptation—Agriculture sector. In: X. Zhu (Ed.), UNEP Risø Centre, Roskilde.Google Scholar
  3. Communication. (2015). 6th National communication of the Republic of Belarus in accordance with obligations under the UNFCCC. The Ministry of Natural Resources and Environmental Protection. Scientific Research Center “Ecology”. Minsk (in Russian).Google Scholar
  4. Convention. (1985). The Vienna convention for the protection of the ozone layer. Accessed 25th Mar 2017.
  5. Cook, J., Oreskes, N., Doran, P. T., Anderegg, W. R. L., Verheggen, B., Maibach, E. W., (2016). Consensus on consensus: A synthesis of consensus estimates on human-caused global warming. Environmental Research Letters, 11, 48002. Accessed 25th Mar 2017. Scholar
  6. EEA. (2015a). Protecting the ozone layer while also preventing climate change. European Environment Agency. Kopenhagen, 2015.Google Scholar
  7. EEA. (2015b). Europe continues to phase out ozone layer-damaging chemicals. European Environment Agency. Kopenhagen, 2015.Google Scholar
  8. FAO. (2014). The state of food and agriculture. Innovation in family farming. Food and agriculture organization of the United Nations. Rome, 2014.Google Scholar
  9. Handbook. (2008). Operation handbook—Ozone observation with a Dobson spectrophotometer. WMO. Global atmosphere watch. GAW No. 183. WMO/TD-No. 1469. 93 P.Google Scholar
  10. Hegglin, M. I., Fahey, D. W., McFarland, M., Montzka, S. A., & Nash, E. R. (2015). Twenty questions and answers about the ozone layer: 2014 update, scientific assessment of ozone depletion: 2014, 84 pp., World Meteorological Organization, Geneva.Google Scholar
  11. IPCC. (2014). Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. In Core Writing Team, R. K. Pachauri. & L.A. Meyer (Eds.), Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (151 p). IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  12. Krasouski, A., & Turyshev, L. (2011). Interaction of “ozone-climate”. Science and innovations, 4, 14–16. (In Russian).Google Scholar
  13. Kyoto Protocol. (1998). Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, United Nations, 1998. Accessed 25th Mar 2017.
  14. Law. (2001). The Republic of Belarus of November 12, 2001 N 56-Z “On Protection of the Ozone Layer”. Accessed 28th Mar 2017,“(in Russian).
  15. Memo. (2007). Safe use of ultraviolet radiation. Reminder for ecologist. The Ministry of Natural Resources and Environmental Protection. The National Ozone Monitoring Research and Education Center. Minsk (in Russian), 2007.Google Scholar
  16. Montreal Protocol. (1987). European Commission, Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. Accessed 25th Mar 2017.
  17. NOAA. (2015). NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information, State of the Climate: Global Analysis for Annual 2015, published online Jan 2016. Retrieved on 2 Apr 2017 from
  18. Nowack, P., et al. (2015). A large ozone-circulation feedback and its implications for global warming assessments. Nature Climate Change, 5, 41–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Program. (2013). The state program of measures to mitigate climate change for 2013–2020. Adopted by Decree of the Council of Ministers of the Republics of Belarus 21 June 2013, No 510 (in Russian).Google Scholar
  20. Report. (2017). National Report of the Republic of Belarus for the 10th WMO, UNEP Ozone Research Managers Meeting Geneva, 28–30 Mar 2017.Google Scholar
  21. Sivasakthivel, T., & Reddy, K. K. S. K. (2011). Ozone layer depletion and its effects: A review. International Journal of Environmental Science and Development, 2(1), 30–37.Google Scholar
  22. Tubiello, F. (2012). Climate change adaptation and mitigation: challenges and opportunities in the food sector. Natural Resources Management and Environment Department, FAO, Rome. In Prepared for the High-Level Conference on World Food Security: the Challenges of Climate Change and Bioenergy, Rome, 3–5 June 2008.Google Scholar
  23. UNEP. (2016). The Emissions Gap Report 2016. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), Nairobi.Google Scholar
  24. UNFCCC. (1992). The United Nation Framework Convention on Climate Change. United Nations, 1992, FCCC/INFORMAL/84 GE.05-62220 (E) 200705.Google Scholar
  25. WHO. (2000). In S. Kovats, B. Menne, A. McMichael, R. Bertollini, & C. Soskolne (Eds.), Climate change and stratospheric ozone depletion. Early effects on our health in Europe. WHO Regional Publications, European Series, No. 88. Denmark.Google Scholar
  26. WMO. (2017). WMO statement on the state of the global climate in 2016. WMO—No. 1189. World Meteorological Organization, 2017.Google Scholar
  27. WMO (World Meteorological Organization). (2014). Assessment for decision-makers: Scientific assessment of ozone depletion: 2014 (Global Ozone Research and Monitoring Project—Report No. 56), 88 pp. Geneva, Switzerland.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Belarussian State University, National Ozone Monitoring Research and Education CenterMinskBelarus
  2. 2.Minsk Branch of Plekhanov Russian University of EconomicsMinskBelarus

Personalised recommendations