Emission Trading Schemes and Carbon Markets in the NDCs: Their Contribution to the Paris Agreement

  • Veronica CaciagliEmail author
Part of the Climate Change Management book series (CCM)


At present there are 18 emission trading schemes (ETS) operating in the world. At the COP21 in Paris a clear path for climate and energy policies has been outlined over the coming decades: states have committed themselves to reach zero net emissions by the second half of this century and to maintain the average global temperature rise well below 2 °C, with an additional effort to stay within 1.5 °C. 191 countries, whose emissions cover 98.9% of global greenhouse gas emissions, have already submitted their INDCs/NDCs. The contribution of this paper is twofold. First, it presents a review of the existing ETS and the incumbent ones, like the Chinese national scheme. The ETS currently existing are summarized in a table and than described. Moreover, an overview of the countries which are planning to start new cap-and-trade systems is provided, as well as a table showing which countries included a reference to an ETS in their INDC/NDC. Second, it offers a comprehensive overview about what the countries included in their NDCs about national ETS and international carbon markets. In fact, many developing countries are now considering to access carbon finance to fulfil part of their commitments. But in order for them to receive this kind of finance, and therefore to be able to achieve their climate targets, there has to be a demand for credits. For this reason, understanding whether there will be this match between demand and offer for carbon credits will lead to more efficient choices in policy making, for both sides of the market and thus contribute to the achievement of the Paris Agreement.


Climate change Carbon markets Emission trading Paris agreement ETS NDC NDCs COP21 Cap-and-trade Climate mitigation NDCs implementation 


  1. Caciagli, V. (2013). Emission trading, del back-loading e di altre riforme, Available at Accessed June 21, 2017.
  2. De Beaupuy, F., & Fouquet, H. (2017). Macron seeking stiff carbon costs to avert climate change., June 9, 2017. Available at: Accessed June, 23, 2017.
  3. De Perthuis, C., & Trotignon, R. (2014). Governance of CO2 markets: Lessons from the EU ETS. Energy Policy, 75, 100–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ellerman, A. D., Convery, F., et al. (2010). Pricing carbon: The European Union emissions trading scheme. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. European Commission. (2014). Impact assessment, 22/01/2014 – SWD (2014) 17.Google Scholar
  6. European Commission. (2015). EU ETS handbook. Available at Accessed June 25, 2017.
  7. Federal Office for the Environment. (2017). Swiss emissions trading scheme (ETS). Available at:–ets-.html. Accessed June 18, 2017.
  8. Hawkins, S., & Jegou, I. (2014). Linking emissions trading schemes—Considerations and recommendations for a joint EU-Korean carbon market. Available at: Accessed June 20, 2017.
  9. Holdaway, E., & Dodwell, C. (2015). A guide to INDCs, intended nationally determinated contributions, CDKN. Available at Accessed June 20, 2017.
  10. ICAP. (2017a). Emissions trading worldwide—Status Report 2017. Available at Accessed June 25, 2017.
  11. ICAP. (2017b). Nova Scotia releases cap-and-trade design options. Accessed June 16, 2017.
  12. ICAP. (2017c). Taiwan to introduce emissions trading system. Accessed June 16, 2017.
  13. ICAP. (2017d). ICAP Quarterly—Global trends in emissions trading. Issue n. 13, 05 April 2017. Available at Accessed June 16, 2017.
  14. ICAP. (2017e). Rules on cap setting and allowance allocation for emissions trading in China approved. Available at Accessed June 19, 2017.
  15. IEA. (2016). CO2 emissions from fuel combustion. Available at Accessed June 10, 2017.
  16. Kitous, A., & Keramidas, K. (2015). Analysis of scenarios integrating the INDCs. Sevilla, Spain: JRC Policy Brief.Google Scholar
  17. Koch, N., Fuss, S., Grosjean, G., & Edenhofer, O. (2014). Causes of the EU ETS price drop: Recession, CDM, renewable policies or a bit of everything? Energy Policy, 73, 676–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Laing, T., Sato, M., Grubb, M., Comberti, C. (2013). Assessing the effectiveness of the EU emissions trading scheme. Available at Accessed June 15, 2017.
  19. OECD. (2016). Effective carbon rates: Pricing CO2 through taxes and emissions trading systems. Paris: OECD Publishing. Available at Accessed June 15, 2017.
  20. Peng, N., Yuqing, L., & Guang, Y. (2017). The establishment of carbon trading market in People’s Republic of China: A legislation and policy perspective. International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management, 9(2), 138–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. PMR. (2016). Project implementation status report. Available at Accessed June 15, 2017.
  22. Richstein, J. C., Chappin, E. J. L., et al. (2015). The market (in-)stability reserve for EU carbon emission trading: Why it might fail and how to improve it. Utilities Policy, 35(2015), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rogelj, J., den Elzen, M., Höhne, N., Fransen, T., Fekete, H., Winkler, H. (2016). Paris Agreement climate proposals need a boost to keep warming well below 2  °C. Nature, 534, 631–639. Available at Accessed June 05, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sato, M., Laing, T., Cooper, S,, & Wang, L. (2016). Methods for evaluating the performance of emissions trading schemes. Available at Accessed June 25, 2017.
  25. State of Washington—Department of Ecology. (2017). Clean air rule. Available at: Accessed June 16, 2017.
  26. UNFCCC. (2012). United Nations framework convention on climate change. Available at Accessed June 19, 2017.
  27. UNFCCC. (2013). Report of the conference of the parties on its nineteenth session, held in Warsaw from 11 to 23 November 2013. Addendum. Part two: Action taken by the Conference of the Parties at its nineteenth session, FCCC/CP/2013/10/Add.1. Available at Accessed June 18, 2017.
  28. UNFCCC. (2014). Decision 1/CP.20, Lima call for climate action. Accessed June 18, 2017.
  29. UNFCCC. (2015). Decision 1/CP.21, adoption of the Paris Agreement. Available at Accessed June 18, 2017.
  30. Vöhringer, F. (2012). Linking the Swiss emissions trading system with the EU ETS: Economic effects of regulatory design alternatives. Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics, 148(2), 167–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wood, P. J., & Jotzo, F. (2011). Price floors for emissions trading. Energy Policy, 39(3), 1746–1753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. WRI/UNDEP. (2015). Designing and preparing intended nationally determinated contributions (INDCs). Available at Accessed June 20, 2017.

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Independent Consultant and JournalistRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations