Advertisement

Understanding Climate Change Adaptation: The Role of Citizens’ Perceptions and Appraisals About Extreme Weather Events

  • Samuel Domingos
  • Rui Gaspar
  • João Marôco
  • Rita Beja
Chapter
Part of the Climate Change Management book series (CCM)

Abstract

Climate change is driving dramatic environmental changes and posing new demands to citizens, health authorities, and policy makers worldwide. This is due to an increased frequency, intensity, and duration of associated extreme weather events. Recent calls for better understanding of how citizens adapt to such demands and the role that psychological processes’ play in that adaptation, have been put forward. We contributed in this regard by (1) applying the Biopsychosocial Model of Challenge and Threat (e.g. Blascovich 2008) to the study of human responses (psychological, physiological, and behavioural) to extreme weather events; (2) using it as the conceptual basis for a mixed methods study aimed at exploring citizens’ perceptions, beliefs, and appraisals of the demands posed by such events and available resources to cope with them. Preliminary qualitative results are presented and potential implications for stakeholders and policy makers in the climate change domain are discussed. An example of how such conceptual and methodological approaches may contribute to developing evidence-based strategies for incrementing citizens’ resilience and adaptation to climate change, will be provided. This allow a better understanding of citizen appraisals and perceptions’ role  in shaping adaptive behaviour, in order to provide them with the necessary personal and social resources to cope with extreme weather events and increment future resilience.

Keywords

Climate change Extreme weather events Adaptation Psychological processes Coping 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The first author’s work is funded by the Foundation for Science and Technology (Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia-FCT) with the grant PD/BD/128512/2017. William James Center for Research, ISPA-Instituto Universitário is supported by the FCT Grant No. UID/PSI/04810/2013.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Ahmed, K., & Long, W. (2010). Adaptation as a response to climate change: A literature review. Munich Personal RePEc Archive. Retrieved from https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/45024/.
  2. American Psychological Association (APA). (2011). Resolution on affirming psychologists’ role in addressing global climate change. American Psychological Association. Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/about/policy/climate-change.aspx.
  3. Arbuthnott, K., Hajat, S., Heaviside, C., & Vardoulakis, S. (2016). Changes in population susceptibility to heat and cold over time: Assessing adaptation to climate change. Environmental Health, 15(1), 33.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12940-016-0102-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blascovich, J. (2008). Challenge, threat, and health. In J. Y. Shah & W. L. Gardener (Eds.), Handbook of Motivation Science (pp. 481–493). New York, USA: Guilford Press. ISBN:9781593855680.Google Scholar
  5. Blascovich, J., & Mendes, W. B. (2001). Challenge and threat appraisals: the role of affective cues. In J. Forgas (Ed.), Feeling and thinking: the role of affect in social cognition (pp. 59–82). New York, USA: Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 9780521011891.Google Scholar
  6. Blascovich, J. & Mendes, W. B. (2010). Social psychophysiology and embodiment. In S. T. Fiske, D. T. Gilbert, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (5th Edn., pp. 194–227). New York, USA: Wiley. ISBN: 9780470137482.Google Scholar
  7. Blascovich, J., & Tomaka, J. (1996). The biopsychosocial model of arousal regulation. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (vol. 28, pp. 1–51). San Diego, USA: Academic Press. ISBN: 9780120152285.Google Scholar
  8. Bradley, G. L., & Reser, J. P. (2017). Adaptation processes in the context of climate change: a social and environmental psychology perspective. Journal of Bioeconomics, 19(1), 29–51.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10818-016-9231-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bruine de Bruin, W., Lefevre, C. E., Taylor, A. L., Dessai, S., Fischhoff, B., & Kovats, S. (2016). Promoting protection against a threat that evokes positive affect: the case of heatwaves in the UK. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 22(3), 261–271.  https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000083.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Casimiro, E., Calheiros, J. M., & Dessai, S. (2003). Human health. In F. D. Santos, K. Forbes, & Moita, R. (Eds.), Climate change in Portugal. Scenarios, impacts and adaptation measures—SIAM Project. Lisboa, Portugal: Gradiva. ISBN: 972–662-843-1.Google Scholar
  11. Chen, R. S., Boulding, E., & Schneider, S. H. (1983). Social science research and climate change: an interdisciplinary appraisal. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Reidel. ISBN 978-94-009-7003-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Clayton, S., Devine-Wright, P., Stern, P. C., Whitmarsh, L., Carrico, A., Steg, L., et al. (2015). Psychological research and global climate change. Nature Climate Change, 5(7), 640–646.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Clayton, S., Manning, C. M., & Hodge, C. (2014). Beyond storms & droughts: the psychological impacts of climate change. Washington, DC, USA: American Psychological Association and ecoAmerica.Google Scholar
  14. Connell, S., Fien, J., Lee, J., Sykes, H., & Yencken, D. (1999). If it doesn’t directly affect you, you don’t think about it’: a qualitative study of young people’s environmental attitudes in two Australian cities. Environmental Education Research, 5(1), 95–113.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1350462990050106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Demski, C., Capstick, S., Pidgeon, N., Sposato, R. G., & Spence, A. (2017). Experience of extreme weather affects climate change mitigation and adaptation responses. Climatic Change, 140(2), 149–164.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-016-1837-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Direção-Geral da Saúde (DGS). (2015). Plano de contingência para temperaturas extremas adversas - módulo calor. Direção de Serviços de Prevenção da Doença e Promoção da Saúde, Divisão de Saúde Ambiental e Ocupacional. Lisboa, Portugal: Direção-Geral da Saúde.Google Scholar
  17. Doherty, T. J., & Clayton, S. D. (2011). The psychological impacts of global climate change. American Psychologist, 66(4), 265–276.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fonseca, R., Blascovich, J., & Garcia-Marques, T. (2014). Challenge and threat motivation: effects on superficial and elaborative information processing. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1170.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fritze, J. G., Blashki, G. A., Burke, S., & Wiseman, J. (2008). Hope, despair, and transformation: Climate change and the promotion of mental health and wellbeing. International journal of mental health systems, 2, 13.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1752-4458-2-13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Garcia-Marques, T., Fonseca, R., & Blascovich, J. (2015). Familiarity, challenge, and processing of persuasion messages. Social Cognition, 33(6), 585–604.  https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2015.33.6.585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gaspar, R., Barnett, J., & Seibt, B. (2015). Crisis as seen by the individual: the norm deviation approach. Psyecology: Bilingual. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 6, 103–135.  https://doi.org/10.1080/21711976.2014.1002205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gaspar, R., Domingos, S., Diniz, A., & Falanga, R. (2016). Barriers to and facilitators of older adult’s adherence to health recommendations: towards an engAging two-way health communication. In G. Graffigna (Ed.), Promoting Patient Engagement and Participation for Effective Healthcare Reform (pp. 58–82). Hershey, USA: IGI Global.  https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-9992-2.ch004.
  23. Gifford, R. (2008). Psychology’s essential role in alleviating the impacts of climate change. Canadian Psychology, 49(4), 273–280.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gifford, R. (2011). The dragons of inaction: Psychological barriers that limit climate change mitigation and adaptation. American Psychologist, 66(4), 290–302.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gilman, N., Randall, D., & Schwartz, P. (2007). Impacts of climate change: A system vulnerability approach to consider the potential impacts to 2050 of a mid-upper greenhouse gas emissions scenario. Retrieved from goo.gl/oSC7dP.
  26. Glick, P., Staudt, A., & Stein, B. (2009). A new era for conservation: Review of climate change adaptation literature. National Wildlife Federation. Retrieved from https://www.nwf.org/pdf/Reports/NWFClimateChangeAdaptationLiteratureReview.pdf.
  27. Grothmann, T., & Patt, A. (2005). Adaptive capacity and human cognition. Global Environmental Change, 15(3), 199–213.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2005.01.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2014). Climate change 2014: Synthesis report. In Core Writing Team, R. K. Pachauri & L. A. Meyer (Eds.), Contribution of working groups i, ii and iii to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Geneva, Switzerland: IPCC. ISBN 9789291691432.Google Scholar
  29. Lazarus, R. S. (1984). On the primacy of cognition. American Psychologist, 39(2), 124–129.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.39.2.124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lefevre, C., Bruine de Bruin, W., Taylor, A., Dessai, S., Kovats, S., & Fischhoff, B. (2015). Heat protection behaviors and positive affect about heat during the 2013 heat wave in the United Kingdom. Social Science and Medicine, 128, 282–289.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.01.029.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ojala, M. (2012). How do children cope with global climate change? Coping strategies, engagement, and well-being. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 32(3), 225–233.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.02.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Özdem, Y., Dal, B., Öztürk, N., Sönmez, D., & Alper, U. (2014). What is that thing called climate change? An investigation into the understanding of climate change by seventh-grade students. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 23(4), 294–313.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10382046.2014.946323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Prüss-Ustün, A., Wolf, J., Corvalán, C., Bos, R., & Neira, M. (2016). Preventing disease through healthy environments: A global assessment of the burden of disease from environmental risks. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization. ISBN 9789241565196.Google Scholar
  34. Reser, J. P., Bradley, G. L., & Ellul, M. E. (2012). Coping with climate change: bringing psychological adaptation in from the cold. In B. Molinelli & V. Grimaldo (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of coping: Psychology of emotions, motivations, and actions (pp. 1–34). New York, USA: Nova Science.Google Scholar
  35. Santos, F. D. (2006). Problemática das alterações climáticas no início do século XXI. In F. D. Santos & P. Miranda (Eds.), Alterações climáticas em Portugal: cenários, impactos e medidas de adaptação - Projeto SIAM II. Lisboa, Portugal: Gradiva.Google Scholar
  36. Schwarzer, R. (1992). Self-efficacy in the adoption and maintenance of health behaviors: Theoretical approaches and a new model. In R. Schwarzer (Ed.), Self-efficacy: Thought control of action (pp. 217–243). Washington, DC, USA: Hemisphere.Google Scholar
  37. Slovic, P., Finucane, M. L., Peters, E., & MacGregor, D. G. (2004). Risk as analysis and risk as feelings: Some thoughts about affect, reason, risk, and rationality. Risk Analysis, 24(2), 311–322.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00433.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Spence, A., Pidgeon, N., & Uzzell, D. (2009). Climate change: Psychology’s contribution. The Psychologist, 21, 108–111. ISSN: 09528229.Google Scholar
  39. Spence, A., Poortinga, W., & Pidgeon, N. (2012). The psychological distance of climate change. Risk Analysis, 32(6), 957–972. ISSN 1539-6924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Swim, J. K., Stern, P. C., Doherty, T. J., Clayton, S., Reser, J. P., Weber, E. U., et al. (2011). Psychology’s contributions to understanding and addressing global climate change. American Psychologist, 66(4), 241–250.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tomaka, J., Blascovich, J., Kelsey, R. M., & Leitten, C. L. (1993). Subjective, physiological, and behavioral effects of threat and challenge appraisal. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(2), 248–260.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.65.2.248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Tomaka, J., Blascovich, J., Kibler, J., & Ernst, J. M. (1997). Cognitive and physiological antecedents of threat and challenge appraisal. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(1), 63–72.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.73.1.63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5(2), 207–232.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(73)90033-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Zajonc, R. B. (1984). On the primacy of affect. American Psychologist, 39(2), 117–123.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.39.2.117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Samuel Domingos
    • 1
  • Rui Gaspar
    • 2
    • 3
  • João Marôco
    • 1
  • Rita Beja
    • 1
  1. 1.William James Center for Research, ISPA-Instituto UniversitárioLisbonPortugal
  2. 2.Universidade do Algarve, Departamento de Psicologia e Ciências da Educação, Faculdade de Ciências Humanas e Sociais, Campus de GambelasFaroPortugal
  3. 3.Catolica Research Centre for Psychological, Family and Social Wellbeing (CRC-W), Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Universidade Católica PortuguesaLisbonPortugal

Personalised recommendations