Environmental Justice and Climate Change Adaptation in the Context of Risk Society

  • Maria Eduarda Medeiros da Silveira
  • Solange Buchele de S. Thiago
  • Larissa Pereira Cipoli Ribeiro
  • Ana Clara Medeiros da Silveira
  • José Baltazar Salgueirinho Osório de Andrade GuerraEmail author
  • Jéssica Garcia
  • Sthefanie Aguiar da Silva
Part of the Climate Change Management book series (CCM)


The latest surveys show the importance of Environmental Justice in order to guarantee the rights of marginalized parts of society to live in a healthier environment and to provide equal treatment for people regardless of race, nationality, gender or income. Following the context of risk society, this article provides a literature review that aims to identify the importance of environmental justice in achieving climate change adaptation. Through a qualitative and interdisciplinary approach, the research illustrates how interconnected climate change adaptation, risk societies and environmental justice are, in the interest of drawing attention of stakeholders and decision-makers to the distinct levels of impact that climate change has on the various sectors of society. Overall, the study emphasize that climate change adaptation strategies can often be discriminatory. By having parts of the society vulnerable to climate change impacts, the pathway towards adaptation will never be fully reached. The course to prevent those issues from being even more aggravated is to address climate change adaptation in a way that enables to benefit all groups of society by providing the information and resources for the adaptation of those living in the margins.


Environmental justice Climate change adaptation Risk society 



This study was conducted by the Research Centre on Energy Efficiency and Sustainability (Greens), from the University of Southern Santa Catarina (Unisul), in the context of the projects: Building Resilience in a Dynamic Global Economy: Complexity across scales in the Brazilian Food-Water-Energy Nexus (BRIDGE)), funded by the Newton Fund, Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa e Inovação do Estado de Santa Catarina (FAPESC) and the Research Councils United Kingdom (RCUK).


  1. Adger, W. N., Paavola, J., & Huq, S. (2006). Toward justice in adaptation to climate change. In N. Adger (Ed.), Fairness in adaptation to climate change (pp. 1–19). Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  2. Alario, M. V., & Freudenburg, W. R. (2003). The paradoxes of modernity: Scientific advances, environmental problems, and risks to the social fabric? Sociological Forum, 18.
  3. Alario, M. V., & Freudenburg, W. R. (2010). Environmental risks and environmental justice, or how titanic risks are not so Titanic after all. Sociological Inquiry, 80, 500–512. Scholar
  4. Aspinall, R. W. (2016). Children’s rights in a risk society: The case of schooling in Japan. Japan Forum, 28, 135–154. Scholar
  5. Beck, U. (1996). Risk society and the provident state. In: S. Lash, B. Szerszynski, & B. Wynne (Eds.), Risk, environment & modernity: Towards a new ecology. London: SAGE Publications Ltd. ISBN 080397937 1. ISBN 0 8039 7938X (pbk).Google Scholar
  6. Beck, U. (2006). Living in the world risk society. Economy and Society, 35, 329–345. Scholar
  7. Beck, U. (2010). Sociedade de Risco: rumo a uma outra modernidade. São Paulo: Editora 34 Ltda.Google Scholar
  8. Bergkamp, L. (2016). The concept of risk society as a model for risk regulation—Its hidden and not so hidden ambitions, side effects, and risks. Journal of Risk Research. Scholar
  9. Bizikova, L., Habtezion, Z., Bellali, J., Diakhite, M. M., & Pintér, L. (2009). Vulnerability and climate change impact assessments for adaptation. Available at Accessed on December 15, 2016.
  10. Blowers, A. (1997). Environmental policy: Ecological modernisation or the risk society? Urban Studies, 34, 845–871. Scholar
  11. Bohle, H. G., Downing, T. E., & Watts, M. J. (1994). Climate change and social vulnerability: Toward a sociology and geography of food insecurity. Global Environmental Change, 4(1), 37–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Boone, C. G., Fragkias, M., Buckley, G. L., & Grove, J. M. (2014). A long view of polluting industry and environmental justice in Baltimore. Cities, 36, 41–49. Scholar
  13. Bravo, M. A., Anthopolos, R., Bell, M. L., & Miranda, M. L. (2016). Racial isolation and exposure to airborne particulate matter and ozone in understudied US populations: Environmental justice applications of downscaled numerical model output. Environment International, 92–93, 247–255. Scholar
  14. Briska, I. (2013). Ecological Risks in the context of sustainable development: Statistical figres in Latvia. European Integration Studies, 7, 18–27. Scholar
  15. Bullard, R. D. (2001). Environmental justice in the 21st century: Race still matters. Phylon, 49, 151–171. Scholar
  16. Bullard, R. D., & Johnson, G. S. (2000). Environmental justice: Grassroots activism and its impact on public policy decision making. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 555–578. Scholar
  17. Burney, J., Cesano, D., Russell, J., La Rovere, E. L., Corral, T., Coelho, N. S., et al. (2014). Climate change adaptation strategies for smallholder farmers in the Brazilian Sertão. Climatic Change, 126(1–2), 45–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cleere, R. (2016). Environmental racism and the movement for black lives: Grassroots power in the 21st century (p. 140). Paper: Pomona Senior Theses.Google Scholar
  19. Davies, A. R. (2006). Environmental justice as subtext or omission: Examining discourses of anti-incineration campaigning in Ireland. Geoforum, 37, 708–724. Scholar
  20. Deng, H., & Chen, Y. (2017). Influences of recent climate change and human activities on water storage variations in Central Asia. Journal of Hydrology, 544, 46–57. Scholar
  21. EPA—United States Environmental Protection Agency. (1964). Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.Google Scholar
  22. European Comission. (2016). Adaptation to climate change. European Comission Website.Google Scholar
  23. Fraser, N. (2007). Re-framing justice in a globalizing world. In T. Lovel (Ed.), (Mis)recognition, social inequality and social justice (pp. 17–35). London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar
  24. Fuentes-George, K. (2013). Neoliberalism, environmental justice, and the convention on biological diversity: How problematizing the commodification of nature affects regime effectiveness. Global Environmental Politics, 13, 144–163. Scholar
  25. Füssel, H. M., & Klein, R. J. (2006). Climate change vulnerability assessments: An evolution of conceptual thinking. Climatic Change, 75(3), 301–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gauna, E. (2012). Environmental law, civil rights and sustainability: Three frameworks for environmental justice. Journal of Environmental and Sustainability Law, 19, 34–59.Google Scholar
  27. Giddens, A. (2000). Runaway world: How globalization is reshaping our lives (124p). London: Routledge. ISBN-13: 978-0415944878.Google Scholar
  28. Gordon, E. L. (2012). History of the modern environmental movement in America. American Center—Environment.Google Scholar
  29. Heinz, T. L. (2005). From civil rights to environmental rights: Constructions of race, community, and identity in three African American newspapers’ coverage of the environmental justice movement. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 29, 47–65. Scholar
  30. Helfand, G. E., & Peyton, L. J. (1999). A conceptual model of environmental justice. Social Science Quarterly, 80, 68–83.Google Scholar
  31. IFAD. (n.d.). Climate change: Building the resilience of poor rural communities. IFAD documents.Google Scholar
  32. Ikeme, J. (2003). Equity, environmental justice and sustainability: Incomplete approaches in climate change politics. Global Environmental Change, 13, 195–206. Scholar
  33. IPCC. (2007). Climate change 2007: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. In M. L. Parry, O. F. Canziani, J. P. Palutikof, P. J. van der Linden, & C. E. Hanson (Eds.), Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (976 pp.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  34. IPCC. (2014a). Climate change 2014: Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part A: Global and sectoral aspects. In Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (1132 pp.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  35. IPCC. (2014b). Climate change 2014: Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part B: Regional aspects. In Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (p. 688). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  36. IPCC. (2014c). Climate change 2014: Mitigation of climate change. In Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Jones, M. R., Diez-Roux, A. V., Hajat, A., Kershaw, K. N., O’Neill, M. S., Gualiar, E., et al. (2014). Race/ethnicity, residential segregation, and exposure to ambient air pollution: The multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis (MESA). American Journal of Public Health, 104, 2130–2137. Scholar
  38. Jørstad, H., & Webersik, C. (2016). Vulnerability to climate change and adaptation strategies of local communities in Malawi: Experiences of women fish-processing groups in the Lake Chilwa Basin. Earth System Dynamics, 7, 977–989. Scholar
  39. Kaperson, R. E., Renn, O., & Slovic, P. (1988). The social amplification of risk: A conceptual framework. Society for Risk Analysis, 8, 177–187.$06.00/1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kurtz, H. E. (2003). Scale frames and counter-scale frames: Constructing the problem of environmental injustice. Political Geography, 22, 887–916. Scholar
  41. Larsen, K., Gunnarsson-Östling, U., & Westholm, E. (2011). Environmental scenarios and local-global level of community engagement: Environmental justice, jams, institutions and innovation. Futures, 43, 413–423. Scholar
  42. Lau, L. C., Lee, K. T., & Mohamed, A. R. (2012). Global warming mitigation and renewable energy policy development from the Kyoto Protocol to the Copenhagen Accord—A comment. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16, 5280–5284. Scholar
  43. Legarda, A. A., & Buendia, M. P. (2011). Environmental justice. The State of the Art. Revista Internacional de Sociologia, 69, 627–648.
  44. Li, Q., Zhang, C., Shen, Y., Jia, W., & Li, J. (2016). Quantitative assessment of the relative roles of climate change and human activities in desertification processes on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau based on net primary productivity. CATENA, 147, 789–796. Scholar
  45. Lim, B., Spanger-Siegfried, E., Burton, I., Malone, E. L., & Huq, S. (2005). Adaptation policy frameworks for climate change: Developing strategies. United Nations Development Programme: Policies and Measures.Google Scholar
  46. Maantay, J., & Maroko, A. (2009). Mapping urban risk: Flood hazards, race, & environmental justice in New York. Applied Geography, 29, 111–124. Scholar
  47. Maroko, A. R. (2012). Using air dispersion modeling and proximity analysis to assess chronic exposure to fine particulate matter and environmental justice in New York City. Applied Geography, 34, 533–547. Scholar
  48. Massey, R. (2004). Environmental justice: income, race, and health. Global Development and Environment Institute, Tufts University.Google Scholar
  49. Mathur, A., & van Aalst, M. K. (2004). An adaptation mosaic: A sample of the emerging World Bank work in climate change adaptation. World Bank Global Climate Change Team.Google Scholar
  50. Matten, D. (2004). The impact of the risk society thesis on environmental politics and management in a globalizing economy—Principles, proficiency, perspectives. Journal of Risk Research, 7, 377–398. Scholar
  51. Mayer, S. (2016). Science in the World Risk Society: Risk, the novel, and global climate change. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik, 64, 207–221. Scholar
  52. McBride, D. (2016). Urban Power and community development in the ‘World Risk Society’: Post-Hurricane Katrina New Orleans (USA). Perspectives on Global Development and Technology, 15, 128–142. Scholar
  53. McCarthy, J., & Prudham, S. (2004). Neoliberal nature and the nature of neoliberalism. Geoforum, 35, 275–283. Scholar
  54. Mendelsohn, R., Dinar, A., & Williams, L. (2006). The distributional impact of climate change on rich and poor countries. Environment and Development Economics, 11(02), 159–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Mitchell, G., & Norman, P. (2012). Longitudinal environmental justice analysis: Co-evolution of environmental quality and deprivation in England, 1960–2007. Geoforum, 43, 44–57. Scholar
  56. Moss, R. H., Brenkert, A. L, & Malone, E. L. (2001). Vulnerability to climate change: A quantitative approach. Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy Under Contract DE-AC06-76RLO 1830.Google Scholar
  57. Mythen, G. (2015). The problem of governance in the Risk Society: Envisaging strategies, managing not-knowing. In: Risk Governance, 43–57. Scholar
  58. Navickė, J. (2015). Between a risk society and a welfare state: Social risk resilience and vulnerability to poverty in Lithuania. Socialinė politika, 10, 95–109. Scholar
  59. Neumayer, E. (2000). In defence of historical accountability for greenhouse gas emissions. Ecological Economics, 33, 185–192. Scholar
  60. Obermaier, M., Maroun, M. R., Kligerman, D. C., La Rovere, E. L., Cesano D., Corral, T., et al. (2009). Adaptation to climate change in Brazil: The Pintadas pilot project and multiplication of best practice examples through dissemination and communication networks [56kB]. Proceedings of RIO, 9.Google Scholar
  61. Okereke, C. (2006). Global environmental sustainability: Intragenerational equity and conceptions of justice in multilateral environmental regimes. Geoforum, 37, 725–738. Scholar
  62. Olmos, S. (2001). Vulnerability and adaptation to climate change: Concepts, issues, assessment methods. Climate Change Knowledge Network—Foundation Paper.Google Scholar
  63. Padilla, E., & Serrano, A. (2006). Inequality in CO2 emissions across countries and its relationship with income inequality: A distributive approach. Energy policy, 34(14), 1762–1772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Pearce, J., & Kingham, S. (2008). Environmental inequalities in New Zealand: A national study of air pollution and environmental justice. Geoforum, 39, 980–993. Scholar
  65. Power, A., & Elster, J. (2005). Environmental issues and human behaviour in low-income areas in the UK: A report to the Economic and Social Research Council (37p). Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion. Available at Accessed on July 08, 2016.
  66. Proag, V. (2014). The concept of vulnerability and resilience. Procedia Economics and Finance, 8, 369–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Ranco, D. J., O’Neill, C. A., Donatuto, J., & Harper, B. L. (2011). Environmental justice, American Indians and the cultural dilemma: Developing environmental management for tribal health and well-being. Environmental Justice, 4, 221–230. Scholar
  68. Reese, G., & Jacob, L. (2015). Principles of environmental justice and pro environmental action: A two-step process model of moral anger and responsibility to act. Environmental Science & Policy, 51, 88–94. Scholar
  69. Ribeiro, W. C. (2010). Impactos das mudanças climáticas em cidades no Brasil. Parceriasestratégicas, 13(27), 297–322.Google Scholar
  70. Roberts, R. G. (1998). Environmental justice and community empowerment: Learning from the civil rights movement. American University Law Review, 48, 229–269.Google Scholar
  71. Schlosberg, D. (2004). Reconceiving environmental justice: Global movements and political theories. Environmental Politics, 13, 517–540. Scholar
  72. Scott, M., Gupta, S., Jauregui, E., Nwafor, J., Satterthwaite, D., Wannasinghe, Y. A. D. S., et al. (2001). Human settlements, energy and industry. Climate change 2001: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability (pp. 381–416). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  73. Shilling, F. M., London, J. K., & Liévanos, R. S. (2009). Marginalization by collaboration: Environmental justice as a third party in a beyond CALFED. Environmental Science & Policy, 12, 694–709. Scholar
  74. Short, J. F., Jr. (1984). The social fabric at risk: Toward the social transformation of risk. American Sociological Review, 49, 711–725. Scholar
  75. Shrader-Frechette, K. (2005). Environmental justice: Creating equality, reclaiming democracy. Environmental Ethics and Science Policy Series (288p). ISBN: 9780195183573.Google Scholar
  76. Teelucksingh, C., Poland, B., Buse, C., & Hasdell, R. (2016). Environmental justice in the environmental non-governmental organization landscape of Toronto (Canada). Canadian Geographer, 1–13. Scholar
  77. Todd, H., & Zografos, C. (2005). Justice for the environment: developing a set of indicators of environmental justice for Scotland. Environmental Values, 14, 483–501. Scholar
  78. Truelove, H. B., & Parks, C. (2012). Perceptions of behaviors that cause and mitigate global warming and intentions to perform these behaviors. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 32, 246–259. Scholar
  79. UNEP. (2016a). Climate Change—Introduction. UNEP Website.Google Scholar
  80. UNEP. (2016b). Knowledge Support and Policy Integration. UNEP Website.Google Scholar
  81. UNEP. (2016c). Climate change Factsheet. UN Environment. UNEP Website.Google Scholar
  82. United Nations. (1992). United Nations framework convention on climate change. New York: UNFCCC.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maria Eduarda Medeiros da Silveira
    • 1
  • Solange Buchele de S. Thiago
    • 1
  • Larissa Pereira Cipoli Ribeiro
    • 1
  • Ana Clara Medeiros da Silveira
    • 1
  • José Baltazar Salgueirinho Osório de Andrade Guerra
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jéssica Garcia
    • 1
  • Sthefanie Aguiar da Silva
    • 1
  1. 1.Universidade do Sul de Santa CatarinaFlorianópolisBrazil

Personalised recommendations