Advertisement

Outlining Community Perceptions of Climate Change in Local Adaptation Strategies Development: The Case of ClimAdaPT.Local

  • Luísa Schmidt
  • Adriana Ferreira Alves
  • Susana Valente
  • João Morais Mourato
Chapter
Part of the Climate Change Management book series (CCM)

Abstract

ClimAdaPT.Local’s goal was the development of 26 Municipal Adaptation Strategies for Climate Change (EMAAC). The project aimed to increase the capacity of these municipalities to incorporate adaptation to Climate Change (CC) in their planning instruments. To do so, several methodologies and tools were specifically developed. One of these, the local stakeholder engagement strategy, constitutes an innovation as far as the development of these strategies in Portugal is concerned. This paper focuses on this stakeholder engagement process and its achievements. ClimAdaPT.Local’s stakeholder engagement was workshop based. These were put in place in order to understand perceptions of CC, its impacts, local risks, but also survey potential inputs into the ongoing EMAAC development. Each session comprised several discussion tables, intending to: (i) obtain a global reference framework on perceptions and sensitivity to CC at the local level; (ii) complement the vulnerabilities assessment made by the technical staff from each municipality; (iii) inform, adjust and optimise the local adaptation strategies. In addition, stakeholders were asked to share their visions of the future, namely how CC and local territorial identity will be articulated in the near, and not so near, future. The analytical findings encompassed in paper refer to point (i). All in all, in Portugal, there is a widespread perception that CC is happening, in particular among social groups that engage in activities such as agriculture and fishing. And despite being considered to pose a threat, CC is, at the same time, broadly perceived as a window of opportunity to put in place measures that improve local living conditions.

Keywords

Climate change Local adaptation Community perceptions Stakeholders Adaptation strategies Portugal ClimAdaPT.Local 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank the Consortium of ClimAdaPT.Local led by professor Filipe Duarte Santos and Gil Penha-Lopes (CCIAM–FCUL) and EEA Grants, the Portuguese Carbon Fund and also the Agência Portuguesa do Ambiente (APA).

References

  1. Almeida, J. F. (Ed.). (2000). Os Portugueses e o Ambiente: I Inquérito Nacional às Representações e Práticas dos Portugueses sobre o Ambiente. Oeiras: Celta Editora.Google Scholar
  2. Almeida, J. F. (Ed.). (2004). Os Portugueses e o Ambiente: II Inquérito Nacional às Representações e Práticas dos Portugueses sobre o Ambiente. Oeiras: Celta Editora.Google Scholar
  3. Capstick, S., Whitmarsh, L., Poortinga, W., Pidgeon, N., & Upham, P. (2015). International trends in public perceptions of CC over the past quarter century. WIREs CC, 6, 35–61.  https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carvalho, A. (2011). Conclusões. In A. Carvalho (Ed.), As Alterações Climáticas, os Media e os Cidadãos (pp. 223–240). Coimbra: Grácio Editor.Google Scholar
  5. Carvalho and Pereira. (2008). See Schmidt and Delicado 2014 (p. 123).Google Scholar
  6. Dunlap, R. (1998). Lay perceptions of global risk—Public views of global warming in cross-national context. International Sociology, 13(4).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dunlap. (2008). See Schmidt and Delicado, 2014 (p. 123).Google Scholar
  8. Erev and Barron, see Weber 2010 (p. 333).Google Scholar
  9. Grothmann, T., Prutsch, A., Schauser, I., McCallum, S., & Rob, S. (2014). Identify and cooperate with relevant stakeholders. In A. Prutsch, T. Grothmann, S. McCallum, I. Schauser & S. Rob (Eds.), CC adaptation manual: Lessons learned from European and other industrialised countries (pp. 119–152). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Guerra, J., Travassos, D., Schmidt, L., & Ferrão, J. (2017). Monitorização ClimAdaPT.Local: Relatório Final. Projecto ClimAdaPT.Local. Instituto de Ciências Sociais da Universidade de Lisboa.Google Scholar
  11. Hertwig. (2004). See Weber 2010 (p. 333).Google Scholar
  12. Hulme, M. (2009). Why we disagree about CC: Understanding controversy, inaction and opportunity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Leiserowitz. (2006). See Schmidt and Delicado 2014 (p. 123).Google Scholar
  14. Lockwood, M. (2010). Good governance for terrestrial protected areas: A framework, principles and performance outcomes. Journal of Environmental Management, 91(3), 754–766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lorenzoni, I., Nicholson-Cole, S., & Whitmarsh, L. (2007). Barriers perceived to engaging with CC among the UK public and their policy implications. Global Environmental Change, 17, 445–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Miranda, P. M. A., Valente, M. A., Tomé, A. R., Trigo, R., Coelho, M. F., Aguiar, A., et al. (2006) O clima de Portugal nos séculos XX e XXI. In F. D. Santos & P. Miranda (Eds.), Alterações Climáticas em Portugal: Cenários, Impactos e Medidas d Adaptação – Projecto SIAM II (p. 506). Gradiva, Lisboa.Google Scholar
  17. Reser, J. P., Bradley, G. L., & Ellul, M. C. (2014). Encountering CC: “seeing” is more than “believing”. WIREs CC, 5:521–537.  https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.286.
  18. Reyes-García, V., Fernández-Llamazares, A., Guèze, M., Garcés, A., Mallo, M., Vila-Gómez, M., et al. (2016). Local indicators of CC: the potential contribution of local knowledge to climate research. WIREs CC, 7, 109–124.  https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Santos, F. D. (2012). Alterações Globais: Os desafios e os riscos presentes e futuros. Lisboa: Fundação Francisco Manuel dos Santos.Google Scholar
  20. Santos, F. D., Forbes, K., & Moita, R. (Eds.). (2002). CC in Portugal: scenarios. Gradiva, Lisboa: Impacts and Adaptation Measures—SIAM Project.Google Scholar
  21. Schmidt, L. (2008) ‘Comunicar a Ciência: o papel dos media e os problemas científico-ambientais’. Ciência e Cidadania - Homenagem a Bento de Jesus Caraça (pp. 85–112). Lisboa: Imprensa de Ciências Sociais.Google Scholar
  22. Schmidt, L., & Delicado, A. (2014). Alterações climáticas na opinião pública. In L. Schmidt & A. Delicado (Eds.), Ambiente, Alterações Climáticas, Alimentação e Energia: a Opinião dos Portugueses no Contexto Europeu (pp. 113–143). Lisboa: Imprensa de Ciências Sociais.Google Scholar
  23. Schmidt, L., Delicado, A., & Fonseca, S. (2015a). Consulta mundial sobre clima e energia: a opinião dos portugueses. Policy Brief – Observa, Edição ICS – Instituto de Ciências Sociais da Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa.Google Scholar
  24. Schmidt, L., Ferrão, J., Guerra, J., Mourato, J. M., Alves, A. F., Baixinho, A., et al. (2015b). Adaptação às alterações climáticas nos municípios: um processo de aprendizagem social. In J. Ferrão & A. Horta (Eds.), Ambiente, Território e Sociedade: Novas Agendas de Investigação (pp. 15–131). Lisboa: Imprensa de Ciências Sociais. ISBN 978-972-671-363-0.Google Scholar
  25. Schmidt, L., Prista, P., Saraiva, T., O’Riordan, T., & Gomes, C. (2013). Adapting governance for coastal change in Portugal. Land Use Policy, 31, 314–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Spence, A., Poortinga, W., & Pidgeon, N. (2012). The psychological distance of CC. Risk Analysis, 32(6), 957–972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. UNDP. (2010). Designing CC adaptation initiatives: A UNDP toolkit for practitioners. NY: United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). Available at: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/951013_Toolkit%20for%20Designing%20Climate%20Change%20Adaptation%20Initiatives.pdf.
  28. Weber, E. U. (2010). What shapes perceptions of CC? WIREs CC, 1, 332–342.Google Scholar
  29. Weber, E. U. (2016). What shapes perceptions of CC? New research since 2010. WIREs CC, 7, 125–134.  https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Weber, E. U., Shafir, S., & Blais, A.-R. (2004). Predicting risk sensitivity in humans and lower animals: Risk as variance or coefficient of variation. Psychological Review, 111(2), 430–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Whitmarsh, L. (2008). Are flood victims more concerned about CC than other people? The role of direct experience in risk perception and behavioural response. Journal of Risk Research, 11(3), 351–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Website consulted: www.ClimAdaPT-local.pt.

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Luísa Schmidt
    • 1
  • Adriana Ferreira Alves
    • 1
  • Susana Valente
    • 2
  • João Morais Mourato
    • 1
  1. 1.Instituto de Ciências Sociais da Universidade de LisboaLisbonPortugal
  2. 2.Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade de LisboaCenter for Ecology, Evolution & Environmental Changes (CE3C)Campo GrandePortugal

Personalised recommendations