Promoting Private Sector Engagement in Climate Change Adaptation and Flood Resilience—A Case Study of Innovative Approaches Applied by MSMEs in Mumbai, India

Chapter
Part of the Climate Change Management book series (CCM)

Abstract

Recurring heavy precipitation and flooding cause extensive loss and damage in cities like Mumbai. Among the worst affected are Micro Small and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs), which suffer damage to physical structure and loss of business. These costs amount to millions of dollars and are borne by MSMEs in the absence of adequate insurance protection. With limited flood management services and inadequate infrastructure provided by the municipal authorities, MSMEs are implementing their own temporary measures for flood protection. These are often ineffective during heavy precipitation and create risks of maladaptation. As climate change is expected to worsen the risk of flash floods with changes in intensity, frequency and duration of rainfall, MSMEs need long-term solutions to build their adaptive capacity and resilience. This paper describes the business case for private sector engagement in flood risk reduction and climate adaptation from the perspective of MSMEs in Mumbai. Based on extensive field surveys of MSMEs located in industrial estates, the paper discusses the implications of floods for MSMEs. Moreover, the authors present a framework developed for MSMEs to make informed risk reduction and adaptation decisions and implement effective structural and non-structural measures to minimize the recurring adverse impacts of floods on their business operations.

Keywords

Climate change adaptation Private sector engagement Flood resilience Mumbai India 

Bibliography

  1. Agrawala, S., Carraro, M., Kingsmill, N., Lanzi, E., & Prudent-richard, G. (2011). Private Sector Engagement in Adaptation to Climate Change. OECD Environment Working Paper No 39.Google Scholar
  2. Berkhout, F., Hertin, J., & Gann, D. M. (2006). Learning to adapt: Organisational adaptation to climate change impacts. Climatic Change, 78(1), 135–156.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-006-9089-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dougherty-Choux, L., Terpstra, P., Kurukulasuriya, P., & Kammila, S. (2015). Adapting from the ground up. UNDP: WRI.Google Scholar
  4. Field, C. B., Barros, V., Stocker, T. F., Qin, D., Dokken, D. J., Ebi, K. L., et al. (2012). Managing the risks of extreme events and disasters to advance climate change adaption. A Special Report of Working Groups I and II of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  5. GIZ, & SIDBI. (2013). Facing the impacts of climate change: Indian MSMEs and adaptation. New Delhi.Google Scholar
  6. Haigh, N., & Griffiths, A. (2012). Surprise as a catalyst for including climatic change in the strategic environment. Business & Society, 51(1), 89–120. http://doi.org/10.1177/0007650311427425.
  7. Hussain, I., Farooq, Z., Akhtar, W. (2012). SMEs development and failure avoidance in developing countries through public private partnership. African Journal of Business Management, 6(4), 1581–1589.Google Scholar
  8. IPCC. (2014). Climate change 2014: Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part B: Regional aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. In V. R. Barros, C. B. Field, D. J. Dokken, M. D. Mastrandrea, K. J. Mach, T. E. Bilir (Eds.), New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and 688 pp.Google Scholar
  9. Kushnir, K., Mirmulstein, M. L., & Ramalho, R. (2010). Micro, small, and medium enterprises around the world: How many are there, and what affects the count? World Bank/IFCGoogle Scholar
  10. Lempert, R. J., & Groves, D. G. (2010). Technological forecasting & social change identifying and evaluating robust adaptive policy responses to climate change for water management agencies in the American west. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 77(6), 960–974.Google Scholar
  11. Linnenluecke, M. K., Griffiths, A., & Winn, M. (2012). Extreme weather events and the critical importance of anticipatory adaptation and organizational resilience in responding to impacts. Business Strategy and the Environment, 21(1), 17–32.  https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. MCGM. (2014). Greater Mumbai City Development Plan 2005 to 2025. Available at http://www.mcgm.gov.in/irj/portal/anonymous?NavigationTarget=navurl://095e1c7b9486b1423b881dce8b106978.
  13. MCGM. (2015). Flood preparedness guidelines 2014. Disaster Management Unit, Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai.Google Scholar
  14. Nicholls, R. J., Hanson, S., Herweijer, C., Patmore, N., Hallegatte, S., Corfee-Morlot, J., et al. (2008). Ranking port cities with high exposure and vulnerability to climate extremes: Exposure estimates (Environment Working Papers No. 1). Paris.Google Scholar
  15. Okereke, C., Wittneben, B., & Bowen, F. (2012). Climate change: Challenging business, transforming politics. Business and Society, 51(1), 7–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Patankar, A., & Patwardhan, A. (2016). Estimating the uninsured losses due to extreme weather events and implications for informal sector vulnerability: A case study of Mumbai, India. Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, 80(1), 285–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Pauw, P., & Pegels, A. (2013). Private sector engagement in climate change adaptation in least developed countries: An exploration. Climate and Development, 5(4), 257–267.Google Scholar
  18. Ranger, N., Hallegatte, S., Bhattacharya, S., et al. (2011). Climatic Change, 104, 139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Schiller, A., de Sherbinin, A., Hsieh, W.-H., Pulsipher, A. (2007). The vulnerability of global cities to climate hazards. George Perkins Marsh Institute, Clark University, Center for International Earth Science Information Network (CIESIN), Columbia University.Google Scholar
  20. UNEP. (2016). The adaptation finance gap report 2016. Nairobi, Kenya: United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP).Google Scholar
  21. UN-HABITAT. (2016). World Cities Report. UN-Habitat HS Number: HS/038/16E No of Pages: 262 ISBN Series Number: 978-92-1-133395-4.Google Scholar
  22. United Nations Global Compact (UNGC). (2015). The business case for responsible corporate adaptation: Strengthening private sector and community resilience a caring for climate report.Google Scholar
  23. Wedawatta, G., Ingirige, B., & Amaratunga, D. (2010). Building up resilience of construction sector SMEs and their supply chains to extreme weather events. International Journal of Strategic Property Management, 14(4), 362–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.UNEP DTU PartnershipCopenhangen ØDenmark
  2. 2.MP Ensystems Advisory Pvt. Ltd.Dwarka, MumbaiIndia

Personalised recommendations