Abstract
In this paper we introduce the idea of solving problems by simulation with didactical intention. Based on this idea, we analyse the way we prepare the teachers to teach solving probability problems by simulation, in distinguishing whether the teaching is offered to prospective elementary teachers or secondary school teachers. The process of solving probability problems is seen as an inquiry process, which uses simulation as a resolution method with heuristic content, so that the preparation of teacher is then based on this approach. Therefore, prospective teachers should have the opportunities to learn about probability problems, about the process of solving probability problems, and about students’ resolution process by observing the work of other classmates.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407.
Bernoulli, J. (1987). Ars conjectandi- 4ème partie. Rouen: IREM. (Original work published in 1713).
Borrás, E. (1996). Algunos modelos de simulación aleatoria y su aplicación a la enseñanza del azar (Some random simulation models and their application to the teaching of chance). Unpublished Ph.D. Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya. Barcelona, Spain.
Borovcnik, M., & Kapadia, R. (2014a). A historical and philosophical perspective on probability. In E. J. Chernoff & B. Sriraman (Eds.), Probabilistic thinking: Presenting plural perspectives. (pp. 7–34). Berlin: Springer.
Borovcnik, M., & Kapadia, R. (2014b). From puzzles and paradoxes to concepts in probability. In E. J. Chernoff & B. Sriraman (Eds.), Probabilistic thinking: Presenting plural perspectives (pp. 35–73). Berlin: Springer.
Chaput, B., Girard, J. C., & Henry, M. (2011). Frequentist approach: modelling and simulation in statistics and probability teaching. In C. Batanero, G. Burril, & C. Reading (Eds.), Teaching statistics in school mathematics-challenges for teaching and teacher education. A Joint ICMI/IASE study (pp. 85–95). New York: Springer.
Chernoff, E., & Sriraman, B. (2014). Probabilistic thinking: Presenting plural perspectives. Berlin: Springer.
DeGroot, M. H., & Schervish, M. J. (2012). Probability and statistics (4th ed.). Menlo Park, CA: Addison Wesley.
Eichler, A., & Vogel, M. (2014). Three approaches for modelling situations with randomness. In E. J. Chernoff, & B. Sriraman, Probabilistic thinking: Presenting plural perspectives. (pp. 75–99). Berlin: Springer.
Engel, A (1975). The probabilistic abacus. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 6(1), 1–22.
Gordon, H. (2012). Discrete probability (2nd ed.). New York: Springer.
Huerta, M. P. (2015). La resolución de problemas de probabilidad con intención didáctica en la formación de maestros y profesores de matemáticas. (The probability problem solving with didactical intention in preparing teachers and mathematics teachers). In C. Fernández, M. Molina, & N. Planas (Eds.), Investigación en Educación Matemática XIX (pp. 105–119). Alicante, Spain: Spanish Society for Research in Mathematics Education.
Huerta, M. P., Cerdán, F., Lonjedo, M. A., & Edo, P. (2011). Assessing difficulties of conditional probability problems. In M. Pytlak, T. Rowland, & E. Swoboda (Eds.), Proceedings of the Seventh Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 807–817). Rzeszów, Poland: European Society for Research in Mathematics Education.
Jacobs, V. L., Lamb, L. L. C., & Philipp, R. A. (2010). Professional noticing of children’s mathematical thinking. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 41(2), 169–202.
Kilpatrick, J. (2016). Reformulating: Approaching mathematical problem solving as inquiry. In P. Felmer; E. Pehkonen, & J. Kilpatrick (2016), Posing and solving mathematical problems (pp. 69–81). New York: Springer.
Leonng, Y. H., Tay E. G., Toh, T. L., Quek, K. S., Toh, P. C., & Dindyal, J. (2016). Infusing mathematical problem solving in the mathematics curriculum: replacement units. In P. Felmer; E. Pehkonen, & J. Kilpatrick (2016), Posing and solving mathematical problems (pp. 309–325). New York: Springer.
Maaβ, K., & Doorman, M. (2013). A model for a widespread implementation of inquiry-based learning. ZDM—International Journal on Mathematics Education, 45(6), 887–899.
Martínez, M. L., & Huerta, M. P. (2015). Diseño e implementación de una situación de incertidumbre en una clase de educación infantil (Design and implementation of an uncertainty situation in a Kindergarten class). Edma 0-6: Educación matemática en la Infancia 4(1), 24–36.
Maxara, C., & Biehler, R. (2006). Students’ simulation and modelling competence after a computer-intensive elementary course in statistics and probability. In A. Rossman, & B. Chance (Eds.), Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Teaching Statistics. Salvador de Bahia, Brazil: International Statistical Institute. https://iase-web.org/documents/papers/icots7/7C1_MAXA.pdf Accessed April 14, 2017.
Pfannkuch, M., & Ziedins, I. (2014). A modelling perspective on probability. In E. J. Chernoff, & B. Sriraman, Probabilistic thinking: Presenting plural perspectives (pp. 101–115). Berlin: Springer.
Polya, G. (1957). How to solve it (2nd Edition). New Jersey: Princeton.
Puig, L. (1996). Elementos de resolución de problemas (Elements of problem solving). Granada, Spain: Comares.
Rossman, A. (2013). Interview with Mike Shaughnessy. Journal of Statistics Education, 21(1), 1–27.
Santos, M. (2012). El papel de la resolución de problemas en el desarrollo del conocimiento matemático de los profesores para la enseñanza (The role of problem solving in developing teachers’ mathematics knowledge for teaching). Cuadernos de Investigación y Formación en Educación Matemática 7(10), 151–163.
Shaughnessy, M. (1983). The psychology of inference and the teaching of probability and statistics: Two sides of the same coin? In R. W. Scholz (Ed.), Decision making under uncertainty (pp. 325–350). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Shaughnessy, J. M. (1992). Research in probability and statistics: Reflections and directions. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 465–494). New York: MacMillan.
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand. Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.
Siñeriz, L., & Puig, L. (2006). Un modelo de competencia para la resolución de problemas de construcción con regla y compás (A model of competence for solving problems of constructions with rule and compass). In J. Aymerich, & S. Macario, (Eds.), Matemáticas para el siglo XXI (pp. 323–332). Castellón de la Plana, España: Publicacions de la Universitat Jaume I.
Ulam, S. (1951). On the Monte Carlo method. Proceedings of a Second Symposium on Large-scale digital Calculating Machinery (pp. 207–212). Cambridge: Harvard Academic Press.
Von Newmann, J. (1951). Various techniques used in connection with random digits, Monte Carlo method. National Bureau of Standards Applied Math. Series 12, 36–38.
Wilson, P. S., & Heid, M. K. (Eds.). (2010). Framework for mathematical proficiency for teaching. Athens, GA: Mid-Atlantic Center for Mathematics Teaching and Learning. http://jwilson.coe.uga.edu/Situations/Framework%20Folder/111021MPT%20Framework.pdf. Accessed 15 April, 2017.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Huerta, P.M. (2018). Preparing Teachers for Teaching Probability Through Problem Solving. In: Batanero, C., Chernoff, E. (eds) Teaching and Learning Stochastics. ICME-13 Monographs. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72871-1_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72871-1_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-72870-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-72871-1
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)