Advertisement

Development and Characterization of In-situ Aluminum–Titanium Carbide Composites Prepared by Pneumatic Powder Injection Route

  • Sheetal GuptaEmail author
  • Anirban Giri
  • Saikat Adhikari
  • Vivek Srivastava
Conference paper
Part of the The Minerals, Metals & Materials Series book series (MMMS)

Abstract

High costs, consistency and scalability are the major challenges in development of metal matrix composites. To overcome these challenges, a novel process has been demonstrated in which pneumatic powder injection was used instead of the conventional mechanical stirring process. In this study, aluminum–titanium carbide particulate composites were prepared in situ by injection of mixed salt of titanium (K2TiF6-potasium titanium fluoride salt) and graphite powder through submerged lance into molten aluminum. Uniform distribution of equiaxed Al3Ti (aluminum–titanium intermetallic) particles and TiC (titanium carbide) particles were achieved depending on the reaction temperature and holding time. SEM-EDS confirmed the presence of submicron TiC particles distributed throughout the matrix. TiC particles generated in situ are thermodynamically more stable and tend to have cleaner matrix particle interfaces. More than 15% improvement in elastic modulus along with significant improvement in other mechanical properties was achieved by up to 10 wt% TiC reinforcement.

Keywords

Metal matrix composites In-situ Pneumatic powder injection Modulus TiC 

References

  1. 1.
    Report on The road ahead-automotive materials. Ducker Worldwide Research Company 2016Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Birol Y (2008) In situ synthesis of Al–TiCp composites by reacting K2TiF6 and particulate graphite in molten aluminum. J Alloy Compd 454:110–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chawla KK (1998) Metal matrix composites. In: Composite materials. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Borgonovo C, Apelian D (2011) Manufacture of aluminum nanocomposites: a critical review. Mater Sci Forum 678:1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Liu YB, Lim SC, Lu L, Lai MO (1994) Recent development in the fabrication of metal matrix-particulate composites using powder metallurgy techniques. J Mater Sci 29:999–2007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Surappa MK (2003) Aluminium matrix composites: challenges and opportunities. In: Sadhana, vol 28, Parts 1 & 2. Department of Metallurgy, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, pp 319–334Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Babalola PO, Bolu CA, Odunfa KM (2014) Development of aluminium matrix composites. Int J Eng Technol Res 2:1–11Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kadolkar PB, Watkins TR, De Hosson JTM, Kooi BJ, Dahotre NB (2007) State of residual stress in laser-deposited ceramic composite coatings on aluminum alloys. Acta Mater 55:1203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Vreeling JA, Ocelı́k V, Hamstra GA, Pei YT, De Hosson JTM (2000) In-situ microscopy investigation of failure mechanisms in Al/SiCp metal matrix composite produced by laser embedding. Scripta Mater 42:589Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Anandkumar R, Almeida A, Colaço R, Vilar R, Ocelik V, De Hosson JTM (2007) Microstructure and wear studies of laser clad Al-Si/SiC(p) composite coatings. Surf Coat Technol 201:9497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Torres B, Lieblich M, Ibáñez J, García-Escorial A (2002) Mechanical properties of some PM aluminide and silicide reinforced 2124 aluminium matrix composites. Scripta Mater 47:45CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sheetal Gupta
    • 1
    Email author
  • Anirban Giri
    • 1
  • Saikat Adhikari
    • 1
  • Vivek Srivastava
    • 2
  1. 1.Aditya Birla Science and Technology Company Private LimitedNavi MumbaiIndia
  2. 2.Hindalco Industries LimitedMumbaiIndia

Personalised recommendations