• Kevin A. Morrison


Victorian liberalism is currently undergoing reappraisal by scholars in the disciplines of literature and history. In recent years, this reconsideration of liberalism has extended to its lived dimensions. How did liberalism look and feel? How was it practiced? Yet despite the now burgeoning corpus of scholarship on the topic, only a handful of studies have addressed the implications of Victorian liberalism for intimate personal relations and none have considered the relationship of parent and child. This chapter provides an overview of liberal parenting, an introduction to John Morley, and a defense of the microhistorical approach.


Victorian liberalism Parenting Microhistory John Morley 


  1. Arneil, B. (2002). Becoming versus Being: A Critical Analysis of the Child in Liberal Theory. In D. Archard & C. M. Macleod (Eds.), The Moral and Political Status of Children (pp. 70–94). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bagehot, W. (1915). The First Edinburgh Reviewers. In R. Barrington (Ed.), The Works and Life of Walter Bagehot (Vol. 2, pp. 51–88). London: Longmans.Google Scholar
  3. Birrell, A. (1899). Collected Essays. London: Elliot Stock.Google Scholar
  4. Broughton, T. L., & Rogers, H. (Eds.). (2007). Gender and Fatherhood in the Nineteenth Century. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  5. Callan, E. (1997). Creating Citizens. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cohen, D. (2006). Household Gods: The British and Their Possessions. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Davidoff, L., & Hall, C. (1987). Family Fortunes: Men and Women of the English Middle Class, 1780–1850. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  8. Davidoff, L., Doolittle, M., Fink, J., & Holden, K. (1999). The Family Story: Blood, Contract, and Intimacy, 1830–1960. London: Longmans.Google Scholar
  9. Dever, C. (1998). Death and the Mother from Dickens to Freud: Victorian Fiction and the Anxiety of Origins. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Easley, A. (2011). Literary Celebrity, Gender, and Victorian Authorship, 1850–1914. Newark: University of Delaware Press.Google Scholar
  11. Frost, G. (2008). Victorian Childhoods. Westport: Praeger.Google Scholar
  12. Galston, W. (2002). Liberal Pluralism: The Implications of Value Pluralism for Political Theory and Practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hirst, F. W. (1927). Early Life and Letters of John Morley (Vol. 1). London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  14. Houghton, W. E. (1957). The Victorian Frame of Mind, 1830–1870. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Jenkins, M. S. (2016). Fatherhood, Authority, and British Reading Culture, 1831–1907. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Knickerbocker, F. W. C. (1943). Free Minds: John Morley and Friends. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lepore, J. (2001). Historians Who Love Too Much: Reflections on Microhistory and Biography. The Journal of American History, 88, 129–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Levi, G. (2001). On Microhistory. In P. Burke (Ed.), New Perspectives on Historical Writing (pp. 97–119). University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Locke, J. (1988). In P. Laslett (Ed.), Two Treatises of Government. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Maitland, F. W. (1906). The Life and Letters of Leslie Stephen. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
  21. Matthew, H. C. G. (1986). Gladstone, 1809–1874. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. McKnight, N. J. (1997). Suffering Mothers in Mid-Victorian Novels. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  23. McKnight, N. (Ed.). (2011). Fathers in Victorian Fiction. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Scholars Press.Google Scholar
  24. Mill, J. S. (1977). On Liberty. In J. M. Robson (Ed.), The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill (Vol. 18, pp. 212–310). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  25. Morley, J. (1866, May–October). Social Responsibilities. Macmillan’s Magazine, 18, 377–386.Google Scholar
  26. Morley, J. (1900). Studies in Literature. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  27. Morley, J. (1917). Recollections (Vol. 1). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  28. Morley, J. (1923, March 29). Last Will and Testament of John Morley. London Probate Department, Principal Registry of the Family Division.Google Scholar
  29. Morley, J. (1997). In J. Powell (Ed.), On Compromise with “Mr. Swinburne’s New Poems.”. Edinburgh: Keele University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Morrison, K. A. (2018a). A Friendship ‘Below Enthusiasm’: John Morley, George Eliot, and George Henry Lewes. George Eliot–George Henry Lewes Studies. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
  31. Morrison, K. A. (2018b). ‘Armed Thinker,’ ‘Militant Stoic’: John Morley through French Eyes. Nineteenth-Century Prose. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
  32. Nelson, C. (1995). Invisible Men: Fatherhood in Victorian Periodicals, 1850–1910. Athens: University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
  33. Nelson, C. (2007). Family Ties in Victorian England. Westport: Praeger.Google Scholar
  34. Robertson, A. W. (1995). The Language of Democracy: Political Rhetoric in the United States and Britain, 1790–1900. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.Google Scholar
  35. Rosenman, E., & Klaver, C. C. (2008). Other Mothers: Beyond the Maternal Ideal. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Sadoff, D. F. (1982). Monsters of Affection: Dickens, Eliot, and Brontë on Fatherhood. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Samuel, H. L. S., Viscount. (1945). Memoirs. London: Crescent.Google Scholar
  38. Sanders, V. (2009). The Tragi-Comedy of Victorian Fatherhood. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Seeley, J. R. (1870). Lectures and Essays. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  40. Sidgwick, H. (1884). The Method of Ethics. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  41. Spencer, H. (1854). The Art of Education. North British Review, 21, 137–171.Google Scholar
  42. Spencer, H. (1858). The Moral Discipline of Children. British Quarterly Review, 27, 383–413.Google Scholar
  43. Staebler, W. (1943). The Liberal Mind of John Morley. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Strange, J.-M. (2015). Fatherhood and the British Working Class, 1865–1914. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Thorne, B., & Yalom, M. (Eds.). (1992). Rethinking the Family: Some Feminist Questions. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Tosh, J. (1999). A Man’s Place: Masculinity and the Middle-Class Home in Victorian England. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Waters, C. (1997). Dickens and the Politics of the Family. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Willey, B. (1956). More Nineteenth-Century Studies: A Group of Honest Doubters. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Wohl, A. S. (1978). The Victorian Family: Structure and Stresses. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
  50. Yates, E. (1884). Edmund Yates: His Recollections and Experiences (Vol. 2). London: Bentley.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kevin A. Morrison
    • 1
  1. 1.Syracuse UniversitySyracuseUSA

Personalised recommendations