Abstract
The measurement of embodied carbon in buildings or building components encounters many problems of uncertainty, which are increased for life cycle measurement. The level of uncertainty for a measurement varies on a spectrum from precise knowledge to total ignorance. The most rudimentary way of measuring an uncertain variable is to use a single-value ‘best guess’. Methods that acknowledge uncertainty and give a probabilistic measurement of the variable include: a range, a three-point estimate, an empirical distribution, or a mathematical distribution.
Life cycle measurement subject to uncertainty can be represented by a tree of possible future values, or by Monte Carlo simulation of sampled future values. When measurements are probabilistic, decision makers’ choices respond to their degree of risk aversion and time preference. In situations of uncertainty, flexible strategies that adapt to unfolding events can mitigate the risk of damaging outcomes.
A worked example compares deterministic and probabilistic measurement of the embodied carbon of a construction system with reusable steel modules. The system reduces embodied carbon if the modules are reused. For the probabilistic measurement, the length of the service life of the modules and the probability of reuse are uncertain variables. The steel module system is compared with conventional reinforced concrete construction. The probabilistic approach provides additional information and understanding for decision makers.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
BCIS (Building Cost Information Service). (2006). Life expectancy of building components: Surveyors’ experiences of buildings in use. London: Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors.
Bernstein, P. L. (1996). Against the gods: The remarkable story of risk. New York: Wiley.
CILECCTA. (2013). Sustainability within the construction sector: CILECCTA – Life cycle costing and assessment (e-handbook for EC-funded collaborative research project).
Cottingham, J. (Ed.). (2013). Descartes: Meditations on first philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Deutsche Gesellschaft für Nachhaltiges Bauen (DGNB). (2009). DGNB Handbuch – Neubau Büro- und Verwaltungsgebäude (DGNB handbook – New construction of office and administration buildings). Stuttgart: Kohlhammer Druck.
Ellingham, I., & Fawcett, W. (2006). New generation whole-life costing: Property and construction decision-making under uncertainty. Oxford: Taylor & Francis.
EN 15804. (2012). Sustainability of construction works – Environmental product declarations – Core rules for the product category of building products. Berlin: Beuth Verlag.
EN 15978. (2012). Sustainability of construction works – Assessment of environmental performance of buildings – Calculation method (German version EN 15978:2011 (2012)). Berlin: Beuth Verlag.
Fawcett, W., Hughes, M., Krieg, H., Albrecht, S., & Vennström, A. (2012). Flexible strategies for long-term sustainability under uncertainty. Building Research and Information, 40(5), 545–557.
Gantner, J. (2017a). Wahrscheinlichkeitsbasierte Methode zum Erfassen von Unsicherheiten in der Ökobilanz bei Entscheidungen unter Berücksichtigung zukünftiger Ereignisse (Probability-based methods of capturing uncertainty in life cycle assessment by considering future events in decision making). PhD thesis, University of Stuttgart (to be published).
Gantner, J. (2017b). Ressourceneffizienz durch Wiederverwendung am Beispiel Modulbau (Resource efficiency through reuse using the example of modular construction). Presentation at Bau 17. Munich.
Gantner, J., Wittstock, B., et al. (2015a). EeBGuide guidance document – Part A: Products. Operational guidance for life cycle assessment studies in of the energy efficient buildings initiative. Stuttgart: Fraunhofer Verlag.
Gantner, J., Wittstock, B., et al. (2015b). EeBGuide guidance document – Part B: Buildings. Operational guidance for life cycle assessment studies in of the energy efficient buildings initiative. Stuttgart: Fraunhofer Verlag.
Gollier, C. (2001). Economics of risk and time. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hammond, G., & Jones, C. (2011). Embodied carbon: The inventory of carbon and energy. Bath: University of Bath/BSRIA.
Hellweg, S., Hofstetter, T. B., & Hungerbuhler, K. (2003). Discounting and the environment. Should current impacts be weighted differently than impacts harming future generations? International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 8, 8–18.
International Reference Life Cycle Data System (ILCD). (2010a). Handbook – General guide for life cycle assessment – Detailed guidance. Luxembourg: European Commission.
International Reference Life Cycle Data System (ILCD). (2010b). Handbook – Analysis of existing environmental impact assessment methodologies for use in life cycle assessment. Luxembourg: European Commission.
International Reference Life Cycle Data System (ILCD). (2010c). Handbook – Framework and requirements for life cycle impact assessment models and indicators. Luxembourg: European Commission.
International Reference Life Cycle Data System (ILCD). (2012). Handbook – Characterization factors of the ILCD, recommended life cycle impact assessment methods, database and supporting information. Luxembourg: European Commission.
ISO 14040. (2009). Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Principles and framework. Berlin: Beuth Verlag.
ISO 14044. (2006). Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Requirements and guidelines. Berlin: Beuth Verlag.
Jordaan, I. (2005). Decisions under uncertainty: Probabilistic analysis for engineering decisions. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (Eds.). (2000). Choices, values and frames. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Mun, J. (2006). Real options analysis (2nd ed.). Hoboken: Wiley.
Oxera Consulting. (2002). Social time preference rate for use in long-term discounting. London: UK Government: Office of the Deputy Prime Minister and Department of Environment Food and Rural Affairs.
Stern, N. H. (2008). The economics of climate change. London: The Stationery Office.
Acknowledgments
Software for probabilistic modelling of life cycle costing (LCC) and life cycle assessment (LCA), including sensitivity analysis and flexibility, was developed in the collaborative CILECCTA project (Construction Industry Life-cycle Costing and Assessment, 2009–13) (see CILECCTA 2013). It was funded by the European Community Programme FP7/2007–2013 for Research, Technological Development and Demonstration Activities under EC Grant Agreement no. 229061.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gantner, J., Fawcett, W., Ellingham, I. (2018). Probabilistic Approaches to the Measurement of Embodied Carbon in Buildings. In: Pomponi, F., De Wolf, C., Moncaster, A. (eds) Embodied Carbon in Buildings. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72796-7_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72796-7_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-72795-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-72796-7
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)