Abstract
Tall buildings are becoming the predominant building typology in cities and megacities worldwide, with only a few regional exceptions. These buildings have unique construction and fire and life safety characteristics, which increase their initial embodied carbon footprints over other building typologies for the same built areas. However, when considering the longevity that also often goes with the more robust construction of tall buildings, as well as the overall site density that they bring to an urban core, where residents can live close enough to walk to work and the population density allows for mass transit to be affordable and functional, the total carbon footprint of the population with time tells a different story.
This chapter explores these issues and helps identify the largest areas of embodied carbon that go into tall buildings. It also looks at opportunities for their optimization and some of the life cycle topics currently being debated within the tall building community. Much of the focus is on the “shell and core” of the tall building and those decisions the initial building design team will often face as they may look to optimize the embodied carbon footprint of the project.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
2030 Inc. (2011). Architecture 1. Products challenge. Retrieved from http://www.architecture2030.org/files/2030products_cp.pdf
Almufti, I., & Willford, M. (2013). REDiTM rating system. Resilience-based earthquake design initiative for the next generation of buildings, Verison 1.0. Arup. https://www.arup.com/publications/research/section/redi-rating-system?query=redi
Arroyo, D., Ordaz, M., & Teran-Gilmore, A. (2015). Seismic loss estimation and environmental issues. Earthquake Spectra, 31(3), 1285–1308. https://doi.org/10.1193/020713EQS023M.
ASCE American Society of Civil Engineers. (2013). 7–10 minimum design loads for buildings and other structures. Reston: American Society of Civil Engineers.
ASCE American Society of Civil Engineers. (2017). 7–16 minimum design loads and associated criteria for buildings and other structures. Reston: American Society of Civil Engineers.
Chang, Y., Ries, R. J., & Lei, S. (2012). The embodied energy and emissions of a high-rise education building: A quantification using process-based hybrid life cycle inventory model. Energy and Buildings, 55, 790–798.
Chen, T. Y., Burnett, J., & Chau, C. K. (2012). Analysis of embodied energy use in the residential building of Hong Kong. Energy and Buildings, 55, 790–798.
Cho, H. W., Roh, S. G., Byun, Y. M., & Yom, K. S. (2004). Structural quantity analysis of tall buildings. Proceedings of the CTBUH 2004 Seoul Conference.
Clark, D. (2013). What colour is your building?: Measuring and reducing the energy and carbon footprint of buildings. London: Royal Institute of British Architects.
Court, A., Simonen, K., Webster, M., Trusty, W., & Morris, P. (2012). Linking next-generation performance-based seismic design criteria to environmental performance. 2012 Structures Congress, March 29–31, Chicago.
Drew, C., Ova, K. F., & Fanning, K. (2014). The environmental impacts of tall vs. small: A comparative study. Proceedings of: CTBUH 2014 Shanghai Conference.
Du, P., Wood, A., & Stephens, B. (2016). Empirical operational energy analysis of downtown high-rise vs. suburban low-rise lifestyles: A Chicago case study. Energies, 9, 445.
FEMA. (2006). Designing for earthquakes: A manual for architects, providing protection to people and buildings. Retrieved: https://www.fema.gov/media-library/assets/documents/8669
FEMA. (2012). Seismic performance assessment of buildings, Vol. 1 – Methodology, Redwood. Retrieved: https://www.fema.gov/media-library-data/1396495019848-0c9252aac91dd1854dc378feb9e69216/FEMAP-58_Volume1_508.pdf
Foraboschi, P., Mercanzin, M., & Trabucco, D. (2014). Sustainable structural design of tall buildings based on embodied energy. Energy and Buildings, 68, 254–269.
Griffis, L., Patel, V., Muthukumar, S., & Baldava, S. (2012). A framework for performance based wind engineering. ATC & SEI Conference on Advances in Hurricane Engineering, 2012, Oct. 24.
Harris, J. (2015). Building seismic safety council (BSSC) colloquium, 2015, Feb. 11, Seismic performance objectives.
International Code Council. (2014). Florida building code – Buildings, 5th Edition. https://codes.iccsafe.org/public/collections/FL
Judah, I., & Cousins, F. (2015). The resilient urban skyscraper as refuge. In: CTBUH Conference Proceeding of CTBUH 2015 New York Conference, pp. 230–237
Khan, F. (1969). Recent structural systems in steel for high-rise buildings. Proceedings of: The British Constructional Steelwork Association Conference on Steel in Architecture London S.W.1, 24th to 26th November, 1969.
Kim, S. B., Lee, Y. H., & Scanlon, A. (2008). Comparative study of structural material quantities of high-rise residential buildings. Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, 17, 217–229.
Kofoworola, O. F., & Gheewala, S. H. (2009). Life cycle energy assessment of a typical office building in Thailand. Energy and Buildings, 41, 1076–1083.
Malkin, A. (2015). A landmark sustainability program for the empire state building. Interchanges: Resurgence of the Skyscraper City Conference, pp. 364, 369.
Newman, P. W. G., & Kenworthy, J. R. (1989). Gasoline consumption and cities. Journal of the American Planning Association, 55(1), 24–37.
Norman, J., MacLean, H. L., & Kennedy, C. A. (2006). Comparing high and low residential density: Life-cycle analysis of energy use and greenhouse gas emissions. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 132, 10–21.
Oldfield, P. (2012). Embodied carbon and high-rise. In Asia Ascending: Age of the Sustainable Skyscraper City – A collection of state-of-the-art, multi-disciplinary papers on tall buildings and sustainable cities, Proc. of the CTBUH 9th World Congress, pp. 614–622
Oldfield, P., Trabucco, D., & Wood, A. (2009). Five energy generations of tall buildings: An historical analysis of energy consumption in high-rise buildings. The Journal of Architecture, 14(5), 591.
Patterson, M., Martinez, A., Vaglio, J., & Noble, D. (2012). New skins for skyscrapers: anticipating Façade Retrofit Proceedings of: CTBUH 2012 9th World Congress, Shanghai.
Patterson, M., Silverman, B., & Casper, J. (2014). Curtainwall lifecycles: Evaluating durability and embodied energy Proceedings of CTBUH 2014 Shanghai Conference Proceedings; Mic Patterson, Ben Silverman & James Casper.
Perkins, A., Hamnett, S., Pullen, S., Zito, R., & Trebilcock, D. (2009). Transport, housing and urban form: The life cycle energy consumption and emissions of city centre apartments compared with suburban dwellings. Urban Policy and Research, 27, 377–396.
Pomponi, F., & Moncaster, A. M. (2016). Embodied carbon mitigation and reduction in the built environment: The evidence. Journal of Environmental Management, 181, 687–700.
Rode, P., & Lin, H. (2010). Talking tall: Greening supertalls: The green retrofit programs of the empire state building and Taipei 101. CTBUH Journal, 2010(3), 46–50.
Space Management Group. (2006). Promoting space efficiency in building design. Retrieved: http://www.smg.ac.uk/reports.html
Stein, R. G. (1977, 2011). Energy cost of building construction. Energy and Buildings. Richard G. Stein and Associates, 1(1), 27–29.
Strain, F. A. I. A. (2017, May). Time value of carbon. Carbon Leadership Forum. http://www.siegelstrain.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Time-Value-of-Carbon-170530.pdf
Trabucco, D. (2016). End of life of a tall building. In N. Clark & B. Price (Eds.), Tall buildings a strategic design guide (pp. 123–129). Newcastle upon Tyne: Riba Publishing.
Trabucco, D., & Fava, P. (2013). Confronting the question of demolition or renovation. CTBUH Journal, 2013, 38–43, ISSN: 1946–1186.
Trabucco, D., Wood, A., Vassart, O., Popa, N., & Davies, D. (2015). Life cycle assessment of tall building structural systems. Chicago: CTBUH.
Trabucco, D., Mejorin, A., Miranda, W., Nakada, R., Troska, C., & Stelzer, I. (2017). Cyclone resistant glazing solutions in the Asia-Pacific region: A growing market to meet present and future challenges. Proceedings of GPD Glass Performance Days 2017, Tampere.
Treloar, G. J., Fay, R., Ilozor, B., & Love, P. E. D. (2001). An analysis of the embodied energy of office buildings by height. Facilities, 19(5/6), 204–214.
Tsai, F., & Chou, J. (2016). A perspective on Taipei’ 101’s decision to upgrade recertification to LEED O+M v4. Proceedings of the 2016 CTBUH Shenzhen – Guangzhou – Hong Kong Conference.
U.S. Resiliency Council. (2015). Implementation Manual 2015. https://codes.iccsafe.org/public/collections/FL
Zhou, Y., Kijewski, T., & Kareem, A. (2002). Along-wind load effects on tall buildings: Comparative study of major international codes and standards. Journal of Structural Engineering, 128, 788–796.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Davies, D., Trabucco, D. (2018). Embodied Carbon of Tall Buildings: Specific Challenges. In: Pomponi, F., De Wolf, C., Moncaster, A. (eds) Embodied Carbon in Buildings. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72796-7_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72796-7_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-72795-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-72796-7
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)