Abstract
The need for embodied carbon management is well recognised, and possible mitigation approaches are highly sought due to the increasing need arising of carbon reduction targets. This requires the unregulated embodied carbon to be tackled instantly. This chapter presents an approach to manage embodied carbon through the identification of carbon and cost hotspots. Carbon hotspots are the elements of buildings that encompass high levels of carbon (embodied carbon). Evidence from the literature suggest that careful design of such hotspot elements will result in the highest potential carbon savings. However, the state of knowledge regarding carbon hotspots has not been extended beyond a few case studies. Hence, this chapter explored the concept of hotspots by collecting data from a sample of 41 office buildings in the UK. The carbon and cost hotspots were identified based on 80:20 Pareto rule which suggest 80% of emissions are resulting from 20% of building elements. However, findings did not fully comply with Pareto’s 80:20 ratio, instead proposed a new ratio of 80:43 for embodied carbon. Substructure, frame, external walls and services were identified as both carbon and cost hotspots of the sample office buildings. In addition, elements were categorised into three types based on the probability of an element being identified as a carbon hotspot in the building. It was interesting to note that the identified carbon hotspots were also found to be contributing up to 72% of the capital cost and the identified cost hotspots contribute up to 81% of embodied carbon. This implies that there is a possibility of reducing both embodied carbon and capital cost, which are considered as the dual currencies of construction projects, by focusing on the design of the hotspots identified.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ashworth, A., & Perera, S. (2015). Cost studies of buildings. Oxon: Routledge.
Ashworth, A., & Skitmore, R. M. (1983). Accuracy in estimating, CIOB Occasional Paper No. 27. London: CIOB.
Chen, T., Burnett, J., & Chau, C. (2001). Analysis of embodied energy use in the residential building of Hong Kong. Energy, 26, 323–340.
Clark, D. H. (2013). What colour is your building?: Measuring and reducing the energy and carbon footprint of buildings. UK: RIBA Enterprises Limited.
Cole, R. J., & Kernan, P. C. (1996). Life-cycle energy use in office buildings. Building and Enrironment, 31, 307–317.
Davies, P. J., Emmitt, S., & Firth, S. K. (2014). Challenges for capturing and assessing initial embodied energy: A contractor’s perspective. Construction Management and Economics, 32, 290–308.
Delers, A. (2015). Pareto’s principle: Expand your business!, 50Minutes.com
Dixit, M. K., Fernández-Solís, J. L., Lavy, S., & Culp, C. H. (2012). Need for an embodied energy measurement protocol for buildings: A review paper. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16, 3730–3743.
Franklin, & Andrews. (2011). Hutchins UK building blackbook: The cost and carbon guide: Hutchins’ 2011: Small and major works. Croydon: Franklin & Andrews.
Halcrow Yolles. (2010). Sustainable offices – Embodied carbon. UK: South West Regional Development Agency.
Hammond, G., & Jones, C. (2011). A BSRIA guide embodied carbon the inventory of carbon and energy (ICE). UK: BSRIA.
Hitchin, R. (2013). CIBSE research report 9: Embodied carbon and building services. UK: CIBSE.
Koch, R. (2011). The 80/20 principle. London: Nicholas Brealey Publishing.
Lockie, S. (2012). Embodied carbon – New guidelines from the RICS [Online]. Available: http://www.fgould.com/uk-europe/articles/embodied-carbon-guidelines/. Accessed 6 Jan 2014.
Monahan, J., & Powell, J. C. (2011). An embodied carbon and energy analysis of modern methods of construction in housing: A case study using a lifecycle assessment framework. Energy and Buildings, 43, 179–188.
Munns, A. K., & Al-Haimus, K. M. (2000). Estimating using cost significant global cost models. Construction Management and Economics, 18, 575–585.
Perera, S., & Victoria, M. (2017). The role of carbon in sustainable development. In P. Lombardi, G. Q. Shen, & P. S. Brandon (Eds.), Future challenges for sustainable development within the built environment. UK: Wiley's Publication.
Ramesh, T., Prakash, R., & Shukla, K. K. (2010). Life cycle energy analysis of buildings: An overview. Energy and Buildings, 42, 1592–1600.
RICS. (2014). Methodology to calculate embodied carbon (1st ed.). UK: RICS.
RICS. (2016). Building cost information services (BCIS). UK: RICS.
Seeley, I. H. (1996). Building economics: Appraisal and control of building design cost and efficiency. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Shafiq, N., Nurrudin, M. F., Gardezi, S. S. S., & Kamaruzzaman, A. B. (2015). Carbon footprint assessment of a typical low rise office building in Malaysia using building information modelling (BIM). International Journal of Sustainable Building Technology and Urban Development, 6(3), 1–16.
Tas, E., & Yaman, H. (2005). A building cost estimation model based on cost significant work packages. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 12, 251–263.
Victoria, M., Perera, S., & Davies, A. (2015a). Developing an early design stage embodied carbon prediction model: A case study. In A. B. Raidén & E. Aboagye-Nimo (Eds.), 31st annual ARCOM conference, 7–9 September 2015. Lincoln: Association of Researchers in Construction Management.
Victoria, M. F., Perera, S., Zhou, L., & Davies, A. (2015b). Estimating embodied carbon: A dual currency approach. Sustainable buildings and structures. UK: CRC Press.
Victoria, M., Perea, S., & Davies, A. (2016). Design economics for dual currency management in construction projects. RICS COBRA 2016. Retrieved from http://www.rics.org/lk/knowledge/research/conference-papers/design-economics-for-dual-currency-managementin-construction-projects/
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Victoria, M., Perera, S. (2018). Carbon and Cost Hotspots: An Embodied Carbon Management Approach During Early Stages of Design. In: Pomponi, F., De Wolf, C., Moncaster, A. (eds) Embodied Carbon in Buildings. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72796-7_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72796-7_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-72795-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-72796-7
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)