Extending Sustainability to Suppliers: The Role of Codes of Conduct

Chapter
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Business book series (BRIEFSBUSINESS)

Abstract

The chapter addresses the antecedents of suppliers’ (mis)conduct along with the role and function of the buyers’ code of conduct in global supply chains. The chapter also presents the main characteristics of multi-stakeholder collaborative initiatives developed to respond to multiple stimuli coming from customers and society. Specific attention is dedicated to the difficulties experienced by MNCs in monitoring supplier’s compliance in complex environments.

Keywords

Compliance Code of conduct Collaboration  

References

  1. Aguinis, H., & Glavas, A. (2012). What we know and don’t know about Corporate Social Responsibility: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 38(4), 932–968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amaeshi, K. M., Osuji, O. K., & Nnodim, P. (2008). Corporate social responsibility in supply chains of global brands: A boundaryless responsibility? Clarifications, exceptions and implications. Journal of Business Ethics, 81(1), 223–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Armbruster-Sandoval, R. (2005). Globalization and cross-border labor solidarity in the Americas: The anti-sweatshop movement and the struggle for social justice. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Arya, B., & Salk, J. (2006). Cross-sector alliance learning and effectiveness of voluntary codes of corporate social responsibility. Business Ethics Quarterly, 16(2), 211–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baccaro, L., & Mele, V. (2011). For lack of anything better? International organizations and global corporate codes. Public Administration, 89(2), 451–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bäckstrand, K. (2006). Multi-stakeholder partnerships for sustainable development: Rethinking legitimacy, accountability and effectiveness. European Environment, 16, 290–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barrientos, S., & Smith, S. (2007). Do workers benefit from ethical trade? Assessing codes of labour practice in global production systems. Third World Quarterly, 28(4), 713–729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bernstein, S. (2005). Legitimacy in global environmental governance. Journal of International Law and International Relations, 1(1/2), 139–166.Google Scholar
  9. Böstrom, M. (2006). Regulatory credibility and authority through inclusiveness: Standardization organizations in cases of ecolabelling. Organization, 13(3), 345–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bowen, F., Cousins, P., Lamming, R., & Faruk, A. (2001). The role of supply management capabilities in green supply. Production and Operations Management, 10(2), 174–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Boyd, D. E., Spekman, R. E., Kamauff, J. W., & Werhane, P. (2007). Corporate Social Responsibility in global supply chains: A procedural justice perspective. Long Range Planning, 40, 341–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bremer, J., & Udovich, J. (2001). Alternative approaches to supply chain compliance monitoring. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal, 5(4), 333–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cashore, B., Auld, G., Bernstein, S., & McDermott, C. (2007). Can non-state governance ‘‘ratchet up’’ global environmental standards? Lessons from the forest sector. Review of European Community & International Environmental Law, 16(2), 158–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cerruti, C., Mena, C., Skipworth, H., & Tavoletti, E. (2016). Characterizing agile supply partnerships in the fashion industry. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 36(8), 923–947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ciliberti, F., de Haan, J., de Groot, G., & Pontrandolfo, P. (2009). Codes to coordinate supply chains: SMEs’ experiences with SA8000. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 14(2), 117–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ciliberti, F., de Haan, J., de Groot, J., & Pontrandolfo, P. (2011). CSR codes and the principal-agent problem in supply chains: Four case studies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 19, 885–894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Clean Clothes Campaign. (2016). Dangerous delays on workers safety. https://cleanclothes.org/resources/publications/dangerous-delays-on-workersafety/view.
  18. Clemens, B., Bamford, C. E., & Douglas, T. J. (2008). Choosing strategic responses to address emerging environmental regulations: Size, perceived influence and uncertainty. Business Strategy and the Environment, 17, 493–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Collins, D. (2004). Five levees for improving ethical performance. Strategic Finance, 88, 19–21.Google Scholar
  20. Das, T. K., & Teng, B. (1998). Between trust and control: Developing confidence in partner cooperation in alliances. Academy of Management Review, 23, 491–512.Google Scholar
  21. Delbufalo, E. (2012). Outcomes of inter-organizational trust in supply chain relationships: A systematic literature review and a meta-analysis of the empirical evidence. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 17(4), 377–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Delbufalo, E., & Bastl, M. (2018). Multi-principal collaboration and supplier’s compliance with codes-of-conduct. International Journal of Logistics Management (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  23. Diller, J. (1999). A social conscience in the global marketplace? Labor dimensions of codes of conduct, social labeling and investor initiatives. International Labor Organizations, 138, 99–129.Google Scholar
  24. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dyer, J. H. (1996). Does governance matter? Keiretsu alliance and asset specificity as sources of Japanese competitive advantage. Organization Science, 7, 649–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Egels-Zandén, N. (2007). Suppliers compliance with MNCs codes of conduct: Behind the scenes at Chinese toy suppliers. Journal of Business Ethics, 75, 45–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Egels-Zandén, N. (2014). Revisiting supplier compliance with MNC codes of conduct: Recoupling policy and practice at Chinese toy suppliers. Journal of Business Ethics, 119, 59–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 57–74.Google Scholar
  29. Elkington, J. (1998). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of the 21st Century. Stoney Creek, CT: New Society Publishers.Google Scholar
  30. Emmelhainz, M., & Adams, R. (1999). The apparel industry response to ‘Sweatshop’ concerns—A review and analysis of codes of conduct. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 35(3), 51–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Erwin, P. M. (2011). Corporate codes of conduct: The effects of code content and quality on ethical performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 99, 535–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Esbenshade, J. (2004). Monitoring sweatshops: Workers, consumers, and the global apparel industry. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Fairclough, G. (2007). China-product scare hits home, too. The Wall Street Journal. http://online.wsj.com/article/SB118487371421671957.html?mod=dist_smartbrief.
  34. Fernandez, A. S., & Chiambaretto, P. (2016). Managing tensions related to information in coopetition. Industrial Marketing Management, 53, 66–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Fransen, L. W., & Kolk, A. (2007). Global rule-setting for business: A critical analysis of multi-stakeholder standards. Organization, 14(5), 667–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Frenkel, S., & Scott, D. (2002). Compliance, collaboration, and codes of labor practice: The Adidas connection. California Management Review, 45(1), 29–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Frundt, H. J. (2000). Models of cross-border organizing in Maquila industries. Critical Sociology, 26(1/2), 36–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Fynes, B., & Voss, C. (2002). The moderating effect of buyer-supplier relationships on quality practices and performance. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 22(6), 589–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Gimenez, C., & Tachizawa, E. M. (2012). Extending sustainability to suppliers: A systematic literature review. Supply Chain Management, 17(5), 531–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Gundlach, G. T., Achrol, R. S., & Mentzer, J. T. (1995). The structure of commitment in exchange. Journal of Marketing, 59(1), 78–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hallett, T. (2010). The myth incarnate: Recoupling processes, turmoil, and inhabited institutions in an urban elementary school. American Journal of Sociology, 75, 52–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hardy, K. G., & Magrath, A. J. (1989). Dealing with cheating in distribution. European Journal of Marketing, 23(2), 123–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Haufler, V. (2003). New forms of governance: Certification regimes as social regulations of the global market. In C. Elliott, E. Meidinger, & G. Oesten (Eds.), Social and political dimensions of forest certification (pp. 237–247). Remagen-Oberwinter: Forstbuch.Google Scholar
  44. Hill, R. P., & Rapp, J. M. (2014). Codes of ethical conduct: A bottom-up approach. Journal of Business Ethics, 123, 621–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Jiang, B. (2009a). Implementing supplier codes of conduct in global supply chains: Process explanations from theoretic and empirical perspectives. Journal of Business Ethics, 85, 77–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Jiang, B. (2009b). The effects of interorganizational governance on supplier’s compliance with SCC: An empirical examination of compliant and non-compliant suppliers. Journal of Operations Management, 27, 267–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kelly, E., & Dobbin, F. (1998). How affirmative action became diversity management. American Behavioral Scientist, 41(7), 960–984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Koçer, R. G., & Fransen, L. (2009). Codes of conduct and the promise of a change of climate in worker organization. European Journal of Industrial Relations, 15(3), 237–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kondej, M. (2016). Decoding sustainability in the denim industry: Interview with Michael Kobori, Vice President of Sustainability at Levi Strauss & Co. Apparel and Footwear in the United Kingdom, Report Euromonitor International.Google Scholar
  50. Kostova, T., & Zaheer, S. (1999). Organizational legitimacy under conditions of complexity: The case of the multinational enterprise. Academy of Management Review, 24(1), 64–81.Google Scholar
  51. Krause, D. R., Handfield, R. B., & Tyler, B. B. (2007). The relationships between supplier development, commitment, social capital accumulation and performance improvement. Journal of Operations Management, 25(2), 528–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Lenox, M. J., & Nash, J. (2003). Industry self-regulation and adverse selection: A comparison across four trade association programs. Business Strategy and the Environment, 12, 343–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Lim, S. J., & Phillips, J. (2008). Embedding CSR values: The global footwear industry’s evolving governance structure. Journal of Business Ethics, 81, 143–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Locke, R., Kochan, T., Romis, M., & Qin, F. (2007). Beyond corporate codes of conduct: Work organization and labour standards at Nike’s suppliers. International Labour Review, 146(1–2), 21–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Lund-Thomsen, P. (2008). The global sourcing and codes of conduct debate: Five myths and five recommendations. Development and Change, 39(6), 1005–1018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Lund-Thomsen, P., & Nadvi, K. (2011). Cluster, chains and compliance: Corporate social responsibility and governance in football manufacturing in South Asia. Journal of Business Ethics, 93, 201–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. McEvily, B., & Marcus, A. (2005). Embedded ties and the acquisition of competitive capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 26, 1033–1055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Mele, V., & Schepers, D. H. (2013). E pluribus unum? Legitimacy issues and multi-stakeholder codes of conduct. Journal of Business Ethics, 118, 561–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Milgrom, P., & Roberts, J. (1992). Economics, organization and management. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Inc.Google Scholar
  60. Moore, G. (2001). Corporate social and financial performance: An investigation in the U.K. supermarket industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 34(3/4), 299–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Moran, P. (2005). Structural versus relational embeddedness: Social capital and managerial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 26, 1129–1151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Murry, J. P., & Heide, J. B. (1998). Managing promotion program participation within manufacturer-retailer relationships. Journal of Marketing, 62(1), 58–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge: Belknap Press/Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  64. O’Rourke, D. (2002). Monitoring the monitors: A critique of corporate third party labor monitoring. In R. Jenkins, R. Pearson, & G. Seyfang (Eds.), Corporate responsibility and ethical trade: Codes-of-conduct in the global economy (pp. 196–208). London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  65. Pedersen, E. R., & Andersen, M. (2006). Safeguarding Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in global supply chains: How codes of conduct are managed in buyer-supplier relationships. Journal of Public Affairs, 6(3/4), 228–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Plambeck, E., Lee, H. L., & Yatsko, P. (2012). Improving environmental performance in your chinese supply chain. MIT Sloan Management Review, 53(12), 43–51.Google Scholar
  67. Porter, T., & Ronit, K. (2006). Self-regulation as policy process: The multiple and criss-crossing stages of private rule-making. Policy Sciences, 39(1), 41–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Prakash, A., & Potoski, M. (2007). Collective action through voluntary environmental programs: A club theory perspective. Policy Studies Journal, 35(4), 773–792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Radaelli, C. (2003). The code of conduct against harmful tax competition: Open method of coordination in disguise? Public Administration, 81(3), 513–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Radin, T. J. (2004). The effectiveness of global codes of conduct: Role models that make sense. Business and Society Review, 109(4), 415–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Risso, M. (2012). A horizontal approach to implementing corporate social responsibility in international supply chains. International Journal of Technology Management, 58(1/3), 64–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Roberts, D., & Engardio, P. (2006, November 27). Secrets, lies, and sweatshops. Business-Week.Google Scholar
  73. Roloff, J. (2007). Learning from multi-stakeholder networks: Issue focused stakeholder management. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(1), 233–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Ross, R. J. S., & Chan, A. (2002). From North–South to South–South: The true face of global competition. Foreign Affairs, 81(5), 8–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Schäferhoff, M., Campe, S., & Kaan, C. (2009). Transnational public-private partnerships in international relations: Making sense of concepts, research frameworks, and results. International Studies Review, 11(3), 451–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Scott, W. R. (2008). Institutions and organizations. Ideas and interests (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
  77. Sethi, S. P. (2002). Standards for corporate conduct in the international arena: Challenges and opportunities for multinational corporations. Business and Society Review, 107(1), 20–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Short, J. L., Toffel, M. W. & Hugill, A. L. (2015). Monitoring global supply chains. Working Paper, Harvard Business Review 0–32.Google Scholar
  79. Stafford, S. (2007). Should you turn yourself in? The consequences of environmental self-policing. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 26(2), 305–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Taylor, M. (2011). Race you to the bottom … and back again? The uneven development of labour codes of conduct. New Political Economy, 16(4), 445–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Tidström, A. (2014). Managing tensions in coopetition. Industrial Marketing Management, 43(2), 261–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Tomkins, C. (2001). Interdependencies, trust and information in relationships, alliances, and networks. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 26, 161–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Williamson, O. E. (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism: Firms, markets and relational contracting. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
  84. World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Our common future. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Human ScienceEuropean University of RomeRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations