Advertisement

Field Research in Indigenous Contexts

  • Arnold Groh
Chapter

Abstract

In this final chapter, the theoretical considerations of the previous chapters are applied to real-life situations. Thus, the perspectives gained on what cultures are; if, when and why they change; how they can become dominant; and what globalisation means now help to find the best practices for planning and carrying out field research in indigenous contexts. This is done on the basis of relevant articles for the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, which are examined under the aspect of our topic. Since comprehensive preparation for field research in indigenous contexts is indispensable, it is set out in detail how to conduct education and training, aiming at optimum transcultural competency of the researchers-to-be, as well as of others, who want to be fit for sustainable intercultural work. While preparing the field research, it is necessary to understand the semiotic functions of the indigenous people’s descriptions in already available texts and pictures. Such descriptions need to be scrutinised critically, taking the relevant psychological mechanisms of their origination into consideration. Also, the socio-cognitive functioning of scientists is analysed, resorting to functional models of intercultural processes. From such meta-perspectives and a Theory of Mind approach, the role of the researchers’ culture of origin can be taken into account with regard to their perspective-taking, the effects of their expectations and cultural distance, so that irrationalities can be avoided. Finally, practical issues are addressed, including healthcare, and advice is given as how to concretely behave in particular circumstances in indigenous settings.

Keywords

Planning Mentalisation Functional models Ethnography Teaching Intercultural competency Expedition conduct 

References

  1. Asch, S. E. (1951). Effects of group pressure upon the modification and distortion of judgement. In: H. S. Guetzkow (Ed.), Groups, leadership, and men. Research in human relations. Reports on research sponsored by the Human Relations and Morale Branch of the Office of Naval Research, 1945–1950. Papers derived from the United States Navy's conference of its Human Relations Advisory Panel and research contractors at Dearborn, Michigan, September, 1950. Reissued (pp. 177–190). Pittsburgh: Carnegie Press.Google Scholar
  2. Assmann, J. (1992). Das kulturelle Gedächtnis. Schrift, Erinnerung und politische Identität in frühen Hochkulturen. Munich: C. H. Beck (Engl.: Cultural memory and early civilization: Writing, remembrance, and political imagination. Cambridge: University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
  3. Baddeley, A. D. (1976). The psychology of memory. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  4. Baddeley, A. D. (2004). Your memory: A user’s guide. New York: Firefly Books.Google Scholar
  5. Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering. A study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Baudrillard, J. (1986). Subjekt und Objekt: fraktal. Bern: Benteli.Google Scholar
  7. Braun, O. L. (1990). Selbsteinschätzung der Fähigkeit: Realistisch oder kompensatorisch? Zeitschrift für Experimentelle und Angewandte Psychologie, 37(2), 208–217.Google Scholar
  8. Brown, J. D. (2007). The self. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Chartier, D. (2003). «Au–delà, il n’y a plus rien, plus rien que l’immensité désolée.» Problématiques de l’histoire de la représentation des Inuits, des récits des premiers explorateurs aux oeuvres cinématographiques. International Journal of Canadian Studies / Revue internationale d’études canadiennes, 31(2005), 177–196.Google Scholar
  10. Cieza de Leon, P. (1553 etc.). The Incas. Edited, with an introd., by von Hagen, V. W. Translation of the Crónicas del Perú, Vol. I (Sevilla, 1553) and Vol. II,29 by de Onis, H. (The Civilization of the American Indian series, no. 53). Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 1959.Google Scholar
  11. Cohen, C. E. (1981). Person categories and social perception: Testing some boundaries of the processing effect of prior knowledge. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40(3), 441–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dijksterhuis, A., Aarts, H., & Smith, P. K. (2005). The power of the subliminal: On subliminal persuasion and other potential applications. In R. R. Hassin, J. S. Uleman, & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), The new unconscious (pp. 77–106). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Dixon, N. F. (1971). Subliminal perception; the nature of a controversy. London: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  14. Erdheim, M. (1988). Die Psychoanalyse und das Unbewußte in der Kultur. Frankfurt/M: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  15. Even-Zohar, I. (1990). Polysystem studies. Poetics Today, special issue, 11, 1.Google Scholar
  16. Farah, M. J., Péronnet, F., Gonon, M. A., & Giard, M. H. (1988). Electrophysiological evidence for a shared representational medium for visual images and visual percepts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117(3), 248–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fonagy, P. (1999). Attachment, the development of the self, and its pathology in personality disorders. In J. Derksen, C. Maffei, & H. Groen (Eds.), Treatment of personality disorders (pp. 53–68). New York: Plenum Press. Available online at: http://mentalizacion.com.ar/images/notas/Attachment,%20the%20development%20of%20the%20self%20and%20its%20pathology.pdf. Accessed 2 Aug 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fonagy, P., & Target, M. (2006). The Mentalization-focused approach to self pathology. Journal of Personality Disorders, 20(6), 544–576.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Freeman, D. (1983). Margaret Mead and Samoa. The making and unmaking of an anthropological myth. Cambridge/MA & London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Frey, D. (1981). Informationssuche und Informationsbewertung bei Entscheidungen. Bern: Huber.Google Scholar
  21. Gallagher, S. (2005). How the body shapes the mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  23. Gollwitzer, P. M., & Wicklund, R. A. (1985). Self–symbolizing and the neglect of others’ perspectives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(3), 702–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gonzalez, J. P., Nakoune, E., Slenczka, W., Vidal, P., & Morvan, J. M. (2000). Ebola and Marburg virus antibody prevalence in selected populations of the Central African Republic. Microbes and Infection, 2(1), 39–44.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Groh, A. (1997). Kultureller Verlust: Mechanismen und Interventionsmöglichkeiten. PhD thesis, University of Bielefeld, Dept. of Psychology, Bielefeld.Google Scholar
  26. Groh, A. (2002). Humanontogenese in kulturelen Kontexten – Gesteninterpretation in Südostasien. Zeitschrift für Humanontogenetik, 5(1), 66–83.Google Scholar
  27. Groh, A. (2006). Globalisation and indigenous identity. Psychopathologie africaine, 33(1), 33–47.Google Scholar
  28. Groh, A. (2008). Marketing & manipulation. Aachen: Shaker.Google Scholar
  29. Groh, A. (2016). Culture, language, and thought: Field studies on colour concepts. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 16(1–2), 83–106. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685373-12342169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gweon, H., & Saxe, R. (2013). Developmental cognitive neuroscience of theory of mind. In P. Rakic & J. Rubenstein (Eds.), Neural circuit development and function in the brain: Comprehensive developmental neuroscience (Vol. 3, pp. 367–377). New York: Elsevier. Available online at: https://sll.stanford.edu/docs/2013_Gweon_Saxe.pdf. Accessed 2 Aug 2017; https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-397267-5.0005.
  31. Happé, F. (2003). Theory of mind and the self. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1001, 134–144. https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1279.008.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Heine, B. (1987). Das Bergvolk: Einige Bemerkungen zu den Ik im Nordosten Ugandas. In H. P. Duerr (Ed.), Authentizität und Betrug in der Ethnologie (pp. 63–86). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  33. Heine, S. J. (2012). Cultural psychology (2nd ed.). New York/London: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  34. Herman, E. S., & Chomsky, N. (1988). Manufacturing consent. The political economy of the mass media. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  35. Hill, T. L. (1996). The problem with non-nudists. Society / Société: Newsletter of the Canadian Sociology and Anthropology Association, 20, 23–25.Google Scholar
  36. Husserl, E. (1948), Erfahrung und Urteil. Untersuchungen zur Genealogie der Logik. (Ed.), L. Landgrebe (2nd unchanged ed., 1954). Hamburg: Claassen & Goverts.Google Scholar
  37. Ingarden, R. (1985). Selected papers in aesthetics. (Ed.), P. J. McCormick. Munich: Philosophia & Washington, D.C.: Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar
  38. Khadilkar, A., Khadilkar, V., Chinnappa, J., Rathi, N., Khadgawat, R., Balasubramanian, S., Parekh, B., & Jog, P. (2017). Prevention and treatment of vitamin D and calcium deficiency in children and adolescents: Indian Academy of Pediatrics (IAP) Guidelines. Indian Pediatrics, 54, 567–573.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Knorr-Cetina, K. (1981). The manufacture of knowledge. An essay on the constructivist and contextual nature of science. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  40. Kohonen, T. (1988). Self-organisation and associative memory. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed., 1970). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  42. Lévi-Strauss, C. (1962). La pensée sauvage. Paris: Librairie Plon (Engl.: The savage mind. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1966).Google Scholar
  43. Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social science: Selected theoretical papers. New York: Harper & Brothers.Google Scholar
  44. Liedloff, J. (1975). The continuum-concept. In Search of lost happiness. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
  45. Mau, S. (2017). Das metrische Wir. Über die Quantifizierung des Sozialen. Berlin: Edition Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  46. McCauley, R. N., & Henrich, J. (2006). Susceptibility to the Müller-Lyer illusion, theory-neutral observation, and the diachronic penetrability of the visual input system. Philosophical Psychology, 19(1), 79–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society. (Ed.), C. W. Morris. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  48. Mead, M. (1977). Letters from the field, 1925–1975. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  49. Meier, A. C. (2013). Minik and the meteor. http://narrative.ly/minik–and–the–meteor/. Accessed 19 May 2016.
  50. Meltzoff, A. N. (1999). Origins of theory of mind, cognition and communication. Journal of Communication Disorders, 32, 251–269.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  51. Mesman, J., van IJzendoorn, M. H., & Sagi-Schwartz, A. (2016). Cross-cultural patterns of attachment. Universal and contextual dimensions. In J. Cassidy & P. Shaver (Eds.), Handbook of attachment. Theory, research, and clinical applications (3rd ed., pp. 852–877). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  52. Milgram, S. (1963). Behavioral study of obedience. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67(4), 371–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Milgram, S. (1974). Obedience to authority; an experimental view. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  54. Miltenberger, R. G. (2012). Behavior modification: Principles and procedures (5th ed.). Wadsworth: Cengage.Google Scholar
  55. Moray, N. (2017). Attention. Selective processes in vision and hearing, Psychology Library Editions: Perception (Vol. 23). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  56. Niedenthal, P. M., Barsalou, L. W., Winkielman, P., Krauth-Gruber, S., & Ric, F. (2005). Embodiment in attitudes, social perception, and emotion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9(3), 184–211.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Othieno-Abinya, N. A., Wanzala, P., Omollo, R., Kalebi, A., Baraza, R., Nyongesa, C. N., Muthoni-Musibi, A., Maina, M. D., Waweru, A.,·& Githaiga, J. (2015). Comparative study of breast cancer risk factors at Kenyatta National Hospital and the Nairobi Hospital. Journal Africain du Cancer / African Journal of Cancer, 7, 41–46, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12558-014-0358-1.
  58. Paasche, H. (1921). Die Forschungsreise des Afrikaners Lukanga Mukara ins innerste Deutschland. Hamburg: Goldmann Verlag.Google Scholar
  59. Palm, G. (1982). Neural assemblies. An alternative approach to artificial intelligence. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  60. Papaleontiou-Louca, E. (2008). Metacognition and theory of mind. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
  61. Pearson, J. C., & Child, J. T. (2007). A cross-cultural comparison of parental and peer attachment styles among adult children from the United States, Puerto Rico, and India. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 36(1), 15–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Penfield, W. (1952). Memory mechanisms. American Medical Association Archives of Neurology and Psychiatry, 67(2), 178–198.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Pfotenhauer, K. M., & Shubrook, J. H. (2017). Vitamin D deficiency, its role in health and disease, and current supplementation. The Journal of the American Osteopathic Association, 117, 301–305. https://doi.org/10.7556/jaoa.2017.055.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Plarre, R. (2005). Wegskizzen und andere Mitteilungen. Zeichnungen und spontane Kartographie in Neuguinea. In A. Groh (Ed.), “beWEGung”. Akademische Perspektiven auf Reisen und Ortswechsel (pp. 173–208). Berlin: Weidler.Google Scholar
  65. Plous, S. (1993). The psychology of judgment and decision making. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  66. Poole, C. B., Li, Z., Alhassan, A., Guelig, D., Diesburg, S., Tanner, N. A., Zhang, Y., Evans, T. C., Jr., LaBarre, P., Wanji, S., Burton, R. A., & Carlow, C. K. S. (2017). Colorimetric tests for diagnosis of filarial infection and vector surveillance using non–instrumented nucleic acid loop–mediated isothermal amplification (NINA–LAMP). PLoS One, 12(2), e0169011. Published: February 15, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169011, downloaded 8 June 2017 from http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0169011.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  67. Posner, R. (1989). What is culture? Toward a semiotic explication of anthropological concepts. In W. A. Koch (Ed.), The nature of culture: Proceedings of the international and interdisciplinary symposium, October 7–11, 1986 in Bochum (pp. 240–295). Brockmeyer: Bochum.Google Scholar
  68. Rutter, M. (2006). Implications of resilience concepts for scientific understanding. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1094, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1376.002.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Silva Rios, S., Rios Chen, A. C., Rios Chen, J., Calvano Filho, C. M., Santos Amorim, N. T., Lin, C. W., & Fátima Brito Vogt, M. (2016). Wearing a tight bra for many hours a day is associated with increased risk of breast cancer. Advances in Oncology Research and Treatments, 1(1), 105. https://doi.org/10.4172/2572-5025.1000105.Google Scholar
  70. Solomon, C. (2003). Transactional analysis theory: The basics. Transactional Analysis Journal, 33(1), 15–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Steinfurth, H.-J. (2001). The pygmies. VHS video, Films Incorporated.Google Scholar
  72. Stücker, M., Struk, A., Altmeyer, P., Herde, M., Baumgärtl, H., & Lübbers, D. W. (2002). The cutaneous uptake of atmospheric oxygen contributes significantly to the oxygen supply of human dermis and epidermis. Journal of Physiology, 538(3), 985–994. https://doi.org/10.1013/jphysiol.2001.013067.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  73. Svane, M. S., Gergerich, E., & Boje, D. (2016). Fractal Change Management and Counter-Narrative in Cross-Cultural Change. In S. Frandsen, T. Kuhn, & M. Wolff Lundholt (Eds.), Counter-narratives and organization, Chapter 6 (pp. 129–154). New York: Taylor & Francis. Available online at: http://davidboje.com/vita/paper_pdfs/CHAPTER_Fractal%20change%20management%20and%20counternarrative%20in%20crosscultural.pdf. Accessed 28 Aug 2017.Google Scholar
  74. United Nations Conference on Freedom of Information. Held at Geneva 23 March – 21 April 1948. Final Act. Lake success, New York: UN.Google Scholar
  75. United Nations General Assembly (1948). Universal Declaration of Human Rights. [Part A of General Assembly resolution 217 (III). International Bill of Human Rights].Google Scholar
  76. Vanhove, A. J., Herian, M. N., Perez, A. L. U., Harms, P. D., & Lester, P. B. (2015). Can resilience be developed at work? A meta-analytic review of resilience-building programme effectiveness. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12123. Available online at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1010&context=pdharms. Accessed 4 Aug 2017.
  77. Watzlawick, P., Beavin, J. H., & Jackson, D. D. (1967). Pragmatics of human communication. A study of Interctional patterns, pathologies, and paradoxes. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  78. West, K. (2017). Naked and unashamed: Investigations and applications of the effects of naturist activities on body image, self-esteem, and life satisfaction. Journal of Happiness Studies, 17, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-017-9846-1.Google Scholar
  79. Wicklund, R. A. (1990). Zero-variable theories and the psychology of the explainer. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Arnold Groh
    • 1
  1. 1.Technical University of BerlinBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations