Advertisement

Methodology: How to Optimally Collect Data in the Fields

  • Arnold Groh
Chapter

Abstract

The methodological aspects of this chapter cover a wide range, starting with research questions to consider even before the beginning of any field research preparations; then looking at the designing of the field research itself, the techniques to apply in the field, the data analysis and evaluation methods; and also addressing issues to be mindful of regarding the presentation of the results after the return from the research. Ethical aspects play a major role throughout these aspects, as transcultural dominance effects would not only debilitate the data but could also have detrimental impacts on the indigenous people concerned. Therefore, it is necessary to apply minimally invasive techniques, which should not only go along with the researchers’ total immersion into the indigenous context but also, in most of these field situations, due to previous destruction of the indigenous culture, with rescue work. Some of the legal aspects, which have been extensively looked at in the previous chapter, such as the issue of full, free, prior and informed consent, are taken up, where necessary, along with particular articles of the UN Indigenous Rights Declaration. This chapter also reviews the common methodological concepts of validity, reliability and objectivity and their purport for our topic, looking at field encounter as quasi-experimentation, as well as at the application of qualitative and quantitative methods. With regard to the actual field research situation, socio-cognitive mechanisms pertaining to the persons involved are analysed with special attention to the constellations of influence, and the role of translators is investigated. Furthermore, researchers exemplary for the history of transcultural field encounters are referred to.

Keywords

Epistemology Data collection Philosophy of science Research ethics Vulnerability and resilience Transcultural copying Social cognition 

References

  1. Aarts, H., Chartrand, T. L., Custers, R., Danner, U., Dik, G., Jefferis, V. E., & Cheng, C. M. (2005). Social stereotypes and automatic goal pursuit. Social Cognition, 23(6), 465–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. AIATSIS. (2012). Guidelines for ethical research in Australian indigenous studies. (Revised 2nd ed.). Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies.Google Scholar
  3. Aldrich, D. P. & Meyer, M. A. (2014). Social capital and community resilience. American Behavioral Scientist. Online version: <http://abs.sagepub.com/content/early/2014/10/01/0002764214550299>, Accessed 27 Aug 2017. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764214550299
  4. Amit, V. (2000). Constructing the field. Ethnographic fieldwork in the contemporary world. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Bere, R. M. (1952). The exploration of the Ruwenzori. The Alpine Journal, LVIII(284), 483–495.Google Scholar
  6. Boesch, C., & Tomasello, M. (1998). Chimpanzee and human cultures. Current Anthropology, 39(5), 591–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bortz, J. & Döring, N. (2003). Forschungsmethoden und Evaluation. (Reprint of 3rd ed.). Berlin/Heidelberg: SpringerGoogle Scholar
  8. Chakkarath, P. (2013). Indian thoughts on psychological human development. In G. Misra (Ed.), Psychology and psychoanalysis, Part 3, of history of science, philosophy and culture in Indian civilization (Vol. XIII, pp. 167–190). New Delhi: Munshiram Manoharlal Publishers.Google Scholar
  9. Champagne, P. (2013). Pierre Bourdieu, Séminaires sur le concept de champ, 1972–1975. Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales, 5(200), Théorie du champ, 4–37.Google Scholar
  10. Cheng, J. T., Tracy, J. L., Foulsham, T., Kingstone, A., & Henrich, J. (2013). Two ways to the top: Evidence that dominance and prestige are distinct yet viable avenues to social rank and influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(1), 103–125. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030398.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Chomsky, N. (1972). Language and mind. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
  12. Clauß, G., & Ebner, H. (1979). Grundlagen der Statistik für Psychologen, Pädagogen und Soziologen. Thun/Frankfurt on the Main: Verlag Harri Deutsch.Google Scholar
  13. Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation. Design & analysis issues for field settings. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.Google Scholar
  14. Csibra, G. (2007). Action mirroring and action understanding: An alternative account. In P. Haggard, Y. Rosetti, & M. Kawate (Eds.), Sensorimotor foundations of higher cognition: Attention and performance (Vol. 22, pp. 435–480). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Daniel, B. (2010). Concepts of adversity, risk, vulnerability and resilience: A discussion in the context of the ‘child protection system’. Social Policy & Society, 9(2), 231–241. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474746409990364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Eckensberger, L. H. (2015). Integrating the emic (indigenous) with the etic (universal)–a case of squaring the circle or for adopting a culture inclusive action theory perspective. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 45(1), 108–140. https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.12057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ermine, W., Sinclair, R., & Jeffery, B. (2004). The ethics of research involving indigenous peoples. Report of the indigenous peoples Health Research Centre to the interagency advisory panel on research ethics. Saskatoon: Indigenous Peoples Health Research Centre.Google Scholar
  18. Eshel, Y. & Kimhi, S. (2016). Community resilience of civilians at war: A new perspective. Community Mental Health Journal, 52, 109–117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-015-9948-3. Published online 2015, available at <https://www.researchgate.net/publication/283050154_Community_Resilience_of_Civilians_at_War_A_New_Perspective> (Accessed 27 Aug 2017).
  19. Ferguson, M. J., & Bargh, J. A. (2004). How social perception can automatically influence behavior. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(1), 33–39.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Feyerabend, P. (1975). Against method. London: New Left Books.Google Scholar
  21. Fontana, A., & Frey, J. (1994). Interviewing. The art of science. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The sage handbook of qualitative research (pp. 361–376). Thousand Oaks/London/New Delhi: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  22. Freeman, D. (1983). Margaret mead and Samoa. The making and unmaking of an anthropological myth. Cambridge, MA/London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Froese, T. & Leavens, D. A. (2014). The direct perception hypothesis: Perceiving the intention of another’s action hinders its precise imitation. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 65. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00065. Article URL <http://frontiersin.org/Journal/Abstract.aspx?s=228&name=comparative%20psychology&ART_DOI=10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00065> (Accessed 1 Aug 2017).
  24. Gallagher, S. (2005). How the body shapes the mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Girtler, R. (2001). Methoden der Feldforschung (4th ed.). Vienna: Böhlau.Google Scholar
  26. Glaser, B. G. & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Strategies for qualitative research (Reprint, 2006). New Brunswick/London: Aldine Transaction.Google Scholar
  27. Gordon, R. (1990). The prospects for anthropological tourism in Bushmanland. Cultural Survival Quarterly, 14(1), 6–8.Google Scholar
  28. Greenfield, P. M. (2000). Three approaches to the psychology of culture: Where do they come from? Where can they go? Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 3(3), 223–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Greenfield, P. M. (2004). Weaving generations together. Evolving creativity in the Maya of Chiapas. Santa Fe: School of American Research Press.Google Scholar
  30. Groh, A. (2002). Humanontogenese in kulturelen Kontexten – Gesteninterpretation in Südostasien. Zeitschrift für Humanontogenetik, 5(1), 66–83.Google Scholar
  31. Groh, A. (2008). Marketing & Manipulation. Aachen: Shaker.Google Scholar
  32. Groh, A. (2016a). Culture, language, and thought: Field studies on colour concepts. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 16(1–2), 83–106. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685373-12342169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Groh, A. (2016b). The impact of mobile phones on indigenous social structures: A cross-cultural comparative study. Journal of Communication, 7(2), 344–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The sage handbook of qualitative research (pp. 105–117). Thousand Oaks/London/New Delhi: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  35. Hariri, A. R., Tessitore, A., Mattay, V. S., Fera, F., & Weinberger, D. R. (2002). The amygdala response to emotional stimuli: A comparison of faces and scenes. NeuroImage, 17, 317–323. https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.2002.1179.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Heine, S. J. (2012). Cultural psychology (2nd ed.). New York/London: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  37. Herman, E. S., & Chomsky, N. (1988). Manufacturing consent. The political economy of the mass media. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  38. Hofstede, G. (1980, 2001). Culture‘s consequences (1st ed.). International differences in work related values. Newbury Park/London/New Delhi: Sage Publications, 1980; Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks/London/New Delhi: Sage Publications, 2001.Google Scholar
  39. Hüncke, A., & Koot, S. (2012). The presentation of bushmen in cultural tourism: Tourists’ images of bushmen and the tourism provider’s presentation of (Hai//om) bushmen at Treesleeper camp, Namibia. Critical Arts: South-North Cultural and Media Studies, 26(5), 671–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Jourard, S. M. (1966). An exploratory study of body accessibility. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 5, 221–231.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Kelly, C. (2013). Using attribution theory to understand resilience for looked after children. Ann Arbor: ProQuest.Google Scholar
  42. Kempskie, N. (2005). The sociologist: A dramatized exploration of feminist roles and research methods. Paper presented at the American Sociological Association Conference 2005. Available online at: <https://my.alliant.edu/ICS/icsfs/Kempskie-TheSociologistADramatizedExplorationofFem.pdf?target=ca07543f-e331-427d-8f47-7e6e056c0402> (Accessed 29 Aug 2017).
  43. Khabarova, Y., Grigoryeva, V., Tuomisto, S., Karhunen, P. J., Mattila, K., & Isokoski, M. (2012). High prevalence of lactase non-persistence among indigenous nomadic Nenets, north-west Russia. International Journal of Circumpolar Health, 71, 17898. Published online 25 Apr. 2012. <http://tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.3402/ijch.v71i0.17898> (Accessed 18 Aug 2017). https://doi.org/10.3402/ijch.v71i0.17898
  44. Kim, U., Yang, K.-S., & Hwang, K.-K. (Eds.). (2006). Indigenous and cultural psychology: Understanding people in context. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  45. Kippen, J. (2008). Working with the masters. In G. Barz & T. J. Cooley (Eds.), Shadows in the field. New perspectives for fieldwork in ethnomusicology (2nd ed., pp. 125–140). Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Knorr-Cetina, K. (1981). The manufacture of knowledge. An essay on the constructivist and contextual nature of science. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  47. Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.: 1970). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  48. Legare, C. H. (2017). Cumulative cultural learning: Development and diversity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(30), 7877–7883. Available at: <https://static1.squarespace.com/static/53485734e4b0fffc0dcc64c2/t/597a4879db29d6d5dc3658f9/1501186171924/cumulative–cultural–learning–development–and–diversity.pdf> (Accessed 1 Aug 2017).
  49. Lévi-Strauss, C. (1949). Les Structures élémentaires de la parenté. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France (Engl.: The elementary structures of kinship. Boston: Beacon Press, 1969).Google Scholar
  50. Lévi-Strauss, C. (1958). Anthropologie structurale. Paris: Librairie Plon (Engl.: Structural anthropology. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1977).Google Scholar
  51. Lévi-Strauss, C. (1973). Anthropologie structurale deux. Paris: Librairie Plon (Engl.: Structural anthropology (Vol. 2). New York: Basic Books, 1976).Google Scholar
  52. Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social science: Selected theoretical papers. New York: Harper & Brothers.Google Scholar
  53. Libet, B., Wright, E. W., Jr., Feinstein, B., & Pearl, D. K. (1979). Subjective referral of the timing for a conscious sensory experience – A functional role for the somatosensory specific projection system in man. Brain, 102, 193–224. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/102.1.193.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Lindström, B., & Eriksson, M. (2005). Salutogenesis. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 59, 440–442. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2005.034777.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  55. Mason, J. (2002). Qualitative researching (2nd ed.). London/Thousand Oaks/New Delhi: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  56. Mauss, I. B.; Bunge, S. A. & Gross, J. J. (2007). Automatic emotion regulation. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 1, doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00005.x. Available online at: <http://bungelab.berkeley.edu/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/Mauss_SPPC_2007.pdf> (Accessed 26 Aug 2017).
  57. Mayring, P. (2000). Qualitative content analysis. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research [online journal], June 2000. Available at: <https://utsc.utoronto.ca/~kmacd/IDSC10/Readings/text%20analysis/CA.pdf> (Accessed 29 Aug 2017).
  58. Morais, J. (2004). Os novos índios. Available online at: <http://planetajota.jor.br/xingu.php> (Accessed 29 Aug 2017).
  59. Morris, D. (1977). Manwatching. A field guide to human behaviour. New York: Abrams.Google Scholar
  60. Mummendey, H. D. (1990). Psychologie der Selbstdarstellung. Göttingen/Toronto/Zürich: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  61. Mummendey, H.-D., & Bolten, H.-G. (1985). Die impression–management–Theorie. In D. Frey & M. Irle (Eds.), Theorien der Sozialpsychologie, Motivations– Und Informationsverarbeitungstheorien (Vol. 3, pp. 57–77). Bern/Stuttgart/Toronto: Verlag Hans Huber.Google Scholar
  62. Narayanan, A. (2009). Resilience, metacognition and complexity. Journal of the Indian Academy of Applied Psychology, 35(Special Issue), 112–118.Google Scholar
  63. Nash, K., Prentice, M., Hirsh, J., McGregor, I., & Inzlicht, M. (2014). Muted neural response to distress among securely attached people. Scan, 9, 1239–1245. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nst099.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Olsson, C. A., Lyndal Bond, L., Burns, J. M., Vella-Brodrick, D. A., & Sawyer, S. M. (2003). Adolescent resilience: A concept analysis. Journal of Adolescence, 26, 1–11.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Punch, M. (1994). Politics and ethics in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The sage handbook of qualitative research (pp. 83–97). Thousand Oaks/London/New Delhi: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  66. Ritchie, J., Lewis, J., & Elam, G. (2003). Designing and selecting samples. In J. Ritchie & J. Lewis (Eds.), Qualitative research practice. A guide for social science students and researchers (pp. 77–108). London/Thousand Oaks/New Delhi: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  67. Rutter, M. (2006). Implications of resilience concepts for scientific understanding. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1094, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1376.002.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Ryan, G. W., & Bernard, H. R. (1994). Data management and analysis methods. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The sage handbook of qualitative research (pp. 769–802). Thousand Oaks/London/New Delhi: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  69. Scert Kerala. (2016). Anthropological research methods and techniques. Available online at: http://scert.kerala.gov.in/images/2015/Plustwo/antrapology%20final.pdf (Accessed 28 Aug 2017).
  70. Schachter, S., & Singer, J. E. (1962). Cognitive, social, and physiological determinants of emotional states. Psychology Review, 69(5), 379–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Schülein, J. A., & Reitze, S. (2010). Wissenschaftstheorie für Einsteiger. Stuttgart: UTB GmbH.Google Scholar
  72. Schultze-Kraft, M., Birman, D., Rusconi, M., Allefeld, C., Görgen, K., Dähne, S., Blankertz, B., & Haynes, J.-D. (2016). The point of no return in vetoing self–initiated movements. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113(4), 1080–1085.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston/New York: Houghton Mifflin Company.Google Scholar
  74. Shaukat, A., Levitt, M. D., Taylor, B. C., MacDonald, R., Shamliyan, T. A., Kane, R. L., & Wilt, T. J. (2010). Systematic review: Effective management strategies for lactose intolerance. Annals of Internal Medicine, 152(12), 797–803. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-152-12-201006150-00241.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Shean, M. (2015). Current theories relating to resilience and young people: A literature review. Melbourne: Victorian Health Promotion Foundation.Google Scholar
  76. Shih, M., Ambady, N., Richeson, J. A., Fujita, K., & Gray, H. M. (2002). Stereotype performance boosts: The impact of self-relevance and the manner of stereotype activation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(3), 638–647.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Spengler, O. (1926). The decline of the west (Vol. 1: Form and actuality). New York: Alfred A. Knopff (Orig.: Der Untergang des Abendlandes. Umrisse einer Morphologie der Weltgeschichte. (Vol. 1: Gestalt und Wirklichkeit). Wien: Braumüller, 1918. Revised ed. Munich: C. H. Beck, 1923).Google Scholar
  78. Spengler, O. (1928). The decline of the west. (Vol. II: Perspectives of world–history). New York: Alfred A. Knopff (Orig.: Der Untergang des Abendlandes. Umrisse einer Morphologie der Weltgeschichte. (Vol. 2: Welthistorische Perspektiven). Munich: C. H. Beck, 1922).Google Scholar
  79. Thomas, R. (2015). “He wants to know how all those people got in there”: Surveying the gods must be crazy through a post- and neo-colonial telescope. Public Journal of Semiotics, 6(2), 32–42.Google Scholar
  80. United Nations General Assembly. (2014). Promotion and protection of the rights of indigenous peoples in disaster risk reduction, prevention and preparedness initiatives. Study by the Expert Mechanism on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. (A/HRC/EMRIP/2014/2).Google Scholar
  81. Vos, M., & Sullivan, H. T. (2014). Community resilience in crises: Technology and social media enablers. Human Technology, 10(2), 61–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Wallace, T. P. (2009). Wealth, energy and human values: The dynamics of decaying civilizations from ancient Greece to America. Bloomington: AuthorHouse.Google Scholar
  83. Watzlawick, P. (1977). How real is real?: Confusion, disinformation, communication. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  84. Watzlawick, P., Beavin, J. H., & Jackson, D. D. (1967). Pragmatics of human communication. A study of interactional patterns, pathologies, and paradoxes. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  85. Wheeler, S. C., DeMarree, K. G., & Petty, R. E. (2004). Understanding prime-to-behavior effects: Insights from the active-self account. Social Cognition, 32(Special Issue), 109–123.Google Scholar
  86. Wicklund, R. A. (1990). Zero-variable theories and the psychology of the explainer. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Wicklund, R. A., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (1982). Symbolic self-completion. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  88. Wogan, P. (2006). Laughing at first contact. Visual Anthropology Review, 22(1), 14–33. https://doi.org/10.1525/var.2006.22.1.14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Arnold Groh
    • 1
  1. 1.Technical University of BerlinBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations