Advertisement

Introduction: Queer(ing) Children and Childhood in Early Modern English Drama and Culture

  • Jennifer Higginbotham
  • Mark Albert Johnston
Chapter

Abstract

The introduction analyzes the various historical and contemporary significances of early modern cultural representations of children and childhood in the drama of Shakespeare and his contemporaries through the lens of queer theory. It lays the groundwork for a discourse of early modern queer childhood studies, engaging with current critical discussions about queer children in the works of queer theorists such as Lee Edelman, James Kincaid, and Kathryn Bond Stockton. Interrogating the significance of premodern constructions of childhood queerness, the editors analyze the respective relevances of narratological, performative, and linguistic ideals and functions; categorical blurring and liminality (age, complexion, physiological development, etc.); temporal and spatial alterity; erotic subjectivity, objectivity, and agency; and differentiations as well as transformations of sex, gender, genre, class, status, race, (dis)ability, humanity/animality, and more. Ultimately, the chapter asserts that queer childhood studies might usefully maintain a productively anachronistic openness both to how children and childhood might have signified as queer for early modern culture, and how those representations might strike us as queer today.

References

  1. Adelman, Janet. 1999. Making Defect Perfection: Shakespeare and the One-Sex Model. In Enacting Gender on the English Renaissance Stage, ed. Viviana Comensoli and Anne Russell, 23–52. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  2. Anon. 1672. The Proverbs of Solomon: Newly Translated Out of the Original Tongue. Very Commodious for the Use of Young Children. Edinburgh: His Majesties Printers.Google Scholar
  3. Ayres, Philip. 1689. Mythologia Ethica, or, Three Centuries of Aesopian Fables in English Prose. London: Thomas Hawkins.Google Scholar
  4. Crooke, Helkiah. 1618. Mikrokosmographia: A Description of the Body of Man. London: William Iaggard Dwelling.Google Scholar
  5. Curiouser: On the Queerness of Children. 2004. Edited by Steven Bruhm and Natasha Hurley. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  6. Edelman, Lee. 2004. No Future: Queer Theory and the Death Drive. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Freccero, Carla. 2006. Queer/Early/Modern. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Golding, Arthur. 2017. Arthur Golding’s A Moral Fabletalk and Other Renaissance Fable Translations. In MHRA Tudor & Stuart Translations, ed. Liza Blake and Kathryn Vomero Santos, vol. 12, 276–277. Cambridge: Modern Humanities Research Association.Google Scholar
  9. Johnston, Mark Albert. 2017. Shakespeare’s Twelfth Night and the Fertile Infertility of Eroticized Early Modern Boys. Modern Philology 114 (3): 573–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kidd, Kenneth. 2011. Queer Theory’s Child and Children’s Literature Studies. PMLA 26 (1): 182–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kincaid, James. 1992. Child-Loving: The Erotic Child and Victorian Culture. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. King, Thomas A. 2004. The Gendering of Men, 1600–1750, The English Phallus. Vol. 1. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
  13. Lemnius, Levinus. 1576. The Touchstone of Complexions Generallye Appliable, Expedient and Profitable for All Such, As Be Desirous & Carefull of Their Bodylye Health. Translated by Thomas Newton. London: Thomas Marsh.Google Scholar
  14. Lesnik-Oberstein, Karín. 2010. Childhood, Queer Theory, and Feminism. Feminist Theory 11 (3): 309–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. ———. 2011. Introduction: Voice, Agency and the Child. In Children in Culture, Revisited, 1–17. Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lesnik-Oberstein, Karín, and Stephen Thomson. 2002. What Is Queer Theory Doing with the Child? Parallax 8 (1): 35–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Macbeth. 2016. Dir. James Kurtzel, Performances by Michael Fassbender Marion Cotillard, and Paddy Considine. Anchor Bay.Google Scholar
  18. Marston, John. 1598. The Metamorphosis of Pigmalions Image and Certaine Satyres. London: Iames Roberts.Google Scholar
  19. Maus, Katherine Eisaman. 1979. ‘Playhouse Flesh and Blood’: Sexual Ideology and the Restoration Actress. English Literary History 46 (4): 595–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. “queer.” adj. 1. 2017. Oxford English Dictionary Online. Accessed September 15, 2017. http://www.oed.com/view/Entry/156236?rskey=gHW2Fo&result=2&isAdvanced=false.
  21. The Riverside Shakespeare. 1997. Edited by G. Blakemore Evans et al. 2nd ed. Boston and New York: Houghton-Mifflin.Google Scholar
  22. Shannon, Laurie. 2000. Nature’s Bias: Renaissance Homonormativity and Elizabethan Comic Likeness. Modern Philology 98 (2): 183–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Shepard, Alexandra. 2003. Meanings of Manhood in Early Modern England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Sparey, Victoria. 2015. Performing Puberty: Fertile Complexions in Shakespeare’s Plays. Shakespeare Bulletin 33 (3): 441–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Stockton, Kathryn Bond. 2009. The Queer Child, or Growing Sideways in the Twentieth Century. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Tilley, Morris Palmer. 1950. A Dictionary of the Proverbs in England in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries: a collection of proverbs found in English literature and dictionaries of the period. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  27. Traub, Valerie. 2015. Thinking Sex with the Early Moderns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jennifer Higginbotham
    • 1
  • Mark Albert Johnston
    • 2
  1. 1.Ohio State UniversityColumbusUSA
  2. 2.Department of EnglishUniversity of WindsorWindsorCanada

Personalised recommendations