Abstract
If we want to use a technical system, we often face a challenge whether it is a coffee machine or a multifunction printer. How is that device functioning and what do I have to do to get a cup of coffee or to scan a page? While the functioning of many devices has been obvious in the past, the digitalization of the technical environment has led to the fact that we are increasingly failing to meet the challenge and finally fail. Contrary to other areas of life, however, failure in usage of technology not often does lead to serious consequences; what fails is merely an action. This can root from different causes: a lack of knowledge and skills, the task is too complex, the user interface of the technical system is badly designed and the organization-related context prevents the success of the action. These causes act on their own, on the other hand they interact with each other. Actions can be controlled in various ways: by thinking and solving problems, by applying learned rules and by automated unconscious routines. On all three levels of control, mistakes and failure are ultimately inevitable. However, the probability of failure can be reduced, in particular, by a Human Centred Design approach. On the other hand, failure can also be quite intentional, for example, when technical safety barriers prevent to perform dangerous actions before they unfold their harmful effects. However, the idea of replacing unreliable humans with reliable technical systems and thus preventing a failure does not work, because humans can also fail as developers, programmers and designers of technical systems. This is why blind trust from users in technology occasionally leads to failure, as numerous curious events in the use of navigation devices show.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bainbridge, L. (1983). Ironies of automation. Automatica, 19(6), 775–779.
BBC News. (1999). Accessed May 7, 2015, from http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/353563.stm
Dreyfus, H. L., & Dreyfus, S. E. (1987). Künstliche Intelligenz. Von den Grenzen der Denkmaschine und dem Wert der Intuition. Rheinbeck bei Hamburg: Rowohlt.
Focus.de. (2006). http://www.focus.de/panorama/welt/endlos-fahrt_aid_120342.html
Franzen, A. E. (2011). Navi denkt, FahrerIn lenkt. Aktive vs. semi-passive Ortserfahrung beim Autofahren. Bachelorarbeit, Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Paris-Lodron-Universität Salzburg, Fachbereich Psychologie.
Frese, M., & Zapf, D. (Hrsg.). (1991). Fehler bei der Arbeit mit dem Computer: Ergebnisse von Beobachtungen und Befragungen im Bürobereich. Reihe. “Schriften zur Arbeitspsychologie” (Bd. 52, hrsg. von E. Ulich). Bern: Huber.
Friedrich Schiller @ www.Wissen-im-Netz.info. (2015). Accessed May 7, 2015, from http://www.wissen-im-netz.info/literatur/schiller/briefe/koerner/1788/90.htm
Gentner, D., & Stevens, A. L. (Eds.). (1983). Mental models. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Hacker, W. & Sachse, P. (2013). Allgemeine Arbeitspsychologie. Psychische Regulation von Wissens-, Denk- und körperlicher Arbeit (3. Aufl.). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
Hurtienne, J., & Prümper, J. (2003). Stress in the office: The influence of software-ergonomic quality. In D. Harris, V. Duffy, M. Smith, & C. Stephanidis (Eds.), Human-centred computing: Cognitive, social, and ergonomic aspects (pp. 63–67). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models: Towards a cognitive science of language, inference, and consciousness. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Kahneman, D. (2012). Schnelles Denken, Langsames Denken. München: Siedler Verlag.
Keith, N., & Frese, M. (2008). Effectiveness of error management training: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 59–69.
Lazar, J., Jones, A., & Shneiderman, B. (2006). Workplace user frustration with computers: An exploratory investigation of the causes and severity. Behaviour & Information Technology, 25(3), 239–251.
Maeda, J. (2006). The laws of simplicity. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Norman, D. A. (2013). Design of everyday things: Revised and expanded. New York/London: Basic Books/MIT Press.
o. A. (2007). idrive – und wer fährt? Automobil-Tests. Heft, 5, 44–49.
Pappas, T. (1989). The joy of mathematics. San Carlos, CA: Wide World Publ./Tetra.
Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6.
Rasmussen, J. (1983). Skills, rules, knowledge; signals, signs, and symbols, and other distinctions in human performance models. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 13, 257–266.
Rasmussen, J. (1987). Mental models and the control of action in complex environments. Selected papers of the 6th interdisciplinary workshop on informatics and psychology: Mental models and human-computer interaction 1 (pp. 41–69). Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Co.
Reason, J. (1987). The chernobyl errors. Bulletin of the British Psychological Science, 40, 201–206.
Reason, J. (1994). Menschliches Versagen. Heidelberg: Spektrum Akademischer Verlag.
Rosa. (2005). Beschleunigung. Die Veränderung der Temporalstrukturen in der Moderne. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.
rp-online.de. (2007). Accessed May 14, 2015, from http://www.rp-online.de/panorama/ausland/lastwagenfahrer-drei-tage-in-kurve-gefangen-aid-1.2030139
Shortnews.de. (2006). Accessed May 14, 2015, from http://www.shortnews.de/id/617449/gb-navigationssystem-fuehrt-autofahrer-anstatt-in-dorf-auf-30-meter-klippe
Spiegel Online.de. (2012). Accessed May 14, 2015, from http://www.spiegel.de/reise/aktuell/navi-leitete-touristen-mit-mietwagen- ins-meer-a-821757.html. letzter.
Streitz, N. (1985). Die Rolle von mentalen und konzeptuellen Modellen in der Mensch-Computer- Interaktion: Konsequenzen für die Software-Ergonomie? In H.-J. Bullinger (Ed.), Software-Erqonomie ‘85: Mensch-Computer-lnteraktion (pp. 280–292). Stuttgart: B.G. Teubner.
Triebe, J. K., & Wittstock, M. (1997). Die Gebrauchstauglichkeit von Software im Dienste einer gesundheitlichen Prävention. In R. Liskowsky et al. (Eds.), Software-Ergonomie 1997 (pp. 297–306). Stuttgart: Teubner.
Online Resources
On the book website, additional content on failure is provided. Please visit: www.artop.de/en/failure
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wandke, H. (2018). Failure in Use of Technology. In: Kunert, S. (eds) Strategies in Failure Management. Management for Professionals. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72757-8_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72757-8_19
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-72756-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-72757-8
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)