Skip to main content

Failure in Design

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Strategies in Failure Management

Part of the book series: Management for Professionals ((MANAGPROF))

  • 1988 Accesses

Abstract

Failure in design may occur anywhere in the process of design, but also when a finished design object interacts with the recipient. Failure is thus shown to be an integral part of the design activity and the design artefact. Remarkably, failure of existing products has often triggered the development of new radical innovations. Design might be one of several disciplines that has cultivated failure as part of its professional routine, and one that has developed a “sense of failure” because of it. In some phenomena that are presented in the main text, failure is identified as the reason for a perceived higher value of the final design artefact.

The authors lay out the intersection of design and failure in a number of categories and connect them to findings from empirical research in a wide range of disciplines. Each intersection is packed with examples from history or practice to further shed light on it. The conclusion provides starting points to incorporate the reflections into the real-world practice of managers and other professionals who are interested in a new perspective in order to improve their own activities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See von Stamm (2018).

  2. 2.

    What happens when these parameters are lacking is vividly described by Thomas Thwaites in his book “The Toaster Project“. The obstacles to developing a simple consumer product, such as a toaster, seem to be a mythical work of art if there is no interdisciplinary expertise, no process, and no organization behind the development.

  3. 3.

    See also “Educating Designers for a Global Context?” on this topic. An Interdisciplinary Education Model for Design Education at the Salzburg University of Applied Sciences, where this insight has already made its way into the curriculum for designers.

References

  • Arendt, H., & Benjamin, W. (1968). The work of art in the age of mechanical reproduction, illuminations. London: Fontana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayern Design (Ed.) (2004). Design, ja aber … Der Rang des Designs in Bayern 2004. Nürnberg: Bayern Design.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bessant, J., & Bruce, M. (2002). Design in business. Strategic innovation through design. London: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Best, K. (2006). Design management. Managing design strategy, process and implementation. Worthing: AVA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J. S. (1961). The act of discovery. Harvard Educational Review, 31, 21–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bürdek, B. E. (2005). Design. History, theory and practice of product design. Basel: Birkhäuser.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyson, J. (2004). Sturm gegen den Stillstand. Hamburg: Hoffmann und Campe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eastaway, R. (2009). Kreatives Denken. 101 Wege neue Ideen zu entwickeln. Köln: Evergreen GmbH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eppler, M. J., Hoffmann, F., & Pfister, R. A. (2014). Creability. Gemeinsam Kreativ – Innovative Methoden für die Ideenentwicklung in Teams. Stuttgart: Schäffer-Poeschel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goel, V. (1995). Sketches of thought. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hank, R. & Meck, G., (2015, December 13). Piechs Erbe. Frankfurter Allgemeine Sonntagszeitung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatamura, Y. (2009). Learning from design failure. Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry, K. (2015). Drawing for product designers. London: Lawrence King.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heufler, G. (2016). Design Basics. Von der Idee zum Produkt (5th ed.). Zürich: Niggli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koren, L. (1994). Wabi-Sabi for artists, designers, poets & philosophers. Berkeley, CA: Stone Bridge Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, V. (2013). 101 design methods. A structured approach for driving innovation in your organization. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lackus, M., Kolar, M., Rothbucher, B., & Walcher, D. (2007). Communication gaps or mentality gaps – Why do product development and design processes get unsuccessful? Puch bei Hallein: Salzburg University of Applied Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang, J. (2015). Prozessästhetik. Eine ästhetische Erfahrungstheorie des ökologischen Designs. Basel: Birkhäuser.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefever, L. (2013). The art of explanation, making your ideas, products, and services easier to understand. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ling, D. (2015). Complete design thinking guide. For successful professionals. Singapore: Emerge Creatives Group LLP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lockwood, T. (2010). DesignThinking. Integrating innovation, customer experience, and brand value. New York: Allworth Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lukas, P. (1998). The ghastliest product launches. Fortune. Retrieved June 10, 2017, from http://archive.fortune.com/magazines/fortune/fortune_archive/1998/03/16/239261/index.htm

  • Mansfield, E., Rapaport, J., Schnee, J., Wagner, S., & Hamburger, M. (1971). Research and innovation in the modern corporation. New York: Norton.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, R. (2009). The design of business. Why design thinking is the next competitive advantage. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMath, R. (1998). What were they thinking? Marketing lessons I’ve learned from over 80,000 new product innovations and idiocies. New York: Times Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nachtigall, W. (1997). Vorbild Natur. Bionik-Design für funktionelles Gestalten. Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, D. A. (2013). The design of everyday things. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olofsson, E., & Sjölen, K. (2005). Design sketching. Klippan: Keeos Design Books AB.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oser, F., & Volery, T. (2012). «Sense of failure» and «sense of success» among entrepreneurs: The identification and promotion of neglected twin entrepreneurial competencies. Empirical Research in Vocational Education and Training, 4(1), 27–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Packard, V. (1960). The waste makers. New York: Ig Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petroski, H. (2008). The evolution of useful things: Success through failure. In S. Heller (Ed.), Design disasters: Great designers fabulous failures & lessons learned (pp. 133–137). New York: Allworth Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothbucher, B. (2003). Framework toward cultural customization of design. Bulletin of Japanese Society for the Science of Design, 49(5), 51–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothbucher, B. (2004). IDEA, executive training. Linz: University of Applied Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothbucher, B., & Lackus, M. (2008). Interdisciplinary method development for the operationalization of product and brand communication. 4th Swiss design network symposium 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, B. (2005). Design – Eine Einführung. Entwurf im sozialen, kulturellen und wirtschaftlichen Kontext. Basel: Birkhäuser.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1988). The science of design: Creating the artificial. Design Issues, 4(1/2), 67–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. M., Collins, A. F., Morris, P. E., & Levy, P. (1995). Cognition in action (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sniukas, M., Lee, P., & Morasky, M. (2016). The art of opportunity. How to build growth and ventures through strategic innovation and visual thinking. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stamm, B. v. (2008). Managing innovation, design and creativity (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thwaites, T. (2011). The toaster project. Or a heroic attempt to build a simple electric appliance from scratch. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tufte, E. R. (2006). The cognitive style of powerpoint: Pitching out corrupts within (2nd ed.). Cheshire, CN: Graphics Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verganti, R. (2009). Design-driven innovation. Changing the rules of competition by radically innovating what things mean. Boston, MA: Harvard Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Stamm, B. (2018). Failure in innovation: Is there such a thing? In S. Kunert (Ed.), Strategies in failure management: Scientific insights, case studies and tools. Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

Online Resources

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Rothbucher, B., Rothbucher, K. (2018). Failure in Design. In: Kunert, S. (eds) Strategies in Failure Management. Management for Professionals. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72757-8_18

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics