Skip to main content

Development Aid—An Historic-Political Overview

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Development Aid—Populism and the End of the Neoliberal Agenda

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Philosophy ((BRIEFSPHILOSOPH))

  • 1609 Accesses

Abstract

Development aid has been an important catalyst for economic development and international politics since the end of WWII. A critical analysis of the main political, social and economic advances in development aid, traces the development agenda from the advent of the Bretton Woods agreement, the Truman Doctrine and the Marshall Plan, to the Washington Consensus and its neoliberal manifesto. The failure of the Washington Consensus and the rise of the post-Washington Consensus is analysed providing a backdrop for the critique of economic globalisation as a development aid cornerstone. Trump’s rejection of the neoliberal globalisation agenda and departure from post-WWII ideologies is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abbott, G.C. 1971. A Re-Examination of the 1929 Colonial Development Act. The Economic History Review 24 (1): 68–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aksamit, D. 2011. Modernization Theory in all but the name: Chester Bowles and the Point Four Program. Manhattan Kansas: Kansas State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atwood, J.B., M.P. McPherson, and A. Natsios. 2008. Arrested Development: Making Foreign Aid a More Effective Tool. Foreign Affairs 87 (6): 123–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhagwati, J. 2004. In Defense of Globalization. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blomgren, A.-M. 1997. Nyliberal politisk filosofi. En kritisk analys av Milton Friedman, Robert Nozickoch F. A. Hayek. Nora: Bokförlaget Nya Doxa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boneau, D. 2004. Friedrich von Hayek, the Father of neo-liberalism. http://www.voltairenet.org/article30058.html. Accessed November 5, 2017.

  • Bostdorff, D.M. 2008. Proclaiming the Truman Doctrine: The Cold War Call to Arms. College Station: Texas A&M University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broad, R. 2004. The Washington Consensus Meets the Global Backlash. Globalizations 1 (2): 129–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buira, A. 2003. An analysis of IMF conditionality. G24 Discussion Paper, No. 22. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.66.1578&rep=rep1&type=pdf. Accessed November 5, 2017.

  • Burk, K. 2001. The Marshall Plan: Filling in Some of the Blanks. Contemporary European History 10 (2): 267–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burnside, A.C., and D. Dollar. 1997. Aid, Policies, and Growth. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 569252. https://ssrn.com/abstract=569252. Accessed March 6, 2017.

  • Committee on Foreign Affairs. 1949. Point Four Background and Program—International Technical Cooperation Act 1949. Washington: United States House Committee on Foreign Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cromwell, W.C. 1979. The Marshall Non-Plan, Congress and the Soviet Union. The Western Political Quarterly 32 (4): 422–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das, D.P. 2010. The Evolution and Unfolding of Financial Globalisation. Robina Qld: Bond University Globalisation and Development Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delton, J.A. 2013. Rethinking the 1950s: How Anticommunism and the Cold War made America Liberal. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Development Assistance Committee. 2006. DAC in Dates: The History of OECD’s Development Assistance Committee. Paris: OECD Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easterly, W. 2005. National Policies and Economic Growth: A Reappraisal. In Handbook of Economic Growth, vol. 1, ed. P. Aghion, and S. Durlauf, 1015–1059. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, S. 2014. Economic development and the effectiveness of foreign aid: A historical perspective. VOX—CEPR’s Policy Portal. http://voxeu.org/article/development-and-foreign-aid-historical-perspective. Accessed February 19, 2017.

  • Ekbladh, D. 2010. The Great American Mission: Modernization and the Construction of an American World Order. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, P. 2000. Fighting Marginalization with Transnational Networks: Counter-Hegemonic Globalization. Contemporary Sociology 29 (1): 230–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Figaj, M. 2010. Who Gets Environmental Aid? The Characteristics of Global Environmental Aid Distribution. Environmental Economics and Policy Studies 12: 97–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleck, R.K., and C. Kilby. 2010. Changing aid regimes? U.S. foreign aid from the Cold War to the War on Terror. Journal of Development Economics 91 (2): 185–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. 1962. Capitalism and Freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. 1980. Free to Choose. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M., and A.J. Schwartz. 1963. A Monetary History of the United States 1867–1960, Princeton. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, F. 1989. The end of history? The National Interest 16: 3–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, F. 1992. The End of History and the Last Man. London: Penguin Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaddis, J.L. 2005. Strategies of Containment: A Critical Appraisal of Postwar American National Security Policy. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerschenkron, A. 1962. Economic backwardness in historical perspective, a book of essays. Cambridge MA: Belknap Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillingham, J. 2003. European Integration 1950–2003: Superstate or New Market Economy?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gimbel, J. 1976. The origins of the Marshall Plan. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, M. 2005. Imperial Nature: The World bank and the Struggle for Social Justice in the Age of Globalisation. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • González, A. 2016. Globalization Is the Only Answer. Project Syndicate (August 8, 2016). http://www.worldbank.org/en/news/opinion/2016/08/08/globalization-is-the-only-answer. Accessed April 3, 2017.

  • Gore, C. 2000. The Rise and Fall of the Washington Consensus as a Paradigm for Developing Countries. World Development 28 (5): 789–804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goroff, K. 2017. Why Trump Can’t Bully China. Project Syndicate, (February 9, 2017). https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/trump-trade-war-china-by-kenneth-rogoff-2017-02?utm_source=Project+Syndicate+Newsletter&utm_campaign=d882b0888d-why_trump_cant_bully_china_by_rogoff_2_12_2016&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_73bad5b7d8-d882b0888d-93848665. Accessed February 12, 2017.

  • Harvey, D. 2005. A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F.A. 1944. The Road to Serfdom. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F.A. 1973. Law, Legislation and Liberty: A new Statement of the Liberal Principles and Political Economy. Volume I: Rules and Order. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A. 1979. Law, Legislation and Liberty: A new Statement of the Liberal Principles and Political Economy. Vol. III: The Political Order of a Free People. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayton, B. 2010. Vietnam Rising Dragon. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hebron, L., and J.F. Stack. 2017. Globalisation—Debunking the Myths, 3rd ed. New York and London: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helleiner, E. 2014. Forgotten Foundations of Bretton Woods: International Development and the Making of the Postwar Order. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Held, D. 2008. Global Covenant—The Social Democratic Alternative to the Washington Consensus. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Held, D., A. McGrew, D. Goldblatt, and J. Perraton. 1999. Global Transformations: Politics, Economics and Culture. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, M.J. 1987. The Marshall Plan—America, Britain, and the reconstruction of Western Europe, 1947–1952. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ikenberry, G.J. 1993. The Political Origins of Bretton Woods. In A Retrospective on the Bretton Woods System: Lessons for International Monetary Reform, ed. M.D. Bordo, and B. Eichengreen, 155–198. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Monetary Fund (IMF). 2006. Globalization: Threat or Opportunity? SCC Data Paper. https://www.imf.org/external/np/exr/ib/2000/041200to.htm. Accessed April 3, 2017.

  • Jakupec, V., and M. Kelly. 2015. The Relevance of Asian Development Bank: Existing in the Shadow of the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank. Journal of Regional Socio-Economic Issues 5 (3): 31–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jakupec, V., and M. Kelly. 2016. Development Aid: Regulatory Impact Assessment and Conditionality. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 34 (4): 319–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jomo, K., and B. Fine (eds.). 2006. The New Development Economics: After the Washington Consensus. London: Zed Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, P.R. 1986. Strategic Trade Policy and The New International Economics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, P.R. 1995a. Cycles of Conventional Wisdom on Economic Development. International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs 1944-) 71(4):717–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, P. 1995b. Dutch tulips and emerging markets. Foreign Affairs 74 (4): 28–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, P.R. 2008. Inequality and Redistribution. In The Washington Consensus Reconsidered—Towards a New Global Governance, ed. N. Serra, and J.E. Stiglitz, 31–40. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lebovic, J.H., and E. Voeten. 2009. The Cost of Shame: International Organizations and Foreign Aid in the Punishing of Human Rights Violators. Journal of Peace Research 46 (1): 79–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundestad, G. 2003. The United States and Western Europe Since 1945: From Empire to Invasion to Transatlantic Drift. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Macekura, S. 2013. The Point Four Program and U.S. International Development Policy. Political Science Quarterly 128 (1): 127–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magid, J. 2012. The Marshall Plan. Advances in Historical Studies 1 (1): 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mallalieu, W.C. 1958. The Origin of the Marshall Plan: A Study in Policy Formation and National Leadership. Political Science Quarterly 73 (4): 481–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mann, M. 2013. The Sources of Social Power: Volume 4, Globalizations, 1945–2011. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marangos, J. 2008. The evolution of the anti-Washington Consensus debate: from “post-Washington Consensus” to “after the Washington Consensus”. Competition and Change 12 (3): 227–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marangos, J. 2009. What happened to the Washington Consensus? The evolution of international development policy. The Journal of Socio-Economics 38: 197–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGlinchey, S. 2009. The Marshall Plan, the Truman Doctrine, and the Division of Europe. E-International Relations. http://www.e-ir.info/2009/10/13/the-marshall-plan-the-truman-doctrine-and-the-division-of-europe/. Accessed March 1, 2017.

  • Mc Grew, A. 1992. A Global Society? In Modernity and its Futures, ed. S. Hall, D. Held, and T. McGrew, 61–116. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mises, v.L. 1962. The Free and Prosperous Commonwealth: An Exposition of the Ideas of Classical Liberalism. Princeton: Van Nostrand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgenthau, H. 1962. A political theory of foreign aid. American Political Science Review 56 (2): 301–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munck, R. 2005. Neoliberalism and Politics, and the Politics of Neoliberalism. In Neoliberalism: A Critical Reader, ed. A. Saad-Filho, and D. Johnston, 60–69. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nozick, R. 1974. Anarchy, State and Utopia. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Önis, Z., and F. Senses. 2003. Rethinking the Emerging Post-Washington Consensus: A Critical Appraisal - Economic Research Center Working Paper in Economics 03/09. Ankara: ERC Middle East Technical University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Overseas Development Institute. 1964. British Aid-5—Colonial Development a factual survey of the origins and history of British aid to developing countries. London: ODI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peet, R. 2009. Unholy Trinity: The IMF, World Bank and WTO. London and New York: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rafter, K., and H.W. Singer. 2001. ODA after the Cold War: Less Money at Tougher Conditions. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiner, E.S., and J.K. Sundaram. 2015. Why we need a global Marshall Plan. World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2015/04/why-we-need-a-global-marshall-plan/. Accessed March 15, 2017.

  • Rodrik, D. 1998. Industrial development: Some stylized facts and policy directions. In Industrial Development for the 21st Century, ed. D. O’Connor, and M. Kjöllerström, 7–28. London and New York: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrik, D. 2006. Goodbye Washington Consensus, hello Washington confusion? A review of World Bank’s economic growth in the 1990s: learning from a decade of reform. Journal of Economic Literature 44: 973–987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruffin, R.J. 2002. David Ricardo’s discovery of comparative advantage. History of Political Economy 34 (4): 727–748.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sachs, J.D., and W.T. Woo. 2000. Understanding China’s Economic Performance. Journal of Policy Reform 4 (1): 1–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sachs, J.D. 2005. The End of Poverty: How we can make it happen in our lifetime. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soborski, R. 2012. Globalization and ideology: a critical review of the debate. Journal of Political Ideology 17 (3): 323–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spalding, E.E. 2006. The First Cold Warrior: Harry Truman, Containment, and the Remaking of Liberal Internationalism. Lexington: The University Press of Kentucky.

    Google Scholar 

  • Starr, A., and J. Adams. 2003. Anti-globalization; The Global Fight for Local Autonomy. New Political Science 25 (1): 19–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stehr, C. 2009. Globalisierung und Destabilisierugstendenzen innerhalb des Internationalen Systems: Eine Indikatorenanalyse für ausgewählte Nationalstaaten. München: Herbert Utz Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J.E. 1998a. More Instruments and Broader Goals: Moving toward the Post-Washington Consensus. WIDER Annual Lectures, Tokyo: The United Nations University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J. E. 1998b. Towards a New Paradigm for Development. Raúl Prebisch Lecture. Geneva: UNCTAD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J.E. 2001. The role of International Finance Institutions in the current Global Economy. In The Rebel Within, ed. H.-J. Chang, 172–193. London: Wimbledon Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J. 2002. Globalization and its Discontent. New York: W.W. Norton & Company Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J.E. 2008. Is there a Post-Washington Consensus Consensus? In The Washington Consensus Reconsidered—Towards a New Global Governance, ed. N. Serra, and J.E. Stiglitz, 41–56. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J.E., and B. Greenwald. 2003. Towards a New Paradigm for Monetary Policy. London: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wilde, R. 2016. The Truman Doctrine and the Cold War. About-Education: European History. http://europeanhistory.about.com/od/glossary/g/gltrumandoctrin.htm. Accessed March 1, 2017.

  • Williams, D. 2011. International Development and Global Politics: History, Theory and Practice. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, J. 1989. What Washington Consensus Means by Policy Reforms. In Latin American Readjustment: How much has happened, ed. J. Williamson, 421–427. Washington: Institute for International Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, J. 2002. Did the Washington Consensus Fail? Outline of Remarks at CSIS. Washington DC: Institute for International Economics (November 6, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, M. 2013. Globalisation. Financial Times (June 13, 2013). https://www.ft.com/content/12c74980-d1bf-11e2-9336-00144feab7de. Accessed April 3, 2017.

  • Wood, R. 1986. From Marshall Plan to Debt Crisis: Foreign Aid and Development Choices in the World Economy. Berkeley, Los Angeles and London: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yunker, J.A. 2014. Global Marshall Plan: Theory and Evidence. London and Lanham: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Viktor Jakupec .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Jakupec, V. (2018). Development Aid—An Historic-Political Overview. In: Development Aid—Populism and the End of the Neoliberal Agenda. SpringerBriefs in Philosophy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72748-6_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics