Advertisement

From ‘Redemption of Physical Reality’ to ‘Recreation of Perceptual (Hyper)reality’

  • Yong Liu
Chapter
  • 182 Downloads

Abstract

I undertake a comparative analysis of the distinctions between 2D and 3D cinema based on a correlation between production mode and perceptual physiologies. Moreover, with reference to Kracauer’s classic remark (Theory of film: The redemption of physical reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1961) that ‘the nature of film is the redemption of physical reality,’ I argue for 3D’s enhanced ability to (re)construct and recreate a ‘hyper-reality,’ based on 3D’s (actual or virtual) two-camera mechanism and its integration with digital technologies. Furthermore, based on the above argument, I show how 3D’s hyper-reality leads to distinctive aesthetic approaches, comparing contemporary examples of 2D and 3D cinema. This chapter thus considers the question of ‘the very nature’ of stereoscopic cinema, from which its narrative tropes and techniques are derived. It therefore provides the ontological basis for my subsequent discussion of such tropes and techniques, from the spatiotemporal articulation of 3D ‘timespaces’ to the layering of narrational perspectives.

References

  1. Bazin, A. (2005). What is cinema? (H. Gary, Ed. & Trans., Vols. I & II). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  2. Branigan, E. (1984). Point of view in the cinema. Berlin/New York/Amsterdam: Mouton Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Evans, B. J. W. (2009). Binocular vision assessment. In M. Rosenfield, N. Logan (Eds.), & K. Edwards (Contributing Ed.), Optometry: Science, techniques and clinical management (pp. 241–256). Edinburgh/New York: Elsevier, Ltd.Google Scholar
  4. Goldstein, E. B. (2002). Sensation and perception (6th ed.). Pacific Grove: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  5. Haber, R. N., & Hershenson, M. (1973). The psychology of visual perception. Oxford: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
  6. Keyes, R. (2011). Christopher Nolan explains choice of no 3D in Batman 3. Screenrant Website. Retrieved from https://screenrant.com/christopher-nolan-3d-batman-3-dark-knight-rises/
  7. Kozachik, P. (2009, February). 2 worlds in 3 dimensions. American Cinematographer Website. Retrieved from https://theasc.com/ac_magazine/February2009/Coraline/page1.html
  8. Kracauer, S. (1961). Theory of film: The redemption of physical reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Lee, A. (2013, April 23). Exclusive live video interview with Ang Lee about 3D in the Life of Pi @ 3DCS 2013 [YouTube]. 3DCreativeSummit. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8YXzKJu5wjw
  10. Mather, G. (2006). Foundations of perception. Hove/New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  11. Nelson, J. (1988). Binocular vision: Disparity detection and anomalous correspondence. In K. Edwards & R. Llewellyn (Eds.), Optometry (pp. 217–237). London: Butterwoth & Co. Ltd.Google Scholar
  12. Prince, S. (2000). Screening violence. London: The Athlone Press.Google Scholar
  13. Prince, S. (2012). Digital visual effects in cinema: The seduction of reality. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Purse, L. (2013). Digital imaging in popular cinema. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Rodowick, D. N. (2007). The virtual life of film. Cambridge, MA/London: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ross, M. (2012, Winter). The 3-D aesthetic: Avatar and hyperhaptic visuality. Screen, 53(4), 381–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ross, S. (2012). Invitation to the voyage: The flight sequence in contemporary 3D cinema. Film History, 24(2), 210–220.  https://doi.org/10.1353/fih.2012.0010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Shaviro, S. (2011, August 30). The Pinocchio theory: Post-continuity [Web log post]. Shaviro blog. Retrieved from http://www.shaviro.com/Blog/?p=1003
  19. Wood, A. (2007). Digital encounters. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Wood, A. (2013). Intangible spaces: Three-dimensional technology in Hugo and IMAX in The Dark Knight. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 21(2), 169–181, published by SAGE Online September 20, 2013 and a revised version republished in May 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Zettl, H. (2012). Why 3D may work occasionally: Case reopened. Visual Communication Quarterly, 19(3), 148–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yong Liu
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Arts and Social SciencesUniversiti Brunei DarussalamBandar Seri BegawanBrunei Darussalam

Personalised recommendations