Skip to main content

Participation as Learning for Change in Everyday Spaces: Enhancing Meaning and Effectiveness Using Action Research

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Theorising Childhood

Part of the book series: Studies in Childhood and Youth ((SCY))

Abstract

In spite of advances in the theory and practice of participation, emphasis continues to be placed on hearing children’s views and experiences rather than more active roles in all stages of the project cycle. In particular, comparatively little attention is paid to the importance of learning in participatory processes. In addition, attention is broadening beyond formal decision-making contexts to focus on the ways in which young people participate in everyday life contexts, bringing to the fore the importance of process and of social learning in everyday relationships as young people reflexively engage with others as equal and active citizens. This chapter draws on recent research to elaborate a case for understanding participation as a process of learning for change, drawing on principles of action research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    As identified by respondents.

  2. 2.

    There is a body of literature that critiques empowerment in terms of placing responsibility for change on the individual (see, e.g., McLaughlin, 2016). In contrast, I argue that ‘empowerment’ does not negate the responsibility of the state nor individualise power and responsibility, but instead seeks to maximise the power of individuals in relation to the state.

  3. 3.

    See also Mannion (2007), who advocates for understanding participation as a relational process in which the collaboration and interaction between children and adults is key.

  4. 4.

    www.partispace.eu.

  5. 5.

    In the UK public sector, interventions are often developed according to a ‘commissioning cycle’ (see, e.g., http://commissioning.libraryservices.nhs.uk/commissioning-cycle).

  6. 6.

    The phases originally outlined by Kolb (1984) in his experiential learning cycle were experience, reflection, learning and action.

  7. 7.

    Adapted from Freire (1996, p. 14).

  8. 8.

    This chapter acknowledges that there are many ‘traveller’ groups who do not identify as Roma. Indeed, many travellers, even in one community, argue for the need to recognise diversity in traveller/Roma communities. The arguments and approaches in this chapter are, however, relevant to all types of traveller and indeed any marginalised groups.

  9. 9.

    This project with young Roma was funded by a Fundamental Rights and Citizenship Action grant (Just/2013/FRAC/AG/6230) and was coordinated by Maria Roth from Babes-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania, and Cath Larkins, University of Central Lancashire, UK. For further information, see www.peeryouth.eu.

  10. 10.

    See http://www.editura.ubbcluj.ro/bd/ebooks/pdf/2009.pdf.

  11. 11.

    This case-study material draws on work specifically in Bulgaria coordinated by Borislava Metcheva from the Know How Centre, New Bulgarian University.

  12. 12.

    This is resonant with the child reporters of Orissa in India where children and young people conducted surveys of their neighbourhood to identify changes they felt were needed (Acharya, 2010).

  13. 13.

    See participatory practice guide for the PEER project (http://peeraction.eu/en/guide-for-professionals/).

References

  • Acharya, L. (2010). The Child reporters of Orissa. In B. Percy-Smith & N. Thomas (Eds.), A Handbook of children and young people’s participation: Perspectives from theory and practice (pp. 204–214). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allender, S., Cowburn, G., & Foster, C. (2006). Understanding participation in sport and physical activity among children and adults: A review of qualitative studies. Health Education Research, 21(6), 826–835. https://doi.org/10.1093/her/cyl063.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batsleer, J. (2010). Commentary 4: Methods and frameworks. In B. Percy-Smith & N. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of children and young people’s participation: Perspectives from theory and practice (pp. 193–195). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronfrenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chawla, L. (2002). Growing up in an urbanizing world. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkoway, B., & Gutierrez, L. (Eds.). (2006). Youth participation and community change. Binghamton, NY: Haworth Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, P. M., & O’Brien, M. (2003). Children in the city: Home, neighbourhood and community. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A., & Percy-Smith, B. (2006). Beyond consultation: Participatory practices in everyday spaces. Children, Youth and Environments, 16(2), 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cockburn, T. (2013). Rethinking children’s citizenship. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • DES. (1982). Experience and participation: Review group on the youth service in England (‘The Thompson Report’). London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • ECORYS. (2015). Evaluation of legislation, policy and practice on children’s participation in the European Union. Brussels: EU DG Justice. https://doi.org/10.2838/45596.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, K., & Furlong, A. (1997). Metaphors of youth transitions: Niches, pathways, trajectories or navigations. In J. Bynner, L. Chisholm, & A. Furlong (Eds.), Youth, citizenship and social change in a European context. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fielding, M. (2006). Leadership, radical student engagement and the necessity of person-centre education. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 9(4), 299–313. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603120600895411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald, R., Graham, A., Smith, A., & Taylor, N. (2010). Children’s participation as a struggle over recognition: Exploring the promise of dialogue. In B. Percy-Smith & N. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of children’s participation: Perspectives from theory and practice (pp. 293–305). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P. (1971/1996). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedmann, J. (1992). Empowerment: The politics of alternative development. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallacher, L., & Gallagher, M. (2008). Methodological immaturity in childhood research? Thinking through ‘participatory methods’. Childhood, 15(4), 499–516. https://doi.org/10.1177/0907568208091672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelder, K., & Thornton, S. (Eds.). (1997). The subcultures reader. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginwright, S., & Cammarota, J. (2007). Youth activism in the urban community: Learning critical civic praxis within community organisations. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 20(6), 693–710. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518390701630833.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, S., & Jefferson, T. (Eds.). (1976). Resistance through rituals: Youth subcultures in post-war Britain. London: Hutchinson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, R. (1992). Children’s participation: From tokenism to citizenship. Florence, Italy: UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hebdige, D. (1979). Subculture: The meaning of style. London: Methuan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hickey, S., & Mohan, G. (Eds.). (2004). Participation: From tyranny to transformation? Exploring new approaches to participation. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Honneth, A. (1995). The struggle for recognition: The moral grammar of social conflicts. Bristol: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juris, J. S., & Pleyers, G. H. (2009). Alter-activism: Emerging cultures of participation among young global justice activists. Journal of Youth Studies, 12, 57–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676260802345765.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kemmis, S. (2001). Exploring the relevance of critical theory for action research: Emancipatory action research in the footsteps of Jurgen Habermas. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), The handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice (pp. 91–102). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. (1948). Resolving social conflicts; selected papers on group dynamics. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieberg, M. (1995). Teenagers and public space. Communication Research, 22(6), 720–744. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365095022006008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundy, L. (2007). ‘Voice’ is not enough: Conceptualising Article 12 of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. British Educational Research Journal, 33(6), 927–942. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920701657033.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mannion, G. (2007). Going spatial, going relational: Why listening to children and children’s participation needs reframing. Discourse, 28(3), 405–420. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596300701458970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, H., & Limb, M. (1999). Defining an agenda for the geography of children: Review and prospect. Progress in Human Geography, 23(1), 61–90. https://doi.org/10.1191/030913299670961492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, H., Limb, M., & Percy-Smith, B. (1998). Changing worlds: The microgeographies of young teenagers. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie, 89(2), 193–202. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9663.00018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, K. (2016). Empowerment: A critique. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moosa-Mitha, M. (2005). A difference-centred alternative to theorization of children’s citizenship rights. Citizenship Studies, 9(4), 369–388. https://doi.org/10.1080/13621020500211354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Percy-Smith, B. (1999). Multiple childhood geographies: Giving voice to young people’s experience of place (Unpublished PhD thesis). University of Northampton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Percy-Smith, B. (2006). From consultation to social learning in community participation with young people. Children Youth and Environments, 16(2), 153–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Percy-Smith, B. (2007). You think you know? You have no idea: Youth participation in health policy development. Health Education Research, 22(6), 879–894. https://doi.org/10.1093/her/cym032.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Percy-Smith, B. (2010). Councils, consultation and community: Rethinking the spaces for children and young people’s participation. Children’s Geographies, 8(2), 107–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733281003691368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Percy-Smith, B., & Malone, K. (2001). Making children’s participation in neighbourhood settings relevant to the everyday lives of young people. PLA Notes, 42, 18–22. London: IIED.

    Google Scholar 

  • Percy-Smith, B., & Thomas, N. (Eds.). (2010). Handbook of children’s participation: Perspectives from theory and practice. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reason, P., & Bradbury, H. (Eds.). (2001). A Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, F. M. (2009). Youth political participation: Is this the end of generational cleavage? International Sociology, 24(4), 467–497. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580909334498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schon, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, R. (2004). Participation in practice: Making it meaningful, effective and sustainable. Children and Society, 18(2), 106–118. https://doi.org/10.1002/chi.817.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skelton, T., & Valentine, G. (Eds.). (1998). Cool places: Geographies of youth cultures. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, N. (2007). Towards a theory of children’s participation. International Journal of Children’s Rights, 15(2), 199–218. https://doi.org/10.1163/092755607X206489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, N. (2012). Love, rights and solidarity: Studying children’s participation using Honneth’s theory of recognition. Childhood, 19(4), 453–466. https://doi.org/10.1177/0907568211434604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, N., & Percy-Smith, B. (2012). ‘It’s about changing services and building relationships’: Evaluating the development of Children in Care Councils. Child and Family Social Work, 17(4), 487–496. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2206.2011.00806.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilbury, D. (2007). Learning based change for sustainability: Perspectives and pathways. In A. E. J. Wals (Ed.), Social learning: Towards a sustainable world (pp. 117–132). Wageningen: Wageningen Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tisdall, E. K. M. (2013). The transformation of participation? Exploring the potential of ‘transformative participation’ for theory and practice around children and young people’s participation. Global Studies of Childhood, 3(2), 183–193. https://doi.org/10.2304/gsch.2013.3.2.183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsekoura, M. (2016). Spaces for youth participation and youth empowerment: Case studies from UK and Greece. Young, 24(4), 326–341. https://doi.org/10.1177/1103308815618505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valentine, G. (2004). Public space and the culture of childhood. Aldershot: Gower publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vromen, A., Xenos, M. A., & Loader, B. (2015). Young people, social media and connective action: From organizational maintenance to everyday political talk. Journal of Youth Studies, 18(1), 80–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2014.933198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weil, S. (1998). Rhetorics and realities in public service organisations: Systemic practice and organisational learning as critically reflexive action research. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 11(1), 37–62. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022912921692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weil, S., Wildemeersch, D., & Jansen, T. (2005). Unemployed youth and social exclusion in Europe: Learning for inclusion? Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wildemeersch, D., Jansen, T., Vandenbeele, J., & Jans, M. (1998). Social learning: A new perspective on learning in participatory systems. Studies in Continuing Education, 20(2), 251–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037980200210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wulff, H. (1995). Introducing youth culture in its own right: The state of the art and new possibilities. In V. Amit-Talai & H. Wulff (Eds.), Youth cultures: A cross-cultural perspective (pp. 1–18). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Percy-Smith, B. (2018). Participation as Learning for Change in Everyday Spaces: Enhancing Meaning and Effectiveness Using Action Research. In: Baraldi, C., Cockburn, T. (eds) Theorising Childhood. Studies in Childhood and Youth. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72673-1_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72673-1_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-72672-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-72673-1

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics