Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Subharmonic Aided Pressure Estimation (SHAPE)

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Diagnostic Methods for Cirrhosis and Portal Hypertension

Abstract

Portal hypertension results from obstruction of the portal blood flow. An increase of over 5 mmHg in the pressure gradient between the portal vein and the inferior vena cava (IVC) or the hepatic vein defines portal hypertension. The current clinical technique for measuring the hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) is invasive. Noninvasive techniques have very poor sensitivity for portal pressure estimation and are therefore, not accurate enough to be used routinely for diagnosis of portal hypertension. Thus, an alternative accurate, noninvasive ultrasound based procedure would be a major development in the diagnosis of portal hypertension making the diagnosis safer, quicker and cheaper. Our group has proposed the use of ultrasound contrast agents as pressure sensors (i.e., Subharmonic Aided Pressure Estimation, SHAPE) for noninvasive, quantitative pressure estimation in portal hypertension. SHAPE is based on the inverse relationship between the subharmonic amplitude of the microbubbles and the ambient pressure change. A pilot study was conducted with 45 patients; the SHAPE gradient between the portal and hepatic veins was in good overall agreement with the clinical HVPG measurements (r = 0.82). Patients at increased risk for variceal hemorrhage (HVPG >12 mmHg) had a significantly higher mean subharmonic gradient than patients with lower HVPGs (1.93 dB ± 0.61 vs 21.47 dB ± 0.29; p < 0.001), with a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 81%, indicating that SHAPE may be a useful tool for the diagnosis of clinically important portal hypertension. A large, multi-center trial is now underway and early results appear to confirm these initial findings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Navarro V, Rossi S, Herrine S. Hepatic cirrhosis. Pharmacology and therapeutics: principles to practice. Saunders-Elsevier, Philadelphia, PA, USA. 2008. p. 505–26.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sanyal AJ, Bosch J, Blei A, Arroyo V. Portal hypertension and its complications. Gastroenterology. 2008;134(6):1715–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bosch J, Garcia-Pagan JC, Berzigotti A, Abraldes JG. Measurement of portal pressure and its role in the management of chronic liver disease. Semin Liver Dis. 2006;26(4):348–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Iwakiri Y. Pathophysiology of portal hypertension. Clin Liver Dis. 2014;18(2):281–91.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Garcia-Tsao G, Groszmann RJ, Fisher RL, et al. Portal pressure, presence of gastroesophageal varices and variceal bleeding. Hepatology. 1985;5(3):419–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Groszmann RJ, Garcia-Tsao G, Bosch J, et al. Beta-blockers to prevent gastroesophageal varices in patients with cirrhosis. N Engl J Med. 2005;353(21):2254–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kalambokis G, Manousou P, Vibhakorn S, et al. Transjugular liver biopsy – indications, adequacy, quality of specimens, and complications – a systematic review. J Hepatol. 2007;47(2):284–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kumar A, Khan NM, Anikhindi SA, et al. Correlation of transient elastography with hepatic venous pressure gradient in patients with cirrhotic portal hypertension: a study of 326 patients from india. World J Gastroenterol. 2017;23(4):687–96.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Cokkinos DD, Dourakis SP. Ultrasonographic assessment of cirrhosis and portal hypertension. Curr Med Imaging Rev. 2009;5(1):62–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lafortune M, Marleau D, Breton G, et al. Portal venous system measurements in portal-hypertension. Radiology. 1984;151(1):27–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Choi YJ, Baik SK, Park DH, et al. Comparison of Doppler ultrasonography and the hepatic venous pressure gradient in assessing portal hypertension in liver cirrhosis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2003;18(4):424–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kim MY, Jeong WK, Baik SK. Invasive and non-invasive diagnosis of cirrhosis and portal hypertension. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20(15):4300–15.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Goldberg BB, Liu JB, Forsberg F. Ultrasound contrast agents – a review. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1994;20(4):319–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Stride EP, Coussios CC. Cavitation and contrast: the use of bubbles in ultrasound imaging and therapy. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2010;224(H2):171–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Forsberg F, Shi WT, Goldberg BB. Subharmonic imaging of contrast agents. Ultrasonics. 2000;38(1–8):93–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Forsberg F, Liu JB, Shi WT, et al. In vivo pressure estimation using subharmonic contrast microbubble signals: proof of concept. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2005;52(4):581–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Shankar PM, Krishna PD, Newhouse VL. Subharmonic backscattering from ultrasound contrast agents. J Acoust Soc Am. 1999;106(4):2104–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Daeichin V, Bosch JG, Needles A, et al. Subharmonic, non-linear fundamental and ultraharmonic imaging of microbubble contrast at high frequencies. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2015;41(2):486–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Shi WT, Forsberg F, Raichlen JS, Needleman L, Goldberg BB. Pressure dependence of subharmonic signals from contrast microbubbles. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1999;25(2):275–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Halldorsdottir VG, Dave JK, Leodore LM, et al. Subharmonic contrast microbubble signals for noninvasive pressure estimation under static and dynamic flow conditions. Ultrason Imaging. 2011;33(3):153–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Sontum PC. Physicochemical characteristics of sonazoid (tm), a new contrast agent for ultrasound imaging. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2008;34(5):824–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Landmark KE, Johansen PW, Johnson JA, et al. Pharmacokinetics of perfluorobutane following intravenous bolus injection and continuous infusion of sonazoid (tm) in healthy volunteers and in patients with reduced pulmonary diffusing capacity. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2008;34(3):494–501.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Bouakaz A, De Jong N. Wfumb safety symposium on echo-contrast agents: nature and types of ultrasound contrast agents. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2007;33(2):187–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Dave JK, Halldorsdottir VG, Eisenbrey JR, et al. Investigating the efficacy of subharmonic aided pressure estimation for portal vein pressures and portal hypertension monitoring. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2012;38(10):1784–98.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Eisenbrey JR, Dave JK, Halldorsdottir VG, et al. Chronic liver disease: noninvasive subharmonic aided pressure estimation of hepatic venous pressure gradient. Radiology. 2013;268(2):581–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Malinchoc M, Kamath PS, Gordon FD, et al. A model to predict poor survival in patients undergoing transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts. Hepatology. 2000;31(4):864–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Dave JK, Halldorsdottir VG, Eisenbrey JR, et al. On the implementation of an automated acoustic output optimization algorithm for subharmonic aided pressure estimation. Ultrasonics. 2013;53(4):880–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Kamath PS, Wiesner RH, Malinchoc M, et al. A model to predict survival in patients with end-stage liver disease. Hepatology. 2001;33(2):464–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Maruyama H, Shimada T, Ishibashi H, et al. Delayed periportal enhancement: a characteristic finding on contrast ultrasound in idiopathic portal hypertension. Hepatol Int. 2012;6(2):511–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Zhang CX, Hu J, Hu KW, et al. Noninvasive analysis of portal pressure by contrast-enhanced sonography in patients with cirrhosis. J Ultrasound Med. 2011;30(2):205–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Jansen C, Bogs C, Verlinden W, et al. Shear-wave elastography of the liver and spleen identifies clinically significant portal hypertension: a prospective multicentre study. Liver Int. 2017;37(3):396–405.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Gupta I, Eisenbrey J, Stanczak M, et al. Effect of pulse shaping on subharmonic aided pressure estimation in vitro and in vivo. J Ultrasound Med. 2017;36(1):3–11.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Halldorsdottir VG, Dave JK, Eisenbrey JR, et al. Subharmonic aided pressure estimation for monitoring interstitial fluid pressure in tumours – in vitro and in vivo proof of concept. Ultrasonics. 2014;54(7):1938–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA

    Ipshita Gupta, John R. Eisenbrey & Flemming Forsberg

Authors
  1. Ipshita Gupta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. John R. Eisenbrey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Flemming Forsberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John R. Eisenbrey .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Inselspital, University of Bern, UVCM, DMLL, Hepatology Inselspital, University of Bern, Berne, Switzerland

    Annalisa Berzigotti

  2. Hospital Clinic, Hepatic Hemodynamic Laboratory Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain

    Jaime Bosch

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Gupta, I., Eisenbrey, J.R., Forsberg, F. (2018). Subharmonic Aided Pressure Estimation (SHAPE). In: Berzigotti, A., Bosch, J. (eds) Diagnostic Methods for Cirrhosis and Portal Hypertension. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72628-1_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72628-1_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-72627-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-72628-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation