Generational Belonging and Historical Ruptures: Continuity or Discontinuity of Values and Attitudes in Post-Communist Romania

  • Dana Gavreliuc
  • Alin Gavreliuc
Part of the Societies and Political Orders in Transition book series (SOCPOT)


The aim of the present study was to examine the patterns in the distribution of values and attitudes for three generational cohorts in contemporary Romania: the ‘younger’ generation (M = 30 years old), the ‘middle generation’ (M = 45 years old) and the ‘older’ generation (M = 60 years old), analysed on representative generational samples (N = 1481 participants). The outcomes indicate an intergenerational transfer of values and attitudes between the cohorts, underlining the power of continuity in terms of values and attitudes, despite of the historical rupture generated by the breakdown of communism. As the exposure to socialization processes was significantly different for these distinct cohorts, the research examined the impact of the (post)communist period on the generational strata. In the same time, the collapse of communism brought major changes at a social, political and behavioural level; however, little changes occurred in the profound mental structures (attitudes, especially values).


Intergenerational comparison Value orientations Transgenerational patterns Social attitudes Post-communism Romania 


  1. Albarracín, D. M. (2011). The time for doing is not the time for change: Effects of general action and inaction goals on attitude retrieval and attitude change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 983–998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Almond, G., & Verba, S. (1963). The civic culture: Political attitudes and democracy in five nations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Antohi, S. (1999). Civitas imaginalis. Istorie şi utopie în cultura română. Iaşi, Romania: Polirom.Google Scholar
  4. Aronson, E. (1988). The social animal. San Francisco, CA: Freeman.Google Scholar
  5. Bachman, J. G., & O’Malley, P. M. (1986). Self-concepts, self-esteem and educational experiences: The frog pond revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 35–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bardi, A., Buchanan, K. E., Goodwin, R., Slabu, L., & Robinson, M. (2015). Value stability and change during self-chosen life transition: Self-selection versus socialization effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106(1), 131–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bardi, A., & Goodwin, R. (2011). The dual route to value change: Individual processes and cultural moderators. Journal of Cross Cultural Psychology, 42, 271–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bardi, A., Lee, J. A., Towfigh, N., & Soutar, G. (2009). The structure of intraindividual value change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 913–929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bardi, A., & Schwartz, S. H. (1996). Relations among socio-political values in Eastern Europe: Effects of the communist experience? Political Psychology, 17, 525–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bardi, A., & Schwartz, S. H. (2003). Values and behavior: Strength and structure of relations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 1207–1220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bilsky, W., & Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Values and personality. European Journal of Personality, 8, 163–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Boehnke, K. (2008). Design – with empirical underpinnings parent-offspring value transmission in a societal context: Suggestions for a utopian research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32, 241–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Boehnke, K., Hadjar, A., & Baier, D. (2007). Parent-child value similarity: The role of Zeitgeist. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69, 778–792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Braudel, F. (1996). Histoire et sciences sociales. La longue durée. In F. Braudel (Ed.), Ecrits sur l’histoire (4th ed., pp. 41–84). Paris, France: Flammarion.Google Scholar
  15. Cernat, V. (2010). Socio-economic status and political support in post-communist Romania. Communist and Post-communist Studies, 43, 43–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cichocka, A., & Jost, J. T. (2014). Stripped of illusions? Exploring system justification processes in capitalist and post-communist societies. International Journal of Psychology, 49(1), 6–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. de Mendelssohn, F. (2008). Transgenerational transmission of trauma: Guilt, shame, and the “heroic dilemma”. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 58, 389–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Flament, C. (1995). Structura, dinamica şi transformarea reprezentărilor sociale. In A. Neculau (Ed.), Psihologia cîmpului social. Reprezentările sociale (pp. 155–176). Bucureşti, Romania: Ştiinţă şi Tehnică SA.Google Scholar
  20. Fontaine, J. R. J., Duriez, B., Luyten, P., Corveleyn, J., & Hutsebaut, D. (2005). Consequences of a multi-dimensional approach to religion for the relationship between religiosity and value priorities. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 15, 123–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gavreliuc, A. (2012). Continuity and change of values and attitudes in generational cohorts of post-communist Romania. Cognition, Brain, Behaviour. An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14(2), 191–212.Google Scholar
  22. Gavreliuc, D. (Ed.). (2016). Education, culture and identity. Diagnosis of societal and personal changes in post-communist Romania. Timișoara: Editura de Vest.Google Scholar
  23. Gherasim, R. L. (2011). Neajutoarea învățată. Concept șo aplicații. Iași, Romania: Editura Universității “Al. I. Cuza”.Google Scholar
  24. Gorshkov, M. K. (2010). The sociological measurement of the Russian mentality. Russian Social Science Review, 51, 32–57.Google Scholar
  25. Hitchins, K. (1994). România. 1866-1947. București, Romania: Humanitas.Google Scholar
  26. Hitlin, S., & Piliavin, J. A. (2004). Values: Reviving a dormant concept. Annual Review of Sociology, 30, 359–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hofmann-Towfigh, N. (2007). Do students’ values change in different types of schools? Journal of Moral Education, 36, 453–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  29. Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and organizations: Software for the mind (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  30. Homer, P. (1993). Transmission of human values: A cross-cultural investigation of generational and reciprocal. Genetic, Social and General Psychology Monographs, 119, 345–359.Google Scholar
  31. Inglehart, R. (1997). Modernization and postmodernization. Cultural, economic and political change in 43 societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Inglehart, R. (2016). After postmaterialism: An essay on China, Russia and the United States. A comment. Canadian Journal of Sociology, 41(2), 213–222.Google Scholar
  33. Inglehart, R., & Baker, W. E. (2000). Modernization, cultural change, and the persistence of traditional values. American Sociological Review, 65, 19–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Inglehart, R., & Welzel, C. (2005). Modernization, cultural change and democracy: The human development sequence. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Inkeles, A., & Smith, D. H. (1974). Becoming modern. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kellermann, N. P. (2001). Transmission of holocaust trauma – an integrative view. Psychiatry, 64, 256–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kohak, E. (1992). Ashes, Ashes… Central Europe after forty years. Daedalus, 121, 197–216.Google Scholar
  38. Kohn, M., & Schooler, C. (1983). Work and personality: An inquiry into the impact of social stratification. Norwood, NJ: Albex.Google Scholar
  39. Kollontai, V. (1999). Social transformations in Russia. International Social Science Journal, 51, 103–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kopecky, P., Doorenspleet, R., & Mudde, C. E. (2008). Deviant democracies: Democratization against the odds. London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  41. Le Goff, J. (1988). Histoire et mémoire. Paris, France: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  42. Lewis, P. G. (1997). Theories of democratization and patterns of regime change in Eastern Europe. The Journal of Communist Studies and Transitional Politics, 13, 4–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Loewenstein, G. (2007). Affect regulation and affective forecasting. In J. J. Gross (Ed.), Handbook of emotion regulation (pp. 180–203). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  44. Marody, M. (1988). Antinomies of collective subcounsciousness. Social Research, 55, 97–110.Google Scholar
  45. Maslow, A. H. (1970). Motivation and personality (2nd ed.). New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  46. McGuire, W. J. (1985). Attitudes and attitude change. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 233–346). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  47. Michelson, P. E. & Michelson, J. T. (1993, May). The dysfunctional society syndrome and ethnicity in contemporary Romania. Paper presented at the Midwest Slavic Conference at Michigan State University, Lansing.Google Scholar
  48. Miroiu, M. (1999). România retro. București, Romania: Editura Trei.Google Scholar
  49. Moghaddam, F. M. (2008). The psychological citizen and the two concepts of social contract: A preliminary analysis. Political Psychology, 29, 881–901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Moghaddam, F. M., & Crystal, D. S. (1997). Revolutions, samurai, and reductions: The paradoxes of change and continuity in Iran and Japan. Political Psychology, 18, 355–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Moscovici, S. (1988). Notes towards a description of social representations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 211–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Mungiu-Pippidi, A. (2010). The other transition. Journal of Democracy, 21(1), 120–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Pasti, V., Miroiu, M., & Codiță, C. (1996). România. Starea de fapt. Bucuresti, Romania: Nemira.Google Scholar
  54. Putnam, R. (1993). Making democracy work. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  55. Roesch, S. C., & Amirkham, J. H. (1997). Boundary conditions for self-serving attributions: Another look at the sports pages. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27, 245–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New-York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  57. Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Roskin, M. G. (2001). The rebirth of East Europe (4th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  59. Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized: Expectances for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs, 80, 526–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Rupnik, J. (1988). The other Europe. London: Weidenfeld and Nicholson.Google Scholar
  61. Sandu, D. (2003). Sociabilitatea în spațiul dezvoltării. Iaşi, Romania: Polirom.Google Scholar
  62. Sandu, D. (2010). Lumile sociale ale migrației românești. Iași, Romania: Polirom.Google Scholar
  63. Schooler, C., Mulatu, M. S., & Oates, G. (1999). The continuing effects of substantively complex work on the intellectual functioning of older workers. Psychology and Aging, 14, 483–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theory and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 1–65). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  65. Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Beyond individualism/collectivism: New cultural dimensions of values. In U. Kim, H.C. Triandis, C. Kagitcibasi, S-C. Choi, G. Yoon (Eds.), Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method and applications (pp. 85-119). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  66. Schwartz, S. H. (2014). Rethinking the concept and measurement of societal culture in light of empirical findings. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 45(1), 5–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Schwartz, S., Bardi, A., & Bianchi, G. (2000). Value adaptation to the imposition and collapse of Communist regimes in East-Central Europe. In S. Renshon & J. Dukitt (Eds.), Political psychology (pp. 217–236). New York: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Schwartz, S. H., & Huismans, S. (1995). Value priorities and religiosity in four western religions. Social Psychology Quarterly, 58, 88–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Scott, J. (2000). Is it a different world to when you were growing up? Generational effects on social representations and child-rearing values. British Journal of Sociology, 51, 355–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Sheldon, K. M. (2005). Positive value change during college: Normative trends and individual differences. Journal of Research in Personality, 39, 209–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Sheldon, K. M., Ryan, R. M., & Reis, H. (1996). What makes for a good day? Competence and autonomy in the day and in the person. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 1270–1279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Singelis, T. M. (1994). The measurement of independent and interdependent self-construal. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 580–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Singelis, T. M., Bond, M. H., Sharkey, W. F., & Lai, C. S. (1999). Unpackaging culture’s influence on self-esteem and embarrassability: The role of self-construal. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 30, 315–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Singelis, T. M., & Brown, W. J. (1995). Culture, self and collectivist communication: Linking culture to individual behavior. Human Communication Research, 21, 354–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Sztompka, P. (2000). Cultural trauma. The other face of social change. European Journal of Social Theory, 3, 449–466.Google Scholar
  76. van den Broek, A., & de Moor, R. (1994). Eastern Europe after 1989. In P. Ester, L. Halman, & R. de Moor (Eds.), The individualizing society: Value change in Europe and North America (pp. 197–228). Tilburg, The Netherlands: Tilburg University Press.Google Scholar
  77. Voicu, B. (2005). Penuria post-modernă a postcomunismului românesc. Iași, Romania: Expert Projects.Google Scholar
  78. Voicu, B., & Voicu, M. (Eds.). (2007). Valori ale românilor (1993-2006). Iași, Romania: Institutul European.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.West University of TimisoaraTimisoaraRomania

Personalised recommendations