Skip to main content

Truth, Power and Capitalist Accumulation in Mathematics Education

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Sociopolitical Dimensions of Mathematics Education

Part of the book series: ICME-13 Monographs ((ICME13Mo))

Abstract

In this chapter I raise a set of questions intended to make us reflect on our work as researchers, namely in the way we propagate and naturalise common assumptions or truths about mathematics education, as well as the mechanisms of power that makes it difficult for us to see beyond these well-accepted truths. I suggest that some of the forces that impact upon and restrict socially just outcomes for mathematics education are not just “external”, that is, originated outside the mathematics education community, but also, and perhaps more importantly for us, from the way research itself addresses the teaching and learning of mathematics in schools. Instead of positing ourselves as the beautiful souls of mathematics education, my invitation is for us to posit ourselves as part of the problem, and be willing to address some of our ideological assumptions before relegating to the social and political world the causes of our discontentment. For this purpose, I will rely on Foucault’s and Lacan’s works on the notion of truth, as a way to explore the role that contemporary mathematics education plays within capitalism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This is particularly the case with primary teachers who, besides mathematics, have to teach all the other subjects.

  2. 2.

    See, for instance, the United Kingdom, Portugal and Sweden curriculums, where enjoyment is posited as one of the main goals for the teaching and learning of mathematics: “the subject aims at pupils experiencing delight in developing their mathematical creativity, and the ability to solve problems, as well as experience something of the beauty and logic of mathematics” (Utbildningsdepartementet 2000).

  3. 3.

    An exception are the works or Roberto Baldino and Tânia Cabral.

  4. 4.

    Suffice to think about the hysterical reaction every time someone suggests an increase in social benefits, a reduction of the working hours, or a public investment in public healthcare and education.

  5. 5.

    The history of modern science is rich in episodes that show how difficult it is for results that do not fit into a certain stablished worldview to be accepted—Copernicus’ model of the universe is perhaps the most well-known example, but we can also mention the introduction of non-Euclidian geometries and non-standard analysis in mathematics, Darwin’s theory of natural evolution in biology, Marx’s works on political economy or Freud’s studies of the human psyche.

  6. 6.

    In this sense, capital is creative potential, a specific form of vitalism.

References

  • Althusser, L. (2008). On ideology. Verso Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachelard, G. (2002). The formation of the scientific mind. Manchester: Clinamen Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldino, R., & Cabral, T. (2013). The productivity of students’ schoolwork: An exercise on Marxist rigour. Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies, 11(4), 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boaler, J. (2010). The elephant in the classroom. Helping children learn & love maths. London: Souvenir Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, M. (1998). Meaning and money. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 36, 123–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T. (2011). Mathematics education and subjectivity: Cultures and cultural renewal. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Clements, M. A. (2013). Past, present and future dimensions of mathematics education: Introduction to the third international handbook of mathematics education. In M. A. Clements, A. Bishop, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, & F. Leung (Eds.), Third international handbook of mathematics education (pp. v–xi). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, P. (2007). Putting philosophy to work: Coping with multiple theoretical perspectives. In F. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 3–38). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, J. (1999). Building bridges: Reflections on the problem of transfer of learning in mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 39, 23–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fendler, L. (1998) What is it impossible to think? A genealogy of the educated subject. In T. S. Popkewitz, & M. Brennan (Eds.), Foucault’s challenge. Discourse, knowledge, and power in education, New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1979). Truth and power: an interview with Michel Foucault. Critique of Anthropology, 4(13–14), 131–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1997). The birth of biopolitics. In P. Rabinow (Ed.), Michel Foucault, ethics: Subjectivity and truth (pp. 73–80). New York: The New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerofsky, S. (2010). The impossibility of ‘real-life’ word problems (according to Bakhtin, Lacan, Žižek and Baudrillard). Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 31(1), 61–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutiérrez, R. (2010). The sociopolitical turn in mathematics education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 41, 1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutstein, E. (2003). Teaching and learning mathematics for social justice in an urban, Latino school. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 23(1), 37–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jablonka, E., Wagner, D., & Walshaw, M. (2013). Theories for studying social, political and cultural dimensions of mathematics education. In M. A. Clements, A. Bishop, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, & F. Leung (Eds.), Third international handbook of mathematics education (pp. 41–67). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jurdak, M. (2006). Contrasting perspectives and performance of high school students on problem solving in real world situated and school contexts. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 63, 283–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klette, K. (2004). Classroom business as usual? (What) do policymakers and researchers learn from classroom research? In M. Høine & A. Fuglestad (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, pp. 3–16). Bergen, Norway: University College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacan, J. (1990). Television. New York: Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacan, J. (2007). The other side of psychoanalysis: The seminar of Jacques Lacan book XVII. New York: Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundin, S. (2012). Hating school, loving mathematics: on the ideological function of critique and reform in mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 80(1), 73–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics Board of Directors. (2016). Mission. Retrieved from http://www.nctm.org/About/.

  • Pais, A. (2012). A critical approach to equity in mathematics education. In O. Skovsmose & B. Greer (Eds.), Opening the cage: Critique and politics of mathematics education. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pais, A. (2013). An ideology critique of the use-value of mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 84(1), 15–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pais, A. (2014). Economy: The absent centre of mathematics education. ZDM—The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 46, 1085–1093.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pais, A. (2015). Symbolising the real of mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 89(3), 375–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pais, A. (2016). At the intersection between the subject and the political: A contribution for an ongoing discussion. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 92(3), 347–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pais, A. (2017). The narcissism of mathematics education. In H. Straehler-Pohl, N. Bohlmann, & A. Pais (Eds.), The disorder of mathematics education: Challenging the sociopolitical dimensions of research. Switzerland: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pais, A., & Valero, P. (2012). Researching research: Mathematics education in the political. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 80(1–2), 9–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pais, A., & Valero, P. (2014). Whither social theory? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 87(2), 241–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Popkewitz, T. S. (2004). The alchemy of the mathematics curriculum: Inscriptions and the fabrication of the child. American Educational Research Journal, 41(1), 3–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Presmeg, N., & Radford, L. (2008). On semiotics and subjectivity: A response to Tony Brown’s “Signifying ‘students’, ‘teachers’, and ‘mathematics’: A reading of a special issue”. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 69, 265–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radford, L. (2006). The anthropology of meaning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 61(1–2), 39–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radford, L. (2008). Culture and cognition: Towards an anthropology of mathematical thinking. In L. English (Ed.), Handbook of International Research in Mathematics Education (2nd ed., pp. 439–464). New York: Routledge, Taylor and Francis

    Google Scholar 

  • Rancière, J. (1995). Disagreement: Politics and philosophy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skovsmose, O. (2005). Travelling through education: Uncertainty, mathematics, responsibility. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skovsmose, O., & Valero, P. (2008). Democratic access to powerful mathematical ideas. In L. D. English (Ed.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education (2nd ed., pp. 415–438). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skriabine, P. (2013). Science, the subject and psychoanalysis. Psychoanalytical Handbooks, 27, 51–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sriraman, B., & English, L. (2010). Surveying theories and philosophies of mathematics education. In B. Sriraman & L. English (Eds.), Theories of mathematics education: Seeking new frontiers. Heidelberg: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Straehler-Pohl, H., & Pais, A. (2014). Learning to fail and learning from failure: Ideology at work in a mathematics classroom. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 22(1), 79–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomšič, S. (2015). The capitalist unconscious. New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Utbildningsdepartementet. (2000). Mathematics. Aims of the subject in upper secondary school. Retrieved from http://www3.skolverket.se/. May 10, 2009.

  • Williams, J., & Wake, G. (2007). Black boxes in workplace mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 64, 317–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Žižek, S. (2012). Less than nothing. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexandre Pais .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Pais, A. (2018). Truth, Power and Capitalist Accumulation in Mathematics Education. In: Jurdak, M., Vithal, R. (eds) Sociopolitical Dimensions of Mathematics Education. ICME-13 Monographs. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72610-6_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72610-6_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-72609-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-72610-6

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics