Advertisement

Recognising and Identifying the Participant and Researcher in Mathematics Education Research: A Sociopolitical Act

  • Lisa Darragh
Chapter
Part of the ICME-13 Monographs book series (ICME13Mo)

Abstract

Researcher positioning is an important consideration in acknowledgement of the power inherent in the act of research. As such, the concept of identity may be deployed to consider such a political act. In this chapter, I examine the use of identity in mathematics education research to both identify the participant and also to consider the identity work of the researcher. I use Butler’s (Theatre J 40:519–531, 1988) definition of identity as performative to understand the ways in which the subject is produced in discourse and incorporate the notion of identity recognition to consider the ways in which discourses are drawn from in performing and recognizing. I engage in a reflection of my own identity work as a researcher and suggest we should consider the researcher identity as being multiple, temporal, fearful and desiring, and also complicit in the (re)production and disruption of broader social and political discourses in mathematics education.

Keywords

Mathematics identity Performative identity Researcher positioning Discourse 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Funding from: PIA-CONICYT Basal Funds for Centers of Excellence Project FB0003, and Project Fondecyt #3160469 are gratefully acknowledged.

References

  1. Apple, M. W. (2000). Between neoliberalism and neoconservatism: Education and conservatism in a global context. In N. C. Burbules & C. A. Torres (Eds.), Globalisation and education: Critical perspectives (pp. 57–77). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Ávalos-Salamé, D., & Thomas Ponce, E. (2007). Medición de la vulnerabilidad social: Un análisis de los alumnos de Infocap. Retrieved from http://www.infocap.cl/web/pdf/Informe_Final_Medicion_Vulnerabilidad_Social.pdf.
  3. Ball, S. J. (2013). Foucault, power, and education. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis Inc.Google Scholar
  4. Boaler, J., Wiliam, D., & Brown, M. (2000a). Students’ experiences of ability grouping—Disaffection, polarisation and the construction of failure. British Educational Research Journal, 26(5), 631–648.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920020007832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boaler, J., Wiliam, D., & Zevenbergen, R. (2000). The construction of identity in secondary mathematics education. In International Mathematics Education and Society Conference. Montechoro, Portugal. Retrieved from http://eprints.ioe.ac.uk/1142/1/Boalertheconstructionofidentity.pdf.
  6. Boylan, M., & Povey, H. (2014). Ability thinking. In D. Leslie & H. Mendick (Eds.), Debates in mathematics education (pp. 7–16). London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Braathe, H. J., & Solomon, Y. (2015a). Choosing mathematics: The narrative of the self as a site of agency. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 89, 151–166.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-014-9585-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Braathe, H. J., & Solomon, Y. (2015b). Choosing mathematics: The narrative of the self as a site of agency. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 89, 151–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brown, T., Solomon, Y., & Williams, J. (2016). Theory in and for mathematics education: In pursuit of a critical agenda. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 92, 287–297.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-016-9706-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Butler, J. (1988). Performative acts and gender constitution: an essay in phenomenology and feminist theory. Theatre Journal, 40(4), 519–531. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3207893.
  11. Butler, J. (1993). Bodies that matter. Oxon, United Kingdom: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Butler, J. (1997). The psychic life of power. California: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Chassapis, D. (2017). “Numbers have the power” or the key role of numerical discourse in establishing a regime of truth about crisis in Greece. In Mathematics education and life at times of crisis (pp. 45–55).Google Scholar
  14. Chronaki, A. (2011a). Disrupting “development” as the quality/equity discourse: Cyborgs and subalterns in school technoscience. In B. Atweh, M. Graven, W. Secada, & P. Valero (Eds.), Mapping equity and quality in mathematics education (pp. 3–19). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer Science & Business Media.Google Scholar
  15. Chronaki, A. (2011b). “Troubling” essentialist identities: performative mathematics and the politics of possibility. In M. Kontopodis, C. Wulf, & B. Fichtner (Eds.), Children, development and education (Vol. 3, pp. 207–226). Springer, The Netherlands.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0243-1_13.
  16. D’Ambrosio, B., Frankenstein, M., Gutierrez, R., Kastberg, S., Martin, D. B., Moschkovich, J., et al. (2013). Positioning oneself in mathematics education research. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 44(1), 11–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Damarin, S. K., & Erchick, D. (2010). Toward clarifying the meanings of gender in mathematics education research. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 41(4), 310–323.Google Scholar
  18. Darragh, L. (2014). Raising the curtain on mathematics identity: The drama of transition to secondary school. University of Auckland.Google Scholar
  19. Darragh, L. (2015a). Recognising gender in mathematics identity performances—Playing the fool? In S. Mukhopadhyay & B. Greer (Eds.), Proceedings of the Eighth International Mathematics Education and Society Conference (pp. 441–454). Portland, Oregon: MES8.Google Scholar
  20. Darragh, L. (2015b). Recognising “good at mathematics”: Using a performative lens for identity. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 27(1), 83–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Darragh, L. (2016). Identity research in mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 93, 19–33.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-016-9696-5.
  22. Davison, I. (2013). Gap widens between NZ students. The New Zealand Herald. Retrieved from http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11167148.
  23. de Freitas, E. (2008). Mathematics and its other: (Dis)locating the feminine. Gender and Education 2, 20(3), 281–290.Google Scholar
  24. Gutiérrez, R. (2013). The sociopolitical turn in mathematics education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 44(1), 37. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5951/jresematheduc.44.1.0037.
  25. Gutiérrez, R., & Dixon-Román, E. (2011). Beyond gap gazing: How can thinking about education comprehensively help us (re)envision mathematics education? In B. Atweh, M. Graven, W. Secada, & P. Valero (Eds.), Mapping equity and quality in mathematics education (pp. 21–34). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
  26. Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Hossain, S., Mendick, H., & Adler, J. (2013). Troubling “understanding mathematics in-depth”: Its role in the identity work of student-teachers in England. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 84(1), 35–48.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-013-9474-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jurdak, M., Vithal, R., de Freitas, E., Gates, P., & Kollosche, D. (2016). Social and Political dimensions of mathematics education: Current thinking. Switzerland: Springer Open.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kanes, C., Morgan, C., & Tsatsaroni, A. (2014). The PISA mathematics regime: Knowledge structures and practices of the self. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 87, 145–165.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-014-9542-6.
  30. Lerman, S. (2009). Pedagogy, discourse, and identity. In L. Black, H. Mendick, & Y. Solomon (Eds.), Mathematical relationships in education. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. Llewellyn, A. (2008). “Maths with Sam and Alex”: A discussion of choice, control and confidence. In J. F. Matos, P. Valero, & K. Yasukawa (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fifth International Mathematics Education and Society Conference (pp. 362–375). Lisbon: Department of Education, Learning and Philosophy, Aalborg University.Google Scholar
  32. Llewellyn, A. (2009). “Gender games”: A post-structural exploration of the prospective teacher, mathematics and identity. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 12(6), 411–426.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-009-9109-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Llewellyn, A. (2016). Problematising the pursuit of progress in mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 92(3), 299–314.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-015-9645-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lundin, S. (2012). Hating school, loving mathematics: On the ideological function of critique and reform in mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 2(80), 73–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Martin, D. B. (2000). Mathematics success and failure among African-American youth. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  36. Martin, D. B. (2009). Researching race in mathematics education. Teachers College Record, 111(2), 295–338.Google Scholar
  37. Martin, D. B., Gholson, Maisie, & Leonard, L. (2010). Mathematics as gatekeeper: Power and privilege in the production of knowledge. Journal of Urban Mathematics Education, 3(2), 12–24.Google Scholar
  38. Mead, G. H. (1913). The social self. The Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods, 10(14), 374–380.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2012910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mendick, H. (2005). Mathematical stories: Why do more boys than girls choose to study mathematics at AS-level in England? British Journal of Sociology of Education, 26(2), 235–251.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0142569042000294192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mendick, H. (2017). Mathematical futures: Discourses of mathematics in fictions of the post-2008 financial crisis. In A. Chronaki (Ed.), Mathematics Education and Life at Times of Crisis: Proceedings of the Ninth International Mathematics Education and Society Conference (pp. 74–89). Volos, Greece: MES9.Google Scholar
  41. Mendick, H., Epstein, D., & Moreau, M.-P. (2008). Mathematical images and identities: Entertainment, education, social justice. Research in Mathematics Education, 10(1), 101–102.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14794800801916978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Nasir, N. S. (2002). Identity, goals, and learning: Mathematics in cultural practice. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 4(2&3), 213–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pais, A., & Valero, P. (2012). Researching research: Mathematics education in the political. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 80, 9–24.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-012-9399-5.
  44. Pais, A., & Valero, P. (2014). Whither social theory. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 87(2), 241–248.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-014-9573-z.
  45. Planas, N., & Valero, P. (2016). Tracing the socio-cultural-political axis in understanding mathematics education. In The second handbook of research on the psychology of mathematics education (pp. 447–479).Google Scholar
  46. Robertson, S. (2012). Placing teachers in global governance agendas. Comparative Education Review, 56(4), 584–607. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/667414.
  47. Rubie-Davies, C. M. (2006). Teacher expectations and student self-perceptions: Exploring relationships. Psychology in the Schools, 43(5), 537–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Solomon, Y., Lawson, D., & Croft, T. (2011). Dealing with “fragile identities”: Resistance and refiguring in women mathematics students. Gender and Education, iFirst Art, 1–19.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2010.512270.
  49. Solomon, Y., Radovic, D., & Black, L. (2015). “I can actually be very feminine here”: Contradiction and hybridity in becoming a female mathematician. Educational Studies in Mathematics. Published  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-015-9649-4.
  50. Stinson, D. W. (2008). Negotiating sociocultural discourses: The counter-storytelling of academically (and mathematically) successful African American male students. American Educational Research Journal, 45(4), 975–1010. Retrieved from http://ezproxy.auckland.ac.nz/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/200446519?accountid=8424.Google Scholar
  51. Stinson, D. W. (2013). Negotiating the “White Male Math Myth”: African American male students and success in school mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 44(1), 69. Retrieved from http://ezproxy.auckland.ac.nz/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/1284416138?accountid=8424.Google Scholar
  52. Straehler-Pohl, H., Gellert, U., Fernandez, S., & Figueiras, L. (2014). School mathematics registers in a context of low academic expectations. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 85(2), 175–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Swanson, D., & Black, L. (2017). Integrating critical theory and practice in mathematics education. In CERME10. Dublin.Google Scholar
  54. Turner, H., & Rubie-Davies, C. M. (2015). Teacher expectations, ethnicity and the achievement gap. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40841-015-0004-1.
  55. Vale, C., Atweh, B., Averill, R., & Skourdoumbis, A. (2016). Equity, social justice and ethics in mathematics education. In K. Makar, S. Dole, J. Visnovska, M. Goos, A. Bennison, & K. Fry (Eds.), Research in mathematics education in Australasia 2012–2015 (pp. 97–118). Singapore: Springer Nature.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1419-2.
  56. Valenzuela, J. P., Bellei, C., & de los Ríos, D. (2014). Socioeconomic school segregation in a marketoriented educational system. The case of Chile. Journal of Education Policy, 29(2), 217–241.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2013.806995.
  57. Valero, P. (2004). Socio political perspectives on mathematics education. In P. Valero & R. Zevenbergen (Eds.), Researching the socio political dimensions of mathematics education. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Valero, P. (2016). Mathematics for all, economic growth, and the making of the citizen-worker. In T. Popkewitz, J. Diaz, & C. Kirchgasler (Eds.), Political sociology and transnational educational studies: The styles of reason governing teaching, curriculum and teacher education. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  59. Walkerdine, V. (1990). Schoolgirl fictions. London, UK: Verso.Google Scholar
  60. Walkerdine, V. (1994). Reasoning in a post-modern age. In P. Ernest (Ed.), Mathematics, education and philosophy: An international perspective. London: The Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  61. Walkerdine, V. (1998). Counting girls out: Girls and mathematics (new ed.). London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  62. Walshaw, M. (2001). A Foucauldian gaze on gender research: What do you do when confronted with the tunnel at the end of the light? Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 32(5), 471–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Walshaw, M. (2010). The researcher’s self in research: Confronting issues about knowing and understanding others. In L. Sparrow, B. Kissane, & C. Hurst (Eds.), Shaping the Future of Mathematics Education: Proceedings of the 33rd annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (pp. 587–593). Fremantle, Australia: MERGA.Google Scholar
  64. Walshaw, M. (2013). Post-structuralism and ethical practical action: Issues of identity and power. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 44(1), 100–118.  https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.44.1.0100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Webb, A., & Radcliffe, S. (2013). Mapuche demands during educational reform, the Penguin revolution and the Chilean winter of discontent. Studies in Ethnicity and Nationalism, 13(3), 319–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. William, D., Bartholomew, H., & Reay, D. (2004). Assessment, learning and identity. In P. Valero & R. Zevenbergen (Eds.), Researching the socio political dimensions of mathematics education. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  67. Youdell, D. (2006a). Diversity, inequality, and a post-structural politics for education. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 27(1), 33–42.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01596300500510252.Google Scholar
  68. Youdell, D. (2006b). Subjectiviation and performative politics—Butler thinking Althusser and Foucault: Intelligibility, agency, and the raced-nationed-religioned subjects of education. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 27(4), 511–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Zeichner, K. (2010). Competition, economic rationalization, increased surveillance, and attacks on diversity: Neo-liberalism and the transformation of teacher education in the U.S. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 1544–1552.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.06.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Zevenbergen, R. (2003). Ability grouping in mathematics classrooms: A Bourdieuian analysis. For the Learning of Mathematics, 23(3), 5–10.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Advanced Research in Education (CIAE), Universidad de ChileSantiagoChile

Personalised recommendations