“Now There’s Everything to Stop You”: Teacher Autonomy Then and Now

Chapter
Part of the ICME-13 Monographs book series (ICME13Mo)

Abstract

Globalisation and neoliberal political agendas currently dominate educational policies and practices in, amongst others, many Anglophone and northern European countries including England, with discourses of the market and performance circulating widely and having become established regimes of truth. This demands sustained critique of hegemonic, taken-for-granted understandings and an exploration of how the lived experience of neoliberalism can be disrupted. In this chapter, we utilise the tools of genealogy to develop a history of the present, focussing particularly on the variation in autonomy revealed through a study of mathematics curriculum development. Juxtaposing stories from teachers involved in the Smile mathematics curriculum development project in England in the 1970s and 1980s with responses from currently serving teachers to the experience of performativity we highlight differences in teacher autonomy over time. We conclude by discussing the possibilities for teachers to mobilise such stories in their resistance to dominant, neo-liberal discourses.

Keywords

Socio-historical Neoliberalism Autonomy 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the British Academy/Leverhulme for financial support for the project (Grant SG150824), to all those who have contributed so generously to the archive and to those new teachers, particularly Rosie Everley, who have given freely of their time to help us in this project.

References

  1. Adams, G., & Povey, H. (2016). Workshop report: Using data from a history of Smile to overcome ‘historic loneliness’. Proceedings of the British Society for Research in Learning Mathematics, 36, 2. Loughborough University, Loughborough, June 2016. http://www.bsrlm.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/BSRLM-CP-36-2-15.pdf. Accessed January 10, 2017.
  2. Ball, S., Maguire, M., Braun, A., Perryman, J., & Hoskins, K. (2012). Assessment technologies in schools: ‘Deliverology’ and the ‘play of dominations’. Research Papers in Education, 27(5), 513–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ball, S. J. (2003). The teacher’s soul and the terrors of performativity. Journal of Education Policy, 18(2), 215–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ball, S. J. (2013a). Foucault, power, and education. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Ball, S. J. (2013b). The education debate (2nd ed.). Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
  6. Berger, J. (2016a). History is a meeting place. New Statesman, January 15–21, 2016, 17.Google Scholar
  7. Berger, J. (2016b). How to resist a state of forgetfulness. In Confabulations (pp. 133–143). UK: Penguin.Google Scholar
  8. Berry, J. (2012). Teachers’ professional autonomy in England: Are neo-liberal approaches incontestable? Forum, 54(3), 397–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brighouse, T. (2016). From ‘optimism and trust’ to ‘markets and managerialism’. In R. Pring & M. Roberts (Eds.), A generation of radical educational change: Stories from the field (pp. 153–166). Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Brown, M., Askew, M., Baker, D., Denvir, H., & Millett, A. (1998). Is the national numeracy strategy research-based? British Journal of Educational Studies, 46(4), 362–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Buxton, L. (1975). How did it all happen? Splash 0010. London: Pimlico School.Google Scholar
  12. Chitty, C. (2009). Education policy in Britain (2nd ed.). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  13. Cundy, H. M. (1963). The school mathematics project. The Mathematical Gazette, 47(359), 20–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Darragh, L. (2017). Fears and desires: Researching teachers in neoliberal contexts. In A. Chronaki (Ed.), Proceedings of the 9th International Conference of Mathematics Education and Society: Vol.1. Mathematics Education and Life at Times of Crisis (pp. 227–231). http://mes9.ece.uth.gr/portal/. Accessed May 26, 2017.
  15. Darragh, L., Björklund Boistrup, L., Valero, P., Adams, G., & Povey, H. (2017). Neoliberalism: A crisis for mathematics education? In A. Chronaki (Ed.), Proceedings of the 9th International Conference of Mathematics Education and Society: Vol. 1. Mathematics Education and Life at Times of Crisis (pp. 149–153). http://mes9.ece.uth.gr/portal/. Accessed May 26, 2017.
  16. Day, C., & Smethem, L. (2009). The effects of reform: Have teachers really lost their sense of professionalism? Journal of Educational Change, 10(2–3), 141–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Eades, J. (2017) Maths mag. In H. Povey & G. Adams (Eds.), Smilemaths. https://smilemaths.wordpress.com/themes/learning-together/students-at-the-centre/. Accessed May 12, 2017.
  18. Elliot, J., & Norris, N. (Eds.). (2012). Curriculum, pedagogy and educational research: The work of Lawrence Stenhouse. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Ely, M., Vinz, R., Downing, M., & Anzul, M. (1997). On writing qualitative research: Living by words. London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  20. Foucault, M. (1979). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  21. Foucault, M. (1980). Two lectures. Lecture one: 7 January 1976. In C. Gordon (Ed.), Power-knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972–1977 (Vintage Books ed., pp. 78–92). New York: Harvester Press.Google Scholar
  22. Gibbons, R. (1975). Smile history. Splash 0001. London: Ladbroke Mathematics Centre.Google Scholar
  23. Gillard, D. (2011). Education in England: A brief history. www.educationengland.org.uk/history.
  24. Goodson, I. (2014). Curriculum, personal narrative and the social future. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Groundwater-Smith, S., & Mockler, N. (2009). Teacher professional learning in an age of compliance: Mind the gap. Milton Keynes, UK: Springer.Google Scholar
  26. Hargreaves, A. (2000). Four ages of professionalism and professional learning. Teachers and Teaching, 6(2), 151–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hargreaves, A., & Moore, S. (2005). Voice, nostalgia, and teachers’ experiences of change. In F. Bodone (Ed.), What difference does research make and for whom? (pp. 129–140). New York, NY: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  28. Hodgkin, K., & Radstone, S. (2003). Introduction: Contested pasts. In K. Hodgkin & S. Radstone (Eds.), Contested pasts: The politics of memory (pp. 1–22). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  29. Howson, G., Keitel, C., & Kilpatrick, J. (1981). Curriculum development in mathematics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Keddie, A. (2016). Children of the market: Performativity, neoliberal responsibilisation and the construction of student identities. Oxford Review of Education, 42(1), 108–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Llewellyn, A. (2017). Technologies of (re)production in mathematics education research: Performances of progress. In H. Straehler-Pohl, N. Bohlmann, & A. Pais (Eds.), The disorder of mathematics education: Challenging the sociopolitical dimensions of research (pp. 153–169). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Macpherson, I., Robertson, S., & Walford, G. (2014). An introduction. In I. Macpherson, S. Robertson, & G. Walford (Eds.), Education, privatisation and social justice: Case studies from Africa, South Asia and South East Asia (pp. 9–24). Oxford: Symposium Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Monbiot, G. (2016, October 12). Neoliberalism is creating loneliness. That’s what’s wrenching society apart. The Guardian.Google Scholar
  34. Montecino, A., & Valero, P. (2017). Mathematics teachers as products and agents: To be or not to be. That is the point! In H. Straehler-Pohl, N. Bohlmann & A. Pais (Eds.), The disorder of mathematics education: Challenging the sociopolitical dimensions of research (pp. 135–152). Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar
  35. Newsam, P. (2016). 1944–2015: Towards the nationalisation of education in England. In R. Pring & M. Roberts (Eds.), A generation of radical educational change: Stories from the field (pp. 179–190). Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  36. Noss, R. (1990). The national curriculum and mathematics: A case of divide and rule. In P. Dowling (Ed.), Mathematics versus the national curriculum (pp. 13–32). London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  37. O’Farrell, C. (2005). Michel Foucault. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  38. Paechter, C. (2017). Biography. In H. Povey & G. Adams (Eds.), Smilemaths. https://smilemaths.wordpress.com/biographies/carrie-paechter/. Accessed May 25, 2017.
  39. Popkewitz, T. (2013). The sociology of education as the history of the present: Fabrication, difference and abjection. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 34(3), 439–456.Google Scholar
  40. Povey, H., & Adams, G. (2017a). Thinking forward: Using stories from the recent past in mathematics education in England. In A. Chronaki (Ed.), Proceedings of the 9th International Conference of Mathematics Education and Society: Vol. 2. Mathematics Education and Life at Times of Crisis (pp. 803–811). http://mes9.ece.uth.gr/portal/index.php. Accessed May 26, 2017.
  41. Povey, H., & Adams, G. (2017b). Possibilities for mathematics education? Aphoristic fragments from the past. Paper under review for a special issue of The Disorder of Mathematics Education.Google Scholar
  42. Povey, H., Adams, G., & Everley, R. (2016). “Its influence taints all”: Mathematics teachers resisting performativity through engagement with the past. Paper presented at 13th International Congress on Mathematical Education (ICME-13), Hamburg, July 24–31, 2016.Google Scholar
  43. Pring, R. (2016). Evolution of teacher training and professional development. In R. Pring & M. Roberts (Eds.), A generation of radical educational change: Stories from the field (pp. 81–94). Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  44. Sachs, J. (2001). Teacher professional identity: Competing discourses, competing outcomes. Journal of Education Policy, 16(2), 149–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Samuel, R. (1980). On the methods of history workshop: A reply. History Workshop Journal, 9(1), 162–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Schools Council (Great Britain). (1975). The whole curriculum, 13–16: The report of the Schools Council working party on the whole curriculum 1971–74. Working paper 53. London: Evans & Methuen.Google Scholar
  47. Sedikides, C., Wildschut, T., Arndt, J., & Routledge, C. (2008). Nostalgia: Past, present, and future. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17(5), 304–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Splash. (1978). Smile writing week. In H. Povey & G. Adams (Eds.), Smilemaths. https://smilemaths.wordpress.com/themes/developing-the-curriculum/writing-weekends/. Accessed May 12, 2017.
  49. Stronach, I., Corbin, B., McNamara, O., Stark, S., & Warne, T. (2002). Towards an uncertain politics of professionalism: Teacher and nurse identities in flux. Journal of Education Policy, 17, 109–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sugrue, C., & Mertkan, S. (2017). Professional responsibility, accountability and performativity among teachers: The leavening influence of CPD? Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 23(2), 171–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Thatcher, M. (1987). Interview for women’s own 23 September 1987. http://www.margaretthatcher.org/document/106689. Accessed July 26, 2017.
  52. Zembylas, M. (2011). Reclaiming nostalgia in educational politics and practice: Counter-memory, aporetic mourning, and critical pedagogy. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 32(5), 641–655.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Sheffield Hallam UniversitySheffieldUK

Personalised recommendations