Abstract
Globalisation and neoliberal political agendas currently dominate educational policies and practices in, amongst others, many Anglophone and northern European countries including England, with discourses of the market and performance circulating widely and having become established regimes of truth. This demands sustained critique of hegemonic, taken-for-granted understandings and an exploration of how the lived experience of neoliberalism can be disrupted. In this chapter, we utilise the tools of genealogy to develop a history of the present, focussing particularly on the variation in autonomy revealed through a study of mathematics curriculum development. Juxtaposing stories from teachers involved in the Smile mathematics curriculum development project in England in the 1970s and 1980s with responses from currently serving teachers to the experience of performativity we highlight differences in teacher autonomy over time. We conclude by discussing the possibilities for teachers to mobilise such stories in their resistance to dominant, neo-liberal discourses.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Adams, G., & Povey, H. (2016). Workshop report: Using data from a history of Smile to overcome ‘historic loneliness’. Proceedings of the British Society for Research in Learning Mathematics, 36, 2. Loughborough University, Loughborough, June 2016. http://www.bsrlm.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/BSRLM-CP-36-2-15.pdf. Accessed January 10, 2017.
Ball, S., Maguire, M., Braun, A., Perryman, J., & Hoskins, K. (2012). Assessment technologies in schools: ‘Deliverology’ and the ‘play of dominations’. Research Papers in Education, 27(5), 513–533.
Ball, S. J. (2003). The teacher’s soul and the terrors of performativity. Journal of Education Policy, 18(2), 215–228.
Ball, S. J. (2013a). Foucault, power, and education. London: Routledge.
Ball, S. J. (2013b). The education debate (2nd ed.). Bristol: Policy Press.
Berger, J. (2016a). History is a meeting place. New Statesman, January 15–21, 2016, 17.
Berger, J. (2016b). How to resist a state of forgetfulness. In Confabulations (pp. 133–143). UK: Penguin.
Berry, J. (2012). Teachers’ professional autonomy in England: Are neo-liberal approaches incontestable? Forum, 54(3), 397–410.
Brighouse, T. (2016). From ‘optimism and trust’ to ‘markets and managerialism’. In R. Pring & M. Roberts (Eds.), A generation of radical educational change: Stories from the field (pp. 153–166). Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
Brown, M., Askew, M., Baker, D., Denvir, H., & Millett, A. (1998). Is the national numeracy strategy research-based? British Journal of Educational Studies, 46(4), 362–385.
Buxton, L. (1975). How did it all happen? Splash 0010. London: Pimlico School.
Chitty, C. (2009). Education policy in Britain (2nd ed.). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Cundy, H. M. (1963). The school mathematics project. The Mathematical Gazette, 47(359), 20–21.
Darragh, L. (2017). Fears and desires: Researching teachers in neoliberal contexts. In A. Chronaki (Ed.), Proceedings of the 9th International Conference of Mathematics Education and Society: Vol.1. Mathematics Education and Life at Times of Crisis (pp. 227–231). http://mes9.ece.uth.gr/portal/. Accessed May 26, 2017.
Darragh, L., Björklund Boistrup, L., Valero, P., Adams, G., & Povey, H. (2017). Neoliberalism: A crisis for mathematics education? In A. Chronaki (Ed.), Proceedings of the 9th International Conference of Mathematics Education and Society: Vol. 1. Mathematics Education and Life at Times of Crisis (pp. 149–153). http://mes9.ece.uth.gr/portal/. Accessed May 26, 2017.
Day, C., & Smethem, L. (2009). The effects of reform: Have teachers really lost their sense of professionalism? Journal of Educational Change, 10(2–3), 141–157.
Eades, J. (2017) Maths mag. In H. Povey & G. Adams (Eds.), Smilemaths. https://smilemaths.wordpress.com/themes/learning-together/students-at-the-centre/. Accessed May 12, 2017.
Elliot, J., & Norris, N. (Eds.). (2012). Curriculum, pedagogy and educational research: The work of Lawrence Stenhouse. London: Routledge.
Ely, M., Vinz, R., Downing, M., & Anzul, M. (1997). On writing qualitative research: Living by words. London: Falmer Press.
Foucault, M. (1979). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. London: Penguin.
Foucault, M. (1980). Two lectures. Lecture one: 7 January 1976. In C. Gordon (Ed.), Power-knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972–1977 (Vintage Books ed., pp. 78–92). New York: Harvester Press.
Gibbons, R. (1975). Smile history. Splash 0001. London: Ladbroke Mathematics Centre.
Gillard, D. (2011). Education in England: A brief history. www.educationengland.org.uk/history.
Goodson, I. (2014). Curriculum, personal narrative and the social future. Abingdon: Routledge.
Groundwater-Smith, S., & Mockler, N. (2009). Teacher professional learning in an age of compliance: Mind the gap. Milton Keynes, UK: Springer.
Hargreaves, A. (2000). Four ages of professionalism and professional learning. Teachers and Teaching, 6(2), 151–182.
Hargreaves, A., & Moore, S. (2005). Voice, nostalgia, and teachers’ experiences of change. In F. Bodone (Ed.), What difference does research make and for whom? (pp. 129–140). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
Hodgkin, K., & Radstone, S. (2003). Introduction: Contested pasts. In K. Hodgkin & S. Radstone (Eds.), Contested pasts: The politics of memory (pp. 1–22). London: Routledge.
Howson, G., Keitel, C., & Kilpatrick, J. (1981). Curriculum development in mathematics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Keddie, A. (2016). Children of the market: Performativity, neoliberal responsibilisation and the construction of student identities. Oxford Review of Education, 42(1), 108–122.
Llewellyn, A. (2017). Technologies of (re)production in mathematics education research: Performances of progress. In H. Straehler-Pohl, N. Bohlmann, & A. Pais (Eds.), The disorder of mathematics education: Challenging the sociopolitical dimensions of research (pp. 153–169). New York: Springer.
Macpherson, I., Robertson, S., & Walford, G. (2014). An introduction. In I. Macpherson, S. Robertson, & G. Walford (Eds.), Education, privatisation and social justice: Case studies from Africa, South Asia and South East Asia (pp. 9–24). Oxford: Symposium Books.
Monbiot, G. (2016, October 12). Neoliberalism is creating loneliness. That’s what’s wrenching society apart. The Guardian.
Montecino, A., & Valero, P. (2017). Mathematics teachers as products and agents: To be or not to be. That is the point! In H. Straehler-Pohl, N. Bohlmann & A. Pais (Eds.), The disorder of mathematics education: Challenging the sociopolitical dimensions of research (pp. 135–152). Switzerland: Springer.
Newsam, P. (2016). 1944–2015: Towards the nationalisation of education in England. In R. Pring & M. Roberts (Eds.), A generation of radical educational change: Stories from the field (pp. 179–190). Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
Noss, R. (1990). The national curriculum and mathematics: A case of divide and rule. In P. Dowling (Ed.), Mathematics versus the national curriculum (pp. 13–32). London: Taylor & Francis.
O’Farrell, C. (2005). Michel Foucault. London: Sage.
Paechter, C. (2017). Biography. In H. Povey & G. Adams (Eds.), Smilemaths. https://smilemaths.wordpress.com/biographies/carrie-paechter/. Accessed May 25, 2017.
Popkewitz, T. (2013). The sociology of education as the history of the present: Fabrication, difference and abjection. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 34(3), 439–456.
Povey, H., & Adams, G. (2017a). Thinking forward: Using stories from the recent past in mathematics education in England. In A. Chronaki (Ed.), Proceedings of the 9th International Conference of Mathematics Education and Society: Vol. 2. Mathematics Education and Life at Times of Crisis (pp. 803–811). http://mes9.ece.uth.gr/portal/index.php. Accessed May 26, 2017.
Povey, H., & Adams, G. (2017b). Possibilities for mathematics education? Aphoristic fragments from the past. Paper under review for a special issue of The Disorder of Mathematics Education.
Povey, H., Adams, G., & Everley, R. (2016). “Its influence taints all”: Mathematics teachers resisting performativity through engagement with the past. Paper presented at 13th International Congress on Mathematical Education (ICME-13), Hamburg, July 24–31, 2016.
Pring, R. (2016). Evolution of teacher training and professional development. In R. Pring & M. Roberts (Eds.), A generation of radical educational change: Stories from the field (pp. 81–94). Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
Sachs, J. (2001). Teacher professional identity: Competing discourses, competing outcomes. Journal of Education Policy, 16(2), 149–161.
Samuel, R. (1980). On the methods of history workshop: A reply. History Workshop Journal, 9(1), 162–176.
Schools Council (Great Britain). (1975). The whole curriculum, 13–16: The report of the Schools Council working party on the whole curriculum 1971–74. Working paper 53. London: Evans & Methuen.
Sedikides, C., Wildschut, T., Arndt, J., & Routledge, C. (2008). Nostalgia: Past, present, and future. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17(5), 304–307.
Splash. (1978). Smile writing week. In H. Povey & G. Adams (Eds.), Smilemaths. https://smilemaths.wordpress.com/themes/developing-the-curriculum/writing-weekends/. Accessed May 12, 2017.
Stronach, I., Corbin, B., McNamara, O., Stark, S., & Warne, T. (2002). Towards an uncertain politics of professionalism: Teacher and nurse identities in flux. Journal of Education Policy, 17, 109–138.
Sugrue, C., & Mertkan, S. (2017). Professional responsibility, accountability and performativity among teachers: The leavening influence of CPD? Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 23(2), 171–190.
Thatcher, M. (1987). Interview for women’s own 23 September 1987. http://www.margaretthatcher.org/document/106689. Accessed July 26, 2017.
Zembylas, M. (2011). Reclaiming nostalgia in educational politics and practice: Counter-memory, aporetic mourning, and critical pedagogy. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 32(5), 641–655.
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to the British Academy/Leverhulme for financial support for the project (Grant SG150824), to all those who have contributed so generously to the archive and to those new teachers, particularly Rosie Everley, who have given freely of their time to help us in this project.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Adams, G., Povey, H. (2018). “Now There’s Everything to Stop You”: Teacher Autonomy Then and Now. In: Jurdak, M., Vithal, R. (eds) Sociopolitical Dimensions of Mathematics Education. ICME-13 Monographs. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72610-6_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72610-6_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-72609-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-72610-6
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)