Skip to main content

Single-Port Surgery

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Minimally Invasive Gynecology

Abstract

Conventional laparoscopy is the preferred approach for many, if not most, major gynecologic procedures that require abdominal access. Conventional laparoscopic instrumentation and access devices as well as robotic-assisted laparoscopic instrumentation are improving rapidly. Whether conventional or robotic laparoscopy is considered, we prefer to minimize the size and number of ports. Many surgical procedures are customarily performed via 3–5 ports through small incisions in the abdominal wall. Each additional port carries a small but not negligible risk for port site complications [1]. These risks include bleeding, infection, injury to nearby organs, soft tissue trauma, herniation, and decreased cosmesis [2, 3].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Tracy CR, Raman JD, Cadeddu JA, Rane A. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in urology: where have we been and where are we heading? Nat Clin Pract Urol. 2008;5:561–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Escobar PF, Starks DC, Fader AN, et al. Single-port risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy with and without hysterectomy: surgical outcomes and learning curve analysis. Gynecol Oncol. 2010a;119:43–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Escobar PF, Starks DC, Fader AN, et al. Laparoendoscopic single-site and natural orifice surgery in gynecology. Fertil Steril. 2010b;94:2497–502.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Wheeless CR Jr. Elimination of second incision in laparoscopic sterilization. Obstet Gynecol. 1972;39:134–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Pelosi MA, Pelosi MA III. Laparoscopic hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy using a single umbilical puncture. N J Med. 1991;88:721–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gill IS, Advincula AP, Aron M. Consensus statement of the consortium for laparoendoscopic single-site surgery. Surg Endosc. 2010;24(4):762–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Stepp KJ. et al. An AAGL Task Force consensus statement: a standardized approach to LESS hysterectomy. American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists 43nd Annual Clinical Meeting, Vancouver, BC. November 16–21, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hong SH, Seo SI, Kim JC, Hwang TK. Cosmetic circumumbilical incision for extraction of specimen after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Endourol. 2006;20(7):519–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Huang CK, Houng JY, Chiang CJ, et al. Single incision transumbilical laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a first case report. Obes Surg. 2009;19:1711–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kane S, Stepp KJ. Circumumbilical (Omega) incision for laparoendoscopic single-site surgery. Oral Presentation: Society Gynecologic Surgeons Annual Clinical Meeting, San Antonio, TX, April 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Angioni S, Pontis A, Pisanu A, et al. Single-port access subtotal laparoscopic hysterectomy: a prospective case-control study. J Minim Invasive. 2015;22:809–12.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Uppal S, Frumaovitz M, Escobar P. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in gynecology: review of literature and available technology. J Minim Invasive. 2011;18:12–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lee YY, Kim TJ, Kim CJ, et al. Single-port access laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy: a novel method with a wound retractor and a glove. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2009;16(4):450–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sobolewski C, Yeung PP, Hart S. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in gynecology. Obstet Gynecol Clin N Am. 2011;11:741–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Fader AN, Escobar PF. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) in gynecologic oncology: technique and initial report. Gynecol Oncol. 2009;114:157–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Chern BSM, Lakhotia S, Kho CK, et al. Single incision laparoscopic surgery in gynecology: evolution, current trends, and future perspectives. Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 2012;1:9–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Boruta DM. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in gynecologic oncology: an update. Gynecol Oncol. 2016;141:616–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. White W, Goel R, Kaouk J. Single port laparoscopic retroperitoneal surgery: initial operative experience and comparative outcomes. Urology. 2009;73:1279–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Song T, Cho J, Kim TJ, Kim IR, et al. Cosmetic outcomes of laparoendoscopic single-site hysterectomy compared with multi-port surgery: randomized controlled trial. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2013a;20(4):460–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Song T, Lee Y, Kim ML, et al. Single-port access total laparoscopic hysterectomy for large uterus. Gynecol Obstet Investig. 2013b;75:16–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Song T, Kim ML, Jung YW, et al. Laparoendoscopic single-site versus conventional laparoscopic gynecologic surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013c;209:317.e1–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Fagotti A, Bottoni C, Vizzielli G, et al. Post operative pain after conventional laparoscopy and laparoendoscopic single site surgery (LESS) for benign adnexal disease: a randomized trial. Fertil Steril. 2011;96(1):255–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Yoo EH, Shim E. Single-port access compared with three-port laparoscopic adnexal surgery in a randomized controlled trial. J Int Med Res. 2013;41(3):673–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Yang L, Gao J, Zeng L, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of single-port versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2016;133:9–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Chen YJ, Wang PH, Ocampo EJ, et al. Single-port compared with conventional laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;117:906–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Yim GW, Jung YW, Paek J, et al. Transumbilical single port versus conventional total laparoscopic hysterectomy: surgical outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;203:26.e1–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Escobar PF, Fader AN, Paraiso MF, et al. Robotic-assisted laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in gynecology: initial report and technique. J Minim Invasive. 2009;16:589–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kevin J. E. Stepp M.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Stepp, K.J. ., Bastawros, D.A. (2018). Single-Port Surgery. In: Gomes-da-Silveira, G.G., da Silveira, G.P.G., Pessini, S.A. (eds) Minimally Invasive Gynecology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72592-5_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72592-5_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-72591-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-72592-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics