Local Tax Ballot Measures and Quality of Life

  • Ryan M. Yonk
  • Josh T. Smith
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Political Science book series (BRIEFSPOLITICAL)


The previous chapter empirically showed how ballot measures are both less likely to garner support and to pass in areas with high life quality and was focused on state level ballot measures across a variety of subjects. This finding looked at all ballot measures regardless of content or subject. We treated ballot measures about legalizing marijuana as if they were the same as ballot measures on any other subject. In this chapter, we refine that and concentrate on only local ballot measures involving a tax increase. Our interest in this narrower set of ballot measures is twofold. First, we are interested in ballot measures where the quality of life is more homogeneous to better test the effect, and second we are interest in better understanding the impact of quality of life on decisions that have a direct and more immediate effect on the voter.


  1. Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., Miller, W. E., & Stokes, D. E. (1960). The American voter. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  2. Converse, P. E. (1964). The nature of belief systems in mass politics. In D. E. Apter (Ed.), Ideology and discontent (pp. 206–261). New York: The Free Press of Glencoe.Google Scholar
  3. Feldman, S. (2003). Values, Ideology, and the Structure of Political Attitudes. In D. O. Sears, L. Huddy, & R. Jervis (Eds.), Oxford handbook of political psychology. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Fiorina, M. P. (1981). Retrospective voting in American national elections. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Goren, P. (2005). Party identification and core political values. American Journal of Political Science, 49(4), 882–897.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hansen, T., Olkkonen, M., Walter, S., & Gegenfurtner, K. R. (2006). Memory modulates color appearance. Nature Neuroscience, 9(11), 1367–1368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Henderson, H., Lickerman, J., & Flynn, P. (2000). Calvert-Henderson quality of life indicators. Bethesda, MD: Calvert Group.Google Scholar
  8. Huddy, L., Feldman, S., & Cassese, E. (2008). On the distinct political effects of anxiety and anger. In W. R. Neumann (Ed.), The affect effect (pp. 202–230). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  9. Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. J. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129(3), 339–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
  11. Kuklinski, J. H., & Quirk, P. J. (2001). Reconsidering the rational public: Cognition, heuristics, and mass opinion. In A. Lupia (Ed.), Elements of reason (pp. 153–182). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Lau, R. R., & Redlawsk, D. P. (1997). Voting correctly. American Political Science Review, 91(3), 585–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lau, R. R., & Redlawsk, D. P. (2006). How voters decide: Information processing in electoral campaigns. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. League of Women Voters. (2002). Direct democracy: The initiative and referendum process in Washington state. Retrieved from
  15. Lodge, M., Steenbergen, M. R., & Brau, S. (1995). The responsive voter: Campaign information and the dynamics of candidate evaluation. The American Political Science Review, 89(2), 309–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lupia, A. (1994). Shortcuts versus encyclopedias: Information and voting behavior in California insurance reform elections. The American Political Science Review, 88(1), 63–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Popkin, S. L. (1991). The reasoning voter. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  18. Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Rahn, W. M. (1993). The role of partisan stereotypes in information processing about political candidates. American Journal of Political Science, 37(2), 472–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Rahn, W. M. (2000). Affect as information: The role of public mood in political reasoning. In A. Lupia (Ed.), Elements of reason (pp. 130–150). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rahn, W. M., Brehm, J., & Carlson, N. (1999). National elections as institutions for generating social capital. In T. Skocpol & M. Fiorina (Eds.), Civic engagement in American democracy. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
  22. Redlawsk, D. P. (2002). Hot cognition or cool consideration? Testing the effects of motivated reasoning on political decision making. Journal of Politics, 64(4), 1021–1044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Schacter, D. L. (1999). The seven sins of memory: Insights from psychology and cognitive neuroscience. American Psychologist, 54(3), 192–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Taber, C. S., & Lodge, M. (2006). Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. American Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 755–769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2009). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness.Google Scholar
  26. Yonk, R. M. (2013). I tax you tax: Quality of life and self taxation. Public Administration Research, 2(2). Retrieved from
  27. Zaller, J. R. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ryan M. Yonk
    • 1
  • Josh T. Smith
    • 1
  1. 1.Utah State UniversityLoganUSA

Personalised recommendations