Skip to main content

Quality of Life and Direct Democracy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Politics and Quality of Life

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Political Science ((BRIEFSPOLITICAL))

  • 267 Accesses

Abstract

The essential logic of direct democracy measures is to offer another avenue for those who want to make their voices heard if they believe their concerns are not being attended to in the normal legislative process. For example, initiatives and referendums that circumvent the legislature constitute a means for individuals to place questions openly to their fellow constituents. Those working to place such measures on ballots are obviously doing so to promote their quality of life.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bowler, S., Donovan, T., & Happ, T. (1992). Ballot propositions and information costs: Direct democracy and the fatigued voter. The Western Political Quarterly, 45(2), 559–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Branton, R. P. (2003). Examining individual-level voting behavior on state ballot propositions. Political Research Quarterly, 56(3), 367–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brockington, D. (2003). A low information theory of ballot position effect. Political Behavior, 25(1), 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Converse, P. E. (1964). The nature of belief systems in mass politics. In D. E. Apter (Ed.), Ideology and discontent (pp. 206–261). New York: The Free Press of Glencoe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darcy, R., & Schnider, A. L. (1989). Confusing ballots, roll-off, and the black vote. Western Political Quarterly, 42(3), 347–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerber, E. (1999). The populist paradox: Interest group influence and the promise of direct legislation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawley, W. D. (1973). Nonpartisan elections and the case for party politics. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, A. O. (1970). Exit, voice, and loyalty: Responses to decline in firms, organizations and states. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimball, D. C., & Kropf, M. (2006). Ballot initiatives and residual ballots in the 2004 presidential election. Presented at the annual meeting of the Southern Political Science Association, Atlanta, GA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, E. C. (1960). The politics of nonpartisanship: A study of California city elections. Berkley, CA: California University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipow, A. (1973). Plebiscitarian politics and progressivism: The direct democracy movement. Paper prepared for the annual meeting of the American Historical Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lodge, M., Steenbergen, M. R., & Brau, S. (1995). The responsive voter: Campaign information and the dynamics of candidate evaluation. The American Political Science Review, 89(2), 309–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magleby, D. B. (1984). Direct legislation: Voting on ballot propositions in the United States. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsusaka, J. G. (2004). For the many or the few. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, S. M. (1998). State referendum voting, ballot roll-off, and the effect of new electoral technology. State and Local Government Review, 30(2), 106–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, S. M., & Strizek, G. A. (1995). Electronic voting machines and ballot roll-off. American Politics Quarterly, 23(3), 300–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson, S. P. (2003). The political environment and ballot proposition awareness. American Journal of Political Science, 47(3), 403–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson, S. P. (2005). Voting the agenda: Candidates, elections and ballot measures. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nie, N. H., Verba, S., & Petrocik, J. R. (1979). The changing American voter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pillsbury, A. J. (1931). The initiative, its achievements and abuses. Commonwealth Part, II(25), 426–433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popkin, S. L. (1991). The reasoning voter. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. D. (1995). Tuning in, tuning out: The strange disappearance of social capital in America. American Political Science Association, 28(4), 664–683.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rauch, J. (2015, May). Political realism: How hacks, machines, big money, and back-room deals can strengthen American democracy. Center for Effective Public Management at Brookings. Retrieved from https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/political-realism-rauch2.pdf

  • Reilly, S. (2010). Design, meaning and choice in direct democracy: Petitioners and voter’s influences. New York: Ashgate Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reilly, S., & Richey, S. (2011). Language complexity and voters: Does ballot question wording impact participation? Political Research Quarterly, 64(1), 59–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaffner, B., Streb, M., & Wright, G. (2001). Teams without uniforms: The nonpartisan ballot in state and local elections. Political Research Quarterly, 54(1), 7–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, D. (1989). Citizen lawmakers: The ballot initiative revolution. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. A., & Tolbert, C. J. (2004). Educated by initiative: The effects of direct democracy on citizens and political organizations in the States. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. (2002). Ballot initiatives and the democratic citizen. Journal of Politics, 64(3), 892–903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taebel, D. A. (1975). The effect of ballot position on electoral success. American Journal of Political Science, 19(3), 519–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tolbert, C. J., McNeal, R. S., & Smith, D. A. (2003). Enhancing civic engagement: The effects of direct democracy on political participation and knowledge. State Politics and Policy Quarterly, 3(1), 23–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanderleeuw, J. M., & Engstrom, R. L. (1987). Race, referenda and roll-off. The Journal of Politics, 49(4), 1081–1092.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, J. L. (1966). Ballot forms and voter fatigue: An analysis of the office block and party column ballots. Midwest Journal of Political Science, 10(4), 448–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfinger, R. E., & Rosenstone, S. J. (1980). Who votes? New Haven, CT: Yale University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yonk, R. M., & Reilly, S. (2011). Citizen involvement & quality of life: Exit, voice and loyalty in a time of direct democracy. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 7(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-011-9142-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaller, J. R. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Yonk, R.M., Smith, J.T. (2018). Quality of Life and Direct Democracy. In: Politics and Quality of Life. SpringerBriefs in Political Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72571-0_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics