Introduction: Quality of Life Studies; Our Dulling and Rusting Tools
The notion of what it means to have a high quality of life, to lead the good life, or simply to be happy has become increasingly the focus of social scientists. Its roots, however, extend much farther, at least to the foundations of the western world in philosophical treatises, the platonic dialogues, and perhaps most significantly in the Aristotelian conception of eudaimonia and questions of the proper social and political order (Russel, 2014). These philosophical foundations are all rooted in the commonality of what seems to be a near universal longing for a life well lived, and as a corollary a society organized in such a way as to achieve that life.
- Costanza, R., Hart, M., Posner, S., & Talberth, J. (2009). Beyond GDP: The need for new measures of progress, Pardee paper no. 4. Boston: Pardee Center for the Study of the Longer-Range Future. Retrieved from http://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1010&context=iss_pub.Google Scholar
- Costanza, R., Kubiszewski, I., Giovannini, E., Lovins, H., McGlade, J., Pickett, K. E., et al. (2014, January 16). Development: Time to leave GDP behind. Nature, 505, 283–285. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/505283a. Retrieved from https://www.nature.com/news/development-time-to-leave-gdp-behind-1.14499
- Russel, D. (2014). Eudaimonia in encyclopedia of quality of life research. In A. Michalos (Ed.). Springer.Google Scholar
- Smith, A. The Theory of Moral Sentiments. (1790). Library of economics and liberty. Retrieved July 30, 2017 from http://www.econlib.org/library/Smith/smMS6.html
- The Sonoran Institute. (2006). Ten truths and trends in the new American west. Tucson, AZ: The Sonoran Institute.Google Scholar