Advertisement

Evaluating the Performance of Three Classification Methods in Diagnosis of Parkinson’s Disease

  • Salama A. Mostafa
  • Aida Mustapha
  • Shihab Hamad Khaleefah
  • Mohd Sharifuddin Ahmad
  • Mazin Abed Mohammed
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 700)

Abstract

Accurate diagnosis of the Parkinson’s disease is a challenging task that involves many physical, psychological and neurological examinations. The examinations include investigating a number of signs and symptoms, reviewing the medical history and checking the nervous system conditions of a patient. Recently, researchers use voice disorders to diagnose Parkinson’s disease patients. They extract features of a recorded human voice and apply classification methods to diagnosis this disease. In this paper, we apply a Decision Tree, Naïve Bayes and Neural Network classification methods for the diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease. The aim of this paper is to resolve the problem by evaluating the performance of the three methods. The objectives of the paper are to (i) implement three classification methods independently on a Parkinson’s dataset, and (ii) determine the best method among the three. The classification results show that the Decision Tree produces the highest accuracy rate of 91.63%, followed by the Neural Network, 91.01% and the Naïve Bayes produces the lowest accuracy rate of 89.46%. The results recommend using the Decision Tree or the Neural Network over the Naïve Bayes for datasets with similar properties.

Keywords

Classification Decision tree Naïve bayes Neural network 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This project is sponsored by Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, ORICC, under Vot D004.

References

  1. 1.
    Smith, T.F., Waterman, M.S.: Identification of common molecular subsequences. J. Mol. Biol. 147, 195–197 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Davie, C.A.: A review of Parkinson’s disease. Br. Med. Bull. 86(1), 109–127 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sutherland, M., Dean, P.: What is Parkinson’s Disease? Neuro Challenges, Foundation for Parkinson’s. http://www.parkinsonsneurochallenge.org (2017). Accessed 08 June 2017
  4. 4.
    Asuncion, A., Newman, D.: UCI machine learning repository. https://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml/datasets/parkinsons (2007)
  5. 5.
    Little, M.A., McSharry, P.E., Roberts, S.J., Costello, D.A., Moroz, I.M.: Exploiting nonlinear recurrence and fractal scaling properties for voice disorder detection. Biomed. Eng. Online 6(1), 23 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Arjmandi, M.K., Pooyan, M.: An optimum algorithm in pathological voice quality assessment using wavelet-packet-based features, linear discriminant analysis and support vector machine. Biomed. Sign. Process. Control 7(1), 3–19 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gnanapriya, S., Suganya, R., Devi, G.S., Kumar, M.S.: Data mining concepts and techniques. Data Min. Knowl. Eng. 2(9), 256–263 (2010)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tatu, A., Albuquerque, G., Eisemann, M., Schneidewind, J., Theisel, H., Magnor, M., Keim, D.: Combining automated analysis and visualization techniques for effective exploration of high-dimensional data. In: 2009 IEEE Symposium on Visual Analytics Science and Technology VAST 2009, pp. 59–66. IEEE (2009)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Das, R.: A comparison of multiple classification methods for diagnosis of Parkinson disease. Expert Syst. Appl. 37(2), 1568–1572 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Exarchos, T.P., Tzallas, A.T., Baga, D., Chaloglou, D., Fotiadis, D.I., Tsouli, S., Konitsiotis, S.: Using partial decision trees to predict Parkinson’s symptoms: a new approach for diagnosis and therapy in patients suffering from Parkinson’s disease. Comput. Biol. Med. 42(2), 195–204 (2012)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Can, M.: Neural networks to diagnose the Parkinson’s disease. SouthEast Eur. J. Soft Comput. 2(1) (2013)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mohammed, M.A., Ghani, M.K.A., Hamed, R.I., Mostafa, S.A., Ibrahim, D.A., Jameel, H.K., Alallah, A.H.: Solving vehicle routing problem by using improved K-nearest neighbor algorithm for best solution. J. Comput. Sci. (2017)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Khaleefah, S.H., Nasrudin, M.F., Mostafa, S.A.: Fingerprinting of deformed paper images acquired by scanners. In: 2015 IEEE Student Conference on Research and Development (SCOReD), pp. 393–397. IEEE, Dec 2015Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mohammed, M.A., Gani, M.K.A., Hamed, R.I., Mostafa, S.A., Ahmad, M.S., Ibrahim, D.A.: Solving vehicle routing problem by using improved genetic algorithm for optimal solution. J. Comput. Sci. (2017)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hall, M., Frank, E., Holmes, G., Pfahringer, B., Reutemann, P., Witten, I.H.: The WEKA data mining software: an update. SIGKDD Explor. Newsl. 11(1), 10–18 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kumar, S.A., Vijayalakshmi, M.: Efficiency of decision trees in predicting student’s academic performance. In: The First International Conference on Computer Science, Engineering and Applications, CS and IT, vol. 2, pp. 335–343Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rennie, J.D., Shih, L., Teevan, J., Karger, D.R.: Tackling the poor assumptions of naive bayes text classifiers. In: Proceedings of the International conference on Machine Learning ICML, Vol. 3, pp. 616–623 (2003) Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bahramirad, S., Mustapha, A., Eshraghi, M.: Classification of liver disease diagnosis: a comparative study. In: 2013 Second International Conference on Informatics and Applications (ICIA), pp. 42–46. IEEE, Sept 2013Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hossain, J., FazlidaMohdSani, N., Mustapha, A., SurianiAffendey, L.: Using feature selection as accuracy benchmarking in clinical data mining. J. Comput. Sci. 9(7), 883 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Salama A. Mostafa
    • 1
  • Aida Mustapha
    • 1
  • Shihab Hamad Khaleefah
    • 2
  • Mohd Sharifuddin Ahmad
    • 3
  • Mazin Abed Mohammed
    • 4
  1. 1.Faculty of Computer Science and Information TechnologyUniversiti Tun Hussein Onn MalaysiaParit Raja, Batu PahatMalaysia
  2. 2.Faculty of Computer ScienceAlmaaref University CollegeAnbarIraq
  3. 3.College of Computer Science and Information TechnologyUniversiti Tenaga NasionalKajangMalaysia
  4. 4.Planning and Follow-up DepartmentUniversity of AnbarAnbarIraq

Personalised recommendations