Advertisement

Towards Designing Tangible Interaction for Children with Dyslexia in Learning the Malay Language

  • Siti Nurliana Jamali
  • Novia Admodisastro
  • Siti Suhaila Abdul Hamid
  • Azrina Kamaruddin
  • Abdul Azim Abd Ghani
  • Sa’adah Hassan
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 700)

Abstract

In this paper, we provide a study of tangible interaction (TI) based on theories and related works for dyslexic children. The study is an attempt to investigate TI for dyslexic children in learning Malay language in Malaysia primary schools. TI has tremendous contribution in supporting dyslexic children to enhance their way of learning process. However, TI that were developed currently have different capabilities and purposes. For example, current works currently only developed for other languages like English, Mandarin and Dutch. The TI model for English or other languages may not be suitable to be adopted directly for the Malay language due to differences of letter sound, morphology and etc. There were nine related works reviewed in this study. Based on these previous related works and learning theories we designed a conceptual TI model for dyslexic children in learning the Malay language.

Keywords

Tangible interaction Dyslexia Children Language difficulty Malay language 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Special thanks to Dyslexia Association Malaysia (DAM) for great assistance in this research. We would also like to thank the University for funding the research to conduct the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Adelman, J.S.: Visual Word Recognition: Models and Methods, Orthography and Phonology, vol. 1. Psychology Press, Hove, East Sussex (2012)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    UNICEF Malaysia: Children with Disabilities in Malaysia: Mapping the Policies, Programmes, Interventions and Stakeholders. UNICEF (2014)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    International Dyslexia Association: Multisensory Structured Language Teaching (2017). Accessed from https://dyslexiaida.org/multisensory-structured-language-teaching/
  4. 4.
    Marshall, P.: Do tangible interfaces enhance learning? In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Tangible and Embedded Interaction. ACM (2007)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Falcão, T.P., Price, S.: Informing design for tangible interaction: a case for children with learning difficulties. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Interaction Design and Children. ACM (2010)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pandey, S., Srivastava, S.: Tiblo: a tangible learning aid for children with dyslexia. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Creativity and Innovation in Design. ACM (2011)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pandey, S., Srivastava, S.: SpellBound: a tangible spelling aid for the dyslexic child. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Human Computer Interaction. ACM (2011)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hamid, S.S.A., Admodisastro, N., Ghani, A.A.A.: Computer-based learning model to improve learning of the malay language amongst dyslexic primary school students. In: Proceedings of the APCHIUX, OzCHI2015. ACM (2015)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    British Dyslexia Association.: Assessing Reading Difficulties: A Diagnostics and Remedial Approach. Windsor: NFER-Nelson (1999)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Reid, G.: Dyslexia: A Practitioner’s Handbook. Wiley (2016)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Clark, J.M., Paivio, A.: Dual coding theory and education. Edu. Psychol. Rev. 3(3), 149–210 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kinesthetic Learning Strategies, Kinesthetic Learning Strategies for Various Subjects. Accessed from http://www.kinestheticlearningstrategies.com/kinesthetic-learning-strategies-for-various-subjects/ (2017)
  13. 13.
    Teh, T.T.L., Ng, K.H., Parhizkar, B.: TraceIt: an air tracing reading tool for children with dyslexia. In: Advances in Visual Informatics, vol. 9429. LNCS, Springer. (2015)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hornecker, E.: Physicality in tangible interaction: bodies and the world. In: Position Paper of the International Workshop on Physicality. University of Lancaster (2006)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ullmer, B., Ishii, H.: Emerging frameworks for tangible user interfaces. In: Carroll, J.M. (ed.) HCI in the New Millennium. Addison-Wesley Pub, Reading, MA (2001)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hornecker, E., Buur, J.: Getting a grip on tangible interaction: a framework on physical space & social interaction. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI CHI. ACM (2006)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zuckerman, O., Arida, S., Resnick, M.: Extending tangible interfaces for education: digital montessori-inspired manipulatives. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI CHI. ACM (2005)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Price, S., Sheridan, J.G., Falcao, T.P., Roussos, G.: Towards a framework for investigating tangible environments for learning. Int. J. Arts Tech. 1(3–4) (2008)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Antle, A.N., Fan, M., Cramer, E.S.: PhonoBlocks: a tangible system for supporting dyslexic children learning to read. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Tangible, Embedded and Embodied Interaction. ACM (2015)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Price, S., Rogers, Y., Scaife, M., Stanton, D., Neale, H.: Using ‘Tangibles’ to promote novel forms of playful learning. J. Interact. Comput 15(2), 169–185 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lund, H.H., Marti, P., Palma, V.: Educational robotics: manipulative technologies for cognitive rehabilitation. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Artificial Life and Robotics (AROB). Oita, Japan (2004)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lin, C.Y., Chai, H.C.: Using an e-talk pen to promote phonological awareness on communication training. In: Proceedings of the ICCSE. IEEE (2014)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Fan, M., Antle, A.N.: Tactile letters: a tangible tabletop with texture cues supporting alphabetic learning for dyslexic children. In Proceedings of the Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction. ACM (2015)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Marti, P., Lund, H.H.: Novel tangible interfaces for physical manipulation, conceptual constructions and action composition. In: Proceedings of the Intelligent Manipulation and Grasping (IMG04) (2004)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hengeveld, B., Voort, R., Hummels, C., de Moor, J., van Balkom, H., Overbeeke, K., van der Helm, A.: The development of linguabytes: an interactive tangible play and learning system to stimulate the language development of toddlers with multiple disabilities. In: Proceedings of the Advances in Human-Computer Interaction (2008)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Goh, W.B., Chamara Kasun, L.L., Fitriani, Tan, J., Shou, W.: The i-cube: design considerations for block-based digital manipulatives and their applications. In Proceedings of the Conference on Designing Interactive Systems Conference. ACM (2012)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Vijayarani, S., Sakila, M.A.: Template matching technique for searching words in document images. Int. J. Cybern. Inform. (IJCI) 4 (6) (2015)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Chantara, W., Ho, Y.S.: Object detection based on fast template matching through adaptive partition search. In: Proceedings of the JCSSE. IEEE (2015)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Jayanthi, N., Indu, S.: Comparison of image matching technique. J. Latest Trends Eng. Technol. 7, 396–401(2016)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Siti Nurliana Jamali
    • 1
  • Novia Admodisastro
    • 1
  • Siti Suhaila Abdul Hamid
    • 1
  • Azrina Kamaruddin
    • 1
  • Abdul Azim Abd Ghani
    • 1
  • Sa’adah Hassan
    • 1
  1. 1.Universiti Putra MalaysiaSerdangMalaysia

Personalised recommendations