Skip to main content

“Social Consequences” of School Lunch for Students Who Receive Special Education Services: A Critical Outlook

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Educational Dimensions of School Lunch

Abstract

In this chapter we highlight the need for further investigation into and discussion about the school lunch experiences of students who receive special education services. In 2011, Marcus B. Weaver-Hightower entreated scholars to begin examining the “social consequences” of school lunch, including those of different student populations interacting in the cafeteria. These social interactions and their meanings have been studied in regard to race, socio-economic status, gender, and age, among other factors. However, there has been little investigation into the lunchroom experiences of students who receive special education services, and little is known about interactions between this student population and their general education peers. Among the key questions in need of answers are: What is the current practice in school lunchrooms? What policy informs practice? Who determines procedures to be followed? Asking and exploring such questions will help bring attention to a space (the school lunchroom) and a population (students who receive special education services), which, in combination, have been the focus of very little critical study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 19.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 27.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The authors of this chapter have retained the language used at the time a referenced study was conducted or a paper written. In no current context is the term “mental retardation” appropriate or endorsed by these writers.

References

  • Eckert, P. (1989). Jocks and burnouts: Social categories and identity in high school. New York: Columbia University, Teachers College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eder, D. (1995). School talk: Gender and adolescent culture. New Brunswick: Rutgers University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furlow, T. W. (1973). A matter of life and death. Pharos, 36(3), 84–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gargiulo, R. M., & Bouck, E. C. (2018). Special education in contemporary society: An introduction to exceptionality (6th ed.). Los Angeles: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallahan, D. P., Kauffman, J. M., & Pullen, P. C. (2015). Exceptional learners: An introduction to special education (13th ed.). Boston: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heyne, L., Wilkins, V., & Anderson, L. (2012). Social inclusion in the lunchroom and on the playground at school. Social Advocacy and Systems Change Journal, 3(1), 54–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004 (IDEA), 20 U.S.C. §1400 et seq.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanner, L. (1964). A history of the care and study of the mentally retarded. Springfield: Charles C. Thomas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunc, N. (1992). The need to belong: Rediscovering Maslow’s hierarchy of needs. Retrieved from http://www.broadreachtraining.com/articles/armaslow.htm

  • Kunc, N. (1995). The other side of therapy: Disability, normalcy, and the tyranny of rehabilitation. Retrieved from Axis Consultation & Training, Ltd., November 4, 2004. http://www.normemma.com

  • Kunc, N., & Van der Klift, E. (1995). A credo for support. Retrieved from http://www2.gnb.ca/content/dam/gnb/Departments/pcsdp-cpmcph/pdf/docs/CredoforSupport.pdf

  • Lauer, V. K. (2014). When the school says no…how to get the yes! Securing special education services for your child. London: Jessica Kingsley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, S. (2008). School lunch politics: The surprising history of America’s favorite welfare program. Princeton: Princeton University.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Maslow, A. (1970). Motivation and personality (2nd ed.). New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKnight, J. (1995). The careless society: Community and its counterfeits. New York: BasicBooks, Perseus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milner, M. (2004). Freaks, geeks, and cool kids: American teenagers, schools, and the culture of consumption. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences. (2009). Characteristics of public school districts in the United States: Results from the 2007–08 schools and staffing survey. First look. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2009/2009320.pdf

  • Ng, J., Sweeney, H. M., & Mitchiner, M. (2013). Let’s sit together: Exploring the potential for human relations education at lunch. Journal of Thought, 48(2), 65–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perske, R. (1991). Unequal justice? What can happen when persons with retardation or other developmental disabilities encounter the criminal justice system. Nashville: Abingdon.

    Google Scholar 

  • President’s Committee on Mental Retardation. (1970). The six-hour retarded child. Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. D. (1995). Pieces of purgatory: Mental retardation in and out of institutions. Pacific Grove: Brookes/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. D., & Wehmeyer, M. L. (2012). Good blood bad blood: Science, nature, and the myth of the Kallikaks. Washington, DC: American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Southern Poverty Law Center. (2017). Teaching tolerance. Retrieved March 6, 2017, from http://www.tolerance.org/mix-it-up/what-is-mix

  • Tatum, B. D. (1997). Why are all the Black kids sitting together in the cafeteria? And other conversations about race. New York: BasicBooks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorne, B. (1993). Gender play: Girls and boys in school. New Brunswick: Rutgers University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turnbull, A., Turnbull, R., Wehmeyer, M. L., & Shogren, K. A. (2016). Exceptional lives: Special education in today’s schools (8th ed.). Boston: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weaver-Hightower, M. B. (2011). Why education researchers should take school food seriously. Educational Researcher, 40, 15–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bashinski, S.M., Smilie, K.D. (2018). “Social Consequences” of School Lunch for Students Who Receive Special Education Services: A Critical Outlook. In: Rice, S., Rud, A. (eds) Educational Dimensions of School Lunch. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72517-8_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72517-8_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-72516-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-72517-8

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics