Quality and Innovation for International Pathway Programs: Good Practice and Recommendations for the Future in the UK Context and Beyond

  • Anthony Manning


The provision of international pathway programs as a means for international students to gain access to Higher Education is an area of activity which has developed rapidly in the UK and in several other countries in recent decades. This paper will examine a range of features which can be seen as markers of quality in international pathway programs. It will also identify areas of innovation, support and stimulus for international pathway providers, which can contribute to ongoing quality enhancements. In the process of discussing quality markers and innovative practices, features of curriculum, program design and student experience are discussed and mechanisms for the development of educationalists are explored. Reference is made to content and language-related considerations from the UK and other regions of activity and relevance.


International Foundation program (IFP) Pre-sessional course Pre-masters program HEFCE HESA UUK HEA UPA UCU English for academic purposes (EAP) Assessment literacy Curriculum internationalisation Cross curricular collaboration 


  1. Adams,R. (2018, February 4). UK universities report rise in applications from EU students. The Guardian. Retrieved from
  2. Agarwal, V. B., & Winkler, D. R. (1985). Foreign demand for United States higher education: A study of developing countries in the Eastern Hemisphere. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 33(3), 623–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alexander, O., Argent, S., & Spencer, J. (2008). EAP essentials: A teacher’s guide to principles and practice. Reading: Garnet.Google Scholar
  4. Andrade, M., & Evans, N. (2009). International students: Strengthening a critical resource. Lanham: R&L Education.Google Scholar
  5. Arkoudis, T. (2010). Finding common ground: Enhancing interaction between domestic and international students. Melbourne: Melbourne Centre for the Study of Higher Education.Google Scholar
  6. Bali, V. (2015). The California community college system: A valuable degree from a prestigious university, at half the cost. Alternative pathways to higher education- CIS Forum, November 2015. Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  7. Baratta, A. M. (2009). Laying the foundations for discipline specific writing skills. InForm. Retrieved from
  8. Barron, C. (2003). Problem-solving and EAP: Themes and issues in a collaborative teaching venture. English for Specific Purposes, 3(22), 297–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Berry, J. W. (2005). Acculturation: Living successfully in two cultures. International Journal of Intercultural Relations., 29, 697–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Blue, G. M., Milton, J., & Saville, J. (2000). Assessing English for academic purposes. Oxford: P. Lang.Google Scholar
  11. Bodycott, P. (2009). Choosing a higher education study abroad destination. Journal of Research in International Education, 8(3), 349–373. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bolden, R., Petrov, G., & Gosling, J. (2008). Developing collective leadership in higher education. London: LFHE.Google Scholar
  13. Bolton, G., & Lucas, C. (2008). What are universities for? Leuven: League of European Research Universities (LERU).Google Scholar
  14. Bool, H., & Luford, P. (1999). Academic standards and expectations: The role of EAP. Nottingham: Nottingham University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Bressan, & Green. (2011). From intercultural awareness to global citizenship: Engaging home students and staff in the process of internationalisation. InForm. Retrieved from
  16. Britcher, C. (2017). University says Kent cashes in with share of £25 billion spend in local economy from foreign students. Retrieved from
  17. Cazemier, F. (2015). Study at a University of Applied Sciences in the Netherlands. Alternative pathways to higher education- CIS Forum, November 2015, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  18. CentreForum. (2011). Pathway to prosperity: Making student immigration work for universities and the economy. Retrieved from
  19. Cizek, G. J. (1995). The big picture in assessment and who ought to have it. The Phi Delta Kappan, 77(3), 246–249.Google Scholar
  20. Coaldrake, P., & Stedman, L. (1998). On the brink: Australia’s Universities confronting their future. St Lucia: University of Queensland Press.Google Scholar
  21. Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2000). Designs for social futures. InMultiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures (pp. 203–234). South Yarra: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  22. Cronbach, L. J. (1990). Essentials of psychological testing (5th ed.). New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  23. Cushner, K., & Brislin, R. (1996). Intercultural interactions: A practical guide. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  24. Deardorff, D. K. (2009) Connecting International and Domestic Students. In Andrade, M. &Evans, N. (Eds.), International Students: Strengthening a Critical Resource (pp. 211–215). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Education.Google Scholar
  25. Durkin, K., & Main, A. (2002). Discipline-based study skills support for first-year undergraduate students. Active Learning in Higher Education, 3(1), 24–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fava-Verde, A. (2008). ‘Student tracking: Enhancing the transition to Higher education’. InForm. Retrieved from
  27. Fetter, J. H. (1995). Questions and admissions: Reflections on 100,000 admissions decisions at Stanford. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Fry, H., Ketteridge, S., & Marshall, S. (1999). A handbook for teaching and learning in higher education: Enhancing academic practice. London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
  29. Fulcher, G. (1999). Assessment in English for academic purposes: Putting content validity in its place. Applied Linguistics, 20(2), 221–236. Scholar
  30. Fulcher, G. (2007, April 13). Universities undermine their own foundations: Contracting out English preparation courses in Britain is a short-term fix. The Guardian. Retrieved from,,2055735,00.html
  31. Fulcher, G. (2009). The commercialisation of language provision at university. In J. C. Alderson (Ed.), The politics of language education: Individuals and institutions (pp. 125–143). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  32. Gong, X., & Huybers, T. (2015, August). Chinese students and higher education destinations: Findings from a choice experiment. Australian Journal of Education, 59, 196–218. Scholar
  33. Hamp-Lyons, L. (2011). English for academic purposes: 2011 and beyond. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 10(1), 2–4. Scholar
  34. Hawkes, L. (2012). The psychosocial adjustment of international students. InForm. Retrieved from
  35. HEA. (2015). International student life cycle. Retrieved from
  36. HEFCE. (2016). Financial health of the sector. Retrieved from,2014/Content/Pubs/2016/201604/HEFCE2016_04.pdf
  37. Hellmann, K., & Miranda, D. (2015). Connecting international student retention and global competency. International Student Experience Journal, 3(1), 9.Google Scholar
  38. HESA. (2015). Table D- Undergraduate students by mode sex and region of Domicile. Retrieved from
  39. Hoodith, A. (2013). The shift to subject-based content in EAP/Science. InForm. Retrieved from
  40. Hunter, D., & Whiteside, K. (2010). Developing a core module for a Foundation programme. InForm. Retrieved from
  41. Hyland, K. (2006). English for academic purposes: An advanced resource book. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  42. Hyland, K., & Hamp-Lyons, L. (2002). EAP: Issues and directions. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 1, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Jones, E. (2013). IFP and the transition to UK academic culture: Bridge, Ferry or Ford. InForm. Retrieved from
  44. Jordan, R. R. (1997). English for academic purposes: A guide and resource book for teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Lange, J. (2012). Transformative leadership, involvement, and service learning: A 21st century paradigm for foundation programmes? InForm Conference 2012, University of Reading. Retrieved from
  46. Leask, B. (2009). Using formal and informal curricula to improve interactions between home and international students. Journal of International Education, 13(2), 205–221.Google Scholar
  47. Leask, B. (2015). Internationalizing the curriculum. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  48. Lipsett, A. (2008, November 12). Newcastle expels overseas students with fake grades. The Guardian. Retrieved from
  49. Manning, A. (2008) From the editorial board. InForm. Retrieved from
  50. Manning, A. (2009) Cross curricular collaboration through the IFP. InForm. Retrieved from
  51. Manning, A. (2013). One size doesn’t t al. InForm Retrieved from
  52. Manning, A. (2014). Assessment literacy: Research and recommendations relevant to the IFP. InForm. Retrieved from
  53. Manning, A., & Nukui, C. (2007). Transferable Academic Skills Kit (TASK). Reading: Garnet.Google Scholar
  54. Mazzarol, T., & Soutar, G. N. (2002). “Push-pull” factors influencing international student destination choice. The International Journal of Educational Management, 16(2/3), 82–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. McCaffery, P. (2010). The higher education manager’s handbook. Oxford: Routledge.Google Scholar
  56. McNay, I. (1995). From collegial academy to corporate enterprise: The changing culture of universities. In T. Schuller (Ed.), The changing university? Buckingham: SRHE and OUP.Google Scholar
  57. McNay, I. (1996). Work’s committees. In R. Cuthbert (Ed.), Working in higher education. Buckingham: SRHE and OUP.Google Scholar
  58. Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In R. L. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed.). New York: American Council on Education.Google Scholar
  59. Morgan, J. (2013). Undergraduate numbers cap ‘to be abolished’ – Osborne. Times Higher Education. Retrieved from
  60. Morgan, J. (2016). Overseas student number falls ‘significant risk’ to sector – Osborne. Times Higher Education. Retrieved from
  61. Moss, P. A., Girard, B. J., & Haniford, L. C. (2006). Validity in educational assessment. Review of Research in Education: Special issue on rethinking learning: What counts as learning and what learning. American Educational Research Association, pp. 109–162.Google Scholar
  62. Newman, M. (2007). Students shun foreign peers. Times Higher Education. Retrieved from
  63. Nukui, C. (2009). ‘Critical incidents? Need for raising cultural awareness at foundation level’. InForm. Retrieved from
  64. OBHE. (2013). Horizon scanning: What will higher education look like in 2020? Retrieved from
  65. OBHE. (2014). The future of public-private partnerships in higher education. London: Regent’s University. Retrieved from
  66. O’Sullivan, B. (Ed.). (2011). Language testing: Theories and practices. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  67. Paudel, S. (2014). Theresa May: Don’t close the doors on international students. The Guardian. Retrieved from
  68. Popham, W. J. (2001). The truth about testing: An educator’s call to action. Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Google Scholar
  69. Putnam, R. D. (2007). E pluribus unum: Diversity and community in the twenty-first century the 2006 Johan Skytte Prize Lecture. Scandinavian Political Studies, 30(2), 137–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Raimes, A. (1991). Out of the woods: Emerging traditions in the teaching of writing. TESOL Quarterly, 25(3), 407–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Redden, E. (2010). Privatized pathways for foreign students. Inside Higher Education. Retrieved from
  72. Reichard, R., & Stephenson, M. (2014). Authentic assessment: Does joint marking of subject assignments work? InForm. Retrieved from
  73. Shiel, C. (2006). Developing the global citizen. Academy Exchange, 5(Winter), 18–20. HEA, York.Google Scholar
  74. Shohamy, E. (2001). The power of tests: A critical perspective on the uses of language tests. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
  75. Sibley, J. (2015). International student wellbeing and academic progress. International Student Experience Journal, 3(2), 1–8.Google Scholar
  76. Sloan, D., & Vicary, A. (2013). An integrated approach to addressing the communicative needs of IFP students: The CEM model. InForm. Retrieved from
  77. Stiggins, R. J. (1995). Assessment literacy for the 21st century. The Phi Delta Kappan, 77(3), 238.Google Scholar
  78. Study Portals. (2015). New routes to higher education: The global rise of foundation programmes. Retrieved from
  79. Tomlinson, C. A., & Imbeau, M. B. (2010). Leading and managing a differentiated classroom. Alexandria: ASCD.Google Scholar
  80. University and College Union (UCU). (2012). Fighting privatisation in tertiary education: Campaigns against INTO. Retrieved 16 April, 2018, from
  81. Universities UK (UUK). (2015a). One size fits all? Analysis of the international student’s journey through the UK higher education system. Retrieved from
  82. Universities UK (UUK). (2015b). Patterns and trends in UK higher education 2015. Retrieved from
  83. University of Warwick (2013). Circle of friends. Retrieved from
  84. University Pathway Alliance (UPA). (2016). About. Retrieved from!tutoring/c1enr
  85. University Pathways Alliance (UPA). (2018). About us. Retrieved 16 April 2018, from
  86. Ward, L. E. (1962). Some observations of underlying dynamics of conflict in a foreign student. Studenterraad Med, 18, 430–440.Google Scholar
  87. Weick, K. (1976). Educational organizations as loosely-coupled systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21(1), 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Yang, M. (2007). What attracts mainland Chinese students to Australian higher education. Studies in Learning, Evaluation, Innovation and Development, 4(2), 1–12.Google Scholar
  89. Zwingman, C. A., & Gunn, A. D. G. (1983). Uprooting and health: Psycho-social problems of students from abroad. Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of KentCanterburyUK

Personalised recommendations