Abstract
This chapter is an introduction to this volume. The chapter traces the factors that caused the emergence of university pathway programs at a national and global scale. It delves in matters of nomenclature, types of programs offered and the links between universities and private providers in program delivery. When discussing the aims and traits of university pathway programs, the chapter includes three models that developers, teachers and students of such programs might find useful to inform their approach to language proficiency, academic literacies and pastoral care issues. These models are: a heuristic of English language proficiency (Humphreys 2015), the academic literacies methodological approach to learning and teaching (Lea and Street 2006) and a consideration of five areas of students’ needs that must be met to facilitate their successful transition to higher education (Lizzio 2006). The chapter then presents the goals, structure and content overview of the book. It ends with a consideration of the difficulties faced by those involved in different areas of university pathway programs development and delivery.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
This report includes the following information about university preparation programs: subjects that students choose, entry requirements, qualifications gained upon completion, cost, number of programs available worldwide, program providers, global value of the sector, benefits gained by universities that provide them, and future trends in the sector.
- 2.
English Medium Instruction in Higher Education in Asia- Pacific: From Policy to Pedagogy (2017) Fenton-Smith, B., Humphreys, P. & Walkinshaw, I. (Eds.) includes an insightful collection of papers that focus on challenges at the governmental, institutional, curriculum development and teaching levels that must be faced when considering English as a medium of instruction in both countries where English is students’ L1 and where it is an AL for them.
- 3.
Harvey (2004–2017) defines “non-traditional” students as those whose characteristics are not the ones usually associated with those who enter higher education. This might be the case due to the age groups, social classes and/or ethnic groups to which these students belong which have been underrepresented in the past. It can also be related to gender groups that have not been associated with certain disciplines such as males in nursing. Another non-traditional group would be that of students with a disability or first generation student in a family.
- 4.
Several approaches to teaching academic writing preceded and formed the basis for the academic literacies approach. Those approaches include English for specific purposes, North American New Rhetoric, English as an additional language (EAL) and Australian systemic functional linguistics (SFL). Bastalich, Behrend and Bloomfield (2014) present a succinct description of each approach and their impact on learning and teaching in academic contexts. The following sources provide a clear view of the academic literacies approach to teaching and learning: Lea and Street (1998), Lillis (2001, 2003) and Lillis and Scott (2007).
- 5.
For an interesting overview on the internationalisation of Higher Education and the reasons that underpin it see Altbach and Knight (2007).
References
Abasi, A., & Graves, B. (2008). Academic literacy and plagiarism: Conversations with international graduate students and disciplinary professors [Electronic version]. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 7, 221–233.
Agosti, C. (2006). Seizing the opportunity for change: The business preparation program, a new pathway to gain direct entry into Macquarie University (The TESOL curriculum development series, Vol. 5, pp. 99–122). Alexandria: TESOL Organization.
Agosti, C., & Bernat, E. (2008). Teaching direct entry programs effectively: Insights for ELICOS teachers and managers. English Australia Journal, 25(1), 27–41.
Agosti, C., & Hicklin, C. (2001). A new pathway to gain direct entry to Macquarie University: The Business Preparation Program at E.L.S., N.C.E.L.T.R. In A. Read (Ed.), Internationalising the curriculum (pp. 73–82). Sydney: Macquarie University. Centre for Professional Development.
Altbach, P., & Knight, J. (2007). The internationalisation of higher education: Motivations and realities. Journal of Studies in International Education, 11(3–4), 290–305. https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315307303542.
Altbach, P., Reisberg, L., & Rumbley, L. E. (2009). Trends in global higher education: Tracking an academic revolution. A report prepared for the UNESCO 2009 world conference on higher education. Paris: UNESCO.
Andrewartha, L., & Harvey, A. (2014). Willing and enabled: The academic outcomes of a tertiary enabling program in regional Australia. Australian Journal of Adult Learning, 54(1), 50–68.
Bachman, L. F. (1990). Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Baik, C., Naylor, R., & Arkoudis, S. (2015). The first year experience in Australian universities: Findings from two decades 1992–2014. Melbourne: Report published by the Melbourne Centre for the Study of Higher Education, The University of Melbourne.
Bastalich, W., Behrend, M., & Bloomfield, R. (2014). Is non-subject based research training a ‘waste of time’, good only for the development of professional skills? An academic literacies perspective. Teaching in Higher Education, 19(4), 376–384. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2013.860106.
Bergman, L. (2016). Supporting academic literacies: University teachers in collaboration for change. Teaching in Higher Education, 21(5), 516–531. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2016.1160220.
Bernat, E., & Agosti, C. (2010). Developing oral competence: The weakest link in EAP pedagogy. In A. Jendli, C. Coombe, & N. Miled (Eds.), Developing oral skills in English: Theory, research and pedagogy (pp. 102–124). Dubai: TESOL Arabia Publications.
Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. D. (1992). The purpose of reflexive sociology (The Chicago workshop). In P. Bourdieu & L. D. Wacquant (Eds.), An invitation to reflexive sociology (pp. 61–216). New York: Polity Press.
Chanock, K., Horton, C., Reedman, M., & Stephenson, B. (2012). Collaborating to embed academic literacies and personal support in first-year discipline subjects. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 9(3.) Retrieved from http://ro.uow.edu.au/jutlp/vol9/iss3/3.
Duff, P. (2010). Language socialization into academic discourse communities. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 30, 169–192. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190510000048.
Ellis, B., Cooper, N., & Sawyer, J. (2001). Bridging studies: An alternative pathway to university for rural Australians. In17th SPERA national conference proceedings. Wagga: Wagga.
Feez, S. (1998). Text-based syllabus design. Sydney: NCELTR. Macquarie University.
Fenton-Smith, B., & Humphreys, P. (2015). Language specialists’ views on academic language and learning support mechanisms for EAL postgraduate coursework students: The case for adjunct tutorials. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 20, 40–45.
Fenton-Smith, B., Humphreys, P., & Walkinshaw, I. (Eds.). (2017). English medium instruction in higher education in Asia-Pacific: From policy to pedagogy. Cham: Springer.
Gee, J. (2008). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses (3rd ed.). London: Routledge.
Gee, J. P. (2012). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses. London: Routledge.
Goldingay, S., Hitch, D., Carrington, A., Nipperess, S., & Rosario, V. (2016). Transforming roles to support student development of academic literacies: A reflection on one team’s experience. Reflective Practice, 17(3), 334–346. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2016.1164682.
Grace, M., Daddow, A., Egan, R., Fox, J., Noble, C., O’Maley, P., Ridley, C., & Testa, D. (2011). Blurring the boundaries: A collaborative approach to language and learning support for social work students. In L. Harbon & L. Woodrow (Eds.), Multiculturalism: Perspectives from Australia, Canada and China (pp. 74–80). Sydney: University of Sydney. Retrieved from http://sydney.edu.au/education_social_work/professional_learning/resources/papers/MulticulturalismConference_Sydney2011_Proceedings.pdf.
Green, T., & Agosti, C. (2011). Apprenticing students to academic discourse: Using student and teacher feedback to analyse the extent to which a discipline-specific academic literacies program works. Journal of Academic Language and Learning, 5(1), A18–A35.
Hallett, F. (2013). Study support and the development of academic literacy in higher education: A phenomenographic analysis. Teaching in Higher Education, 18(5), 518–530. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2012.752725.
Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1985). Language, context, and text: Aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective. Victoria: Deakin University.
Harvey, L. (2004–2017). Analytic quality glossary: Quality research international. http://www.qualityresearchinternational.com/glossary/nontraditionalstudents.htm
Hitch, D., Macfarlane, S., & Nihill, C. (2015). Inclusive pedagogy in Australian universities: A review of current policies and professional development activities. International Journal of the First Year in Higher Education, 6(1), 135–145. https://doi.org/10.5204/intjfyhe.v6i1.254.
Humphreys, P. (2015). English Language Proficiency in Higher Education: Students’ Conceptualisations and Outcomes. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Griffith University, Queensland.
Hyland, K. (2006). English for academic purposes. New York: Routledge.
Ivanič, R. (1998). Writing and identity: The discoursal construction of identity in academic writing. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Jacobs, C. (2005). On being an insider on the outside: New spaces for integrating academic literacies. Teaching in Higher Education, 10(4), 475–487.
James, R., Krause, K-L., & Jennings, C. (2010). The first year experience in Australian universities: Findings from 1994 to 2009. Report published by Centre for the Study of Higher Education, The University of Melbourne, and Griffith Institute for Higher Education, Griffith University. Retrieved from http://www.cshe.unimelb.edu.au/research/experience/docs/FYE_Report_1994_to_2009.pdf
Johns, A. M. (1997). Text, role and context: Developing academic literacies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Johnson, E. (2008). An investigation into pedagogical challenges facing international tertiary-level students in New Zealand [Electronic version]. Higher Education Research & Development, 27(3), 231–243.
Kift, S. (2008). The next, great first-year challenge: Sustaining, coordinating and embedding coherent institution–wide approaches to enact the FYE as “everybody’s business”. Conference Proceedings of the 11th international Pacific Rim first year in higher education conference: An apple for the learner: Celebrating the first year experience, 30 June – 2 July 2008, Hobart.
Kift, S. (2009). Articulating a transition pedagogy to scaffold and to enhance first year student learning experience in Australian higher education. Strawberry Hills: Australian Learning and Teaching Council.
Kift, S., Nelson, K., & Clarke, J. (2010). Transition pedagogy: A third generation approach to FYE – A case study of policy and practice for the higher education sector. The International Journal of the First Year in Higher Education, 1(1), 1–20.
Klinger, C., & Murray, N. L. (2011). Chapter 4.2: Access, aspiration and attainment: Foundation studies at the University of South Australia. In Institutional transformation to engage a diverse student body (pp. 137–146). Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.
Krause, K. –L.., (2006). On being strategic about the first year. Brisbane: Queensland University of Technology First Year Forum. Retrieved from: http://www.fye.qut.edu.au/fyeatqut/KrauseQUTPaper.pdf
Lankshear, C. (1997). Changing literacies. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Larcombe, W., & Malkin, I. (2008). Identifying students likely to benefit from language support in first-year law. Higher Education Research and Development, 27(4), 319–329.
Lea, M. R. (2004). Academic literacies: A pedagogy for course design. Studies in Higher Education, 29(6), 739–756. https://doi.org/10.1080/0307507042000287230.
Lea, M., & Street, B. (1998). Student writing in higher education: An academic literacies approach. Studies in Higher Education, 23, 157–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079812331380364.
Lea, M., & Street, B. (2006). The “academic literacies” model: Theory and applications. Theory Into Practice, 45(4), 368–377. Retrieved from http://www-tandfonline-com.simsrad.net.ocs.mq.edu.au/doi/pdf/10.1207/s15430421tip4504_11?needAccess=true.
Lebcir, R., Wells, H., & Bond, A. (2008). Factors affecting academic performance of international students in project management courses: A case study from a British Post 92 University. International Journal of Project Management, 26, 268–274. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com.simsrad.net.ocs.mq.edu.au/science/article/pii/S0263786308000306.
Lillis, T. (2001). Student writing: Access, regulation, desire. London: Routledge.
Lillis, T. (2003). Student writing as ‘academic literacies’: Drawing on Bakhtin to move from critique to design. Language and Education, 17(3), 192–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500780308666848.
Lillis, T., & Scott, M. (2007). Defining academic literacies: Issues of epistemology, ideology and strategy. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 4(1), 5–32. https://doi.org/10.1558/japl.v4i1.5.
Lizzio, A. (2006). First-year experience project: Designing an orientation and transition strategy for commencing students: Applying the five senses model. Nathan: Griffith University. Retrieved from http://fyhe.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Lizzio-TheFivesensesofStudentSuccessSelf-AssessmentFrameworkforplanningandreviewofOT_doc.pdf
Lizzio, A., & Wilson, K. (2013). Early intervention to support the academic recovery of first-year students at risk of non-continuation. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 50(2), 109–120.
Magyar, A., McAvoay, D., & Forstner, K. (2011). If only we knew what they wanted: Bridging the gap between student uncertainty and lecturer’s expectations. Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education, 3, 1–7. Retrieved from http://www.aldinhe.ac.uk/ojs/.
Marginson, S. (2004). Competition and Markets in Higher Education: A ‘glonacal’ analysis. Policy Futures in Education., 2, 175–244.
McKenzie, J., & Egea, K. (2014). Successful student transition: A guide to teaching students in their first year at university. Sydney: Booklet published by the University of Technology.
Ministry of Education. (2014). Tertiary education strategy 2014–2019. Priority 1: Delivering skills for industry. Wellington: Author. Retrieved from http://www.education.govt.nz/ministry-of-education/overall-strategies-and-policies/tertiary-education-strategy
Neghina, C. (2016). Routes to higher education. https://www.studyportals.com/intelligence/pathway-programmes/
Nelson, K. (2014). The first year in higher education-where to from here? The International Journal of the First Year in Higher Education, 5(2), 1.
Nelson, K., Creagh, T., Kift, S., & Clarke, J. (2014). Transition pedagogy handbook: A good practice guide for policy and practice in the first year experience at QUT (Unpublished).
Paltridge, B. (2006). Genre, text type, and the language learning classroom. ELT Journal, 50(3), 237–242.
Percival, J., DiGiuseppe, M., Goodman, B., LeSage, A., Longo, F., De La Rocha, A., Hinch, R., Samis, J., Sanchez, O., Augusto Rodrigues, A., & Raby, P. (2016). Exploring factors facilitating and hindering college-university Pathway Program completion. International Journal of Educational Management, 30(1), 20–42. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-04-2014-0051.
Phillips, D., & Ochs, K. (2003). Processes of policy borrowing in education: Some explanatory and analytical devices. Comparative Education, 39, 451–461.
Pitman, T., Trinidad, S., Devlin, M., Harvey, A., Brett, M. & McKay, J. (2016). Pathways to higher education: The efficacy of enabling and sub-bachelor pathways for disadvantaged students. National Centre for Student Equity in Higher Education (NCSEHE), Perth: Curtin University.
Priest, A. M. (2009). “I have understanding as well as you”: Supporting the language and learning needs of students from low socio-economic status backgrounds. Journal of Academic Language and Learning, 3(2), A1–A12.
Redden, E. (2010). Privatized pathways for foreign students. Retrieved from https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2010/08/04/pathways
Smit, R. (2012). Towards a clearer understanding of student disadvantage in higher education: Problematizing the deficit thinking. Higher Education Research & Development, 31(3), 369–380. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2011.634383.
Stirling, J., & Rossetto, C. (2015). “Are we there yet?” Making sense of transition in higher education. Paper presented at the 2015 STARS conference. Retrieved from https://studentsuccessjournal.org/issue/view/13
Street, B. (1984). Literacy in theory and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Street, B. (1995). Social literacies: Critical approaches to literacy development, ethnography and education. London: Longman.
Study Portals & Cambridge English. (2015). New routes to higher education: The global rise of foundation programmes. The world’s first global mapping of an expanding market. Retrieved from http://www.cambridgeenglish.org/images/pathways-report-2015.pdf
Study Portals B. V. (2007–2017). Study abroad: Search for preparation courses worldwide. Retrieved from https://www.preparationcoursesportal.com/
Thies, L., Wallis, A., Turner, A. & Wishart, L. (2014). Embedded academic literacies curricula: The challenges of measuring success. Journal of Academic Language and Learning, 8(2), A43–A59. Retrieved from www.journal.aall.org.au/index.php/jall/article/download/301/197
Velliaris, D., & Breen, P. (2014). Tailoring graduate attributes to meet the needs of international students in a pathway program. ISANA International Academy conference. 4th December 2014. Adelaide. Retrieved from http://isana.proceedings.com.au/docs/2014/Velliaris_Donna_PAPER.pdf
Wilson, K. (2009). The impact of institutional, programmatic and personal interventions on an effective and sustainable first-year student experience. Paper presented at the 12th First Year in Higher Education Conference 2009, Townsville. Retrieved from http://transitionpedagogy.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/Keithia_Wilson_paper.pdf
Wingate, U. (2006). Doing away with study skills. Teaching in Higher Education, 11(4), 457–469. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510600874268.
World Education News and Reviews. (2013). An evaluation of Britain’s university pathway programs. New York: World Education Services. Retrieved from http://wenr.wes.org/2013/09/an-evaluation-of-britains-university-pathway-programs.
Acknowledgement
The authors are very grateful to Dr. Pamela Humphreys for giving them access to her unpublished doctoral thesis and for her valuable feedback on this chapter.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Agosti, C.I., Bernat, E. (2018). University Pathway Programs: Types, Origins, Aims and Defining Traits. In: Agosti, C., Bernat, E. (eds) University Pathway Programs: Local Responses within a Growing Global Trend. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72505-5_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72505-5_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-72504-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-72505-5
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)