Advertisement

University Pathway Programs: Types, Origins, Aims and Defining Traits

Chapter

Abstract

This chapter is an introduction to this volume. The chapter traces the factors that caused the emergence of university pathway programs at a national and global scale. It delves in matters of nomenclature, types of programs offered and the links between universities and private providers in program delivery. When discussing the aims and traits of university pathway programs, the chapter includes three models that developers, teachers and students of such programs might find useful to inform their approach to language proficiency, academic literacies and pastoral care issues. These models are: a heuristic of English language proficiency (Humphreys 2015), the academic literacies methodological approach to learning and teaching (Lea and Street 2006) and a consideration of five areas of students’ needs that must be met to facilitate their successful transition to higher education (Lizzio 2006). The chapter then presents the goals, structure and content overview of the book. It ends with a consideration of the difficulties faced by those involved in different areas of university pathway programs development and delivery.

Keywords

Pathway programs Academic literacies International students’ needs Equity in higher education Enabling programs Widening participation 

Notes

Acknowledgement

The authors are very grateful to Dr. Pamela Humphreys for giving them access to her unpublished doctoral thesis and for her valuable feedback on this chapter.

References

  1. Abasi, A., & Graves, B. (2008). Academic literacy and plagiarism: Conversations with international graduate students and disciplinary professors [Electronic version]. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 7, 221–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agosti, C. (2006). Seizing the opportunity for change: The business preparation program, a new pathway to gain direct entry into Macquarie University (The TESOL curriculum development series, Vol. 5, pp. 99–122). Alexandria: TESOL Organization.Google Scholar
  3. Agosti, C., & Bernat, E. (2008). Teaching direct entry programs effectively: Insights for ELICOS teachers and managers. English Australia Journal, 25(1), 27–41.Google Scholar
  4. Agosti, C., & Hicklin, C. (2001). A new pathway to gain direct entry to Macquarie University: The Business Preparation Program at E.L.S., N.C.E.L.T.R. In A. Read (Ed.), Internationalising the curriculum (pp. 73–82). Sydney: Macquarie University. Centre for Professional Development.Google Scholar
  5. Altbach, P., & Knight, J. (2007). The internationalisation of higher education: Motivations and realities. Journal of Studies in International Education, 11(3–4), 290–305.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315307303542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Altbach, P., Reisberg, L., & Rumbley, L. E. (2009). Trends in global higher education: Tracking an academic revolution. A report prepared for the UNESCO 2009 world conference on higher education. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
  7. Andrewartha, L., & Harvey, A. (2014). Willing and enabled: The academic outcomes of a tertiary enabling program in regional Australia. Australian Journal of Adult Learning, 54(1), 50–68.Google Scholar
  8. Bachman, L. F. (1990). Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Baik, C., Naylor, R., & Arkoudis, S. (2015). The first year experience in Australian universities: Findings from two decades 1992–2014. Melbourne: Report published by the Melbourne Centre for the Study of Higher Education, The University of Melbourne.Google Scholar
  10. Bastalich, W., Behrend, M., & Bloomfield, R. (2014). Is non-subject based research training a ‘waste of time’, good only for the development of professional skills? An academic literacies perspective. Teaching in Higher Education, 19(4), 376–384.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2013.860106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bergman, L. (2016). Supporting academic literacies: University teachers in collaboration for change. Teaching in Higher Education, 21(5), 516–531.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2016.1160220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bernat, E., & Agosti, C. (2010). Developing oral competence: The weakest link in EAP pedagogy. In A. Jendli, C. Coombe, & N. Miled (Eds.), Developing oral skills in English: Theory, research and pedagogy (pp. 102–124). Dubai: TESOL Arabia Publications.Google Scholar
  13. Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. D. (1992). The purpose of reflexive sociology (The Chicago workshop). In P. Bourdieu & L. D. Wacquant (Eds.), An invitation to reflexive sociology (pp. 61–216). New York: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  14. Chanock, K., Horton, C., Reedman, M., & Stephenson, B. (2012). Collaborating to embed academic literacies and personal support in first-year discipline subjects. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 9(3.) Retrieved from http://ro.uow.edu.au/jutlp/vol9/iss3/3.
  15. Duff, P. (2010). Language socialization into academic discourse communities. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 30, 169–192.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190510000048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ellis, B., Cooper, N., & Sawyer, J. (2001). Bridging studies: An alternative pathway to university for rural Australians. In17th SPERA national conference proceedings. Wagga: Wagga.Google Scholar
  17. Feez, S. (1998). Text-based syllabus design. Sydney: NCELTR. Macquarie University.Google Scholar
  18. Fenton-Smith, B., & Humphreys, P. (2015). Language specialists’ views on academic language and learning support mechanisms for EAL postgraduate coursework students: The case for adjunct tutorials. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 20, 40–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fenton-Smith, B., Humphreys, P., & Walkinshaw, I. (Eds.). (2017). English medium instruction in higher education in Asia-Pacific: From policy to pedagogy. Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
  20. Gee, J. (2008). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses (3rd ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Gee, J. P. (2012). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Goldingay, S., Hitch, D., Carrington, A., Nipperess, S., & Rosario, V. (2016). Transforming roles to support student development of academic literacies: A reflection on one team’s experience. Reflective Practice, 17(3), 334–346.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2016.1164682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Grace, M., Daddow, A., Egan, R., Fox, J., Noble, C., O’Maley, P., Ridley, C., & Testa, D. (2011). Blurring the boundaries: A collaborative approach to language and learning support for social work students. In L. Harbon & L. Woodrow (Eds.), Multiculturalism: Perspectives from Australia, Canada and China (pp. 74–80). Sydney: University of Sydney. Retrieved from http://sydney.edu.au/education_social_work/professional_learning/resources/papers/MulticulturalismConference_Sydney2011_Proceedings.pdf.Google Scholar
  24. Green, T., & Agosti, C. (2011). Apprenticing students to academic discourse: Using student and teacher feedback to analyse the extent to which a discipline-specific academic literacies program works. Journal of Academic Language and Learning, 5(1), A18–A35.Google Scholar
  25. Hallett, F. (2013). Study support and the development of academic literacy in higher education: A phenomenographic analysis. Teaching in Higher Education, 18(5), 518–530.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2012.752725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1985). Language, context, and text: Aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective. Victoria: Deakin University.Google Scholar
  27. Harvey, L. (2004–2017). Analytic quality glossary: Quality research international. http://www.qualityresearchinternational.com/glossary/nontraditionalstudents.htm
  28. Hitch, D., Macfarlane, S., & Nihill, C. (2015). Inclusive pedagogy in Australian universities: A review of current policies and professional development activities. International Journal of the First Year in Higher Education, 6(1), 135–145.  https://doi.org/10.5204/intjfyhe.v6i1.254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Humphreys, P. (2015). English Language Proficiency in Higher Education: Students’ Conceptualisations and Outcomes. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Griffith University, Queensland.Google Scholar
  30. Hyland, K. (2006). English for academic purposes. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. Ivanič, R. (1998). Writing and identity: The discoursal construction of identity in academic writing. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Jacobs, C. (2005). On being an insider on the outside: New spaces for integrating academic literacies. Teaching in Higher Education, 10(4), 475–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. James, R., Krause, K-L., & Jennings, C. (2010). The first year experience in Australian universities: Findings from 1994 to 2009. Report published by Centre for the Study of Higher Education, The University of Melbourne, and Griffith Institute for Higher Education, Griffith University. Retrieved from http://www.cshe.unimelb.edu.au/research/experience/docs/FYE_Report_1994_to_2009.pdf
  34. Johns, A. M. (1997). Text, role and context: Developing academic literacies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Johnson, E. (2008). An investigation into pedagogical challenges facing international tertiary-level students in New Zealand [Electronic version]. Higher Education Research & Development, 27(3), 231–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kift, S. (2008). The next, great first-year challenge: Sustaining, coordinating and embedding coherent institution–wide approaches to enact the FYE as “everybody’s business”. Conference Proceedings of the 11th international Pacific Rim first year in higher education conference: An apple for the learner: Celebrating the first year experience, 30 June – 2 July 2008, Hobart.Google Scholar
  37. Kift, S. (2009). Articulating a transition pedagogy to scaffold and to enhance first year student learning experience in Australian higher education. Strawberry Hills: Australian Learning and Teaching Council.Google Scholar
  38. Kift, S., Nelson, K., & Clarke, J. (2010). Transition pedagogy: A third generation approach to FYE – A case study of policy and practice for the higher education sector. The International Journal of the First Year in Higher Education, 1(1), 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Klinger, C., & Murray, N. L. (2011). Chapter 4.2: Access, aspiration and attainment: Foundation studies at the University of South Australia. In Institutional transformation to engage a diverse student body (pp. 137–146). Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
  40. Krause, K. –L.., (2006). On being strategic about the first year. Brisbane: Queensland University of Technology First Year Forum. Retrieved from: http://www.fye.qut.edu.au/fyeatqut/KrauseQUTPaper.pdf
  41. Lankshear, C. (1997). Changing literacies. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Larcombe, W., & Malkin, I. (2008). Identifying students likely to benefit from language support in first-year law. Higher Education Research and Development, 27(4), 319–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lea, M. R. (2004). Academic literacies: A pedagogy for course design. Studies in Higher Education, 29(6), 739–756.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0307507042000287230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lea, M., & Street, B. (1998). Student writing in higher education: An academic literacies approach. Studies in Higher Education, 23, 157–172.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079812331380364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lea, M., & Street, B. (2006). The “academic literacies” model: Theory and applications. Theory Into Practice, 45(4), 368–377. Retrieved from http://www-tandfonline-com.simsrad.net.ocs.mq.edu.au/doi/pdf/10.1207/s15430421tip4504_11?needAccess=true.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lebcir, R., Wells, H., & Bond, A. (2008). Factors affecting academic performance of international students in project management courses: A case study from a British Post 92 University. International Journal of Project Management, 26, 268–274. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com.simsrad.net.ocs.mq.edu.au/science/article/pii/S0263786308000306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lillis, T. (2001). Student writing: Access, regulation, desire. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  48. Lillis, T. (2003). Student writing as ‘academic literacies’: Drawing on Bakhtin to move from critique to design. Language and Education, 17(3), 192–207.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09500780308666848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lillis, T., & Scott, M. (2007). Defining academic literacies: Issues of epistemology, ideology and strategy. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 4(1), 5–32.  https://doi.org/10.1558/japl.v4i1.5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Lizzio, A. (2006). First-year experience project: Designing an orientation and transition strategy for commencing students: Applying the five senses model. Nathan: Griffith University. Retrieved from http://fyhe.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Lizzio-TheFivesensesofStudentSuccessSelf-AssessmentFrameworkforplanningandreviewofOT_doc.pdf
  51. Lizzio, A., & Wilson, K. (2013). Early intervention to support the academic recovery of first-year students at risk of non-continuation. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 50(2), 109–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Magyar, A., McAvoay, D., & Forstner, K. (2011). If only we knew what they wanted: Bridging the gap between student uncertainty and lecturer’s expectations. Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education, 3, 1–7. Retrieved from http://www.aldinhe.ac.uk/ojs/.Google Scholar
  53. Marginson, S. (2004). Competition and Markets in Higher Education: A ‘glonacal’ analysis. Policy Futures in Education., 2, 175–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. McKenzie, J., & Egea, K. (2014). Successful student transition: A guide to teaching students in their first year at university. Sydney: Booklet published by the University of Technology.Google Scholar
  55. Ministry of Education. (2014). Tertiary education strategy 2014–2019. Priority 1: Delivering skills for industry. Wellington: Author. Retrieved from http://www.education.govt.nz/ministry-of-education/overall-strategies-and-policies/tertiary-education-strategy
  56. Neghina, C. (2016). Routes to higher education. https://www.studyportals.com/intelligence/pathway-programmes/
  57. Nelson, K. (2014). The first year in higher education-where to from here? The International Journal of the First Year in Higher Education, 5(2), 1.Google Scholar
  58. Nelson, K., Creagh, T., Kift, S., & Clarke, J. (2014). Transition pedagogy handbook: A good practice guide for policy and practice in the first year experience at QUT (Unpublished).Google Scholar
  59. Paltridge, B. (2006). Genre, text type, and the language learning classroom. ELT Journal, 50(3), 237–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Percival, J., DiGiuseppe, M., Goodman, B., LeSage, A., Longo, F., De La Rocha, A., Hinch, R., Samis, J., Sanchez, O., Augusto Rodrigues, A., & Raby, P. (2016). Exploring factors facilitating and hindering college-university Pathway Program completion. International Journal of Educational Management, 30(1), 20–42.  https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-04-2014-0051.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Phillips, D., & Ochs, K. (2003). Processes of policy borrowing in education: Some explanatory and analytical devices. Comparative Education, 39, 451–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Pitman, T., Trinidad, S., Devlin, M., Harvey, A., Brett, M. & McKay, J. (2016). Pathways to higher education: The efficacy of enabling and sub-bachelor pathways for disadvantaged students. National Centre for Student Equity in Higher Education (NCSEHE), Perth: Curtin University.Google Scholar
  63. Priest, A. M. (2009). “I have understanding as well as you”: Supporting the language and learning needs of students from low socio-economic status backgrounds. Journal of Academic Language and Learning, 3(2), A1–A12.Google Scholar
  64. Redden, E. (2010). Privatized pathways for foreign students. Retrieved from https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2010/08/04/pathways
  65. Smit, R. (2012). Towards a clearer understanding of student disadvantage in higher education: Problematizing the deficit thinking. Higher Education Research & Development, 31(3), 369–380.  https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2011.634383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Stirling, J., & Rossetto, C. (2015). “Are we there yet?” Making sense of transition in higher education. Paper presented at the 2015 STARS conference. Retrieved from https://studentsuccessjournal.org/issue/view/13
  67. Street, B. (1984). Literacy in theory and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  68. Street, B. (1995). Social literacies: Critical approaches to literacy development, ethnography and education. London: Longman.Google Scholar
  69. Study Portals & Cambridge English. (2015). New routes to higher education: The global rise of foundation programmes. The world’s first global mapping of an expanding market. Retrieved from http://www.cambridgeenglish.org/images/pathways-report-2015.pdf
  70. Study Portals B. V. (2007–2017). Study abroad: Search for preparation courses worldwide. Retrieved from https://www.preparationcoursesportal.com/
  71. Thies, L., Wallis, A., Turner, A. & Wishart, L. (2014). Embedded academic literacies curricula: The challenges of measuring success. Journal of Academic Language and Learning, 8(2), A43–A59. Retrieved from www.journal.aall.org.au/index.php/jall/article/download/301/197
  72. Velliaris, D., & Breen, P. (2014). Tailoring graduate attributes to meet the needs of international students in a pathway program. ISANA International Academy conference. 4th December 2014. Adelaide. Retrieved from http://isana.proceedings.com.au/docs/2014/Velliaris_Donna_PAPER.pdf
  73. Wilson, K. (2009). The impact of institutional, programmatic and personal interventions on an effective and sustainable first-year student experience. Paper presented at the 12th First Year in Higher Education Conference 2009, Townsville. Retrieved from http://transitionpedagogy.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/Keithia_Wilson_paper.pdf
  74. Wingate, U. (2006). Doing away with study skills. Teaching in Higher Education, 11(4), 457–469.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510600874268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. World Education News and Reviews. (2013). An evaluation of Britain’s university pathway programs. New York: World Education Services. Retrieved from http://wenr.wes.org/2013/09/an-evaluation-of-britains-university-pathway-programs.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Arts, International Studies DepartmentMacquarie UniversityNorth RydeAustralia
  2. 2.Australian School of Applied ManagementMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations