Skip to main content

In-Situ XRD Investigation of Bauxite Dehydroxylation

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: The Minerals, Metals & Materials Series ((MMMS))

Abstract

Thermal activation of bauxite has been proposed to enable bauxite dissolution at a reduced digestion temperature and also to reduce the organic content in the liquor. Research has been carried out on phase transformation of its main hydroxide components (gibbsite , boehmite and kaolinite ) during calcination. However, there is limited information available on phase bauxite phase transformation during thermal activation . In this study, two bauxite ore samples were heated from 25 to 700 °C at a rate of 50 °C/min while monitoring the phase transformation using Rigaku in situ XRD. Different phase transformation pathways for gibbsite in the bauxite compared with pure gibbsite was observed. Boehmite and kaolinite in bauxite behaved similarly to their pure phases. The temperature of phase transformation depends to some extent on the bauxite sample. Samples were also characterised by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to reveal changes in the microstructure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Wenzhong C et al (2015) Research of the mineral fouling composition and removal method in bauxite digestion process. Light metals, p 55–58

    Google Scholar 

  2. Heng-qin Z et al (2001) Review of current situation on bauxite resources and production technology of alumina in China. Conserv Util Miner Res 5:38–42

    Google Scholar 

  3. Smith P (2009) The processing of high silica bauxites—review of existing and potential processes. Hydrometallurgy 98(1):162–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Munn J et al (1992) In-situ studies of the hydrothermal synthesis of zeolites using synchrotron energy-dispersive X-ray diffraction. Phase Trans A Multinatl J 39(1–4):129–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kenyon N, Weller M (2003) The effect of calcium on phase formation in the sodium aluminium silicate carbonate system and the structure of NaCaSiO3OH. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 59(2):185–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hermeler G, Buhl J-C, Hoffmann W (1991) The influence of carbonate on the synthesis of an intermediate phase between sodalite and cancrinite. Catal Today 8(4):415–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hollit MJ et al. (2001) Process for removing reactive silica from a bayer process feedstock. U.S. Patent 6,309,615. Comalco Aluminum Limited

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hollitt M, Kisler J, Raahauge B (2002) The comalco bauxite activation process. In: Proceedings of 6th international alumina quality workshop pp 115–122

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wang H et al (2006) Kinetic modelling of gibbsite dehydration/amorphization in the temperature range 823–923 K. J Phys Chem Solids 67(12):2567–2582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gan BK, Madsen IC, Hockridge JG (2009) In situ X-ray diffraction of the transformation of gibbsite to α-alumina through calcination: effect of particle size and heating rate. J Appl Crystallogr 42(4):697–705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhu B, Fang B, Li X (2010) Dehydration reactions and kinetic parameters of gibbsite. Ceram Int 36(8):2493–2498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Xu B, Smith P, De Silva L (2013) The Bayer digestion behaviour of transition aluminas formed from roasted gibbsite. Int J Miner Process 122:22–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Misra C, Misra C (1986) Industrial alumina chemicals, vol 17. American Chemical Society Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  14. Brindley G, Nakahira M (1959) The kaolinite-mullite reaction series: II, Metakaolin. J Am Ceram Soc 42(7):314–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Frost RL, Vassallo AM (1996) The dehydroxylation of the kaolinite clay minerals using infrared emission spectroscopy. Clays Clay Miner 44(5):635–651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sperinck S et al (2011) Dehydroxylation of kaolinite to metakaolin—a molecular dynamics study. J Mater Chem 21(7):2118–2125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Cheng H et al (2012) The thermal behaviour of kaolinite intercalation complexes-A review. Thermochim Acta 545:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Norby P (2006) In-situ XRD as a tool to understanding zeolite crystallization. Curr Opin Colloid Interface Sci 11(2):118–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Webster NA et al (2010) An investigation of goethite-seeded Al (OH) 3 precipitation using in situ X-ray diffraction and Rietveld-based quantitative phase analysis. J Appl Crystallogr 43(3):466–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Majuste D et al (2013) Applications of in situ synchrotron XRD in hydrometallurgy: literature review and investigation of chalcopyrite dissolution. Hydrometallurgy 131:54–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Johnson HB, Kessler F (1969) Kaolinite dehydroxylation kinetics. J Am Ceram Soc 52(4):199–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ilić BR, Mitrović AA, Miličić LR (2010) Thermal treatment of kaolin clay to obtain metakaolin. Hemijska industrija 64(4):351–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wang H et al (2011) Characterization and thermal behavior of kaolin. J Therm Anal Calorim 105(1):157–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support from the Advance Queensland Research Fellowship supported by Rio Tinto and Queensland Government (Grant ID 2015003035). We acknowledge the facilities, and the scientific and technical assistance, of the Australian Microscopy & Microanalysis Research Facility at the Centre for Microscopy and Microanalysis, The University of Queensland. We thank Warren Staker (Rio Tinto) for helpful discussions and support for this project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hong Peng .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Peng, H., Vaughan, J. (2018). In-Situ XRD Investigation of Bauxite Dehydroxylation. In: Li, B., et al. Characterization of Minerals, Metals, and Materials 2018 . TMS 2018. The Minerals, Metals & Materials Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72484-3_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics