Advertisement

Enforcement of Confiscation Orders

  • Ersilia Calvanese
Chapter

Abstract

The chapter deals with the development of the EU regulation concerning confiscation. It examines Framework Decision 2005/212/JHA and Directive 2014/42/EU as the latter concerns only a specific list of serious crimes and the former is applied out of this area. A brief reference is also made to the proposal of regulation of 2016, which should simplify the current legal framework of the freezing orders and of the confiscation of proceeds of crime in EU countries.

Further Reading

  1. Acosta Arcarazo D, Murphy CC (eds) (2014) EU security and justice law. After Lisbon and Stockholm. Hart Publishing, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  2. Alagna F (2015) Non-conviction based confiscation: why the EU Directive is a missed opportunity. Eur J Crim Policy Res 21(4):447 ffGoogle Scholar
  3. Albert J, Merlin JB (2015) Is the EU ready for automatic mutual recognition …in the fight against crime? Eucrim (2), pp 60 ffGoogle Scholar
  4. Arcifa G (2014) The new EU Directive on confiscation: a good (even if still prudent) starting point for the post-Lisbon EU strategy on tracking and confiscating illicit money. University of Catania Working Papers, no. 64Google Scholar
  5. Balsamo A, Contrafatto V, Nicastro G (2011) Le misure patrimoniali contro la criminalità organizzata. Giuffrè, MilanoGoogle Scholar
  6. Balsamo A, Maltese C (2011) Il Codice antimafia. Giuffrè, MilanoGoogle Scholar
  7. Boucht J (2013) Extended confiscation and the proposed directive on freezing and confiscation of criminal proceeds in the EU: on striking a balance between efficiency, fairness and legal certainty. Eur J Crime Crim Law Crim Just 21:141 ffGoogle Scholar
  8. Brown AN (1996) Proceeds of crime, money laundering, confiscation and forfeiture. W. Green, EdinburghGoogle Scholar
  9. Delmas-Marty M, Spencer JR (eds) (2002) European criminal procedures. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  10. Faraldo Cabana P (2014) Improving the recovery of assets resulting from organised crime. Eur J Crime Crim Law Crim Just 22:13 ffGoogle Scholar
  11. Flore D (2014) Droit pénale européenne. Les enjeux d’une justice pénale européenne. Larcier, BruxellesGoogle Scholar
  12. Gascón Inchausti F (2013) Mutual recognition and transnational confiscation orders. In: Ruggeri S (ed) Transnational inquiries and the protection of fundamental rights in criminal proceedings: a study in memory of Vittorio Grevi and Giovanni Tranchina. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 253 ffGoogle Scholar
  13. Ioannides E (2014) Fundamental principles of EU law against money laundering. Routledge, London-New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. Iuzzolino G (2006) L’armonizzazione della confisca. In: VV.AA., Diritto penale europeo e ordinamento italiano. Giuffrè, Milano, pp 353 ffGoogle Scholar
  15. Kaye N (2006) Freezing and confiscation of criminal proceeds. Revue internationale de droit pénal, pp 323 ffGoogle Scholar
  16. Kilchling M (2001) Tracing, seizing and confiscating proceeds from corruption (and other illegal conduct) within or outside the criminal justice system. Eur J Crime Crim Law Crim Just, pp 263 ffGoogle Scholar
  17. Lelieur J (2015) Freezing and confiscating criminal assets in the European Union. Eur Crim Law Rev (3), pp 279 ffGoogle Scholar
  18. Manes V (2016) The last imperative of criminal policy: Nullum Crimen Sine Confiscatione. Eur Crim Law Rev, pp 143 ffGoogle Scholar
  19. Maugeri AM (2014) La Direttiva 2014/42/UE relativa alla confisca degli strumenti e dei proventi da reato nell’Unione europea tra garanzie ed efficienza: un “work in progress”. Dir. pen. cont. – Riv. trim. (1), pp 300 ffGoogle Scholar
  20. Miettinen S (2013) Criminal law and policy in the European Union. Routledge, London-New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. Milone S (2017) On the borders of criminal law. A tentative assessment of Italian “non-conviction based extended confiscation. New J Eur Crim Law, pp 150 ffGoogle Scholar
  22. Montaldo S (2015) Directive 2014/42/EU and social reuse of confiscated assets in the EU: advancing a culture of legality. New J Eur Crim Law, pp 195 ffGoogle Scholar
  23. Rui JP (2011) The civil asset forfeiture approach to organised crime. Exploring the possibilities for an EU model. Eucrim (4), pp 153 ffGoogle Scholar
  24. Rui JP (2012) Non-conviction based confiscation in the European Union: an assessment of Art. 5 of the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the freezing and confiscation of proceeds of crime in the European Union. ERA-Forum III, pp 349 ffGoogle Scholar
  25. Rui JP, Sieber U (eds) (2015) Non-conviction-based confiscation in Europe. Possibilities and limitations on rules enabling confiscation without a criminal conviction. Duncker & Humblot, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  26. Selvaggi N (2014) On instruments adopted in the area of freezing and confiscation. www.penalecontemporaneo.it, 31 July 2015
  27. Sieber U, Brüner FH, Satzger H, Von Heintschel-Heinegg B (eds) (2011) Europäisches Strafrecht. Nomos, Baden-BadenGoogle Scholar
  28. Simonato M (2015) Directive 2014/42/EU and non-conviction based confiscation: a step forward on assets recovery? New J Eur Crim Law, pp 213 ffGoogle Scholar
  29. Vermeulen G (ed) (2014) Essential texts on international and European criminal law. Maklu Publishers, Antwerpen-ApeldoornGoogle Scholar
  30. Vervaele JAE (2005) European evidence warrant: transnational judicial inquiries in the EU. Intersentia, Cambridge, pp 67 ffGoogle Scholar
  31. Zagaris B, Kingma E (1991) Asset forfeiture international and foreign law: an emerging regime. Emory Int Law Rev, pp 445 ffGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Italian Court of CassationRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations