Abstract
This chapter provides an introduction to the book by first explaining the general approach that it takes and then, second, by discussing who are the key actors in the credit and finance schemes examined. The approach that is taken is to draw on the theory of everyday financialization and theories of human well-being and, with primary research on payday lending and mobile banking, to examine the impact of finance and credit schemes on vulnerable people. Secondary research on other credit and finance schemes are examined and these include microcredit, asset building, and financial literacy. The question that guides the analysis is do credit and finance schemes help (or harm) vulnerable people in ways that they value (not value)?
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
Neoclassical economic theory was formed in the late nineteenth century by various people including Alfred Marshall, Stanley Jevons, and Léon Walras and rooted in the eighteenth-century work of classical political economists such as Adam Smith, David Ricardo, and Robert Thomas Malthus. One might argue that the classical political economy school was broader in scope than later neoclassical theory, perhaps the classical approach—to use a contemporary term—was almost interdisciplinary in nature. Classical political economy took a “broad-brush” theoretical approach and studied how countries grew economically (e.g., through economic specialization or international trade) and how they declined (e.g., through unregulated population growth). By contrast, the neoclassical school narrowed the scope of study to more particular issues, today referred to as the efficient allocation of scarce resources. Basically neoclassical thought shifted the focus to how markets could be structured so that buyers and sellers mutually benefit and that resources—land, labor, and capital—are used efficiently. The shift from classical to neoclassical thought moved the analysis from factors explaining the rise and fall of nations to examining the relationship between suppliers and buyers in markets. This also meant a methodological shift from broad analysis to a focused model-based analysis. The scope of neoclassical analysis is quite sharp, examining the allocation of resources such as labor, land, and capital. This is generally done by creating models of suppliers and demanders using mathematical equations, determining the equilibrium conditions, and then testing the model using relevant data via econometric analysis.
Bibliography
Aitken, Rob. 2007. Performing Capital. 1st ed. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Buckland, Jerry. 2012. Hard Choices: Financial Exclusion, Fringe Banks, and Poverty in Urban Canada. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Goulet, Denis. 1995. Development Ethics. 1st Publ. ed. New York: Apex Press.
Nussbaum, Martha C. 2006. Frontiers of Justice: Disability, Nationality, Species Membership. Boston: Harvard University Press.
Sen, Amartya. 1999. Development as Freedom. New York: Alfred A. Knopf Inc.
Thaler, Richard H., and Cass R. Sunstein. 2008. Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
van der Zwan, Natascha. 2014. Making Sense of Financialization. Socio-Economic Review12 (1): 99–129.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Buckland, J. (2018). Introduction. In: Building Financial Resilience. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72419-5_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72419-5_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-72418-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-72419-5
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)