Advertisement

Video Game Play, Mathematics, Spatial Skills, and Creativity—A Study of the Impact on Teacher Candidates

  • Janet Lynne TassellEmail author
  • Elena Novak
  • Mengjiao Wu
Chapter
Part of the Mathematics Education in the Digital Era book series (MEDE, volume 10)

Abstract

This chapter explores the relationships among video gaming, spatial skills and creativity in mathematics education. Specifically, it highlights the importance of spatial abilities for pre-service elementary teachers, and suggests video games as a teaching approach for potentially enhancing creativity, spatial abilities, and mathematics performance. We argue that spatial abilities deserve more attention in mathematics education, as a major predictor of achievements in science, technology, engineering, and mathematical fields. To support this notion, we describe an experimental study that examined the effects of playing the Angry Birds and Action Video recreational video games on education majors’ math problem-solving and perceptions, math anxiety, working memory, and spatial skills. Individuals with high spatial abilities had significantly higher confidence in learning mathematics, ACT mathematics, science, composite scores, as well as geometry, word, and non-word math problem solving than individuals with low spatial abilities. In addition, students with low spatial abilities had significantly higher math anxiety. After ten hours of playing, both video game intervention groups significantly improved their spatial skills, working memory, and geometry performance from pre- to post-test. These findings suggest potential impact of video gaming in mathematics education and open new horizons for future research that explores how schools and homes working together with strategic gaming plans can help students improve their spatial reasoning and problem solving. The chapter concludes with future research suggestions on spatial abilities and creativity in mathematics education.

Keywords

Action video games Mathematics education Spatial skills Creativity Preservice education 

References

  1. Beilock, S. L., Gunderson, E. A., Ramirez, G., & Levine, S. C. (2010). Female teachers’ math anxiety affects girls’ math achievement. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107(5), 1860–1863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bjorklund, D. F., & Brown, R. D. (1998). Physical play and cognitive development: Integrating activity, cognition, and education. Child Development, 69(3), 604–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boot, W. R., Kramer, A. F., Simons, D. J., Fabiani, M., & Gratton, G. (2008). The effects of video game playing on attention, memory, and executive control. Acta Psychologica, 129(3), 387–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bragg, L. (2007). Students’ confilicting attitudes towards games as a vehicle for learning matheamtics: A methodological dilemma. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 19(1), 29–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown, D. L., & Wheatley, G. H. (1997). Components of imagery and mathematical understanding. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 19, 45–70.Google Scholar
  6. Burnett, S. A., Lane, D. M., & Dratt, L. M. (1979). Spatial visualization and sex differences in quantitative ability. Intelligence, 3(4), 345–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Casey, M. B., Nuttall, R., Pezaris, E., & Benbow, C. P. (1995). The influence of spatial ability on gender differences in mathematics college entrance test scores across diverse samples. Developmental Psychology, 31(4), 697–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ceci, S. J., & Williams, W. M. (2007). Why aren’t more women in science. Top researchers debate the evidence. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cheng, Y. L., & Mix, K. S. (2014). Spatial training improves children’s mathematics ability. Journal of Cognition and Development, 15(1), 2–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cherney, I. D. (2008). Mom, let me play more computer games: They improve my mental rotation skills. Sex Roles, 59(11–12), 776–786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cherney, I. D., & London, K. (2006). Gender-linked differences in the toys, television shows, computer games, and outdoor activities of 5-to 13-year-old children. Sex Roles, 54(9–10), 717–726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Clark-Wilson, A., Robutti, O., & Sinclari, N. (Eds.). (2014). The mathematics teacher in the digital era: An international perspective on technology-focused professional development. Berlin, Germany: Springer.Google Scholar
  13. Cohen, C. A., & Hegarty, M. (2007). Sources of difficulty in imagining cross sections of 3D objects. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 179–184). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar
  14. Cohen, J. E., Green, C. S., & Bavelier, D. (2007). Training visual attention with video games: Not all genres are created equal. In H. O’Neil & R. Perez (Eds.), Computer games and team and individual learning (pp. 205–227).Google Scholar
  15. de Freitas, S. (2006). Learning in immersive worlds: A review of game-based learning. Retrieved from http://www.webarchive.org.uk/wayback/archive/20140615100504/http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/programmes/elearninginnovation/gamingreport_v3.pdf.
  16. Dewey, B., Singletary, T., & Kinzel, M. (2009). Graphing calculator use in algebra teaching. School Science and Mathematics, 109(7), 383–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dorval, M., & Pepin, M. (1986). Effect of playing a video game on a measure of spatial visualization. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 62(1), 159–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Feng, J., Spence, I., & Pratt, J. (2007). Playing an action video game reduces gender differences in spatial cognition. Psychological Science, 18(10), 850–855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fennema, E., & Sherman, J. A. (1976a). Fennema-Sherman mathematics attitudes scales: Instruments designed to measure attitudes toward the learning of mathematics by females and males. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 7(5), 324–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fennema, E., & Sherman, J. (1976b). Sex-related differences in mathematics learning: Myths, realities and related factors. Paper presented at the American Association for the Advancement of Science, Boston.Google Scholar
  21. Ferguson, C. J. (2007). The good, the bad and the ugly: A meta-analytic review of positive and negative effects of violent video games. Psychiatric Quarterly, 78(4), 309–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Freudenthal, H. (1971). Geometry between the devil and the deep sea. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 3, 413–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Friedman, I. A. (1995). Measuring school principal-experienced burnout. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 55(4), 641–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gittler, G., & Glück, J. (1998). Differential transfer of learning: Effects of instruction in descriptive geometry on spatial test performance. Journal of Geometry and Graphics, 2(1), 71–84.Google Scholar
  25. Green, C. S., & Bavelier, D. (2006). The cognitive neuroscience of video games. In L. Humphreys & P. Messaris (Eds.), Digital media: Transformations in human communication (pp. 211–223). New York, NY: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  26. Green, C. S., & Bavelier, D. (2007). Action-video-game experience alters the spatial resolution of vision. Psychological Science, 18(1), 88–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Green, C. S., & Bavelier, D. (2012). Learning, attentional control, and action video games. Current Biology, 22(6), R197–R206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gresham, G. (2008). Mathematics anxiety and mathematics teacher efficacy in elementary pre-service teachers. Teaching Education, 19(3), 171–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gunter, G., Kenny, R., & Vick, E. (2008). Taking educational games seriously: Using the RETAIN model to design endogenous fantasy into standalone educational games. Educational Technology Research and Development, 56(5/6), 511–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Halpern, D. F., & LaMay, M. L. (2000). The smarter sex: A critical review of sex differences in intelligence. Educational Psychology Review, 12(2), 229–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hegarty, M., & Waller, D. (2005). Individual differences in spatial abilities. In P. Shah & A. Miyake (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Visuospatial Thinking (pp. 121–169). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Hembree, R. (1990). The nature, effects, and relief of mathematics anxiety. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21(1), 33–46.Google Scholar
  33. Holzinger, K. J., & Swineford, F. (1946). The relation of two bi-factors to achievement in geometry and other subjects. Journal of Educational Psychology, 37(5), 257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hoyles, C., Noss, R., & Kent, P. (2004). On the integration of digital technologies into matheamtics classrooms. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 9(3), 309–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Jackson, L. A., Witt, E. A., Games, A. I., Fitzgerald, H. E., von Eye, A., & Zhao, Y. (2011). Information technology use and creativity: Findings from the children and technology. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(2), 370–376. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563211002147.
  36. Kell, H. J., Lubinski, D., Benbow, C. P., & Steiger, J. H. (2013). Creativity and technical innovation: Spatial ability’s unique role. Psychological Science, 24(9), 1831–1836. Retrieved from https://my.vanderbilt.edu/smpy/files/2013/01/Kell-et-al.-2013b1.pdf.
  37. Lawrenz, F., Gravely, A., & Ooms, A. (2006). Perceived helfulness and amount of use of technology in science and matheatics classes at different grade levels. School Science and Mathematics, 106(3), 133–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Li, R., Polat, U., Makous, W., & Bavelier, D. (2009). Enhancing the contrast sensitivity function through action video game training. Nature Neuroscience, 12(5), 549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lin, S. F. (2011). Effect of opponent type on moral emotions and responses to video game play. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14(11), 695–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Linn, M. C., & Petersen, A. C. (1985). Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial ability: A meta-analysis. Child Development, 56(6), 1479–1498.Google Scholar
  41. Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2006). Study of mathematically precocious youth after 35 years: Uncovering antecedents for the development of math-science expertise. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 316–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ma, L. (1999). Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics: Teachers’ understanding of fundamental mathematics in China and the United States. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  43. Maloney, E. A., Waechter, S., Risko, E. F., & Fugelsang, J. A. (2012). Reducing the sex difference in math anxiety: The role of spatial processing ability. Learning and Individual Differences, 22(3), 380–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Maxwell, J. W., Croake, J. W., & Biddle, A. P. (1975). Sex differences in the comprehension of spatial orientation. The Journal of Psychology, 91(1), 127–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. McClurg, P. A., & Chaillé, C. (1987). Computer games: Environments for developing spatial cognition? Journal of Educational Computing Research, 3(1), 95–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Michigan State University. (2011, November 9). Video game playing tied to creativity, research shows. ScienceDaily. Retrieved February 18, 2017 from www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/11/111102125355.htm.
  47. Mix, K. S., & Cheng, Y. L. (2011). The relation between space and math: Developmental and educational implications. Advances in Child Development and Behavior, 42, 197–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Moore, D. S., & Johnson, S. P. (2008). Mental rotation in human infants a sex difference. Psychological Science, 19(11), 1063–1066.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Moore, E. A. (2011, November 2). New study links video gaming to creativity. [Web log post] Cnet. Retrieved from https://www.cnet.com/news/new-study-links-video-gaming-to-creativity/.
  50. Mortensen, E. L., Andresen, J., Kruuse, E., Sanders, S. A., & Reinisch, J. M. (2003). IQ stability: The relation between child and young adult intelligence test scores in low-birthweight samples. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 44(4), 395–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. NCTM. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.Google Scholar
  52. Newcombe, N. S. (2007). Taking science seriously: Straight thinking about spatial sex differences. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  53. Novak, E., & Tassell, J. L. (2015). Using video game play to improve education-majors’ mathematical performance: An experimental study. Computers in Human Behavior, 53, 124–130.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.001.
  54. Novak, E., & Tassell, J. L. (2017). Studying preservice teacher math anxiety and mathematics performance in geometry, word, and non-word problem solving. Learning and Individual Differences, 54, 20–29.Google Scholar
  55. Okagaki, L., & Frensch, P. A. (1994). Effects of video game playing on measures of spatial performance: Gender effects in late adolescence. Journal of Applied developmental Psychology, 15(1), 33–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Ozel, S., Larue, J., & Molinaro, C. (2004). Relation between sport and spatial imagery: Comparison of three groups of participants. The Journal of Psychology, 138(1), 49–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Pittalis, M., & Christou, C. (2010). Types of reasoning in 3D geometry thinking and their relation with spatial ability. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 75(2), 191–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Price, J. (2010). The effect of instructor race and gender on student persistence in STEM fields. Economics of Education Review, 29(6), 901–910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Russo, D. M., Diletti, J., Strzelec, J., Reeb, C., Schillace, J., Martin, A., et al. (2013). A study of how angry birds has been used in mathematics education. Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education, 1(2), 107–132.Google Scholar
  60. Shea, D. L., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2001). Importance of assessing spatial ability in intellectually talented young adolescents: A 20-year longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(3), 604–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Spence, I., & Feng, J. (2010). Video games and spatial cognition. Review of General Psychology, 14(2), 92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Spence, I., Yu, J. J., Feng, J., & Marshman, J. (2009). Women match men when learning a spatial skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35(4), 1097.Google Scholar
  63. Subrahmanyam, K., & Greenfield, P. M. (1994). Effect of video game practice on spatial skills in girls and boys. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 15(1), 13–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Terlecki, M. S., & Newcombe, N. S. (2005). How important is the digital divide? The relation of computer and videogame usage to gender differences in mental rotation ability. Sex Roles, 53(5), 433–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Terlecki, M. S., Newcombe, N. S., & Little, M. (2008). Durable and generalized effects of spatial experience on mental rotation: Gender differences in growth patterns. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22(7), 996–1013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Tracy, D. M. (1987). Toys, spatial ability, and science and mathematics achievement: Are they related? Sex Roles, 17(3–4), 115–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Turner, M. L., & Engle, R. W. (1989). Is working memory capacity task dependent? Journal of Memory and Language, 28(2), 127–154.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(89)90040-5.
  68. Uttal, D. H., Meadow, N. G., Tipton, E., Hand, L. L., Alden, A., Warren, C., et al. (2013). The malleability of spatial skills: A meta-analysis of training studies. Psychological Bulletin, 139(2), 352–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Vandenberg, S. G., & Kuse, A. R. (1978). Mental rotations, a group test of three-dimensional spatial visualization. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 47(2), 599–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. van Garderen, D. (2006). Spatial visualization, visual imagery, and mathematical problem solving of students with varying abilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39(6), 496–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Wai, J. (2013). Why we need to value students’ spatial creativity. MindShift. Retrieved from https://ww2.kqed.org/mindshift/2013/07/31/why-we-need-to-value-spatial-creativity/.
  72. Wai, J., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2009). Spatial ability for STEM domains: Aligning over 50 years of cumulative psychological knowledge solidifies its importance. Journal of Educational Psychology101(4), 817–835. Retrieved from https://www.psychologytoday.com/files/attachments/56143/spatial-ability-stem-domains.pdf.
  73. Watson, W. R., & Fang, J. (2012). PBL as a framework for implementing video games in the classroom. International Journal of Game-Based Learning (IJGBL), 2(1), 77–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Wetzel, J. (2013). Early spatial reasoning predicts later creativity and innovation, especially in STEM fields. Research News @ Vanderbilt. Retrieved from https://news.vanderbilt.edu/2013/07/15/early-spatial-reasoning-predicts-later-creativity-and-innovation/.

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Janet Lynne Tassell
    • 1
    Email author
  • Elena Novak
    • 2
  • Mengjiao Wu
    • 2
  1. 1.Western Kentucky UniversityBowling GreenUSA
  2. 2.Kent State UniversityKentUSA

Personalised recommendations