The Effects of Biomass Transport Between Plantation and Industrial Facility on Energy Efficiency of Biofuel Production System

  • Andrzej L. WasiakEmail author
  • Olga Orynycz
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Energy book series (SPE)


Production of biofuels requires transportation of substantial amounts of biomass between plantations and industrial facilities that converts this biomass onto biofuel. This transport might strongly affect energetic effectiveness of the whole production system. Basing on computer model, developed in our earlier works, the contributions of the energy consumed in various transport solutions are analyzed, and their effects on the energy efficiency are estimated. The dependencies of the energy efficiency upon technical characteristics of transportation means are shown for several solutions of production organization. Conclusions suggest optimal choices of transportation means, and transport organization as dependent upon the type and the size of a plantation.


Biofuel Biomass Production system Energy efficiency 



The research have been performed under financial support from Bialystok University of Technology. Statutory Research Project S/WZ/1/2015.


  1. 1.
    Nigam, P.S., Singh, A.: Production of liquid biofuels from renewable resources. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 37, 52–68 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Paneque, M.: Bioenergy—a sustainable and reliable energy source. Agric. Res. Technol.: Open Access J. 4, 1–3 (2017). Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bharathiraja, B., Chakravarthy, M., Ranjith Kumar, R., Yuvaraj, D., Jayamuthunagai, J., Praveen Kumar, R., Palani, S.: Biodiesel production using chemical and biological methods—a review of process, catalyst, acylacceptor, source and process variables. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 38, 368–382 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Abnisa, F., Wan Daud, W.M.A., Husin, W.N.W., Sahu, J.N.: Utilization possibilities of palm shell as a source of biomass energy in Malaysia by producing bio-oil in pyrolysis process. Biomass Bioenergy 35, 1863–1872 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Russo, D., Dassisti, M., Lawlorb, V., Olabi, A.G.: State of the art of biofuels from pure plant oil. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 16, 4056–4070 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Alluvione, F., Moretti, B., Sacco, D., Grignani, C.: EUE (energy use efficiency) of cropping systems for a sustainable agriculture. Energy 36, 4468–4481 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Muller, A.: Sustainable agriculture and the production of biomass for energy use. Clim. Change 94, 319–331 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wasiak, A., Orynycz, O.: Formulation of a model for energetic efficiency of agricultural subsystem of biofuel production. In: IEEE International Energy Conference: ENERGYCON’2014 Croatia, pp. 1333–1337 (2014)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wasiak, A., Orynycz, O.: The effects of energy contributions into subsidiary processes on energetic efficiency of biomass plantation supplying biofuel production system. Agric. Agric. Sci. Proced. 7, 292–300 (2015)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wasiak. A., Orynycz. O.: Modelling of the dependence of energetic efficiency of biomass plantations upon energy fluxes going into subsidiary processes accompanying biomass production. In: EUBCE, 23rd European Biomass Conference and Exhibition, 1–4 June, pp. 289–293 (2015)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wasiak, A.: The effect of biofuel production on sustainability of agriculture. Biol. Syst. Open Access 5 (2016). 17.4172/2329-6577.1000171
  12. 12.
    Wasiak, A., Orynycz, O.: The effect of external transport on energetic efficiency of biodiesel production. J. Ecol. Eng. 18, 57–62 (2017). Scholar
  13. 13.
    Świć, A., Zubrzycki, J., Taranenko, V.: Modelling and systemic analysis of models of dynamic systems of shaft machining. In: 11th International Conference on Industrial, Service and Humanoid Robotics (ROBTEP 2012), Strbske Pleso, Slovakia, pp. 211–220 (2012)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ziabicki, A., Jarecki, L., Wasiak, A.: Modelling of melt spinning. Comput. Theor. Polym. Sci. 8, 143–157 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zubrzycki, J., Świć, A., Taranenko, V.: Mathematical model of the hole drilling process and typical automated process for designing hole drilling operations. In: 11th International Conference on Industrial, Service and Humanoid Robotics (ROBTEP 2012), Strbske Pleso, Slovakia, pp. 221–229 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Palchevskyi, B.: Information aspects of optimisation synthesis of functional-modular structure of technological equipment. In: Optimization of Production Process, pp. 75–89. Politechnika Lubelska, Lublin (2013)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Painuly, J.P., Rao, H., Parikh, J.: A rural energy-agriculture interaction model applied to Karnataka state. Energy 20, 219–233 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Bialystok University of TechnologyBialystokPoland

Personalised recommendations