The Influence of Weather Conditions and Operating Parameters on the Efficiency of Solar Power Collectors Based on Empirical Evidence

  • Aldona Skotnicka-Siepsiak
  • Maciej Wesołowski
  • Maciej Neugebauer
  • Janusz Piechocki
  • Piotr Sołowiej
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Energy book series (SPE)

Abstract

The influence of solar irradiance, ambient temperature and buffer tank temperature on the efficiency of solar collectors was evaluated in the climatic conditions of north-eastern Poland (climatic zone IV) characterized by relatively low irradiance (annual average of 900 kWh/m2). Two types of solar power collectors (flat-plate and evacuated tube collectors) were compared in terms of energy gains, collector efficiency and glycol temperature between May and September 2016. The collectors were mounted on the roof of a building on the campus of the University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn. The roof had a pitch of 45°, the collectors had a tilt angle of 30°, and they faced west of true south. Measurements were performed separately for the analyzed solar collector systems operating simultaneously in identical weather conditions. The combined absorber surface was 4.64 m2 in flat-plate collectors and 3.23 m2 in the evacuated tube collector. Both systems were connected to a water buffer tank. Empirical data were recorded with a controller and were processed and stored in a computer. The factors responsible for differences in the efficiency of the examined collectors are discussed in the paper.

Keywords

Flat-plate solar collectors Evacuated tube collectors Efficiency of solar collectors 

References

  1. 1.
    Solar Heating & Cooling Programme International Energy Agency: Solar heat worldwide global market development and trends in 2016, http://www.iea-shc.org/data/sites/1/publications/Solar-Heat-Worldwide-2017.pdf. Last accessed 2017/06/03
  2. 2.
    Instytut Energii Odnawialnej, Krajowy Plan Rozwoju Mikroinstalacji Odnawialnych Źródeł Energii do roku 2030, http://ieo.pl/pl/raporty/53-krajowy-plan-rozwoju-mikroinstalacji-oze-do-roku-2030-ieo-dla-wne/file. Last accessed 2017/06/05
  3. 3.
    Ministerstwo Infrastruktury i Budownictwa: Homepage, http://mib.gov.pl/files/0/1796817/wmo122720iso.zip. Last accessed 2017/06/03
  4. 4.
    Halawa, E., Chang, K.C., Yoshinaga, M.: Thermal performance evaluation of solar water heating systems in Australia, Taiwan and Japan—a comparative review. Renew. Energy 83, 1279–1286 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sakkal, F., Ghaddar, N., Diab, J.: Solar collectors for the Beirut climate. Appl. Energy 45(4), 313–325 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Merrouni, A.A., Mezrhab, A., Mezrhab, A.: PV sites suitability analysis in the Eastern region of Morocco. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 18, 6–15 (2016)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Giwa, A., et al.: A comprehensive review on biomass and solar energy for sustainable energy generation in Nigeria. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 69, 620–641 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mussard, M.: Solar energy under cold climatic conditions: a review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 74, 733–745 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Elbreki, A.M., et al.: The role of climatic-design-operational parameters on combined PV/T collector performance: a critical review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 57, 602–647 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Weitbrecht, V., Lehmann, D., Richter, A.: Flow distribution in solar collectors with laminar flow conditions. Sol. Energy 73(6), 433–441 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gao, Y., et al.: Effects of thermal mass and flow rate on forced-circulation solar hot-water system: comparison of water-in-glass and U-pipe evacuated-tube solar collectors. Sol. Energy 98, 290–301 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cunio, L.N., Sproul, A.B.: Performance characterisation and energy savings of uncovered swimming pool solar collectors under reduced flow rate conditions. Sol. Energy 86(5), 1511–1517 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Razika, I., Nabila, I., Madani, B., Zohra, H.F.: The effects of volumetric flow rate and inclination angle on the performance of a solar thermal collector. Energy Convers. Manag. 78, 931–937 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hobbi, A., Siddiqui, K.: Optimal design of a forced circulation solar water heating system for a residential unit in cold climate using TRNSYS. Sol. Energy 83(5), 700–714 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bava, F., Dragsted, J., Furbo, S.: A numerical model to evaluate the flow distribution in a large solar collector field. Sol. Energy 143, 31–42 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Chen, Z., Furbo, S., Perers, B., Fan, J., Andersen, E.: Efficiencies of flat plate solar collectors at different flow rates. Energy Proc. 30, 65–72 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cristofari, Ch., et al.: Influence of the flow rate and the tank stratification degree on the performances of a solar flat-plate collector. Int. J. Therm. Sci. 42(5), 455–469 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Haller, M.Y., et al.: Methods to determine stratification efficiency of thermal energy storage processes—review and theoretical comparison. Sol. Energy 83(10), 1847–1860 (2009)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rodríguez-Hidalgo, M.C., et al.: Flat plate thermal solar collector efficiency: transient behavior under working conditions part II: model application and design contributions. Appl. Therm. Eng. 31(14), 2385–2393 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    VIESSMANN: Vitosol System Design Book (Viessmann Manufacturing Company Inc. 2016)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Building EngineeringUniversity of Warmia and Mazury in OlsztynOlsztynPoland
  2. 2.Department of Electrical, Power, Electronic and Control EngineeringUniversity of Warmia and Mazury in OlsztynOlsztynPoland

Personalised recommendations